Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2021 Irish Property Market chat - *mod warnings post 1*

1163164166168169211

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭Hubertj


    Cyrus wrote: »

    What are you going to do with that bit of the sea? Build a beach? Rent it to pirates? Nice big gaff though but I wouldn’t like to live on a busy main road. I presume it’s a protected building so the windows are likely still single glazed (or is double permitted for listed building?) which means noise...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Basically, we and the other low-tax/tax-haven countries in the world will be paying for Biden's infrastructure plan. According to the WSJ:

    "The infrastructure plan would cost roughly $2.3 trillion over eight years and be paid for over 15 years by raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21% and increasing taxes on companies’ foreign earnings. The tax changes would revamp or replace much of the international tax structure congressional Republicans established four years ago in the law signed by then-President Donald Trump."

    Link to WSJ article here: https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-set-to-unveil-2-trillion-infrastructure-plan-11617181208

    corporation tax alone will not fulfill these requirements, we ll be lucky to see anyone raise their taxes, as we re all basically bullsh1tting each other in regards whats actually being paid. at the most, tax will probably only rise by a couple of percent, if even, therefore not covering this level of deficit spending. America is starting to cope on that this over reliance on private sector money, i.e. credit, and under reliance to the public entity, deficit spending, is simply nonsense and dangerous, so its going for it, and we should do the same, as we re all ending up with the same type of problems, particularly in relation to property markets


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,125 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    corporation tax alone will not fulfill these requirements, we ll be lucky to see anyone raise their taxes, as we re all basically bullsh1tting each other in regards whats actually being paid. at the most, tax will probably only rise by a couple of percent, if even, therefore not covering this level of deficit spending. America is starting to cope on that this over reliance on private sector money, i.e. credit, and under reliance to the public entity, deficit spending, is simply nonsense and dangerous, so its going for it, and we should do the same, as we re all ending up with the same type of problems, particularly in relation to property markets

    America has been "deficit spending" for decades. While it can be hard to justify politically, especially in a place as partisan as the US, it does happen.

    Whats happening here is Biden is looking for big investment in the US, and to make it more politically palatable to the Dems & people in general, he can claim its funded from corporation tax increases & taxing of offshore profits. Whether it raises as much as is claimed we wont know till it happens - but all your talk of deficit spending and over reliance on private sector money is nonsense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    corporation tax alone will not fulfill these requirements, we ll be lucky to see anyone raise their taxes, as we re all basically bullsh1tting each other in regards whats actually being paid. at the most, tax will probably only rise by a couple of percent, if even, therefore not covering this level of deficit spending. America is starting to cope on that this over reliance on private sector money, i.e. credit, and under reliance to the public entity, deficit spending, is simply nonsense and dangerous, so its going for it, and we should do the same, as we re all ending up with the same type of problems, particularly in relation to property markets

    Hopefully you're right. However, in the past few weeks, we have had Leo say "In a country full of pessimists and despondency, maybe it’s nice to have someone who thinks the other way.", we have had Paschal get an apology from RTE over the children's shoes reference and we've had Michael McGrath publicly insult our EU neighbours by calling them "jealous" etc.

    Basically, all the people in charge i.e. Tanaiste, Minister for Public Expenditure and Minister for Finance have done a political version of breaking down in public and let the veil slip that not all is right with the country's finances IMO


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭yagan


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    corporation tax alone will not fulfill these requirements, we ll be lucky to see anyone raise their taxes, as we re all basically bullsh1tting each other in regards whats actually being paid. at the most, tax will probably only rise by a couple of percent, if even, therefore not covering this level of deficit spending. America is starting to cope on that this over reliance on private sector money, i.e. credit, and under reliance to the public entity, deficit spending, is simply nonsense and dangerous, so its going for it, and we should do the same, as we re all ending up with the same type of problems, particularly in relation to property markets
    Printing more money has only kept the property debt bubble inflated purely to keep the older property owning voters happy about their retirement assets.

    The policy of one generations rent being another generations pension will end either by yield collapse or reform, or both at the same time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Hopefully you're right. However, in the past few weeks, we have had Leo say "In a country full of pessimists and despondency, maybe it’s nice to have someone who thinks the other way.", we have had Paschal get an apology from RTE over the children's shoes reference and we've had Michael McGrath publicly insult our EU neighbours by calling them "jealous" etc.

    Basically, all the people in charge i.e. Tanaiste, Minister for Public Expenditure and Minister for Finance have done a political version of breaking down in public and let the veil slip that not all is right with the country's finances IMO

    its extremely important to remember, our politicians are all mainly fiscal conservatives, theyre hard wired to think deficits are the work of the devil, and lead to economic crashes, when theres an enormous amount of data and facts to show, they dont. the data and facts in fact show, an over reliance on private sector money, i.e. credit, is more likely to, i.e. 08!
    yagan wrote: »
    Printing more money has only kept the property debt bubble inflated purely to keep the older property owning voters happy about their retirement assets.

    The policy of one generations rent being another generations pension will end either yield collapse or reform.

    yes, printing more private sector money, i.e. credit, will more than likely continue to lead to further asset price inflation, including property prices, we need to use the states ability to create money, i.e. deficit borrowing, and the private sectors ability to do the work, to solve this one, or..........


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    yagan wrote: »
    Printing more money has only kept the property debt bubble inflated purely to keep the older property owning voters happy about their retirement assets.

    The policy of one generations rent being another generations pension will end either yield collapse or reform.


    Printing money = Inflation

    some people believe we are in deflation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭yagan


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    its extremely important to remember, our politicians are all mainly fiscal conservatives, theyre hard wired to think deficits are the work of the devil, and lead to economic crashes, when theres an enormous amount of data and facts to show, they dont. the data and facts in fact show, an over reliance on private sector money, i.e. credit, is more likely to, i.e. 08!



    yes, printing more private sector money, i.e. credit, will more than likely continue to lead to further asset price inflation, including property prices, we need to use the states ability to create money, i.e. deficit borrowing, and the private sectors ability to do the work, to solve this one, or..........
    Without housing policy reform it only inflates a different kind of housing bubble.

    The thing about so many rent farming funds cornering the rental market eventually they'll be a race out, and then we'll hear the cribbing and moaning on Joe Duffy from poor auld landlords complaining about their their retirement funds imploding. The paid up Fianna Failers no doubt have their parachute already lined up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 861 ✭✭✭Zenify


    Anyone bidding on any properties this year in Dublin? Is it still as crazy as last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 614 ✭✭✭random_banter


    Zenify wrote: »
    Anyone bidding on any properties this year in Dublin? Is it still as crazy as last year.

    Yes. And it’s worse. However it feels that there’s a little more supply coming to market now, so there’s the potential for that to ease in the next few months. Or else even more bidders will arrive on the scene as restrictions loosen up. Fingers crossed it gets a little easier for everyone and not harder.

    You could head on over to the Currently Buying/Selling thread where there is more discussion about this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    Looks like the housing minister’s affordable housing bill is in trouble again with senators and TDs of his own party seeking amendments.

    According to the Irish Examiner: “A group of Fianna Fáil politicians has called for amendments to the Affordable Housing Bill brought by its own minister, Darragh O'Brien.”

    The Sinn Fein housing spokesman said “I don't think I've ever seen Government backbenchers asking a minister to amend legislation from the plinth.”

    Will be interesting to see what the end bill will be like. I still don’t understand how the proposed limits are €450k in Dublin but €225k in Tipperary.

    Link to article in Irish Examiner here: https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-40271579.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Shared equity scheme will have 'substantially lower' interest rates than UK equivalent

    Single biggest impact for house prices in a decade
    One would talk about petrol on a fire but this is that substance they were storing in the warehouse in Beirut that blew the city to pieces

    Banks matching it means that 2/3 of FTB would qualify based on the number of annual FTB over the last number years. Now we know that many FTB buy 2nd hand homes so this subsidy will consume close to all new builds that have not been purchased by the state or investment funds.

    This will mean that every new build is heavily subsidised by the state

    The minister has been snake like playing with stats in pushing this as well claiming that it only represented 2% of the budget with the banks now matching it is now 4% and most crucially this 4% is exclusively going to the the portion of the house price that is deemed unaffordable.

    Anyone know why the banks would be matching this. What's in it for them and is it pure coincidence that all their competition has left

    I think this is the point of no return and thus will result in a bubble and crash that looks like will be worse than 08 given our propensity to use gains from good times to increase liabilities for future bad times plus the huge debt we have amassed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,260 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    lots of movemment on cunningham road

    this is beyond ambitious IMO

    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/seaview-8-cunningham-drive-dalkey-co-dublin/4496685


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Cyrus wrote: »
    lots of movemment on cunningham road

    this is beyond ambitious IMO

    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/seaview-8-cunningham-drive-dalkey-co-dublin/4496685

    Wonder would the owners of this or the EA be onto the seller of Sheemore when it went up!

    As a potential WFH option, this is one of the nicer houses I've seen in a while.
    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/farniente-14-kendalstown-rise-delgany-co-wicklow/4496579


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,181 ✭✭✭hometruths


    DataDude wrote: »
    As a potential WFH option, this is one of the nicer houses I've seen in a while.
    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/farniente-14-kendalstown-rise-delgany-co-wicklow/4496579

    That is a good bit nicer than most of the other Kendalstown houses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭DataDude


    schmittel wrote: »
    That is a good bit nicer than most of the other Kendalstown houses.

    A good bit more expensive too :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,260 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    DataDude wrote: »
    Wonder would the owners of this or the EA be onto the seller of Sheemore when it went up!

    As a potential WFH option, this is one of the nicer houses I've seen in a while.
    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/farniente-14-kendalstown-rise-delgany-co-wicklow/4496579

    if that cunningham road house gets more than Sheemore ill eat my hat :P

    thats a lovely house in delgany, looks well situated and well maintained and a great size, the only thing id have against it is that i dont like the compromised ceiling in all of the upstairs rooms but youd imagine at 4,000 sq feet it looks worse than it is.


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,181 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Cyrus wrote: »
    if that cunningham road house gets more than Sheemore ill eat my hat :P

    thats a lovely house in delgany, looks well situated and well maintained and a great size, the only thing id have against it is that i dont like the compromised ceiling in all of the upstairs rooms but youd imagine at 4,000 sq feet it looks worse than it is.

    Yep it looks like they done a pretty comprehensive upgrade of an original Kendalstown house to modernise the style and look to have done it pretty well in my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,181 ✭✭✭hometruths


    A bit different to most of the stuff linked in here, but any thoughts on value of this - Ballyin Garden House asking 1.1m - also covered in today's IT: Country garden escape with private fishing in Waterford for €1.1m

    Spectacular gardens, house maybe not to everyones taste, but beautiful if you're into that sort of thing (I am). Having said that, 1.1m strikes me as a bit strong for what is essentially a collection of outbuildings in West Waterford?

    As the owner says in the paper:
    “You can spend all you want on a house, but you simply cannot build a 300-year-old garden,” says the owner, who purchased the property in 2018 for €1.01 million.

    Fair point but will somebody else pay north of 1m for the garden?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭Hubertj


    schmittel wrote: »
    A bit different to most of the stuff linked in here, but any thoughts on value of this - Ballyin Garden House asking 1.1m - also covered in today's IT: Country garden escape with private fishing in Waterford for €1.1m

    Spectacular gardens, house maybe not to everyones taste, but beautiful if you're into that sort of thing (I am). Having said that, 1.1m strikes me as a bit strong for what is essentially a collection of outbuildings in West Waterford?

    As the owner says in the paper:



    Fair point but will somebody else pay north of 1m for the garden?

    Lovely setting and all that but the house looks like it needs a lot of modernising. Agree on the garden as well. Something that size will need almost full time care...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,260 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    schmittel wrote: »
    A bit different to most of the stuff linked in here, but any thoughts on value of this - Ballyin Garden House asking 1.1m - also covered in today's IT: Country garden escape with private fishing in Waterford for €1.1m

    Spectacular gardens, house maybe not to everyones taste, but beautiful if you're into that sort of thing (I am). Having said that, 1.1m strikes me as a bit strong for what is essentially a collection of outbuildings in West Waterford?

    As the owner says in the paper:



    Fair point but will somebody else pay north of 1m for the garden?

    i think in that scenario they are after someone to whom 1m isnt a whole lot of money and who falls in love with the place, probably spending no more than a month a year at it.

    cant see a big market outside that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭DataDude


    schmittel wrote: »
    A bit different to most of the stuff linked in here, but any thoughts on value of this - Ballyin Garden House asking 1.1m - also covered in today's IT: Country garden escape with private fishing in Waterford for €1.1m

    Spectacular gardens, house maybe not to everyones taste, but beautiful if you're into that sort of thing (I am). Having said that, 1.1m strikes me as a bit strong for what is essentially a collection of outbuildings in West Waterford?

    As the owner says in the paper:



    Fair point but will somebody else pay north of 1m for the garden?

    Not a clue on valuation. It's a lovely vision walking the gardens and doing some fishing on the stream...but brain saying it's highly impractical. I see a huge heating bill and a serious time commitment (or else a full time gardener).

    Maybe if I was retired and lots of time on my hands!


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,181 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Cyrus wrote: »
    i think in that scenario they are after someone to whom 1m isnt a whole lot of money and who falls in love with the place, probably spending no more than a month a year at it.

    cant see a big market outside that.

    yep, i think that makes sense.


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,181 ✭✭✭hometruths


    DataDude wrote: »
    Not a clue on valuation. It's a lovely vision walking the gardens and doing some fishing on the stream...but brain saying it's highly impractical. I see a huge heating bill and a serious time commitment (or else a full time gardener).

    Maybe if I was retired and lots of time on my hands!

    Stream?!!! :eek::eek::eek:

    That's the Blackwater, one of the finest salmon fishing rivers in Ireland! :D:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 138 ✭✭Thomasirl123


    https://m.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/property-mortgages/surge-in-home-purchases-despite-lockdown-restrictions-40342950.html

    Quote:There were more than 13,100 homes bought in the first three months of this year compared with the same quarter last year.

    Wow I thought, an extra 13k house bought! Then I read the next paragraph:

    This is an extra 1,400 home purchases, and is despite buyers not being able to physically view properties they are considering buying.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    https://m.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/property-mortgages/surge-in-home-purchases-despite-lockdown-restrictions-40342950.html

    Quote:There were more than 13,100 homes bought in the first three months of this year compared with the same quarter last year.

    Wow I thought, an extra 13k house bought! Then I read the next paragraph:

    This is an extra 1,400 home purchases, and is despite buyers not being able to physically view properties they are considering buying.

    Looks like the local county councils and state have been busy :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    https://m.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/property-mortgages/surge-in-home-purchases-despite-lockdown-restrictions-40342950.html

    Quote:There were more than 13,100 homes bought in the first three months of this year compared with the same quarter last year.

    Wow I thought, an extra 13k house bought! Then I read the next paragraph:

    This is an extra 1,400 home purchases, and is despite buyers not being able to physically view properties they are considering buying.

    "Experts are predicting that prices will continue to rise on the back of constrained supply."


  • Registered Users Posts: 138 ✭✭Thomasirl123


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    "Experts are predicting that prices will continue to rise on the back of constrained supply."

    Makes me think there's a price drop coming!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭Hubertj


    schmittel wrote: »
    Stream?!!! :eek::eek::eek:

    That's the Blackwater, one of the finest salmon fishing rivers in Ireland! :D:D

    Sounds like a Waterford native getting all defensive at their river being called a stream!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Hubertj wrote: »
    Sounds like a Waterford native getting all defensive at their river being called a stream!


    In fairness, that could never be described as a stream.


  • Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭Cal4567


    https://www.thejournal.ie/readme/cuckoo-funds-housing-market-5416160-Apr2021/

    Social Democrats, who since last year's election, have more TDs now and can start to use their time and resources on issues of national importance such as Housing.

    Eoin O'Broin has been exemplary in highlighting these points. If SF is still a problem for some, having the Social Democrats reining in, can't be at all bad.

    The FF intervention by backbench TDs could almost be a Waterford Whispers piece.


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,181 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Hubertj wrote: »
    Sounds like a Waterford native getting all defensive at their river being called a stream!

    Not a local at all. I'd say a native would have been nowhere near as polite as me!

    I was just amused, as its setting by the Blackwater (and fishing rights) is one of its strongest selling points to the target market. Entertaining to see it so casually dismissed as a stream! (albeit by somebody who is not the target market)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭Villa05


    This is an extra 1,400 home purchases, and is despite buyers not being able to physically view properties they are considering buying.

    One would have thought that Davy stockbrokers would be keeping their heads down in light of the shocking mismanagement at their institution. I suppose no entity is too corrupt to be pumping the property market. Once their doing that, all is grand

    I'm surprised they actually found someone with an ounce of credibility to be widely referenced in the media

    Ireland is surely a white collar crime paradise


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,181 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Cal4567 wrote: »
    https://www.thejournal.ie/readme/cuckoo-funds-housing-market-5416160-Apr2021/

    Social Democrats, who since last year's election, have more TDs now and can start to use their time and resources on issues of national importance such as Housing.

    Eoin O'Broin has been exemplary in highlighting these points. If SF is still a problem for some, having the Social Democrats reining in, can't be at all bad.

    The FF intervention by backbench TDs could almost be a Waterford Whispers piece.

    There is an opportunity for SDs to take the housing bull by the horns and propose some radical alternatives, I think it would pay off well for them at next election if they ran enough candidates.

    There will a lot of disaffected FG/FF voters who currently do not have a lot of palatable options of who to vote for if SDs only run a handful of candidates.

    Interestingly, in the article he says:
    According to the Construction Industry Federation, in 2019, 95% of new apartments were sold to institutions, leaving just 5% for everyone else.

    The stats on who is buying what seem to be all over the place as far as I can see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    https://m.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/property-mortgages/surge-in-home-purchases-despite-lockdown-restrictions-40342950.html

    Quote:There were more than 13,100 homes bought in the first three months of this year compared with the same quarter last year.

    Wow I thought, an extra 13k house bought! Then I read the next paragraph:

    This is an extra 1,400 home purchases, and is despite buyers not being able to physically view properties they are considering buying.

    The properties "sold" in Jan, Feb and March are likely to have been negotiated in November December (when we were open for business and a large number of approved buyers were floating about) and January. Traditionally, Nov and Dec are quiet times for viewing and selling properties and so the 2020 Jan and Feb numbers Davy are comparing to will reflect the "old normal". The volumes in April May and June will be interesting to see relative to 2020.

    Re councils and funds purchasing, the HPM02 data on the CSO site shows approx 2k purchases by "non household buyers" in Jan and Feb


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    schmittel wrote: »
    There is an opportunity for SDs to take the housing bull by the horns and propose some radical alternatives, I think it would pay off well for them at next election if they ran enough candidates.

    There will a lot of disaffected FG/FF voters who currently do not have a lot of palatable options of who to vote for if SDs only run a handful of candidates.

    Interestingly, in the article he says:



    The stats on who is buying what seem to be all over the place as far as I can see.


    At least ordinary buyers still have 5% of the total available stock at any time to fight over. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    schmittel wrote: »
    There is an opportunity for SDs to take the housing bull by the horns and propose some radical alternatives, I think it would pay off well for them at next election if they ran enough candidates.

    There will a lot of disaffected FG/FF voters who currently do not have a lot of palatable options of who to vote for if SDs only run a handful of candidates.

    Interestingly, in the article he says:



    The stats on who is buying what seem to be all over the place as far as I can see.

    Re the stats, everyone is picking and choosing stats - who knows what the CIF are collecting for example? Does it include apartments tendered and built by REITs or only apartments started by independent developers/builders who then got approached the REITs and funds for example to sell in bulk.

    Even when people have stats on properties for sale on daft as an example - is this number of ads or do daft know how many properties are in each ad for new developments?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Seems like half of Dalkey has gone up for sale over the last 72 hours. This is the pick of the bunch.

    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/seaspray-harbour-road-dalkey-co-dublin-a96-dk57/4496755


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    https://m.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/property-mortgages/surge-in-home-purchases-despite-lockdown-restrictions-40342950.html

    Quote:There were more than 13,100 homes bought in the first three months of this year compared with the same quarter last year.

    Wow I thought, an extra 13k house bought! Then I read the next paragraph:

    This is an extra 1,400 home purchases, and is despite buyers not being able to physically view properties they are considering buying.

    Also, in that article Daft are quoted as having 12000 properties for sale on March 1. The "live" national number today is 15491 which whilst still low, is 30% higher. Caveat being I've no clue whether the 2 numbers are exactly comparable with "sold" or "sale agreed" or stale ads needing to be excluded for example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    DataDude wrote: »
    Seems like half of Dalkey has gone up for sale over the last 72 hours. This is the pick of the bunch.

    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/seaspray-harbour-road-dalkey-co-dublin-a96-dk57/4496755

    Swish pad. You'd love to know who's selling it and why!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭flexcon


    (First time buyer)

    Saw this place and thought - Not bad. Still high priced based on the area, but I'd consider it

    Asking €305,000.
    Sale agreed at €370,000.

    WTF. I'm tired of this game. Covid has messed up any chance of the heat being taken off this bull run on house prices. Stuffed
    Even as a FTB I get 30K on a new build. There is no new builds that are even reasonable. Oh well.

    https://www.daft.ie/for-sale/semi-detached-house-10-rocklands-carrigtwohill-co-cork/2577743


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Looks like the local county councils and state have been busy :)

    Except the article doesn't even hint at that.

    You need to stop trying to use articles that do not support your beliefs as support for them. Permanently.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 44 Loverlyhorse


    DataDude wrote: »
    Seems like half of Dalkey has gone up for sale over the last 72 hours. This is the pick of the bunch.

    myhome.ie/residential/brochure/seaspray-harbour-road-dalkey-co-dublin-a96-dk57/4496755

    With rising sea levels, it'll prob be under water in the next decade. Good luck getting home insurance on that. Could be why they're selling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    flexcon wrote: »
    (First time buyer)

    Saw this place and thought - Not bad. Still high priced based on the area, but I'd consider it

    Asking €305,000.
    Sale agreed at €370,000.

    WTF. I'm tired of this game. Covid has messed up any chance of the heat being taken off this bull run on house prices. Stuffed
    Even as a FTB I get 30K on a new build. There is no new builds that are even reasonable. Oh well.

    https://www.daft.ie/for-sale/semi-detached-house-10-rocklands-carrigtwohill-co-cork/2577743

    Considering number 39 sold for 315k and the finishing and furnishings don't look terrible compared to number 10, 370k is a very strong price and is a 20% jump although they look to have built a room off the kitchen to the back?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,260 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    DataDude wrote: »
    Seems like half of Dalkey has gone up for sale over the last 72 hours. This is the pick of the bunch.

    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/seaspray-harbour-road-dalkey-co-dublin-a96-dk57/4496755

    a pretty ordinary house in an extra ordinary location!

    there is a little gated estate of a half dozen houses down on harbour road not far from the loreto.

    Imagine waking up to that view every day!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Browney7 wrote: »
    Also, in that article Daft are quoted as having 12000 properties for sale on March 1. The "live" national number today is 15491 which whilst still low, is 30% higher. Caveat being I've no clue whether the 2 numbers are exactly comparable with "sold" or "sale agreed" or stale ads needing to be excluded for example.

    The Daft numbers are not even a reliable figure, as a new development will often have a handful of listings - one per type - where each listing can be for anything from zero (all that type are sold and they forgot the listing - this is more common than it should be) to triple figures of units.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,807 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    flexcon wrote: »

    WTF. I'm tired of this game. Covid has messed up any chance of the heat being taken off this bull run on house prices. Stuffed
    Even as a FTB I get 30K on a new build. There is no new builds that are even reasonable. Oh well.[/url]


    Covid didn't do this; the state's handling of Covid did this. Politicians and the civil servants suits who run the state will blame Covid, but the responsibility for this disruption to the market rests squarely at their feet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    L1011 wrote: »
    The Daft numbers are not even a reliable figure, as a new development will often have a handful of listings - one per type - where each listing can be for anything from zero (all that type are sold and they forgot the listing - this is more common than it should be) to triple figures of units.
    Agreed, I alluded to as much a few posts back


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    With rising sea levels, it'll prob be under water in the next decade. Good luck getting home insurance on that. Could be why they're selling.


    The sea levels aren't going to rise that much! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭flexcon


    RichardAnd wrote: »
    Covid didn't do this; the state's handling of Covid did this. Politicians and the civil servants suits who run the state will blame Covid, but the responsibility for this disruption to the market rests squarely at their feet.


    Ah no I agree there, I meant help take the heat off the bull run on pricing. Because right now, there is lack of supply, but actual demand. Not some hype.

    I've never been wealthier (in a sense) many first time buyers unaffected by Covid and have just saved.

    It's the perfect storm where second hand houses are now in fashion again for first time buyers on combined incomes of 100K, where as 2 years ago the HTB scheme would have made that a bad deal.

    Also I am speaking from an amateur sense, I have no idea here if I am spouting nonsense.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement