Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Green Party disintegration / split

1246

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    It seems to me that newer members of the party are driven more by social justice issues rather than Green issues.

    The Green Party is and always was about Green/environment issues and everything else is second (or not even bothered with).

    Newer members are better off joining Social Democrats, Labour or even FG.

    Ah c'mere.

    Don't let the fact that they decided to get on the right side of history with those referenda fool you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭KevRossi


    awec wrote: »
    Greens wouldn't endorse her as they don't believe she has a chance of winning.

    Chu seems pretty eager to get into the senate. I think she has tried to be nominated before. I believe she has also approached some independents looking for an endorsement since she's technically not a green candidate.

    The move smacks of absolute careerism to be honest and is just another example of the GP being full of people who don't really suit being in a party. What is the point in being in the Greens if you're happy to ditch it and go solo to run for a cosier position?

    Like if she managed to get elected as an independent senator is she going to vote against any government bills, and therefore against her own party?

    Eamon Ryan needs to start wielding the stick to those in his party who are not toeing the line.

    Hazel tried to run alongside Eamon Ryan in Dublin Bay South last year. He vetoed that as he feared it would split the vote and run the risk of none of them getting elected. She was very unhappy about that and has decided to forage her own path where and when she sees fit.

    She has little or no hope of getting elected in DBS as an Independent. There are a fair few heavyweights in there at the moment and there aren't too many places she can go apart from that. The constituency next door has her husband to be in it, other seats south of the river have established GP TD's, many who are friendly with her and north of the river is Neasa Hourigan. Anywhere else is well outside her hunting ground.

    So it looks like the Senate for a while. I doubt she'll get elected this time out, but it's all about building a profile over a few years and she'll no doubt have a proper stab at the Seanad next time out. Whether she has burned her bridges with the party is another question.

    She hasn't been in the GP very many years, she had an accelerated path to the top and you only go that far that quick by stepping on other peoples toes. She's a bit too fond of shooting off on Twitter before informing herself of the facts; it gets a lot of Likes and Retweets, but it can have consequences as well.

    There's something about her that isn't 100% GP, but it will be interesting to see if she continues to go places or to see if her star crashes and burns. She is keeping her name in the papers and that's one important step in politics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,616 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Ah c'mere.

    Don't let the fact that they decided to get on the right side of history with those referenda fool you.

    FG and the Greens share similar economic policies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 646 ✭✭✭Yakov P. Golyadkin


    KevRossi wrote: »
    Hazel tried to run alongside Eamon Ryan in Dublin Bay South last year. He vetoed that as he feared it would split the vote and run the risk of none of them getting elected. She was very unhappy about that and has decided to forage her own path where and when she sees fit.

    She has little or no hope of getting elected in DBS as an Independent. There are a fair few heavyweights in there at the moment and there aren't too many places she can go apart from that. The constituency next door has her husband to be in it, other seats south of the river have established GP TD's, many who are friendly with her and north of the river is Neasa Hourigan. Anywhere else is well outside her hunting ground.

    Dun Laoghaire? Not too far from her current base, Ossian Smyth is the current Green TD, he was previously a councillor but I'm not sure he's well known enough to be considered established. As far as I recall he voted for ER in the leadership vote so she may not be too concerned with challenging him. Then there's the electorate; I'm sure she'd do well with a significant cohort of voters - She would presumably pick up some current Green voters and likely steal some of RBBs vote too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,362 ✭✭✭landofthetree




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭KevRossi


    Dun Laoghaire? Not too far from her current base, Ossian Smyth is the current Green TD, he was previously a councillor but I'm not sure he's well known enough to be considered established. As far as I recall he voted for ER in the leadership vote so she may not be too concerned with challenging him. Then there's the electorate; I'm sure she'd do well with a significant cohort of voters - She would presumably pick up some current Green voters and likely steal some of RBBs vote too.

    There's no constituency in Dublin that will hold 2 GP seats, at least not in the next election. The GP will not let 2 candidates run anywhere for that reason. At best they might run a 2nd to hoover up votes in one corner of a constituency to increase transfers.

    Also all constituencies in Dublin have either a TD or a candidate (usually a councillor) who has been there for a long time slowly building up a base after the disaster of the locals in 2009. They won't be too keen to let her in as she's a relative newcomer once all the hard graft has been done.

    She would have to go elsewhere and put a few years in to get elected, not sure if she wants to do that. No time like the present as the Locals are in 2024, so she has 3 years to canvass and get a base built. Or she sits it out and waits for Eamon Ryan to go; he'll be 58 this year.

    Or there's another option that may happen; I could possibly see her partner/husband stepping aside to let her run in the next GE if she doesn't get a shot herself in a safe seat. He spent over a decade building up a local profile as a councillor and then as a TD. Not sure if he'll do it or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,616 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    KevRossi wrote: »
    There's no constituency in Dublin that will hold 2 GP seats, at least not in the next election. The GP will not let 2 candidates run anywhere for that reason. At best they might run a 2nd to hoover up votes in one corner of a constituency to increase transfers.

    Also all constituencies in Dublin have either a TD or a candidate (usually a councillor) who has been there for a long time slowly building up a base after the disaster of the locals in 2009. They won't be too keen to let her in as she's a relative newcomer once all the hard graft has been done.

    She would have to go elsewhere and put a few years in to get elected, not sure if she wants to do that. No time like the present as the Locals are in 2024, so she has 3 years to canvass and get a base built. Or she sits it out and waits for Eamon Ryan to go; he'll be 58 this year.

    Or there's another option that may happen; I could possibly see her partner/husband stepping aside to let her run in the next GE if she doesn't get a shot herself in a safe seat. He spent over a decade building up a local profile as a councillor and then as a TD. Not sure if he'll do it or not.



    Hazel Chu is probably more suited to the Seanad. A Mary Robinson/Ivana Bacik type figure - struggles to get elected to the Dail but suits the Seanad grand. (No one cares about the Seanad).

    The Greens must be furious with her and confirms a sell out reputation the party has gained since they entered government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    This comedy just gets funnier

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/hazel-chu-didnt-seek-permission-for-st-stephens-green-event-40236983.html

    Chances of anything coming from this are nil, of course, but it just makes everyone involved look less competent. 9 councillors have come out backing her which would suggest those nine could be willing to leave in a split.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭Augme


    awec wrote: »
    It must be nearly time for Ryan to start actually wielding the stick?


    He can't. Sure he only won the leadership contest by 50 votes. The reality is a large portion of his party don't have a huge amount of faith in him, despite what he has achieved.

    If he wields the stick he collapses the government and his Ministerial position.

    Hard not to see how his days are numbered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭Augme


    KevRossi wrote: »
    Hazel tried to run alongside Eamon Ryan in Dublin Bay South last year. He vetoed that as he feared it would split the vote and run the risk of none of them getting elected. She was very unhappy about that and has decided to forage her own path where and when she sees fit.

    She has little or no hope of getting elected in DBS as an Independent. There are a fair few heavyweights in there at the moment and there aren't too many places she can go apart from that. The constituency next door has her husband to be in it, other seats south of the river have established GP TD's, many who are friendly with her and north of the river is Neasa Hourigan. Anywhere else is well outside her hunting ground.

    So it looks like the Senate for a while. I doubt she'll get elected this time out, but it's all about building a profile over a few years and she'll no doubt have a proper stab at the Seanad next time out. Whether she has burned her bridges with the party is another question.

    She hasn't been in the GP very many years, she had an accelerated path to the top and you only go that far that quick by stepping on other peoples toes. She's a bit too fond of shooting off on Twitter before informing herself of the facts; it gets a lot of Likes and Retweets, but it can have consequences as well.

    There's something about her that isn't 100% GP, but it will be interesting to see if she continues to go places or to see if her star crashes and burns. She is keeping her name in the papers and that's one important step in politics.


    If she ran as a SD candidate in DBS she would have a very strong foundation and I could see her winning a seat at some stage. Their current candidate is a nobody at the moment.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,873 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Augme wrote: »
    He can't. Sure he only won the leadership contest by 50 votes. The reality is a large portion of his party don't have a huge amount of faith in him, despite what he has achieved.

    If he wields the stick he collapses the government and his Ministerial position.

    Hard not to see how his days are numbered.

    As a Green Minister for transport, why is he not out shouting about Metrolink, and how he will have a RO by the week after next, tenders out by next month, and TBMs in the ground by this time next year (I exaggerate) but radio silence on the biggest Green transport project in the states history - come on, what is his game?

    He spends his time talking up failed railway lines, dissing the M20, and quoting nonsense figures. Is not that the story he had about the Sandyford Green line?

    He is not as Green as he is cabbage looking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,081 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Another good article here today: https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/dontmention-electriccars-and-read-karl-marx-ex-green-party-membersplan-new-party-40236979.html

    Some very amusing highlights:
    ARG believes it should “be slightly obnoxious/sassy at most times and de-emphasise politeness”. The document claims the Social Democrats will be “put out” by the launch of ARG and that the new party should be “a little bit edgier”. Plenary minutes from a meeting on December 6 show members being told “everyone go read Marx”.

    A draft strategic plan says the party will take an “intersectional, anti-imperialist and anti-colonialist approach to all policy matters

    These people are completely stuck in their Twitter bubble. Everything about them seems to be designed to win 'woke' college socialist party votes. Who might be very loud and prominent on the internet, but don't exist in the real world as voters in any significant number. The 'normal' Green party will much better off if they lose their crazier members to this splinter party.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    As a Green Minister for transport, why is he not out shouting about Metrolink, and how he will have a RO by the week after next, tenders out by next month, and TBMs in the ground by this time next year (I exaggerate) but radio silence on the biggest Green transport project in the states history - come on, what is his game?

    He spends his time talking up failed railway lines, dissing the M20, and quoting nonsense figures. Is not that the story he had about the Sandyford Green line?

    He is not as Green as he is cabbage looking.

    When it came to Metrolink, he was a useful idiot for wealthy south Dublin voters to stop the road they drive their SUVs down to Mortons etc getting closed off. All to push an implausible alternate that could not happen as the core would not have the capacity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,371 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    As long as the far left remains a splintered mess, the better for the Country.

    Nylon sweaters, bed wetters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 646 ✭✭✭Yakov P. Golyadkin


    KevRossi wrote: »
    There's no constituency in Dublin that will hold 2 GP seats, at least not in the next election. The GP will not let 2 candidates run anywhere for that reason. At best they might run a 2nd to hoover up votes in one corner of a constituency to increase transfers.

    Also all constituencies in Dublin have either a TD or a candidate (usually a councillor) who has been there for a long time slowly building up a base after the disaster of the locals in 2009. They won't be too keen to let her in as she's a relative newcomer once all the hard graft has been done.

    She would have to go elsewhere and put a few years in to get elected, not sure if she wants to do that. No time like the present as the Locals are in 2024, so she has 3 years to canvass and get a base built. Or she sits it out and waits for Eamon Ryan to go; he'll be 58 this year.

    Or there's another option that may happen; I could possibly see her partner/husband stepping aside to let her run in the next GE if she doesn't get a shot herself in a safe seat. He spent over a decade building up a local profile as a councillor and then as a TD. Not sure if he'll do it or not.

    All true, however, I was basing my thoughts on her running as an independent rather than for the GP.


  • Administrators Posts: 54,109 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    All true, however, I was basing my thoughts on her running as an independent rather than for the GP.

    I'd say she has no chance of ever being elected a TD as an independent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    awec wrote: »
    I'd say she has no chance of ever being elected a TD as an independent.

    She would need the banner of a centre-left party to have any chance, and there's only two other options after the Greens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    These are the 12 Green Party TDs:
    1. Neasa Hourigan - Dublin Central
    2. Patrick Costello - Dublin South-Central
    3. Joe O'Brien - Dublin Fingal
    4. Marc Ó Cathasaigh - Waterford
    5. Brian Leddin - Limerick City
    6. Steven Matthews - Wicklow
    7. Francis Noel Duffy - Dublin South-West
    8. Malcolm Noonan - Carlow–Kilkenny
    9. Roderic O'Gorman - Dublin West
    10. Catherine Martin - Dublin Rathdown
    11. Ossian Smyth - Dún Laoghaire
    12. Eamon Ryan - Dublin Bay South

    How many, if any of them could leave to join the new Fluffy Headed Green party (or whatever they are called)?

    N.B. The government coalition currently has a 4 seat majority


    I could see Hourigan and Costello jumping ship. O'Brien, Martin & Duffy would be potential candidates if they weren't ministers / related to ministers.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,873 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    L1011 wrote: »
    She would need the banner of a centre-left party to have any chance, and there's only two other options after the Greens.

    Well, she topped the poll in the Pembroke ward by quite some margin. She runs to get the woman vote, and the minority vote although she was born in Ireland, and if that was not enough, she is a barrister as well.

    I hope she gets elected to the Senate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Well, she topped the poll in the Pembroke ward by quite some margin. She runs to get the woman vote, and the minority vote although she was born in Ireland, and if that was not enough, she is a barrister as well.

    I hope she gets elected to the Senate.

    A significant % of that vote was a Green vote (at that time anyway).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,081 ✭✭✭Blut2


    I could see Hourigan and Costello jumping ship. O'Brien, Martin & Duffy would be potential candidates if they weren't ministers / related to ministers.

    Hourigan and Costello will be the only two I'd say. Martin realistically should as well, but shes probably too close to power/leadership to give that up.

    Even if more did jump though and the government went down to 78/79 TDs it'd manage - the votes of the two Healy-Raes and Michael Lowry are all reliably/easily bought for an FG&FF gov.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,687 ✭✭✭tHE vAGGABOND


    Thinking...

    I would think Neasa Hourigan has a huge fight to regain her seat next election. I can see Mary Lou bringing a mate with her next time. Pascal will keep his seat. So Green and SD fight out, and Gary Gannon is doing a good job. I bet on him to mop uploads of transfers.

    So Greens have to be wondering about another wipeout come next election. Not many of the seats above are terribly safe - let alone second seats..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,081 ✭✭✭Blut2


    ^ their Dublin South-West, Dublin South-Central, Dublin West, Limerick, Carlow and Waterford TDs will all likely lose their seats if theres another SF surge in the next election, and SF run enough candidates. Unless the Greens go massively upwards in support anyway, but that seems unlikely.

    Dun Laoghaire, Dublin Bay South, Dublin Rathdown and then to a lesser extent Dublin Fingal and Wicklow will all be pretty safe though I'd say. Dublin Central could go either way.

    So probably not a total wipeout, but likely back down to 5-6 seats.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,371 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yeah its clear enough Neasa Hourigan does what she wants, when she wants, not too bothered with Party policy, programmes for Government etc. How could a constituent trust her in that situation.

    If she wants to act like an independent or an ARG wannabe, then thats how she should identify.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,383 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Blut2 wrote: »
    ^ their Dublin South-West, Dublin South-Central, Dublin West, Limerick, Carlow and Waterford TDs will all likely lose their seats if theres another SF surge in the next election, and SF run enough candidates. Unless the Greens go massively upwards in support anyway, but that seems unlikely.

    Dun Laoghaire, Dublin Bay South, Dublin Rathdown and then to a lesser extent Dublin Fingal and Wicklow will all be pretty safe though I'd say. Dublin Central could go either way.

    So probably not a total wipeout, but likely back down to 5-6 seats.

    Dublin West is unlikely to change for quite a while. The fortunes of the four parties with seats will go up and down, but that will only change the order in which they are elected. Donnelly doesn't have enough support for a second seat, running someone with him could risk splitting the vote and letting Coppinger back in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,106 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Dublin West is unlikely to change for quite a while. The fortunes of the four parties with seats will go up and down, but that will only change the order in which they are elected. Donnelly doesn't have enough support for a second seat, running someone with him could risk splitting the vote and letting Coppinger back in.

    Given Donnelly's track record he will probably be with a different party by then anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    breezy1985 wrote: »
    Given Donnelly's track record he will probably be with a different party by then anyway

    different Donnelly


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,873 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Dublin West is unlikely to change for quite a while.

    Roderick O'Gorman has been going there for a long time and has built up a reasonable following, steadily increasing his vote. Currently a full Minister, he is building a bigger profile. I would think he will likely stay, unless there is a complete meltdown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,106 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    different Donnelly

    A ya I forgot the chameleon is Wicklow not Dublin


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,081 ✭✭✭Blut2


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Dublin West is unlikely to change for quite a while. The fortunes of the four parties with seats will go up and down, but that will only change the order in which they are elected. Donnelly doesn't have enough support for a second seat, running someone with him could risk splitting the vote and letting Coppinger back in.

    Paul Donnelly got 28.6% of first preferences in the last election. He was at almost 150% of the quota on the first count alone... With any sort of increase in support for SF in the next election, and with a running mate bringing in some of their own support base, SF will be very likely to get a second seat in Dublin West at the Green's expense.

    But even if SF don't run a second candidate (which is very unlikely) for some reason, even just the Green vote going down by 10% would see Ruth Coppinger taking that 4th seat.

    That Dublin West Green seat isn't safe at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    Paul Donnelly will hold his seat. Coppinger is a losing docket. The Greens are on self destruct and hopefully will be wiped out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,106 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Edgware wrote: »
    Paul Donnelly will hold his seat. Coppinger is a losing docket. The Greens are on self destruct and hopefully will be wiped out.

    A green party is needed. I haven't ever voted for them but the pressure they put on bigger parties is good. I'm a big fan of recycling, energy saving lightbulbs, better housing insulation and energy etc. which are all things I see as win win. It's the Dublin or closer to home Raheen/Dooradoyle attitude of I'm all right Jack let's stop building much needed roads and bypasses crap that goes too far


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,616 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    If there is a Sinn Fein wave next time, they'll want to win 2 seats in Dublin West. 2 SF, 1 FG, 1 FF.

    Greens will be squeezed out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Greens and SocDems will be losing seats all over if SF manage to handle transfers properly, as will some of the hard left and left/centrist/not obviously FFG bloodline independents. RBB is safe, nobody else is guaranteed.

    Your biggest risk as a TD is your running mate, and there could be an occasional case of a running mate de-seating the sitting TD (ala Magidan to Shatter 2016) or horrendously splitting the vote and not getting in (this is not common, I'm not sure of a situation where you could be sure someone would have got in without the split - maybe some cases where #1 got in and #2/#3 split and kept each other out).

    When you have no seat and run a sweeper to try ensure the lead gets in, the sweeper can win as happened to Labour in Waterford in 2011 - Conway as the rural Waterford sweeper got in because there is still to this day a Labour base in rural Waterford (Dungarvan and surrounds) and Ryan as the city candidate who 'should' have won, didn't.

    However, as SF have a seat in most constituencies this is also unlikely to happen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,213 ✭✭✭bobbysands81


    If there is a Sinn Fein wave next time, they'll want to win 2 seats in Dublin West. 2 SF, 1 FG, 1 FF.

    Greens will be squeezed out.

    There doesn’t need to be a Sinn Féin wave, they just need to hold their vote in this constituency to get two seats... failing to get their vote out is the only reason they won’t get two seats.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Leonard Hofstadter


    L1011 wrote: »
    Greens and SocDems will be losing seats all over if SF manage to handle transfers properly, as will some of the hard left and left/centrist/not obviously FFG bloodline independents. RBB is safe, nobody else is guaranteed.

    Your biggest risk as a TD is your running mate, and there could be an occasional case of a running mate de-seating the sitting TD (ala Magidan to Shatter 2016) or horrendously splitting the vote and not getting in (this is not common, I'm not sure of a situation where you could be sure someone would have got in without the split - maybe some cases where #1 got in and #2/#3 split and kept each other out).

    When you have no seat and run a sweeper to try ensure the lead gets in, the sweeper can win as happened to Labour in Waterford in 2011 - Conway as the rural Waterford sweeper got in because there is still to this day a Labour base in rural Waterford (Dungarvan and surrounds) and Ryan as the city candidate who 'should' have won, didn't.

    However, as SF have a seat in most constituencies this is also unlikely to happen

    Greens yes (but also to FG, remember the Greens got thr disaffected FG vote last time) but Soc Dems I'm not so sure. They've many young and competent candidates with a high profile. All bar one of their TDs (Jennifer Whitmore) has a very high profile. The only place where they may lose out would be Kildare North (if Murphy decides to retire). I would say Cairns in Cork South West will hold on, FG will get a seat there but it will be at FF's expense, Whitmore not sure but probably alright, don't see Gary Gannon losing (the extra SF here will wipe out Hourigan), Shorthall will have no trouble getting re-elected assuming she runs again. O'Callaghan could be vulnerable alright I suppose, if there's a SF surge there definitely won't be room in Dublin Bay North for both a Soc Dem and a Labour TD. Maybe he will stay on ahead of Ó Riordáin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Greens yes (but also to FG, remember the Greens got thr disaffected FG vote last time) but Soc Dems I'm not so sure. They've many young and competent candidates with a high profile. All bar one of their TDs (Jennifer Whitmore) has a very high profile. The only place where they may lose out would be Kildare North (if Murphy decides to retire). I would say Cairns in Cork South West will hold on, FG will get a seat there but it will be at FF's expense, Whitmore not sure but probably alright, don't see Gary Gannon losing (the extra SF here will wipe out Hourigan), Shorthall will have no trouble getting re-elected assuming she runs again. O'Callaghan could be vulnerable alright I suppose, if there's a SF surge there definitely won't be room in Dublin Bay North for both a Soc Dem and a Labour TD. Maybe he will stay on ahead of Ó Riordáin.

    Veering hugely off-topic here:

    I would not be confident betting on there being more than one SD TD, namely Shortall - assuming she doesn't retire. I cannot see there being more than 3, although I'd not be surprised by 2.

    Murphy's likely replacement - Killeen - is making a lot of efforts beyond her council MD. She will not hold the seat.

    Cairns is gone if FF and FG sort out transfers. She got in on a fluke, nothing more.

    Whitmore got in on a huge amount of ABFF/G transfers that could easily end up elsewhere if there is a second SF. She may survive.

    If there's a squeeze on DBN I suspect O'Riordain takes it. Left transfers got kept O'Callaghan in there. His main escape from the challenge of the time (Green) was PBP transfers that likely mostly came from SF to begin with.

    Gannon has probably the best chance other than Shortall, but Hourigan may not be a Green/Govt TD by then and won't get as much flack. If Burke doesn't run there's a decent floating but almost definitely not Green of any kind vote and transfer base there though. He may survive.

    I don't see any other candidate getting in. Shortall, possibly Whitemore, possibly Gannon and I'd be amazed by any of the others.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    L1011 wrote: »
    Cairns is gone if FF and FG sort out transfers. She got in on a fluke, nothing more.

    I respectfully disagree with this analysis. Cairns came from a long way back on the first count (especially vs the combined FF vote) but her win was neither a fluke nor a transfer blunder by FF/FG.

    FF's 2 candidates got just under a quota combined and the second candidate's elimination led to O'Sullivan's election with nothing left to transfer anywhere else.

    FG's 2 candidates got 75% of a Quota between them and didn't get too many transfers from anyone else apart from an independent where 25% of their transfers went to FG.

    The real problem for both of them was the presence of Michael Collins who was drawing from the same general centre/right pool of the electorate. He took just over a quota himself on the first round to get elected.

    In contrast there was an open channel on the left for 1 candidate. There has always been potential for a left-wing candidate in West Cork given some of the communities down there. The combined vote of the Soc Dems, Greens, Sinn Fein and PBP was just over a quota. Those candidates transferred to each other efficiently leading to Cairns election.

    There was no vote management strategy that FF & FG could have implemented that would have gotten them Cairn's seat given the first preference numbers that day.

    Added to that, she has made the most of the opportunity and has been one of the most impressive debutants in this Dail. Impressive opposition TDs rarely lose their seats. She will get elected in a far more comfortable manner come the next election barring an unlikely scandal.


    Back on Topic: The new party is meant to be launching in 2 days time. It will be interesting to see who is fronting it. I suspect Lorna Bogue will definitely be part of it, perhaps McHugh as well. The real question will be if they have managed to nab a Green TD.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Leonard Hofstadter


    I agree with this. Michael Collins will walk it as long as he wants to run. With FF on 11% of the polls, FG will easily get their seat back (it was truly extraordinary they didn't manage it in the home of Michael Collins of 1920's fame) even if they run Lombard (who is too close to Cork to really have a sizeable base), the West Cork candidate will sweep up. FG on 30 isn't really high enough to get two seats (which they have gotten before in CSW) especially with two other high profile TDs (Cairns and Collins).

    I don't see Cairns losing her seat unless the SDs have a meltdown between now and the next election (which I very much doubt will happen as Murphy and Shorthall know how to win elections).


  • Administrators Posts: 54,109 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I respectfully disagree with this analysis. Cairns came from a long way back on the first count (especially vs the combined FF vote) but her win was neither a fluke nor a transfer blunder by FF/FG.

    FF's 2 candidates got just under a quota combined and the second candidate's elimination led to O'Sullivan's election with nothing left to transfer anywhere else.

    FG's 2 candidates got 75% of a Quota between them and didn't get too many transfers from anyone else apart from an independent where 25% of their transfers went to FG.

    The real problem for both of them was the presence of Michael Collins who was drawing from the same general centre/right pool of the electorate. He took just over a quota himself on the first round to get elected.

    In contrast there was an open channel on the left for 1 candidate. There has always been potential for a left-wing candidate in West Cork given some of the communities down there. The combined vote of the Soc Dems, Greens, Sinn Fein and PBP was just over a quota. Those candidates transferred to each other efficiently leading to Cairns election.

    There was no vote management strategy that FF & FG could have implemented that would have gotten them Cairn's seat given the first preference numbers that day.

    Added to that, she has made the most of the opportunity and has been one of the most impressive debutants in this Dail. Impressive opposition TDs rarely lose their seats. She will get elected in a far more comfortable manner come the next election barring an unlikely scandal.


    Back on Topic: The new party is meant to be launching in 2 days time. It will be interesting to see who is fronting it. I suspect Lorna Bogue will definitely be part of it, perhaps McHugh as well. The real question will be if they have managed to nab a Green TD.

    I would be very surprised if they do. A sitting TD would have far too much to lose.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,081 ✭✭✭Blut2


    awec wrote: »
    I would be very surprised if they do. A sitting TD would have far too much to lose.


    If Hazel Chu is part of it then her husband Patrick Costello would have decent odds I'd presume. Neasa Hourigan too given her very clear dislike of being in government/the current Green party, albeit with lower odds in her case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭joebloggs32




    Back on Topic: The new party is meant to be launching in 2 days time. It will be interesting to see who is fronting it. I suspect Lorna Bogue will definitely be part of it, perhaps McHugh as well. The real question will be if they have managed to nab a Green TD.

    Please please please please please let the launch in 2 days time......April 1st


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Please please please please please let the launch in 2 days time......April 1st

    I'm afraid it won't be. For some reason I had it in my head that the article said that it was launching on April 1st but I went back and looked at it again and they actually specify Feb 1st as the launch date.....not sure what's going on there since that was 8 weeks ago


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,164 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    Eamon Ryan delivered their best ever result last year and brought the party back from the dead, got the highest approval from the membership of his party out of all three parties in Government for going into Government, and look at what his 'reward' has been from a certain branch of his own party.

    Well I suppose as the Greens themselves would say, they like to do things differently. It's like UK Labour, they'd rather be out of power if it means holding onto their principles rather than being in there and trying to implement the things they believe are worth fighting for. The mind truly boggles.

    I don't think Ryan is perfect, but never understood why people were so opposed to them going into power with FF/FG.

    The alternative was FF/FG and right wing Indy's ,,,,at least in power you can try to achieve some of your goals because the alternative was moaning on twitter while noted left wingers such as Lowry and Healy Raes call the shots.

    I don't think their is no any harm in a new Left Wing party, but initial reports make it sound like a student protest party who are going to chase retweets and little more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    More rancour
    The Lord Mayor of Dublin Hazel Chu has said that requests for her to step aside as Green Party chairwoman should be handled by the party’s executive committee, not its group of TDs and Senators.

    Her remarks come ahead of a meeting of the parliamentary party on Wednesday evening where three Senators have tabled a motion calling for Ms Chu to stand aside from her chairwoman role during her bid for a Seanad seat.

    link


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Motion asking Chu to step aside passed 11-5 at the parliamentary party.

    Be interesting to guess the 5. Costello clearly, Hourigan, Martin x2 and Duffy perhaps?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    L1011 wrote: »
    Be interesting to guess the 5. Costello clearly, Hourigan, Martin x2 and Duffy perhaps?

    Either that group or 4 of them + O'Brien


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,687 ✭✭✭tHE vAGGABOND


    Interesting chat with Mrs Vagga last night [We are in Dublin Central] - that she would vote for Hourigan as an independent or as part of another party [as Mrs Vagga agree's with a lot of the things Hourigan has taken a stand on, and happy Hourigan is a principled person]...but Mrs Vagga is not voting Green party again [has voted green last 3 or 4 elections]. I think that kinda opinion is not just hers alone.

    ie: Hourigan runs as an independent and splits the vote and Gary Gannon and Sinn Fein candidate #2 do a little dance


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Seanad count due quite soon

    On the other panel, there was no obvious breach of party discipline - Govt candidate over the line on the first count with 118 of the 208 possible votes. Six people didn't vote!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,588 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Assuming the Oireachtas graphics are correct, Chu got 10 votes. Stone dead last.

    The Labour candidate got 26...

    Really shows the lack of a point of that ridiculous charade that could have brought down the Government.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement