Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Werewolf . . A Star Wars Tale .....

24567…29

Comments

  • #52
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    Good evening all. Big Phil has arrived to crack a few wolf skulls.
    Phil WW wrote: »
    Both palpatine and vader on the good team are searching for Luke. Maybe if Vader doesn't find him he goes rogue and becomes evil. It says that the admirals better be wary if his search goes poorly.
    Phil WW wrote: »
    Both palpatine and vader on the good team are searching for Luke. Maybe if Vader doesn't find him he goes rogue and becomes evil. It says that the admirals better be wary if his search goes poorly.

    These are Phil's contributions including a double post. (don't think there's a rule about no tasks so could this have been a task that the wolves picked up on?)

    Not sure about the wording of the death notice. Does 'Eliminated' mean mod killed? Maybe not because he was actually posting unless something urgent came up and he couldn't continue?
    So do we count this as the munch for today?


  • #53
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    giphy.gif

    Interesting - hasn't posted since the thread opened but made sure she was around at munch time!


  • #54
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    giphy.gif


  • #55
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    These are Phil's contributions including a double post. (don't think there's a rule about no tasks so could this have been a task that the wolves picked up on?)

    Not sure about the wording of the death notice. Does 'Eliminated' mean mod killed? Maybe not because he was actually posting unless something urgent came up and he couldn't continue?
    So do we count this as the munch for today?

    Giving the time of the post I reckon it is the munch post.

    No autopriest in play so hopefully our priest survives long enough to be able to give us some info.


  • #56
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    Interesting - hasn't posted since the thread opened but made sure she was around at munch time!

    I mean if you want to get technical about it Emily 10.10 isn't munch time.

    giphy.gif


  • #57
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    I too reckon it was a munch post. Would be quite a coincidence for them to modkill someone at munch time and not announce it.


  • #58
    Senan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Senan WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    These are Phil's contributions including a double post. (don't think there's a rule about no tasks so could this have been a task that the wolves picked up on?)

    Not sure about the wording of the death notice. Does 'Eliminated' mean mod killed? Maybe not because he was actually posting unless something urgent came up and he couldn't continue?
    So do we count this as the munch for today?

    Could Phil have been Luke? Its certainly what I thought when I read that post, obviously the wolves thought the same thing


  • #59
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Senan WW wrote: »
    Could Phil have been Luke? Its certainly what I thought when I read that post, obviously the wolves thought the same thing

    You talking about the mod post? Would the use of the work eliminated be significant in respect of the theme?


  • #60
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Hey mods, check out this wormhole we go down now discussing the word 'Eliminated'. You're welcome! :)

    I do assume there's a time limit on Vadar/Leia finding Luke so it makes sense that he's telegraphing that he's Luke this early in the game. But if the wolves did have him pinned as Luke why would they kill him? Why wouldn't they just recruit him? Or do we think he has a choice about the light/dark side and they didn't want to take the chance he would pick the Vadar side?


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    Regan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 424 ✭✭Regan WW


    So either no autopriest or some delayed announcement meaning there is some kind of resurrection role in play. Most likely no autopriest

    Very slow start and Phil like everyone else posted feck all!


  • #62
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,752 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    He's probably not Luke


  • #63
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Senan WW wrote: »
    Could Phil have been Luke? Its certainly what I thought when I read that post, obviously the wolves thought the same thing

    But hang on

    Luke is currently unaligned so a potential extra wolf (Leia and Hans searching for him too)

    So..... would wolves kill a potential convert if they spotted him?

    I mean maybe but it's unlikely imo


  • #64
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    Hey mods, check out this wormhole we go down now discussing the word 'Eliminated'. You're welcome! :)

    I do assume there's a time limit on Vadar/Leia finding Luke so it makes sense that he's telegraphing that he's Luke this early in the game. But if the wolves did have him pinned as Luke why would they kill him? Why wouldn't they just recruit him? Or do we think he has a choice about the light/dark side and they didn't want to take the chance he would pick the Vadar side?

    I'd just consider it as the word for being munched in this game until further information comes to light.

    That's what I think as well, they would at least attempt to convert him surely if they did peg him as Luke?

    Seems like they just picked out a player who was trying to make sense of the OP tbh amidst the basic silence of the first two days.


  • #65
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    I'd just consider it as the word for being munched in this game until further information comes to light.

    That's what I think as well, they would at least attempt to convert him surely if they did peg him as Luke?

    Seems like they just picked out a player who was trying to make sense of the OP tbh amidst the basic silence of the first two days.

    Yeah I'm tending to agree with this. He was one of a very few posting yesterday. Wolves probably just took a shot in the dark rolehunting. Sorry Phil! I hope you weren't important!


  • #66
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    We have no way yet of knowing if he was Luke. If he was - at least he cannot become a wolf now and increase their numbers.


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    We have no way yet of knowing if he was Luke. If he was - at least he cannot become a wolf now and increase their numbers.

    This exactly. I agree with the above but find it unlikely he would be Luke tbh


  • #68
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Senan WW wrote: »
    Could Phil have been Luke? Its certainly what I thought when I read that post, obviously the wolves thought the same thing

    Would the wolves kill like though. It sounds like they have a choice which side they’re on so munching them isn’t in the wolves interests


  • #69
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Now can we all agree to lynch Mary for admitting to be a Trekkie in a Star Wars game


  • #70
    Mary WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,752 ✭✭✭Mary WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Now can we all agree to lynch Mary for admitting to be a Trekkie in a Star Wars game

    No. That would be dumb and bad


  • #71
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    Would the wolves kill like though. It sounds like they have a choice which side they’re on so munching them isn’t in the wolves interests

    Its all guess work though, we have no idea if he was Luke and the wolves probably don't know his role either. I agree with Henry that he was probably targeted for trying to work things out.

    If he was Luke and the wolves knew this and killed him its seems like a strange play unless there was more to Luke's choice than just picking a side.


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    So how do we decide who to lynch tonight?


  • #73
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Now can we all agree to lynch Mary for admitting to be a Trekkie in a Star Wars game

    Lol - we've lynched people for less


  • #74
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    So how do we decide who to lynch tonight?

    There is hours until lynch, we see how the day pays out and if the mods have anything else lined up for us today and take it from there.


  • #75
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Mary WW wrote: »
    No. That would be dumb and bad

    Well you would say that.


  • #76
    Senan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Senan WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    Yeah I'm tending to agree with this. He was one of a very few posting yesterday. Wolves probably just took a shot in the dark rolehunting. Sorry Phil! I hope you weren't important!

    Strange wording, why would you be sorry? Unless you were responsible?


  • #77
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Now can we all agree to lynch Mary for admitting to be a Trekkie in a Star Wars game

    I know this is tongue in cheek but.......



    .........


    .......

    Damn right we can :pac:


  • #78
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Star Wars virgin here. I come in peace.

    Can someone explain to me if Darth Vader and Palpatine are actually good guys or are they good guys for the purpose of this game?


  • #79
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Senan WW wrote: »
    Strange wording, why would you be sorry? Unless you were responsible?

    Interesting take Senan. Sorry doesn't necessarily mean that the person is responsible. Sorry for your loss is often said but doesn't mean the person saying sorry was the one responsible.

    Never forgot, that is is never too late to say it

    giphy.gif


  • #80
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Star Wars virgin here. I come in peace.

    Can someone explain to me if Darth Vader and Palpatine are actually good guys or are they good guys for the purpose of this game?

    I'll leave these here and see if you can guess from their appearance whether they are usually goodies

    giphy.gif

    ZNaSi12.gif


  • #81
    Patrick WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Patrick WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Star Wars virgin here. I come in peace.

    Can someone explain to me if Darth Vader and Palpatine are actually good guys or are they good guys for the purpose of this game?

    You would be best served by reading the OP!


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Patrick WW wrote: »
    You would be best served by reading the OP!

    Live long and prosper.


  • #83
    Patrick WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Patrick WW


    They needs of the many outweighs the needs of the few or the one.


  • #84
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Star Wars virgin here. I come in peace.

    Can someone explain to me if Darth Vader and Palpatine are actually good guys or are they good guys for the purpose of this game?

    Well, Vader killed possibly billions when he destroyed Leias home planet. Palpatine heads a facist like organisation that rules the galaxy with an iron fist

    Sweeties really


  • #85
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Patrick's vote is weird.

    Are you a wolf Pattiecake?


  • #86
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Jake WW wrote: »
    Well, Vader killed possibly billions when he destroyed Leias home planet. Palpatine heads a facist like organisation that rules the galaxy with an iron fist

    Sweeties really

    That's the George Lucas propaganda version obviously.

    Duh :pac:


  • #87
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Patrick WW wrote: »
    They needs of the many outweighs the needs of the few or the one.

    Oh Jesus another Trekkie :pac:


    (Actually a Star wars vs Star Trek game could be fun in the future)


  • #88
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    That's the George Lucas propaganda version obviously.

    Duh :pac:

    Of course, the Death Star was really a smart weapon with minimal collateral damage


  • #89
    Senan WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 877 ✭✭✭Senan WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Patrick's vote is weird.

    Are you a wolf Pattiecake?

    In fairness you kinda drew it on yourself


  • #90
    Patrick WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Patrick WW


    Patrick WW wrote: »
    giphy.gif
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    Maybe the rest of the gang will beam in later.....
    Patrick WW wrote: »
    They needs of the many outweighs the needs of the few or the one.
    Henry WW wrote: »
    Patrick's vote is weird.

    Are you a wolf Pattiecake?

    Review my posts.
    Star Trek fan in a Star Wars game?


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Ugh. So we lynch Mary and shoot Patrick, seems like a good day at the office.


  • #92
    Patrick WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,645 ✭✭✭Patrick WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Ugh. So we lynch Mary and shoot Patrick, seems like a good day at the office.

    I'm not defending Mary, but until you come up with better reasoning than lynch the trekies, my vote shall remain were it is. You may be surprised at just how many trekies there are in this game


  • #93
    Winifred WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,083 ✭✭✭Winifred WW


    afternoon folks


  • #94
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Henry WW wrote: »
    Ugh. So we lynch Mary and shoot Patrick, seems like a good day at the office.

    Ah now, lynching one sets an example for everyone but two seems a bit excessive without an interrogation.


    Then again, we are all helping to build a Death Star so who are we to talk about proportionate responses.


  • #95
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Winifred WW wrote: »
    afternoon folks

    Hi Wini, any thoughts for us?


  • #96
    Henry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭Henry WW


    Patrick WW wrote: »
    I'm not defending Mary, but until you come up with better reasoning than lynch the trekies, my vote shall remain were it is. You may be surprised at just how many trekies there are in this game

    Yet you clearly are defending her.

    Funny that :)


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Patrick WW wrote: »
    I'm not defending Mary, but until you come up with better reasoning than lynch the trekies, my vote shall remain were it is. You may be surprised at just how many trekies there are in this game


    star-trek-mess-tribbles-108KUzjTMEp2gw


  • #98
    Riona WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭Riona WW


    I watched one SW movie awhile back, first time I ever watched a SW movie, was one of the worst movies I'd watched in recent years


  • #99
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Patrick WW wrote: »
    I'm not defending Mary, but until you come up with better reasoning than lynch the trekies, my vote shall remain were it is. You may be surprised at just how many trekies there are in this game
    And one more try


    giphy.gif?cid=19f5b51a2e0fda2488eb692375d5c71589a0d6fd37252a28&rid=giphy.gif


  • #100
    Jake WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Riona WW wrote: »
    I watched one SW movie awhile back, first time I ever watched a SW movie, was one of the worst movies I'd watched in recent years

    Which one was it? The quality is somewhat inconsistent between the different sets of movies


  • #101
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Senan WW wrote: »
    Strange wording, why would you be sorry? Unless you were responsible?

    Have you never said that you were sorry someone had died? It's a turn of speech. You're talking like a scummy terrorist robot who doesn't understand human speech here Senan.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement