Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Question about this guy's new quadratic solving method

  • 10-12-2019 11:58pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,620 ✭✭✭


    Just trying to visualise his method graphically and want to double check.

    https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/math/amp30152083/solve-quadratic-equations/

    So at 1:46 when he says the 2 numbers must be the same distance away from their average. Does he mean the "average" is the X value which is half way between the 2 roots?

    Anyone any other solving quadratic method besides the -b , completing the square or guessing by add and multiply?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,141 ✭✭✭Yakuza


    That. Was. Stunning(ly beautiful in its simplicity).
    Mind. Blown.

    Yes, as best as I can make out the average he refers to is the average of the two roots. Chosing it in the form he does makes the product (x+u)(x-u) = x²-u² which he can then solve easily. I am stunned at how simple he's made it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    I really like this method. Thanks for sharing it.

    Another method is completing the squares, which is typically used in deriving the -b formula.

    This method is kind of the same as completing the squares, but I think that it seems much simpler to explain.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,886 ✭✭✭zv2


    This is amazing. I'm looking at it in terms of modular arithmetic:

    ax = 1 (mod m)

    (a + x)/2 = u

    u^2 - v^2 = 1 (mod m)

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Gaoth Laidir


    Where did he get the 4 to begin with? Why 4?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,851 Mod ✭✭✭✭Michael Collins


    Because if you have two numbers that sum to 8 i.e.

    y + z = 8

    their average must be

    (y + z)/2 = 4.

    The average is useful, because the average of two numbers is always exactly midway between the two.

    In this case:

    y............4............z
    <---u---> <---u--->

    So, in this example, y is 4 - u and z is 4 + u.
    Proof that average of two numbers lies midway between the two numbers:
    
    Distance of y from average:
    
    (y + z)/2 - y = (z - y)/2
    
    Distance of z from average:
    
    z - (y + z)/2 = (z - y)/2
    
    i.e. both the same.
    
    


  • Advertisement
Advertisement