Fancies For Today II

4068ac1elhodqr · 20-11-2017 2:35pm

robbiezero wrote: »

Fancies no?

yep Fancies, think it was last year he put up a 100/1, always nice to have on the tail end of an accumulator.

James Delaney · 20-11-2017 9:39pm

ANDREWMUFC wrote: »

Zimmer mate please continue to post tips on here, ignore what these fools have to say.

They are the type of people who do 2 quid 4 fold accumulators. Not punters at all.

You’ve got me quite a few winners in recent times and at big price

*************
And your the big smuck who blows all his money gambling.
Some people bet small amounts just for the entertainment, not to get an addiction high.

TrueDub · 20-11-2017 10:44pm

Lads, any chance you'd take this crap to another thread, and leave this one purely for fancies? Please?

zimmermania · 20-11-2017 11:21pm

TrueDub wrote: »

Lads, any chance you'd take this crap to another thread, and leave this one purely for fancies? Please?

That is the way to go and I will try to stick to what the thread should be,but it is up to the MODS to restrain some posters from referring to those who post here as "numties" and get one in particular to cease the cynical exercise of thanking a post when the horse has lost and ignoring the post if a horse wins.

Mellor · 20-11-2017 11:35pm

Clean up on aisle 3. Clean up on aisle 3

redzerdrog · 21-11-2017 8:45am

Seriously, who cares who thanks what posts

Pathetic really

Sgt Pepper 64 · 21-11-2017 11:52am

slim pickings today but im liking SDS on

Emenem 2:10 Lingfield 11-1
sds has 40% win rate on AW this year

zimmermania · 21-11-2017 12:00pm

redzerdrog wrote: »

Seriously, who cares who thanks what posts

Pathetic really

No doubt about it,you are!

zimmermania · 21-11-2017 12:21pm

Bumble Bay was late coming to the flat,ran its best race lto and is worth a small ew bet in the 1 10 at Lingfield.Shan Dunna Ngall would be the choice but is of for a while and Bumble Bays stablemate Wintour Leap could also be a danger.

The 1 40 looks a good race and seems between Gorgeous Noora and Short Work,i am going to stick in Rose Berry ridden by Nicola Currie and do combination tri-casts and have an ew bet on Short Work going for 5th win.

The nursery at 3 10 can go to Inuk who won lto and has Nicola Currie taking off the weight.

Bird For Life can make it a good day in the final race for Nicola Currie who claims 5 lbs in this apprentice race,she won on the horse lto and while it is competitive 9 or 10/1 is an ok price for an ew bet.

Jsmac67 · 21-11-2017 8:43pm

8.51 Nottingham-Trap 3.

Got big info for this and it has been backed in, given winners in the past here. E/W is great value given the odds, should go off alot shorter.

4068ac1elhodqr · 21-11-2017 9:04pm

Jsmac67 wrote: »

8.51 Nottingham-Trap 3.

Got big info for this and it has been backed in, given winners in the past here. E/W is great value given the odds, should go off alot shorter.

One of my favorite bookmarked pages have T1 as their Nap of the day, so worth considering that as a backup. If you look skywards it's 3pl (1/5) also.

Jsmac67 · 21-11-2017 9:06pm

T1 leads the market and quite rightly, I got on T3 at 8/1 at 1/3 odds so will stick it out. Best of luck nonetheless

redzerdrog · 21-11-2017 10:01pm

Did it win?

Jsmac67 · 21-11-2017 10:02pm

Third, best dog lost. Made up ground for fun, ****e start cost it

4068ac1elhodqr · 21-11-2017 10:04pm

redzerdrog wrote: »

Did it win?

placed anyway. if had the 3pl in the 6 mini-sized-horse race. SP@7

Screen_Shot_2017-11-21_at_21.01.56.png

abarkie · 21-11-2017 10:24pm

Harper Acidic Smokestack wrote: »

placed anyway. if had the 3pl in the 6 mini-sized-horse race. SP@7

Who does the extra place in dog races please?

Stayers hurdle dog race snip above?

munster87 · 21-11-2017 10:28pm

Looks like skybet?

4068ac1elhodqr · 21-11-2017 10:29pm

abarkie wrote: »

Who does the extra place in dog races please?

Stayers hurdle dog race snip above?

The sky people occasionally place 50% of the field. Usually mix n' match the aul accumulators arrays over 2weeks or so. Have couple of interest from the Stayers and couple from the stick ball in hk/aus, will post later in week (golf fancies usually just before off {wed pm}), when all value prices have lessened somewhat.

ANDREWMUFC · 22-11-2017 12:54am

Really like the look of Khafoo Shememi in the 6:40 at Kempton tomorrow at 15/2, C&D winner and has won 3 out of 4 races over this distance of 8f.

zimmermania · 22-11-2017 1:54am

zimmermania wrote: »

Bumble Bay was late coming to the flat,ran its best race lto and is worth a small ew bet in the 1 10 at Lingfield.Shan Dunna Ngall would be the choice but is of for a while and Bumble Bays stablemate Wintour Leap could also be a danger.

The 1 40 looks a good race and seems between Gorgeous Noora and Short Work,i am going to stick in Rose Berry ridden by Nicola Currie and do combination tri-casts and have an ew bet on Short Work going for 5th win.

The nursery at 3 10 can go to Inuk who won lto and has Nicola Currie taking off the weight.

Bird For Life can make it a good day in the final race for Nicola Currie who claims 5 lbs in this apprentice race,she won on the horse lto and while it is competitive 9 or 10/1 is an ok price for an ew bet.

The muppets from the other thread were out in force tonight with their"thanks" though I hardly deserved it,the first one was 4th at 8s got the place bit as pp were paying 4 places,had 2 of the 3 in the tri-cast inc the winner and the other 2 lost,still if it kept the muppets busy it was worth it.:D

droidman123 · 22-11-2017 2:32am

zimmermania wrote: »

The muppets from the other thread were out in force tonight with their"thanks" though I hardly deserved it,the first one was 4th at 8s got the place bit as pp were paying 4 places,had 2 of the 3 in the tri-cast inc the winner and the other 2 lost,still if it kept the muppets busy it was worth it.:D

Why do you insist on this nonsense? If you did tricast and only 2 are in the top 3,is that not a losing bet? At no stage in your post did you say you were backing gorgeous norah.to win,yet you come on here hours after the race and say that you did back the winner.its this type of thing that riles people.

JenovaProject · 22-11-2017 2:35am

Ah look its really simple.
We are all big boys and girls,dont comment or follow if you dont like it.
We dont need a police force on thread.

redzerdrog · 22-11-2017 9:01am

Spoofed gona spoof

realdanbreen · 22-11-2017 9:17am

droidman123 wrote: »

Why do you insist on this nonsense? If you did tricast and only 2 are in the top 3,is that not a losing bet? At no stage in your post did you say you were backing gorgeous norah.to win,yet you come on here hours after the race and say that you did back the winner.its this type of thing that riles people.

If you have problems with him why don't you send him a PM about them. Many of us are glad of the views he gives on various horses and races and have no interest in whatever does or doesn't rile you.

droidman123 · 22-11-2017 9:52am

realdanbreen wrote: »

If you have problems with him why don't you send him a PM about them. Many of us are glad of the views he gives on various horses and races and have no interest in whatever does or doesn't rile you.

Thats the point,some us see through the posts,some dont.i have no agenda here,i just find it irkseome that some people cannot except when they have losing bets and then try and treat people like fools by trying to turn them into winning bets by spoofing.

mailburner · 22-11-2017 9:55am

droidman123 wrote: »

Thats the point,some us see through the posts,some dont.i have no agenda here,i just find it irkseome that some people cannot except when they have losing bets and then try and treat people like fools by trying to turn them into winning bets by spoofing.

I used to work for paddy power, a long time ago mind you.
You can only imagine what I had to listen to on a daily basis :pac:

Cherry_Cola · 22-11-2017 10:04am

droidman123 wrote: »

Thats the point,some us see through the posts,some dont.i have no agenda here,i just find it irkseome that some people cannot except when they have losing bets and then try and treat people like fools by trying to turn them into winning bets by spoofing.

Who cares though? It's a person you don't know who posts on the internet regarding horses and he has good runs of luck doing so. What difference does it make to any of us if he is indeed spoofing? I just find it really bizarre people get so upset over internet bragging rights, is there nothing better going on in your lives?

pearcider · 22-11-2017 10:29am

What I find gas is that neither redzer or droidman have ever posted a winner in this thread. Zimmer has had loads. So really the mods should be banning these plonkers since they are adding nothing but negative vibes to the forum. The mods seem to be completely awol of course.

Anyway I'll put up two fancies for Kempton later.

First is buckland beau in the 4.40 who was given a tender ride lto and was dropped four pounds to his last winning mark of 70 which he races off today. 10-1

In the 6.10 is a highly speculative bet where Fran Berry rides Is it Off. The colt wasn't disgraced in a class 4 lto staying on over 6 furlongs. Steps up in distance today and drops in class. The big unknown is the surface of course (unraved on poly track) and whether the jockey will be trying at all. But Gary Moore is no stranger to big winners at Kempton and at 33-1 or more I will have a dabble ew.

Good luck if you play

mailburner · 22-11-2017 10:38am

Cherry_Cola wrote: »

What difference does it make to any of us if he is indeed spoofing? I just find it really bizarre people get so upset over internet bragging rights, is there nothing better going on in your lives?

In all the years I've been on boards anytime lads have been pulled on aftertiming it has hit a nerve with them so it's the same thing is it not?

Most in the gambling thread stopped posting when pulled up on it and in those cases it was no loss in fairness as unlike zimmer they were only putting up losers anyway.

There was a poster here years ago by the name of coughlan, was the king of all spoofers to the point where he was photoshopping his bets until he was caught out and never heard from again.
His log was pure comedy in fairness, am sure some will remember back that far.

mailburner · 22-11-2017 11:04am

pearcider wrote: »

What I find gas is that neither redzer or droidman have ever posted a winner in this thread. Zimmer has had loads. So really the mods should be banning these plonkers since they are adding nothing but negative vibes to the forum. The mods seem to be completely awol of course.

Anyway I'll put up two fancies for Kempton later.

First is buckland beau in the 4.40 who was given a tender ride lto and was dropped four pounds to his last winning mark of 70 which he races off today. 10-1

In the 6.10 is a highly speculative bet where Fran Berry rides Is it Off. The colt wasn't disgraced in a class 4 lto staying on over 6 furlongs. Steps up in distance today and drops in class. The big unknown is the surface of course (unraved on poly track) and whether the jockey will be trying at all. But Gary Moore is no stranger to big winners at Kempton and at 33-1 or more I will have a dabble ew.

Good luck if you play

ah now get a grip! you don't ban people for nothing, sure you might as well ban people for complaining about the weather at that rate.

Buckland beau ran up a nice streak years back, well due a win now, hope it's today for you.
good luck with your picks

pearcider · 22-11-2017 11:15am

mailburner wrote: »

ah now get a grip! you don't ban people for nothing, sure you might as well ban people for complaining about the weather at that rate.

Buckland beau ran up a nice streak years back, well due a win now, hope it's today for you.
good luck with your picks

I'd have no issue with them laying into Zimmer if they were also putting up their own fancies on a regular or even semi regular basis. Let them do that before they come in here casting stones.

zimmermania · 22-11-2017 11:20am

droidman123 wrote: »

Why do you insist on this nonsense? If you did tricast and only 2 are in the top 3,is that not a losing bet? At no stage in your post did you say you were backing gorgeous norah.to win,yet you come on here hours after the race and say that you did back the winner.its this type of thing that riles people.

I never said I backed the winner Gorgeous Norah,i stated I had two in the tri-cast including the winner Gorgeous Norah and of course it is a losing bet.

I NEVER CLAIMED IT TO BE A WINNING BET,i simply stated that I had two in the tri-cast inc the winner,but of course yourself and your demented handful of spoofer followers seemingly are unable to decipher simple English.

mailburner · 22-11-2017 11:21am

pearcider wrote: »

I'd have no issue with them laying into Zimmer if they were also putting up their own fancies on a regular or even semi regular basis. Let them do that before they come in here casting stones.

I had the same issue with one particular gent here on this same thread who only posted losers but was quick to jump on my back when I hit a bad streak.
I don't like to see lads losing money and despise those who gloat at others misfortune when it comes to gambling which I don't think is the case here in fairness.

zimmermania · 22-11-2017 11:48am

droidman123 wrote: »

Why do you insist on this nonsense? If you did tricast and only 2 are in the top 3,is that not a losing bet? At no stage in your post did you say you were backing gorgeous norah.to win,yet you come on here hours after the race and say that you did back the winner.its this type of thing that riles people.

I never said I backed the winner,yet you state I did,are you crazy or what?:p

droidman123 · 22-11-2017 11:54am

zimmermania wrote: »

I never said I backed the winner,yet you state I did,are you crazy or what?:p

But you tried to give the impression that you did.theres a lot of " muppet" references being made, can i be stadtler and maybe you could be waldorf?

razorhead · 22-11-2017 11:55am

droidman123 wrote: »

Why do you insist on this nonsense? If you did tricast and only 2 are in the top 3,is that not a losing bet? At no stage in your post did you say you were backing gorgeous norah.to win,yet you come on here hours after the race and say that you did back the winner.its this type of thing that riles people.

Droidman, I don't think Zimmer says anywhere here that he backed the winner, he said he had 2 outa 3 in the tricast which included the winner.....

zimmermania · 22-11-2017 12:07pm

The listed race at Kempton tonight is worth a look today and it it is also a fast track entry to good Friday at Lingfield.

So Beloved has done most of his racing over 7 furlongs on turf but runs as if a mile will suit and did run ok over a mile way back,not getting any younger but is too big a price at 9/1 and still has a rating that is is good enough to win this and I am backing it ew,Kem 6 40.

Another old stager tryng to get his head in front is Suegioo in the 7 10 over 2 miles.It is not so long ago since Suegioo was running in group races and getting placed,has dropped to a good mark now and can repay ew support at 8/1.

I will have an ew single on both and a small ew double.

zimmermania · 22-11-2017 12:20pm

droidman123 wrote: »

But you tried to give the impression that you did.theres a lot of " muppet" references being made, can i be stadtler and maybe you could be waldorf?

First you state I said "i backed the winner"and when it is clearly shown I did not say that,you change it to "i tried to give the impression that I did".

It looks like a bit of a porky pie to me that you told initially and then you try to interpret what I stated in a way that tries to give credence to the original lie you told.Tut tut you you must not rely on falsehoods to make a point and I suppose you will remove the post with the lie?

droidman123 · 22-11-2017 1:10pm

zimmermania wrote: »

First you state I said "i backed the winner"and when it is clearly shown I did not say that,you change it to "i tried to give the impression that I did".

It looks like a bit of a porky pie to me that you told initially and then you try to interpret what I stated in a way that tries to give credence to the original lie you told.Tut tut you you must not rely on falsehoods to make a point and I suppose you will remove the post with the lie?

Why bother even telling people you had the winner in a race that was a losing bet for you? Whats the point?

Cherry_Cola · 22-11-2017 1:58pm

droidman123 wrote: »

Why bother even telling people you had the winner in a race that was a losing bet for you? Whats the point?

Why do you care so much? Lose the Christmas money on a bet or something? Please post fancies or take this to PM if you have issues. Put them on ignore. It's beyond pathetic!

zimmermania · 22-11-2017 5:22pm

droidman123 wrote: »

Why bother even telling people you had the winner in a race that was a losing bet for you? Whats the point?

I was simply commenting on how the horses I mentioned ran,the fact that you do not see the point in it does not give you the right to say I said something else,why did you lie about what I posted?anyone who reads your post can see you were lying.

zimmermania · 22-11-2017 5:37pm

droidman123 wrote: »

Thats the point,some us see through the posts,some dont.i have no agenda here,i just find it irkseome that some people cannot except when they have losing bets and then try and treat people like fools by trying to turn them into winning bets by spoofing.

I am not aware of anyone who "cannot except (sic) when they have losing bets and then try and treat people like fools by trying to turn them into winning bets by by spoofing"

Do you think those who post on the "fancies" thread are stupid? Your post is insulting those on thread who clearly do not wish to be called "numties" and idiots by you and a few others.

razorhead · 22-11-2017 6:19pm

In the 6.10 is a highly speculative bet where Fran Berry rides Is it Off. The colt wasn't disgraced in a class 4 lto staying on over 6 furlongs. Steps up in distance today and drops in class. The big unknown is the surface of course (unraved on poly track) and whether the jockey will be trying at all. But Gary Moore is no stranger to big winners at Kempton and at 33-1 or more I will have a dabble ew.

Fran Berry just finished 3rd there on I Can @33/1

droidman123 · 22-11-2017 6:23pm

zimmermania wrote: »

I am not aware of anyone who "cannot except (sic) when they have losing bets and then try and treat people like fools by trying to turn them into winning bets by by spoofing"

Do you think those who post on the "fancies" thread are stupid? Your post is insulting those on thread who clearly do not wish to be called "numties" and idiots by you and a few others.

Now you are just trying to round up the troops,very sad indeed.if you are not aware of anyone who cannot accept when they have losing bets,then you obviously dont read your own posts.i have seen through your codology a long time back,and you can stop trying to say i think people who post on here are idiots,i dont have to resort to insulting people to make a point.you have let your guard down here and on the other thread in the last few days,i seen through it a good while back though.

Nothingbutbets · 22-11-2017 6:31pm

Can we be done with all this nonsense lads? it’s been going on for far too long. Just agree to disagree and leave it

Get back to what the thread is actually about

Cheers

droidman123 · 22-11-2017 6:37pm

Nothingbutbets wrote: »

Can we be done with all this nonsense lads? it’s been going on for far too long. Just agree to disagree and leave it

Get back to what the thread is actually about

Cheers

Fair point

inforfun · 22-11-2017 6:46pm

Oh look, despite me saying not to go on elsewhere, **** was continued here.

How old are you all?

Thread closed

Fancies For Today II

Comments