Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Rank Irish political parties on their willingness to discriminate against men/similar

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭boombang


    This guy came to my attention recently as a total tool.

    https://twitter.com/MTaylorClare/status/1246149828393996295?s=19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    He/Him....right...we all know what we are dealing with then.

    Take a look at how the UK Labour Party and the Lib Dems have fared with enforced gender quotas....those parties have done enormous damage to themselves.

    Feminism is starting to destroy whatever it touches, hopefully it will destroy the Seanad.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    TBH, I'm kinda glad that this is happening. There is nothing more in the public eye than politics. So, these quotas will also be under the public eye, and we might see people acknowledging the inherent sexism that is being promoted these days.
    Once that starts, then a push to connect that sexism with what we see in quota's or other initiatives boosting women in an already equal society... (considering that they're doing better than males in many aspects already, and have been for years)

    Hopefully, we can put all this BS behind us, and return to encouraging actual equality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    https://www.independent.ie/opinion/comment/its-time-for-women-to-get-half-of-all-seats-in-the-next-cabinet-39302462.html
    June 21 2020 02:30 AM

    Now that the programme for government has been agreed, pending all the usual ifs and buts, the real business begins - deciding who should get all those plum jobs in cabinet. The big question is: how many of them should go to women?

    The maths is straightforward enough. There were 36 women elected to the 33rd Dail at February's election (only one more than in 2016), compared to 124 men.

    Of those fortunate few women, 23 will be sitting on the opposition benches, compared to 49 men, a significantly higher representation than in the Dail as a whole - though still far from equal.
    I can't see the full article as it is pay walled. It doesn't seem like a good idea that half the Cabinet should be picked from such a small pool of people (13 women).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    He/Him....right...we all know what we are dealing with then.

    Take a look at how the UK Labour Party and the Lib Dems have fared with enforced gender quotas....those parties have done enormous damage to themselves.

    Feminism is starting to destroy whatever it touches, hopefully it will destroy the Seanad.

    Are you referring to the Labour All Women Shortlists brought in around 1993? I'm not sure that 'enormous damage' would cover all of Labour's developments since then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    Nominated members of Seanad Éireann
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominated_members_of_Seanad_%C3%89ireann

    9 of the 11 individuals nominated by the Taoiseach are female, including 3 out of the 4 Fianna Fáil nominations and all 4 of the Fine Gael nominations


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    The National Women's Council of Ireland says it is really disappointed that just four of the 15 cabinet ministers appointed are women.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/womens-council-really-disappointing-that-just-four-of-15-ministers-appointed-are-women-1007917.html
    "Four women do not even meet the current quota of 30% where we can begin to address gender balance, let alone the desired 50/50 split that has been achieved in many other countries across the world.

    4/15 is 26.7% higher than the 22.5% for the Dail as a whole, and I think higher than the percentage of females in the 3 governing parties. As it is, one woman was chosen after just having been elected to the Dail. Also 2 out the 3 other politicians who will be at the Cabinet are female.
    "NWCI is calling on the new Government to pass legislation for a gender quota for the local elections in 2023 and to increase support for initiatives that support women to run for political office at all levels.’’


  • Registered Users Posts: 545 ✭✭✭CageWager


    If it were up to me I‘d have mandatory 50/50 gender split in terms of candidates in the election, and then let the chips fall where they may. If women choose not to vote for other women then so be it - they had their chance. At that stage nobody could come back after the fact and whinge about not enough women getting elected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    There's going to be a 40% quota soon, which is pretty close to 50-50. The 30% quota was only for the first 7 years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    The Irish Times view on Government jobs: open dissent in Fianna Fáil
    More significant than geographical imbalances is scarcity of women in new administration

    [..]

    What is more striking – and worrying – is the failure to have a greater gender balance at both senior and junior levels. Just four of the 15 Cabinet ministers are women and only five of the 20 junior ministers. This is not nearly good enough and reflects badly on all three coalition parties.
    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/editorial/the-irish-times-view-on-government-jobs-open-dissent-in-fianna-f%C3%A1il-1.4294885

    I don't have easy access to the figures, but don't get the impression the percentages of cabinet ministers and junior ministers who were women were lower than the overall percentages of women who were elected in these parties. So there doesn't seem to have been any discrimination against women, from what I see. So a bit disappointing that the Irish Times would highlight this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    iptba wrote: »
    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/editorial/the-irish-times-view-on-government-jobs-open-dissent-in-fianna-f%C3%A1il-1.4294885

    I don't have easy access to the figures, but don't get the impression the percentages of cabinet ministers and junior ministers who were women were lower than the overall percentages of women who were elected in these parties. So there doesn't seem to have been any discrimination against women, from what I see. So a bit disappointing that the Irish Times would highlight this.
    Some critical comments now up:
    “What is more striking – and worrying – is the failure to have a greater gender balance at both senior and junior levels.”
    More baloney from the Irish Times which must be one of the most tediously “woke” media organs on the planet. Women make up about 22% of TDs so their representation on cabinet is proportional or better. There were hysterical demands from Women for Election for a 50:50 balance; this from a group which receives substantial state funding for jobs for the girls. Nine out of the Taoiseach’s 11 nominees were women. This has caused Regina Doherty to remark that women have a big advantage today in politics and many worthy male candidates are now passed over routinely in the shareout of jobs.
    "failure to have a greater gender balance"
    It's not for nothing that it is called 'jobs for the boys'.
    Giving jobs to people based on anything but qualification and ability is nothing more then corruption. Benefit in kind type bribery.
    That it is fully accepted here and openly commented on in the editorial of the 'paper of record', without as much as a blush, is a mark of just how undermined our 'democracy' has become.
    "The Minister for Children has no children, the Minister for Education never graduated, the Minister for Health is an Engineer and the Minister for Transport hates the internal combustion engine.'
    And we all wonder why the country is in a state of chassis.
    Regarding the gender balance issue, does the amount of women in Ministerial and junior positions not reflect the amount of women TDs elected to the Dail?
    When more women get elected, they will get more Ministerial posts. Simple as.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Rodin


    Should be no quotas.
    Should be no gender/sex balance

    Best person for the job always.

    If that happens to be all men or all women so be it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/eamon-ryan-missed-chance-to-promote-women-says-catherine-martin-1.4299071
    Eamon Ryan missed chance to promote women, says Catherine Martin
    Green Party deputy leader says leader could have united party with Minister selection

    [..]

    “As a female politician and someone who set up the caucus and I set up our own green group Mná Glasa, I would always seek to promote women in our party, but having said that all Green Party Ministers who are there are good for the job, and I respect the decision.”

    Ms Martin said that wherever there are women who have proven they are ready and able, they should be promoted.

    “We should always seek to promote because young girls cannot aim to be what they cannot see. We should always be seeking to do that, to promote women.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    The shock election of Catherine Connolly as the Dáil’s Leas Ceann Comhairle last night sparked anger in Fine Gael after Government TDs rebelled in the secret ballot.
    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/fine-gael-anger-after-shock-dail-defeat-for-government-39393413.html

    As she sought votes she said: "In 101 years, there has never been a female in the chair, either as Ceann Comhairle or as Leas-Cheann Comhairle."

    Ms Connolly argued that due to the visibility of the job it's important that there was gender equality.
    If you get a job partly because of your gender is that really gender equality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    Given that there are are probably more males with appropriate experience than females, one might argue this is biased:
    Today, EU President Ursula von der Leyen called on the Irish government to present two names, one male and one female, as candidates to replace Phil Hogan as EU Commissioner.
    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40038659.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 278 ✭✭Sn@kebite


    iptba wrote: »
    Given that there are are probably more males with appropriate experience than females, one might argue this is biased:

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40038659.html
    And one might argue if there more white people with appropriate experience than non-white people should one be a non-white man on woman.

    And same for working class should one of the 2 be working class?

    Feminism always focuses on privileged white females. It's just about white women networking with each other acting just like they accuse the men. White feminists never fight to eradicate their own unearned privileges which is why it's a farce of a movement. (Ironically feminism is the patriarchy in terms of race and social class.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    Donald Trump vows to nominate a woman to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s vacant seat
    And, after conducting what he joked was a “very scientific poll” of the Fayetteville crowd as to whether supporters wanted a man or a woman, he declared the choice would be “a very talented, very brilliant woman”.
    https://www.irishexaminer.com/world/arid-40051769.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 812 ✭✭✭Dellboy2007


    Equality of opportunity not of outcome!

    When quotas start being implemented the floodgates will well and truly be opened. There’s no turning back then. Next it’s the ethnic minorities who want a quota in the workplace (arguably already do), then it’s the trans, disabled, etc. There is no end to appeasing the “oppressed”. The issue is, how do you account for all these groups? What weighting do you give them? There’s no end to it. The solution is to give all people the opportunity to obtain employment in such roles.

    Jordan Peterson speaks a lot about this and he has a few videos online discussing how this whole area has failed miserably in the Scandinavian states.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Equality of opportunity not of outcome!

    When quotas start being implemented the floodgates will well and truly be opened. There’s no turning back then. Next it’s the ethnic minorities who want a quota in the workplace (arguably already do), then it’s the trans, disabled, etc. There is no end to appeasing the “oppressed”. The issue is, how do you account for all these groups? What weighting do you give them? There’s no end to it. The solution is to give all people the opportunity to obtain employment in such roles.

    Jordan Peterson speaks a lot about this and he has a few videos online discussing how this whole area has failed miserably in the Scandinavian states.

    Actually, the implementation of quotas will be a great step forwards for equality, because it will show just how stupid the whole idea is. As more quotas come into play, the feminists will scream because women are no longer the focus. Feminists will raise the stupidity and unfairness of quotas all by themselves, and it'll be relatively easy to draw attention to the irony of the situation.

    Also quotas based on gender are obviously sexist. It's only a matter of time before people get tired of pretending that it isn't. As each movement happens, feminists move away from the illusion of equality, and show that women already have a very well established position in society and employment. Feminists are simply like the unions... they did great things when society was unfair, but once society became fair, each new initiative/complaint showed up their need to be seen to be doing something. Anything. To promote women's rights beyond actual equality.

    So... nope. While I was initially against quotas, I'm 100% behind them now.. if only because feminists will do what Male rights groups can't do. They'll get society to notice the unfairness that has developed through the pursuit of women's rights.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,636 ✭✭✭feargale


    Dial Hard wrote: »
    The political parties that are overwhelmingly made up of men?

    I know of no political party that has a bar on women joining.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 170 ✭✭DilD


    iptba wrote: »
    I wonder what the reaction would be to an all-male group?

    Can you imagine lol

    Why do these type of people act like men are out here planning on sabotaging women in the workplace, it doesn't happen. Men don't give a sh!t who works with them so long as everyone is pulling their weight. In fact we prefer a mixed work team. In all honesty men are getting it the worst in recent years. I've seen plenty promotions and new hires going to underqualified women just because... And we have had fantastic women in top roles also so no problem there. The problem rises when we select people for jobs based soley on gender or race to balance out the workplace, is this not in fact sexism/racism, choosing these people based solely on race or gender. A hypocritical bunch indeed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    Biden announces all-female senior press team
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55126167

    Has there been much/any criticism of this?
    Mr Biden has promised to build a diverse administration that reflects the country.

    "I am proud to announce today the first senior White House communications team comprised entirely of women," Mr Biden said in a statement.[/B]It isn't very diverse in terms of gender.
    As I have highlighted before, gender balance tends to be mentioned if there are a lower percentage of females than males, but somehow all or mostly female often doesn't seem to be a problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭iptba


    Another politician who publicly calls herself a feminist:
    Holly Cairns TD
    @HollyCairnsTD
    West Cork TD. Social Democrat. Spokesperson for Agriculture and Disability. Seed producer - Brown Envelope Seeds. Farmer. Scientist. Feminist. Seedling
    https://twitter.com/HollyCairnsTD

    I imagine if a politician called themselves a men's right activist or some similar term, they would be criticised for doing so and criticised for being partisan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,653 ✭✭✭cms88


    iptba wrote: »
    Another politician who publicly calls herself a feminist:

    https://twitter.com/HollyCairnsTD

    I imagine if a politician called themselves a men's right activist or some similar term, they would be criticised for doing so and criticised for being partisan.

    He's a prime example to the world we now live it. As a woman she can say anything she likes, there's been many examples, yet if someone calls her up on it she'll play the sexism card or she's being bullied etc


Advertisement