Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
The Ethics of PUA
Options
Comments
-
I'm not talking about people who lack empathy that was just one of the tangents in the thread where you where you were basically criticizing guys for having to fake social interactions by saying they lack empathy for other person if they can deceive them.And I equally think you have a bit of a bias here due to your condition. I'm not chalking it all up to that, by any means, I just think you expect that all these people who use PUA are like you in that they find it difficult to empathize etc. when the reality I think is probably pretty different. I'd wager they're mostly average people who are shy/insecure and would benefit much more from speaking with a professional than resorting to PUA.
What I said applies to guys who can't socialize not just guys who lack empathy. You can be bad a at socializing for loads of reasons but the solution will always involve faking what you can't do naturally until you can do it naturally. Again this is just a reality you are denying.
I can agree with wibbs that the language being used is pejorative like Maniuplitive,decpetion, prey etc.
These guys won't go to a professional for whatever reason so they turn to something they can study in their bedroom like PUA. It's self-medication which is never the best solution but they obviously aren't willing to go to a professional so it's the best they've got. It also works.
The only problem I have with PUA is that it's such a business that these guys are basically getting milked.0 -
I wish I never mentioned I had aspergers because you are just using it to dismiss me. What I said applies to men who aren't good socially. What works for a women is a null point because standing around doing nothing will work for a woman socially.
I'm not trying to dismiss you. I just think it's ironic that you're accusing me of projecting my perspective onto other people, yet you can't see that you're doing it yourself.You still don't understand why your advice is pointless. You are telling someone who is bad social interaction to just become good at it naturally which he simply can't do. You also say stuff like "Be more confident" like I said this is like telling a poor person to just be richer.
That's not what I'm saying at all. You don't even necessarily need to be good at social interaction to find partners. To get laid and no more, then yes, probably, but I know plenty of socially awkward people who managed to find the person who suited them just by being themselves. It's not stupid advice, it's just not the kind of advice that you're looking for, and I never claimed it was the kind of advice to work for literally everyone. There isn't any advice that can do that.Do you really not understand how this is pointless advice? Imagine going to a mechanic with a broken car and them saying "You should fix that" and then that being the end to their solution.
I was referring to your advice of. "Be more confident" "Be yourself" etc.
Starting to think you aren't listening.Who is going to see a therapist because they can't get laid? It's just not something most are willing to do. The solution will still be the same, they will teach you what others do naturally and you basically copy this. It's literally what the professionals did for me because it's the only solution. It's a necessary evil and you seem to pretending there is a solution that doesn't involve this when there simply isn't. You are denying the reality of the problem.
I am not denying the reality of the problem, you simply refuse to accept that there's any other solution besides PUA which I am simply disagreeing with.
Therapists help people with social problems. The PUA crowd needs to make up their mind on this: is the PUA because you need to learn how to socialize, or is the PUA because you want to get laid. It's one or the other. If it's because you need to learn how to socialize, then a therapist can help you in a much more safe way. If you're using it JUST to get laid, then fine, use PUA, just don't expect women to be happy about it if they find out.Like I have also said your own experience is clouding your judgement. You don't realise that what works for you simply doesn't apply to these people. Your not a man.
You complain about me dismissing you, then dismiss me. Make up your mind.This is where you are holding contradicting viewpoints. Learning how to socialize does involve faking a personality. If I just act like myself I can't socilize I have to follow the steps I'm given. These are steps that everyone else just knows naturally, I have to fake them to make me seem naturally socialable. That's just the reality of the problem which you are denying. You keep pretending there is a silver bullet solution that doesn't involve this when there isn't
I think you're missing the nuances of what I said up there and I'm really not sure how to explain it any clearer than I did already.
Are you doing it because you want to learn how to socialize, or are you doing it because you want to make people think you know how to socialize?When I say fake a personality I'm not talking about pretending to be some CEO who fight MMA at the weekend I just mean faking social interaction by following steps that don't come naturally to you. This is pretty much all PUA is. Things like banter don't come naturally to me so I have to study how to do it and basically pretend I can do it by following steps and stuff. Until hopefully I can do it naturally.
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. I have no problem with that. It was the 'fake' stuff that was throwing me off. Thanks for clarifying.
I still disagree with the terms and a lot of the mentality behind PUA and still believe if people are doing it because they want to learn how to build confidence, they'd be better off speaking to a professional than using PUA. But I have no problem with people who are using it to genuinely better themselves and aren't starting to think of women as objects.I'm not talking about people who lack empathy that was just one of the tangents in the thread where you where you were basically criticizing guys for having to fake social interactions by saying they lack empathy for other person if they can deceive them.
What I said applies to guys who can't socialize not just guys who lack empathy. You can be bad a at socializing for loads of reasons but the solution will always involve faking what you can't do naturally until you can do it naturally. Again this is just a reality you are denying.
I'm not denying anything, I was just misunderstanding you.I can agree with wibbs that the language being used is pejorative like Maniuplitive,decpetion, prey etc.
These guys won't go to a professional for whatever reason so they turn to something they can study in their bedroom like PUA. It's self-medication which is never the best solution but they obviously aren't willing to go to a professional so it's the best they've got. It also works.
The only problem I have with PUA is that it's such a business that these guys are basically getting milked.
I never said it didn't work, I just feel there's more sensible solutions, and that I personally would not want to find out I'd been used by a PUA, and that I feel there's some aspects of it that are completely unempathetic due to the terminology/having to take women down to raise yourself up thing - but as I've said throughout the entire thread, I do understand the need for some people to learn how to socialize. It's really not that part that I have a problem with.0 -
The difference is my perspective is a lot closer to theirs than yours is. It really is true that shouldn't take advice on how to pick up women from a woman.I just think it's ironic that you're accusing me of projecting my perspective onto other people, yet you can't see that you're doing it yourself.
Being a socially awakward male makes it very likely you're not getting a GF. Stop denying realities.That's not what I'm saying at all. You don't even necessarily need to be good at social interaction to find partners. To get laid and no more, then yes, probably, but I know plenty of socially awkward people who managed to find the person who suited them just by being themselves. It's not stupid advice, it's just not the kind of advice that you're looking for, and I never claimed it was the kind of advice to work for literally everyone. There isn't any advice that can do that.
Everything someone disagrees with you, you go onto claim it's because they aren't listening to you. Sorry to break it to you but it is possible to understand what you're saying and still disagree with it.Starting to think you aren't listening.
Come off it I am not denying there are other solutions. I have never used PUA I did in fact go the professional route.I am not denying the reality of the problem, you simply refuse to accept that there's any other solution besides PUA which I am simply disagreeing with.
Therapists are expensive and involve having to go to the a therapist which is a big barrier to a lot of people. Especially shy people.Therapists help people with social problems. The PUA crowd needs to make up their mind on this: is the PUA because you need to learn how to socialize, or is the PUA because you want to get laid. It's one or the other. If it's because you need to learn how to socialize, then a therapist can help you in a much more safe way. If you're using it JUST to get laid, then fine, use PUA, just don't expect women to be happy about it if they find out.
The PUA crowds wants to learn both how to socialize and how to get laid. They can be one or they can both. Both are valid reasons for doing it.
I don't do it. I did Social skills classes to learn how to socialize this involved making people think I know how to socialize. You just don't get it.Are you doing it because you want to learn how to socialize, or are you doing it because you want to make people think you know how to socialize?
In it's simplest terms you have to fake it to make it. I had to learn how to fake it with the hope it eventually becomes natural. Some of it did.
I understand you don't like the word fake, like wibbs said a lot of the terms being used in this thread are pejorative. But it is basically what you need to do.Okay, now we're getting somewhere. I have no problem with that. It was the 'fake' stuff that was throwing me off. Thanks for clarifying.
I still disagree with the terms and a lot of the mentality behind PUA and still believe if people are doing it because they want to learn how to build confidence, they'd be better off speaking to a professional than using PUA. But I have no problem with people who are using it to genuinely better themselves and aren't starting to think of women as objects.
As for the terms the PUA use, while I'm not even familiar with most of them I do think they serve a purpose. Yes that purpose is to denigrate and objectify women but that's because this is what works. It removes the fear of women so you can then form relationships with them.
This is how I view it.
You start off looking up to women
PUA drags your view of women down so you now look down on them
After you actually form relationships with you will hopefully view them as equals.
I do think the looking down on them is an unfortunate but necessary step because it removes the fear of approaching them. You have to not care about them to not care about rejection. Fear of rejections is crippling when trying to get with women.
Okay fair enough.I'm not denying anything, I was just misunderstanding you.
Okay again fair enough but I do view the need to tear women down as necessary. I also think most guys naturally go through a phase of looking up to women and then tearing them down below you until finally you view them as equals.I never said it didn't work, I just feel there's more sensible solutions, and that I personally would not want to find out I'd been used by a PUA, and that I feel there's some aspects of it that are completely unempathetic due to the terminology/having to take women down to raise yourself up thing - but as I've said throughout the entire thread, I do understand the need for some people to learn how to socialize. It's really not that part that I have a problem with.0 -
I think there is some serious misunderstanding here going on about what it is to learn PUA. It's not about lying, it's about learning how to behave with high in a high status attractive way while keeping your own core personality just the way it is. We all have an various different personalities that our brain gives us access to in different situations. PUA is about getting access to your attractive personality more often alongside learning some tactics and techniques. A few companies have bootcamps for women too which I'm all for and have no problem with women referring to men as acronyms.
Common advice is to lean back when interacting and to hold your drink low down. Now someone could argue that that is faking their personality because they wouldn't normally lean back, but seriously if it helps someone to get success who cares.0 -
The difference is my perspective is a lot closer to theirs than yours is. It really is true that shouldn't take advice on how to pick up women from a woman.
Being a socially awakward makes it very likely you're not getting a GF. Stop denying realities.
I'm not denying realities, SugarHigh. I understand that it hasn't worked for you or whatever but I HAVE seen it work. It is real, it does happen - it takes longer for some people than others, and some people are luckier than others, but it's not exactly totally unrealistic. I was socially awkward, and my first ex was socially awkward, and we still managed to get together. It happens, and I don't understand why you refuse to accept that it can, especially after I said that I know that it's not something that works for literally everyone.Everything someone disagrees with you, you go onto claim it's because they aren't listening to you. Sorry to break it to you but it is possible to understand what you're saying and still disagree with it.
It's not that I have a problem with the disagreement. I just feel you're making me repeat myself and asking me things I've already answered or making points I've already addressed. I have no problem if you don't agree with me. I'm just tired of saying the same stuff over and over.Come off it I am not denying there are other solutions. I have never used PUA I did in fact go the professional route.
Therapists are expensive and involve having to go to the a therapist which is a big barrier to a lot of people. Especially shy people.
I still think it's a better solution than PUA, repeating over and over that PUA is easier doesn't change my opinion.The PUA crowds wants to learn both how to socialize and how to get laid. They can be one or they can both. Both are valid reasons for doing it.
I don't do it. I did Social skills classes to learn how to socialize this involved making people think I know how to socialize. You just don't get it.
If you want me to stop dismissing you, then stop dismissing me, please. I will speak to you as you are speaking to me, so if you want me to treat you respectfully please do the same for me.
I do get it. I told you many times that I have no problem with people learning how to socialize. I completely understand that someone needs to learn things in steps to catch up to the rest of us. My point is, I don't think it's healthy to get into PUA if your only aim is to get laid, rather than the additional self-improvement.In it's simplest terms you have to fake it to make it. I had to learn how to fake it with the hope it eventually becomes natural. Some of it did.
I understand you don't like the word fake, like wibbs said a lot of the terms being used in this thread are pejorative. But it is basically what you need to do.
Again, I'd use different phrasing, but like I said, I get it.As for the terms the PUA use, while I'm not even familiar with most of them I do think they serve a purpose. Yes that purpose is to denigrate and objectify women but that's because this is what works. It removes the fear of women so you can then form relationships with them.
This is how I view it.
You start off looking up to women
PUA drags your view of women down so you now look down on them
After you actually form relationships with you will hopefully view them as equals.
I do think the looking down on them is an unfortunate but necessary step because it removes the fear of approaching them. You have to not care about them to not care about rejection. Fear of rejections is crippling when trying to get with women.
Okay fair enough.
Okay again fair enough but I do view the need to tear women down as necessary. I also think most guys naturally go through a phase of looking up to women and then tearing them down below you until finally you view them as equals.
I get that. I just don't want to be one of the women they end up with when they've got that in-between mentality, that's all. I also think there's probably healthier ways of going about that process but I understand it regardless.0 -
Advertisement
-
Professional help is is a better solution but it's also a less accessible solution. If they can't afford or don't have access to professional help what can they do? PUA seems like a good solution for a lot of people imo.I still think it's a better solution than PUA, repeating over and over that PUA is easier doesn't change my opinion.
But some people don't want relationships, they just want sex. If they don't have the skills to get what they want, they learn them from PUA. All makes sense to me.My point is, I don't think it's healthy to get into PUA if your only aim is to get laid, rather than the additional self-improvement.0 -
Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,093 Mod ✭✭✭✭
Join Date:Posts: 59022
I would tend to agree with SH here alright. Women IME are much more sensitive to "creepy" behaviour(for good reason). Often enough I've found the diagnosis of creepy behaviour is a guy who doesnt understand social cues. So yea socially awkward guys, unless very good looking or faux socially awkward arty types are in trouble. On the other hand I've seen real creeps operate and have no shortage of women, because they appear to be socially clued in.Being a socially awakward male makes it very likely you're not getting a GF.
Where I agree with Liah is that I don't think PUA is the way forward, or at least there could be a lot better solutions(I think SH agrees on this too). Therapy? It can be great for some and as much use as tits on a bull for others. As far as teaching the social cues involved in sexual interaction with women? I dunno if therapy would be the solution myself?
While the "be yourself" can work, it has been my experience that it "works" in a limited enough way. 1) pure dumb luck, 2) "yourself" is a good basis for an attractive adult anyway, 3) you're a woman(I refer to my previous on the sellers market) 4) first late teen/adult/proper relationships or late in life ones. As a "tactic", Im not so sure. For a start look at the popularity of this PUA stuff. It's effin huge. That's a helluva lot of men just being themselves yet going home at night alone. In my own life I know actual decent guys, far more decent than I and have spent a lifetime with little female company and a lifetime of "being themselves". These aren't all hobbits either.Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.
0 -
Professional help is is a better solution but it's also a less accessible solution. If they can't afford or don't have access to professional help what can they do? PUA seems like a good solution for a lot of people imo.
But some people don't want relationships, they just want sex. If they don't have the skills to get what they want, they learn them from PUA. All makes sense to me.
Then why do these people not just use prostitutes?0 -
There isn't an ego boost in scoring a prostitute*. it's also expensive and maybe they just don't find them attractive. Scoring a woman is self assuring and actually kind of addictive even if you don't like women. There is a challenge aspect and also sort of a sport to it**.Then why do these people not just use prostitutes?
It's good for impressing your mates as well. Sometimes that's actually more of a motivation than the girl.
*You're gonna have a problem with this aren't you?:D
**and this0 -
That whole post is ridiculously depressing :eek:0
-
Advertisement
-
That whole post is ridiculously depressing :eek:
It probably doesn't apply to a lot of guys if that makes you feel better but scoring women can get very competitive in a group of men.
Why is it so depressing though? It's just in a nightclub situation I don't think people think like that with relationships. I also do think women can get competitive about this stuff too although I actually they are far more likely to carry the competition aspect into relationships.
I'd slag a mate for getting with an ugly girl on a night out but if he's in a relationship I wouldn't because I think he's obviously with her for a reason so that's fair enough. I don't think guys compete with GF's but women do seem to with their BF's.0 -
Why is it so depressing though?
Well, it's just back to the lack of consideration for how the women they're banging might feel about it, that's all. It's a very selfish attitude, using someone else to make yourself feel better. It's also pretty immature if one's only picking up girls to impress the lads. Plus the dehumanizing aspect - I always think it's kind of depressing when people can't see other people as humans but rather things to use to their own ends.0 -
Yea I'd agree with all of that but it wouldn't stop me doing it. I'm very immature with certain things but I'm not sure how unusual it is because it seems very common.Well, it's just back to the lack of consideration for how the women they're banging might feel about it, that's all. It's a very selfish attitude, using someone else to make yourself feel better. It's also pretty immature if one's only picking up girls to impress the lads. Plus the dehumanizing aspect - I always think it's kind of depressing when people can't see other people as humans but rather things to use to their own ends.
You won't get guys to admit something like this in real life though. Even on the internet most guys wouldn't admit if they did this kind of stuff.
Yea maybe but I find it more depressing that women respond well to this kind of stuff. In my experience at least, the more your dehumanize women and the less empathy you have for them, the more success you have with them.I always think it's kind of depressing when people can't see other people as humans but rather things to use to their own ends.
I'll be honest and say I genuinely don't care about the women point of view because as far as I'm concerned she's just some girl in a nightclub. I also think women who are done up provoke less empathy in people. It's far easier to treat a slutty looking woman badly than it is a more down to earth cute one. In a way they actually dehumanize themselves with all the make up they wear.0 -
Nothing infuriates me more than the "be yourself" crap. It's just that, crap.
The people who say it tend to have things naturally come to them, naturally socially clued in etc. When they say "be yourself" they really mean "be more like me"
As for "using prostitutes" jesus thats just daft I'm afraid.
Every guy wants to get laid, certainly young guy wants that. Telling him to go out and compensate for his lack of social skills by paying for sex is basically cheating and not addressing the problem at all.0 -
Then why do these people not just use prostitutes?
Why pay for sex with women who don't want to have sex with you when you can have women begging you for sex for free. Then if you decide you don't like having sex with numerous women you have the skillset to get the choose beautiful women to be your girlfriend rather than settling for less attractive women.
Also, it's not all about sex. I actually prefer the thrill of approaching and fully being myself around people to the sex, I've never felt more alive than when approaching a difficult group of women that most would be afraid to. It's amazing. No better feeling in the world. Learning this stuff can be really fun regardless of the outcome.
I can't imagine a therapist having good advice on pulling the most stunning women around. What would they say?0 -
Just to go back to this point
How do they feel? I don't think the women have been completely misled if it's clear it's just a one night stand. It's also not like they will know the banter he is having with lads. Just like the guy won't what she says to get mates.the lack of consideration for how the women they're banging might feel about it,0 -
I think it might help if I threw out a couple of analogies (well maybe not, I just like analogies).
For some people, if you are having a hard time understanding Liah's 'outrage' at the whole PUA thing, how about analogy A.
Analogy (A). Imagine you are browsing around the internet (as you do) and you stumble upon a forum. Let's say it's called GDA.xxx. You start reading the stickies and some of the posts and you find out that GDA stands for 'Gold Digging Artists' and that the forum (with members in the thousands) is populated entirely by women talking about ways to manipulate men for financial gain. How to get guys you meet in clubs to buy you drinks, how to get guys you were in relationships to buy you gifts and give you money. How to marry guys for their money and extract the most out of them in a divorce as quickly as possible.
You read into it and this forum of women have pages and pages of psychological, emotional and physical tactics to accomplish this goal. "How to make a guy think you really love him", "How to spot lonely or vulnerable guys", "How to spot insecure guys", "How to tell which guys are willing to spend the most", "How to fool type x, y or type z guys into doing this" "The best way to make guys x believe think y so they will do z so you can get x1".
Pages of the stuff all dedicated, in the most part, to how to extract the most possible from the most easily manipulated guys (and how to spot them), for the longest you can string them along for, with the least give from yourself.
Now imagine after finding this site you then start clicking links on it to other sites, which have links to blogs, which have links to communities (both on and offline), which have links back to other forums with links to books and dvds and courses. So, you realise their are literally thousands, maybe tens or even hundereds of thousands of women actively trying to learn these psychological techniques and many of them openly bragging about how they are having so much fun getting away with it and taking out their marks and targets.
You realise that chances are, the more popular this stuff becomes, and it does seem to be becoming more popular very quickly, the more and more girls you are probably going to run into who will be using some or more of these techniques to manipulate men in this way.
Now you might say "bah, sure I'd never fall for that" but the techniques wouldn't be working if they didn't work on people who thought that.
Would you not find it a little fucked up? The fact that even though you knew these types of women existed, who wanted to do this and had the skills to pull it off, there are now whole communities of them working together perfecting the techniques and inventing new ones to share with each other, and perfecting them all through trial and error.
Would you not be a little annoyed that now that you knew this, you knew it would be even harder for you to open up and trust girls you meet because they may just be using very carefully honed and refined techniques just to get something out of you. Picking you out because you give off some signs of insecurity or creating an inception of insecurities to develop in you to then exploit?
A bit pissed off that the already difficult task of finding someone genuine that you liked and that liked you back just became all that little bit harder?
While some of the techniques were nothing more than copying techniques girls had naturally developed to attract men as they grew up that now there was whole communities and books and courses out there showing how they could be turned towards the ends that a huge chunk of the GDA community were turning them towards?
(Probably tl;dr, but I did warn you I like analogies, and I'm bored)
===================================
For Liah, if you are having a hard time understanding why people are defending the whole PUA thing. Here is analogy B.
Analogy (B).
Say there is a girl. I'm sure you have come across this girl before, because everyone has. She is kind of pretty and very very good at turning on the charm. A real sex kitten, just knows how to get guys falling for her left, right and centre. Now she's a bitch. Loves the attention and couldn't give a fuck about anyone but herself. One thing she loves doing is stringing guys along. Get's all friendly with genuinely nice but pretty insecure or shy guys, flirts like crazy with them, physically and emotionally, does her utmost to make them think she wants them, wants to be with them. But it's all just to boost her own ego. They mean nothing to her and when she gets bored she has no problem dropping them flat. Or she gets with a guy, has him fall head over heals with her and then treats them like crap before moving onto someone else that shows interest.
Now she has a female friend. They have been friends since school. Her friend is pretty insecure herself. Really nice person but a bit shy. Doesn't really have any idea how to talk to guys never mind flirt with them. No clue how to tell if they are interested in her or how to let them know she is interested in them. Has had one night stands of course but doesn't seem to be able to enrapture men like Bitchina can. So one day she says to herself "well Bitchina always has guys all over her. She seems to have them eating out of the palm of her hand. I'm going to watch her from now on. See if I can work out what she is doing that I am not..."
Now Niceina knows that Bitchina is a bitch. She has seen the way she treats people. But you can't argue with results. She clearly knows what she is doing in terms of attracting and seducing guys, even if as an outside observer Niceina knows it is all done with the most callous manipulation on her friends part. So she watches her, starts making mental notes of things she does, how the guys react, how certain guys react and how certain things work better or worse on certain guys and she starts piecing it all together step by step.
So she begins using this stuff, these little techniques, she knows they are manipulative but they work. For the first time she starts having a bit of luck with guys. Not just random guys wanting to have sex with her. She is able to use these manipulative techniques to make the guys act differently. She is able to string it out a bit and make them work to get to know her, to keep their interest even though she isn't putting out. She knows she is manipulating them because she watched Bitchina with eyes wide open and knew what she was doing and why what she was doing worked.
Is Niceina really being all that unethical in what she is doing? Is she being creepy? Is the fact that she learnt these things from a brazen and not very nice user of people enough to mean that she shouldn't do some of these things too? I mean other people not in anyway similar to her friend, good genuine people, do them too, she's seen them. They just don't seem to be aware of what they are doing when they are doing it.
Does the fact that she learnt them from a bitch, and that she is aware they are very manipulative things mean she is a manipulative bitch herself for using them?
(Yeah, definitely TL;DR. Really have to get myself PSP or something.)0 -
Be yourself is a non-sequitor. You are yourself; how could it be otherwise? What people really mean when they say "be yourself" is don't pretend to be someone you're not. But if that's what they mean why don't they say it? Because they know, as well as we do, that sometimes you have to "fake it to make it". You have to pretend to be more confident than you are approaching girls, chatting to guys, dancing in a crowd or whatever it might be in order to get any better at it. Few, if any, are confident at first, but those who swallow their pride, and hide their fear, sooner also progress sooner.
The message should be "be yourself" but also "grow yourself". Challenge yourself. There is nothing wrong with a bit of false bravado or putting your best foot forward. Everybody does this. And in doing so the bravado becomes real.
I have always thought of PUA as a dysfunctional reaction to the world of dating. But it's a reaction to a "system" that is already dysfunctional. People getting plastered in order to be with one another. Guys being strung along by girls who love the attention but have no intention of ever setting him straight. Girls being strung along by guys pretending to be interested in something more meaningful when really, this the girl is just a prop to occupy their time. There's a thousand other scenarios, I'm sure you know them well. All this existed before PUA. To expect functional behaviour from some of the population whilst the majority act dysfunctionally is naive.
Is this healthy? No. But the patient was already sick. Better to treat the illness and not the symptoms. We're a long way off doing that I feel. The genders have never been so free to be divided as they are today.0 -
Excellent post, strobe. Fleshing it out like that does help me to understand the mentality behind some of these guys. But it still doesn't really.. justify it, you know? I dunno. I'll be mulling it over for a bit.
You definitely got my perspective pretty much down though. Especially by outlining the popularity of it.
And re: 'be yourself,' yeah, I guess what I mean by that is don't be fake, but grow the parts of you you want people to notice. Just don't be deceptive about who you are, is my point, I guess.0 -
I know I've said this a lot but this still misses the point that if being who you are is the problem you need to hide who you are until you change. If someone isn't happy and the problem is clearly with their personality then changing that just makes sense.And re: 'be yourself,' yeah, I guess what I mean by that is don't be fake, but grow the parts of you you want people to notice. Just don't be deceptive about who you are, is my point, I guess.
I just think the "be who you are" is very Disneyish. It sounds nice but isn't really a solution.0 -
Advertisement
-
I know I've said this a lot but this still misses the point that if being who you are is the problem you need to hide who you are until you change. If someone isn't happy and the problem is clearly with their personality then changing that just makes sense.
I just think the "be who you are" is very Disneyish. It sounds nice but isn't really a solution.
It is for a lot of people, you'd actually be surprised. But I get what you mean, some people with extremely anti-social behaviours will probably have to hide parts until they manage to get over the anti-social behaviours. But that's different from faking completely. It's still with the intent to become better, and to grow yourself as a person. Faking is just pretending with no intent to actually change.
Hence why I said a few posts ago our disagreement was down to misunderstanding.0 -
It seems that one of the main reasons why many women take issue with this is because it is a shift in the balance of power between men and women, removes the sense of control they have and puts the man solidly in the driving seat. It empowers men kinda in the way women are, ie having the women themselves doing the chasing rather than the traditional way.
Its funny really, typical situation would be with a group of girls, there is always a really hot one, some nice girls and a decidedly average one(I know it sounds mean but that's the typical formation) if you get the leader, usually the hottest one, to like you then suddenly you become way more attractive to all the other girls.
Heres an anecdote;
I was out with my friend, who I mentioned in my first post, we saw a group like that, he boldly walked up, started talking to one of the girls (the most friendly bubbly looking one, and yes one of the "plainer" ones) and blatantly ignored the hottest one (the one "he was after"). He had the group laughing and having fun (with his stories and jokes etc), the one he liked tried to but in at this point(when she saw her friends liked him), he scolded her(playfully, you know the kinda way that makes someone have a shocked laugh) and told her not to interrupt and went back to ignoring her, not even looking at her, no eye contact, nothing, and talking to her friends. At this point he had subtly moved the group so that he had his back to the wall and the group was gathered around him, LITERALLY the center of attention. She, normally the center of male attention, then had to work to get his, he teased it out until she was basically begging him to talk to her. Then he did, and he was in there. Of course once everyone saw that she was way into him he suddenly became much more attractive to all the other girls in the club.
Now if he went straight up to her he would have been shot down straight off like the half dozen other guys we saw. He totally changed the normal dynamic she was used to, she wasn't in control, he was. Every other guy probably came up and said "eh heya, can I get you a drink" or something similar, he was totally different.
The next time I met him I asked how he did it, he explained and sent me away to read the book.
Is that manipulative and wrong? Judge for yourself. I was pretty impressed. (annoyed too because I had bet him a pint he would be shot down)
He says he is pretty sh!t at this PUA thing, I dunno if he is doing it "properly" or anything but this is powerful stuff. Leggo would know better than me about whether thats typical, I've just read the book and talked to my mate a few times.0 -
Wolfe Tone wrote: »It seems that one of the main reasons why many women take issue with this is because it is a shift in the balance of power between men and women, removes the sense of control they have and puts the man solidly in the driving seat. It empowers men kinda in the way women are, ie having the women themselves doing the chasing rather than the traditional way.
Speaking only for myself, I can say it's 100% not the case, but that's because I'm not interested in relationships with people who think it's about 'power' to begin with. Strobe's summary is a lot closer imho.
What you said sounds like what men tell themselves to make themselves feel better about it but I could be wrong - just how it sounds.0 -
Yea ok fair enough then we are talking about the same things.It is for a lot of people, you'd actually be surprised. But I get what you mean, some people with extremely anti-social behaviours will probably have to hide parts until they manage to get over the anti-social behaviours. But that's different from faking completely. It's still with the intent to become better, and to grow yourself as a person. Faking is just pretending with no intent to actually change.
Hence why I said a few posts ago our disagreement was down to misunderstanding.0 -
So true to the point of being ridiculous.:DWolfe Tone wrote: »if you get the leader, usually the hottest one, to like you then suddenly you become way more attractive to all the other girls.
Good story but I definitely view that as manipulation which isn't a negative thing, it's just what needs to be done. Fair play to the guy and the girls obviously loved it so whats the harm?
Is that manipulative and wrong? Judge for yourself. I was pretty impressed. (annoyed too because I had bet him a pint he would be shot down)
He says he is pretty sh!t at this PUA thing, I dunno if he is doing it "properly" or anything but this is powerful stuff. Leggo would know better than me about whether thats typical, I've just read the book and talked to my mate a few times.0 -
Ha, I actually discussed this with a friend earlier and she was of the opinion I was right. I think you slightly misunderstood, I don't mean power within relationships, I mean about how they start, typically the man chasing. This enables a fundamental shift.Speaking only for myself, I can say it's 100% not the case, but that's because I'm not interested in relationships with people who think it's about 'power' to begin with. Strobe's summary is a lot closer imho.
What you said sounds like what men tell themselves to make themselves feel better about it but I could be wrong - just how it sounds.
Lets go back to my nightclub scenario, women in those situations inhabit a position of power, a comfort zone. PUA changes all that and I think women feel intimidated by the fact that a man can change all that, the fact that they can so easily shatter social norms.
And as for that being what men tell themselves to feel better about it, meh I wouldnt know(can't see how you would either tbh) that was just my observation. As I said, I don't do this myself.0 -
-
Wolfe Tone wrote: »Ha, I actually discussed this with a friend earlier and she was of the opinion I was right. I think you slightly misunderstood, I don't mean power within relationships, I mean about how they start, typically the man chasing. This enables a fundamental shift.
Lets go back to my nightclub scenario, women in those situations inhabit a position of power, a comfort zone. PUA changes all that and I think women feel intimidated by the fact that a man can change all that, the fact that they can so easily shatter social norms.
And as for that being what men tell themselves to feel better about it, meh I wouldnt know(can't see how you would either tbh) that was just my observation. As I said, I don't do this myself.
Like I said, I'm only really speaking for myself here. I've never exactly been 'in tune' with your average woman (or your average human being tbh :pac:). I'm the type to have things all equal - if I'm interested I'll go up to a guy, if he's interested then he's more than welcome to come up to me, no waiting between texts or whatever else 'normal' people do. I've never had a relationship that had any kind of power play, even in the beginning - only ever organic beginnings. So it could be true for some women, sure - but my dislike of PUA is because it's just scary to know that there are these manipulation manuals out there and that there's a higher chance now that the person who comes up to me may not be genuine than there was before (obviously there were dishonest people beforehand, but now the section of them who were too socially inept to get anywhere have a handy guide).
It could be just something I'm hypersensitive to though due to my past, even outside of romance I am terrified of being manipulated. I'm really not sure if my reaction to it/reason for my reaction to it is standard. No other women seem to be replying to the thread either so I guess we'll never know. :pac:0 -
Yea I agree with this.Wolfe Tone wrote: »Ha, I actually discussed this with a friend earlier and she was of the opinion I was right. I think you slightly misunderstood, I don't mean power within relationships, I mean about how they start, typically the man chasing. This enables a fundamental shift.
Lets go back to my nightclub scenario, women in those situations inhabit a position of power, a comfort zone. PUA changes all that and I think women feel intimidated by the fact that a man can change all that, the fact that they can so easily shatter social norms.
Yea I'm not really sure where Liah was coming from with that one. Why would the guys need to feel better about what they're doing? I promise you basically no one who is going to do PUA is going to question the ethics of it. Would they even start it if they felt there was something to be guilty about?And as for that being what men tell themselves to feel better about it, meh I wouldnt know(can't see how you would either tbh) that was just my observation. As I said, I don't do this myself.
The only ethical problem I can see with PUA is that it basically milks money from insecure guys. Anything after that is how the guys decide to use PUA but that doesn't make the techniques unethical. Kind of like how I could go to a self defense class and then just go around starting fights with people, it doesn't make the class unethical.0 -
Advertisement
-
Yea I'm not really sure where Liah was coming from with that one. Why would the guys need to feel better about what they're doing? I promise you basically no one who is going to do PUA is going to question the ethics of it. Would they even start it if they felt there was something to be guilty about?
Well, I just know that if I was using a bunch of canned lines/manipulation tactics on someone I would feel really guilty for manipulating them and basically making them out to be a fool, that's all.0
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement