Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Werewolf . . A Star Wars Tale .....

12357…29

Comments

  • #202
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    Great timing, was going to ask how the catchup is going. What’s your read on the day so far?

    Not much tbh, as I said I think Henry is dodge..

    I've a 3 people I have a village lean on at the moment but I wont be sharing that on thread obviously. I need to re read OP again to try make sense of the deflected shot.


  • #203
    Doris WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,158 ✭✭✭Doris WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Doris, why the vote on me.

    Don't care really but an explanation always helps.

    Do I have to explain? You are ordering people around and mocking other players moves. You say you made a lynch vote in jest yet you want people to take this game very seriously.

    It looks to me like you are trying to control the game and anything you are called out on is a joke so I think you are a wolf.


  • #204
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Leia has skills, one of which may be a blaster I suppose. Wouldn't appear to be Hans given the timing.

    Never thought of Leia, didn't think her skills would be to kill.


  • #205
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    Never thought of Leia, didn't think her skills would be to kill.

    It’s possible I guess, previous games have had roles where players get some different ability each day for example.


  • #206
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Number 3.

    WTF does this mean? #3 in the rules?
    3. Be active: Please all try to reasonably contribute to the game thread with 5 posts being the minimum per day. In the case of a tie vote, the last vote will usually carry the lynch. All players who are mod killed will be replaced if possible, but this decision will be made on a case by case basis. If you wish to be subbed, please PM the mods.

    What are you talking about?
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    What do you mean by it would be carnage at lynch time?

    How would it be carnage?

    Is this just you adding negative overdramatics to the act voting 'no lynch', or do you really believe that carnage would ensue?

    If everyone votes 'No Lynch' and its not permissable it would potentially be counted as a missed vote for everyone. Which means everyone has voted for themselves. So maybe carnage is the wrong word as only one person would be lynched but it would be an absolute ****show. All it takes is one wolf to vote for someone else then to lynch a villager.


  • #207
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Doris WW wrote: »
    Do I have to explain? You are ordering people around and mocking other players moves. You say you made a lynch vote in jest yet you want people to take this game very seriously.

    It looks to me like you are trying to control the game and anything you are called out on is a joke so I think you are a wolf.

    Where am I ordering people around, this false narrative is irritating.

    I'm not controlling anything bar myself.

    Have you or Frank never heard of the terminology 'rustling branches'

    That's what I was playing at with my joke vote, anyone with more than sawdust between their ears would realise that


  • #208
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Make it number 3, Desmond.


  • #209
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Make it number 3, Desmond.

    Clearly I'm missing something here. I've no clue what you're talking about.


  • #210
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Where am I ordering people around, this false narrative is irritating.

    I'm not controlling anything bar myself.

    Have you or Frank never heard of the terminology 'rustling branches'

    That's what I was playing at with my joke vote, anyone with more than sawdust between their ears would realise that

    So you were rustling branches but in such an obvious way that everyone would know you were doing it?

    So a pointless exercise then if everyone should know what you are at.


  • Advertisement
  • #211
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    It’s possible I guess, previous games have had roles where players get some different ability each day for example.

    When I read the Op her took her skills as things like vote tampering, messages etc not kills but suppose it is something we need to bear in mind in case there are anymore surprise attacks.


  • #212
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    So you were rustling branches but in such an obvious way that everyone would know you were doing it?

    So a pointless exercise then if everyone should know what you are at.

    Ah sure look put your vote on me then Frank, you are clearly the master of this game


  • #213
    Senan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Senan WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    Not much tbh, as I said I think Henry is dodge..

    I've a 3 people I have a village lean on at the moment but I wont be sharing that on thread obviously. I need to re read OP again to try make sense of the deflected shot.

    It’s up to yourself but I’d always be in favour of putting that info down on thread


  • #214
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Anyways I've work to do, I'll be back at around 5 or so


  • #215
    Patrick WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Patrick WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »

    If everyone votes 'No Lynch' and its not permissable it would potentially be counted as a missed vote for everyone. Which means everyone has voted for themselves. So maybe carnage is the wrong word as only one person would be lynched but it would be an absolute ****show. All it takes is one wolf to vote for someone else then to lynch a villager.

    Can I alert you attention to this thread.

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2058056654

    This thread is where the voting happens for this game.

    Keep an eye on it and the lynch will not be the absolute ****show you are scaremongering.

    Public voting means that you can tally all the votes yourself of who is voting for who and who is leading.

    At the time of writing this, the tally was
    Henry x 2
    Barbara x 1

    less of the emotive scaremongering please.


  • #216
    Senan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Senan WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Ah sure look put your vote on me then Frank, you are clearly the master of this game

    For someone who was rustling branches you don’t take it very well when it’s flipped
    You’re getting wound up there over very little IMO

    It’s interesting


  • Advertisement
  • #217
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Ah sure look put your vote on me then Frank, you are clearly the master of this game

    If I see inconsistencies in someones game play or reasoning im going to point int out....

    I never claimed to be a master no need to be so snippy.


  • #218
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    @ Mods - can you clear this up - can we vote "No Lynch"


  • #219
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    If I see inconsistencies in someones game play or reasoning im going to point int out....

    I never claimed to be a master no need to be so snippy.

    There are no inconsistencies. This is a stupid argument.

    I have to go back to work.


  • #220
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    There are no inconsistencies. This is a stupid argument.

    I have to go back to work.

    You do know there is no such thing as being able to work when these games are going on - it keeps pulling you back in!


  • #221
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Something to consider. I’ve speculated that yodas Jedi mind trick makes them unpeekable. Generally we have a loud wolf in most games, someone who tried to keep pace with the conversation and to be vocal. If today’s unpeekable that gives them a good reason to play that role Now I know, though obviously the rest of you don’t, that I’m village. Given that it seems likely to me we would have a wolf in Henry, Barbara, senna, des

    Discuss (feel free to include me in the mix)


  • Advertisement
  • #222
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Patrick WW wrote: »
    Can I alert you attention to this thread.

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2058056654

    This thread is where the voting happens for this game.

    Keep an eye on it and the lynch will not be the absolute ****show you are scaremongering.

    Public voting means that you can tally all the votes yourself of who is voting for who and who is leading.

    At the time of writing this, the tally was
    Henry x 2
    Barbara x 1

    less of the emotive scaremongering please.

    Yeah cool thanks for pointing that out. I've actually already seen it and understand how it works. You're not understanding what I'm saying though.

    If everyone put's in a 'no lynch' vote on the thread then yes, we can all see that everyone is voting for a no lynch. If however, no lynch isn't a valid option, the mods could just see it as everyone not voting which would result in everyone getting a penalty vote for themselves. Which we wouldn't see until the voting is over and the person has been lynched. Bit late then isn't it?

    And i'm not scaremongering, I'm being realistic. There's no confirmation from mods that 'No Lynch' is an option, therefore I'm not considering it as an option. Down off your box now lad.


  • #223
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    Something to consider. I’ve speculated that yodas Jedi mind trick makes them unpeekable. Generally we have a loud wolf in most games, someone who tried to keep pace with the conversation and to be vocal. If today’s unpeekable that gives them a good reason to play that role Now I know, though obviously the rest of you don’t, that I’m village. Given that it seems likely to me we would have a wolf in Henry, Barbara, senna, des

    Discuss (feel free to include me in the mix)

    You could be right as Palpatine's role says this :
    Seer, Palpatine can use the force to see someone true intentions. Only other force users may be able to resist his power. He will also be searching for a certain young Skywalker who, should he be turned, prove a valuable ally. Palpatine is gathering his power, and should he survive to the penultimate day, will be able unleash his devastating force lightning against an opponent.

    And Yoda's mentions the force:
    The old Jedi is still strong with the force despite his 900 years. He can see a person's true identity using the force. His mastery of the Jedi mind trick is to be feared.


  • #224
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    You could be right as Palpatine's role says this :



    And Yoda's mentions the force:

    Yep, good spot

    Actually I should have you as a high poster too soz:pac:


  • #225
    Patrick WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Patrick WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    Yeah cool thanks for pointing that out. I've actually already seen it and understand how it works. You're not understanding what I'm saying though.

    If everyone put's in a 'no lynch' vote on the thread then yes, we can all see that everyone is voting for a no lynch. If however, no lynch isn't a valid option, the mods could just see it as everyone not voting which would result in everyone getting a penalty vote for themselves. Which we wouldn't see until the voting is over and the person has been lynched. Bit late then isn't it?

    And i'm not scaremongering, I'm being realistic. There's no confirmation from mods that 'No Lynch' is an option, therefore I'm not considering it as an option. Down off your box now lad.


    Self votes cannot bandwagon, as they are on a single person, self.
    So, the maximum damage 10 (for example) self votes can do to any lynch if there is no no lynch option and they are considered as missed votes is add +1 to one persons tally.

    You seem to care an inordinate amount about a possible +1 to the lynch results. This is not something i'd be worrying about at all.


  • #226
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    Yep, good spot

    Actually I should have you as a high poster too soz:pac:

    If it's true then I wonder if it is for one peek only or for the game.


  • #227
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    There are no inconsistencies. This is a stupid argument.

    I have to go back to work.

    Well making joke votes yourself and wanting people to be serious in game.

    Saying you are rustling branches to try catch baddies but also saying its really obvious what you are doing anyone can see it.

    And after be fairly cool all day, you seem to have gotten mad now you have drawn attention to yourself in a negative way.

    These are all things I see as inconsistency in your posts.


  • #228
    fixXxer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,332 ✭✭✭fixXxer


    Mod Note

    No lynch is not an option, all players must vote

    Failure to vote for a valid player will count as a self vote.


  • #229
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Ok thanks mods. Moving on now.....


  • #230
    Patrick WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Patrick WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    Ok thanks mods. Moving on now.....

    But what about the carnage if the 16 people who are not currently voting don't vote?

    :D


  • #231
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Well then we'll see what happens won't we?


  • Advertisement
  • #232
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    Well making joke votes yourself and wanting people to be serious in game.

    Saying you are rustling branches to try catch baddies but also saying its really obvious what you are doing anyone can see it.

    And after be fairly cool all day, you seem to have gotten mad now you have drawn attention to yourself in a negative way.

    These are all things I see as inconsistency in your posts.

    Where have I wanted to people to be serious?

    Can you please point out where I said that.

    It's a game, have all the fun you like.

    I'm gonna call things out that I find wolfy though and someone refusing to vote 'just cos' is wolfy to me.

    As is yourself sauntering into the thread and stating someone's a 'lock wolf' and then advocating no lynch btw ;)


  • #233
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,600 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Afternoon everyone.

    Just reading back, I didn't like Abi's introduction to the game this morning after munch. There was lots of giffing giddiness at quite a serious time for the village. The first sign of a person in the game is at 10:09am Monday with gifs, no that's not a hangable offence on its own, but something to keep an eye on.


  • #234
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Where have I wanted to people to be serious?

    Can you please point out where I said that.

    It's a game, have all the fun you like.

    I'm gonna call things out that I find wolfy though and someone refusing to vote 'just cos' is wolfy to me.

    As is yourself sauntering into the thread and stating someone's a 'lock wolf' and then advocating no lynch btw ;)

    For someone who says they were rustling trees you are obviously not used to having your jimmies rustled which they well and truly have been.

    And now the old accuse your accuser chestnut.

    You are a lock wolf I can feel it in my jimmies and in your jimmies

    O wait I thought you had to go back to work what happened there :pac:


  • #235
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    Afternoon everyone.

    Just reading back, I didn't like Abi's introduction to the game this morning after munch. There was lots of giffing giddiness at quite a serious time for the village. The first sign of a person in the game is at 10:09am Monday with gifs, no that's not a hangable offence on its own, but something to keep an eye on.

    I called her out on this and her response was that is was actually 10.10 and not munch time :rolleyes:


  • #236
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    Afternoon everyone.

    Just reading back, I didn't like Abi's introduction to the game this morning after munch. There was lots of giffing giddiness at quite a serious time for the village. The first sign of a person in the game is at 10:09am Monday with gifs, no that's not a hangable offence on its own, but something to keep an eye on.

    Hey big, not heard too much from you so far. What are your other thoughts on the game based on your reading back?


  • #237
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Where have I wanted to people to be serious?

    Can you please point out where I said that.

    It's a game, have all the fun you like.

    I'm gonna call things out that I find wolfy though and someone refusing to vote 'just cos' is wolfy to me.

    As is yourself sauntering into the thread and stating someone's a 'lock wolf' and then advocating no lynch btw ;)

    Hmm two things that in the past have most definitely not been wolfy in the scheme of things are:

    No lynch voters: usually suggested by a villager who believes in that strategy to be later used by wolves as a hiding place

    People calling other “lock wolves”: since it’s a sure fire way to get yourself killed if you’re wrong and we all expect wolves to bus each other if you’re right


  • #238
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    Hmm two things that in the past have most definitely not been wolfy in the scheme of things are:

    No lynch voters: usually suggested by a villager who believes in that strategy to be later used by wolves as a hiding place

    People calling other “lock wolves”: since it’s a sure fire way to get yourself killed if you’re wrong and we all expect wolves to bus each other if you’re right

    That's not correct. We only recently had a game where a wolf did not vote, I'm sure if I had the time or inclination I could statistically disprove this theory but tbh I'm just home from work and don't fancy trawling through every game when there's a live one ongoing.

    Remind me post game and I might look into it though.

    Lock wolf I don't care about.

    Someone pointing out my 'inconsistencies' whilst being inconsistent in their own posts (calling someone lock wolf, then advocating for no lynch) is what gets my goat.

    I once caught a wolf for basically regurgitating my own FFA and just sticking me on it at the top, so Frank with his jump onto me whilst doing exactly what he accuses me of doing is very interesting to me.


  • #239
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Typical.

    Goes quiet when I have time to sit in front of the laptop.

    Ok I'm gonna re-read the thread whilst it's quiet.


  • #240
    Senan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Senan WW


    I'm away for an hour or two, going to stick a placeholder vote in on Liam


  • Advertisement
  • #241
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    Evening folks!
    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Evening Lukey.

    Babs, what is this about?


  • #242
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    I'm going for a couple of hours now, will check in when I am home and put my vote in then


  • #243
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Senan WW wrote: »
    I'm away for an hour or two, going to stick a placeholder vote in on Liam

    Any reason? Just the low post/ check in from earlier?


  • #244
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    I think stating that Abi's only contribution being around munchtime is a little bit disingenuous tbh.

    Here's all her posts. Some of them well afterwards. Not much in terms of content... sure. Nothing there at all of any note.

    I went back and looked because a wolf once accused me of being on at munch time as a way of trying to shade me when munch and lynch times are the most obvious times that people will be active.

    Abigail WW wrote: »
    giphy.gif
    Abigail WW wrote: »
    phil-mitchell.gif?w=300
    Abigail WW wrote: »
    giphy.gif
    Abigail WW wrote: »
    I mean if you want to get technical about it Emily 10.10 isn't munch time.

    giphy.gif
    Abigail WW wrote: »
    I too reckon it was a munch post. Would be quite a coincidence for them to modkill someone at munch time and not announce it.
    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Interesting take Senan. Sorry doesn't necessarily mean that the person is responsible. Sorry for your loss is often said but doesn't mean the person saying sorry was the one responsible.

    Never forgot, that is is never too late to say it

    giphy.gif
    Abigail WW wrote: »
    I'll leave these here and see if you can guess from their appearance whether they are usually goodies

    giphy.gif

    ZNaSi12.gif

    Thing about Abi is as I said it's just a pile of fluff and explaining how sorry can mean different things.

    So for that reason I'd likely have her on my FFA, but not for the munch time thing, I think that's a bit lazy if I'm honest.


  • #245
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    fixXxer wrote: »
    Mod Note

    No lynch is not an option, all players must vote

    Failure to vote for a valid player will count as a self vote.

    Enjoy.


  • #246
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Enjoy.

    Hey babs, seen anything since your no vote post that you think is noteworthy or suspicious


  • Advertisement
  • #247
    Doris WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,158 ✭✭✭Doris WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Where am I ordering people around, this false narrative is irritating.

    I'm not controlling anything bar myself.

    Have you or Frank never heard of the terminology 'rustling branches'

    That's what I was playing at with my joke vote, anyone with more than sawdust between their ears would realise that

    Oh look at the mocking behaviour.


  • #248
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,752 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    Out of game. I really wanna vote Henry

    In game. I don't think Henry is a wolf. He's giving reasons, he's playing the game. Sure he's mouthy but I don't think this makes him wolf.


    Babs, I'm not following your posts at all. I'm finding it difficult to picture you as a helpful villager. What does enjoy mean?


  • #249
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    Hey babs, seen anything since your no vote post that you think is noteworthy or suspicious

    No.

    I'm not voting.


  • #250
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Decided to start looking at those voting for me, seeing as I know I'm good and they're either being silly villagers or just flat out wolves.

    Patrick first:
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    giphy.gif
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    Maybe the rest of the gang will beam in later.....
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    They needs of the many outweighs the needs of the few or the one.
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    Review my posts.

    Patrick basically self ISOs here. Meh. Star Trek sucks btw. There, I said it.
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    I'm not defending Mary, but until you come up with better reasoning than lynch the trekies, my vote shall remain were it is. You may be surprised at just how many trekies there are in this game

    Responded to this already, but there is a tinge of defending from Paddy to Mary, I get what he's saying, he mentioned Star Trek a few times, I didn't comment.

    I wasn't paying attention to the thread till this morning tbh, hence me missing them. I think Babs also has a live long and prosper post.
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    Yet you clearly do care or you wouldn't bring it up.

    Funny that :)

    Gone then and now mocking me as I said the same thing.
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    voting no lynch would not attract a penalty vote as no lynch is a vote and not a missed vote.

    Mechanics talk.
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    What do you mean by it would be carnage at lynch time?

    How would it be carnage?

    Is this just you adding negative overdramatics to the act voting 'no lynch', or do you really believe that carnage would ensue?

    I remember reading this post and liking it, it does seem to be a fair sentiment. Desmond referring to carnage seems a bit OTT.
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    Can I alert you attention to this thread.

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2058056654

    This thread is where the voting happens for this game.

    Keep an eye on it and the lynch will not be the absolute ****show you are scaremongering.

    Public voting means that you can tally all the votes yourself of who is voting for who and who is leading.

    At the time of writing this, the tally was
    Henry x 2
    Barbara x 1

    less of the emotive scaremongering please.

    This is more aggressive, a bit pushy maybe. Same point as before though.
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    Self votes cannot bandwagon, as they are on a single person, self.
    So, the maximum damage 10 (for example) self votes can do to any lynch if there is no no lynch option and they are considered as missed votes is add +1 to one persons tally.

    You seem to care an inordinate amount about a possible +1 to the lynch results. This is not something i'd be worrying about at all.

    More discussion with Desmond over self-votes VS No Lynch.

    See here's where I don't like people not voting.

    It messes up wagonomics for later in the game if we catch a wolf.

    No lynch at least produces a wagon where some wolves may hide but as that is not an option imo everyone should vote or it doesn't look good.

    Ok my basic level 1 read of Patrick is that he's a villager who likes to stir the pot.

    Star Trek posts, forceful on lynch votes talk.. I'd like a few reads from him but I'm happy enough to let him play his own game for now.

    Next I'll look at Doris.


  • #251
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Right so Doris...
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Out!
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Jesus tis a queer quiet tread.

    Two posts prior to munch, meh.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Am I right in thinking there is no priest in the op?

    Mechanics talk, seems to be correct but given no auto priest I suspect it's a hidden role.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Game seems totally suited for the wolves to win. The chaos without auto priest and with a wolf seer seems just mental.

    Very negative post, village also have some roles too, why can't the priest be hidden? You'd have to imagine there's some way of transmitting the roles be it via prizes or a hidden role?
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Do I have to explain? You are ordering people around and mocking other players moves. You say you made a lynch vote in jest yet you want people to take this game very seriously.

    It looks to me like you are trying to control the game and anything you are called out on is a joke so I think you are a wolf.

    I responded to this already.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Oh look at the mocking behaviour.

    And this is what I get back. You're the first person who brought up me ordering people around, I've yet to see evidence of that. Also the first person to say I want people to take the game seriously, never said that also.

    Anyways there's feck all to go on here.

    I dislike how they seem to want to twist my posts into something they aren't a lot. But that's for the rest of youse to decide.

    Welcome to my wolf lean pile for now Doris.


    Now moving on to Frank the tank


  • Advertisement
Advertisement