Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How to cite this?

  • 09-02-2019 5:02pm
    #1
    Bredabe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,173 ✭✭✭


    In a follow up to my other woe's,
    I'm doing another LR:(, for Y/E, it on the same topic and three of its applications.

    I found a paper(1) which covers a lot of the info I want to reference, so how do I cite these? do I refer to the paper(1) I'm taking it from or reference those cited in the paper(1) I'm reading?

    As nothing is straightforward, if I use a few quotes from this paper(1) are they considered as one source or not?

    "Have you ever wagged your tail so hard you fell over"?-Brod Higgins.



Comments

  • #2
    CelticRambler
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,892 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    Maybe too late as you've probably finished by now, but always go back to the original research. If paper(1) cites the results of a third-party study, do not cite paper(1) as the source. That's one of the worst sins of academia.

    Additionally, if you can find only one source for the topic/results/application, you should treat it with suspicion. Most of the worst "fake news" in academia comes from multiple papers citing the same (sometimes flawed) original study. So go looking for additional work that confirms - or refutes - the point you want to make, or include a caveat in your own text.


Advertisement