Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Asked for Facebook login in interview

  • 22-03-2012 5:00pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 946 ✭✭✭


    Source
    SEATTLE (AP) -- When Justin Bassett interviewed for a new job, he expected the usual questions about experience and references. So he was astonished when the interviewer asked for something else: his Facebook username and password.

    Bassett, a New York City statistician, had just finished answering a few character questions when the interviewer turned to her computer to search for his Facebook page. But she couldn't see his private profile. She turned back and asked him to hand over his login information.

    Bassett refused and withdrew his application, saying he didn't want to work for a company that would seek such personal information. But as the job market steadily improves, other job candidates are confronting the same question from prospective employers, and some of them cannot afford to say no.
    In their efforts to vet applicants, some companies and government agencies are going beyond merely glancing at a person's social networking profiles and instead asking to log in as the user to have a look around.

    "It's akin to requiring someone's house keys," said Orin Kerr, a George Washington University law professor and former federal prosecutor who calls it "an egregious privacy violation."

    I think its fair enough to research someone before hiring them, but asking for there facebook login is a bit much IMO.
    Its basically like going through your phone or asking about your personal life, I don't see how its fully relevant to the employer.

    What do you think after hours?


«1345

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    I would refuse.
    Invasion of personal privacy.

    If a company/business has a problem with me, I would expect them to show me evidence - not expect them to automatically wish me to lay my entire personal life and thoughts before them on their presumption that I might be guilty of something, have something to hide etc - and that I then have to prove I am innocent.

    Stuff them!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,838 ✭✭✭doncarlos


    Source



    I think its fair enough to research someone before hiring them, but asking for there facebook login is a bit much IMO.
    Its basically like going through your phone or asking about your personal life, I don't see how its fully relevant to the employer.

    What do you think after hours?

    If that was tried in Ireland it would be a nice wee claim from someone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    "Yeah, no bother! Just give me your Credit Card details and we have a deal!"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,518 ✭✭✭matrim


    I'd tell them no and more than likely then complain about it on boards


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Why didn't he tell her he didn't have a Facebook account :confused:

    Why the need to lie?

    If he asked him to show his penis, would he say he didn't have one? Or just say no because it's not appropriate?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,808 ✭✭✭✭chin_grin


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Why the need to lie?

    If he asked him to show his penis, would he say he didn't have one? Or just say no because it's not appropriate?

    Heh, 'penis'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭subway


    surely if you've got nothing to hide you wouldnt have an issue...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,399 ✭✭✭✭Collie D


    I always wondered to employers check people's Facebook status...I mean, it's not like HRists contribute to a company in any meaningful way anyway so they probably do.

    The amount of people I see on Facebook complaining about their job is unreal..especially during business hours. I'm on a week off before anyone points out I'm posting on Boards during business hours.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 193 ✭✭seantorious


    I would refuse not on invasion of privacy but on the fact that entering your password into another computer means it could be copied.

    How would you feel if an IT guy downstairs was watching your character entry and logged into your email and bank account.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    subway wrote: »
    surely if you've got nothing to hide you wouldnt have an issue...

    ...And a person is innocent until proven guilty.
    Its up to an employer/possible employer to show evidence though their own efforts firstly - if we stick to that basic principle.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    Ridiculous request in my opinion.

    Response: politely and calmly say no, I'm not going to do that. Expalin that if they have any queries about my professional or, indeed personal life than by all means ask away.

    That should be enough - smart, reasonable employers should respect a strong, sensible, polite refusal.

    Although if you're younger, inexperienced or desperate I could see how you'd be inclined to hand over your login - even in the 99% of cases when your facebook profile is as dull as dishwater.


  • Registered Users Posts: 217 ✭✭Unavailable for Comment


    Biggins wrote: »
    I would refuse.
    Invasion of personal privacy.

    "Oh that's no problem Mr. Biggins. I completely understand your refusal. Ok . . . well thanks for coming. We'll er . . . we'll call you."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    subway wrote: »
    surely if you've got nothing to hide you wouldnt have an issue...

    "Hi there Subway. I think that you have been stealing and putting said items up your arse! Take off your clothes, bend over and spread your arse-cheeks apart.......

    ........ well if you've nothing to hide then what's the issue?"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,196 ✭✭✭CardBordWindow


    Just change your name on Facebook when you're applying for jobs. That way, they can't find you if they search!


  • Registered Users Posts: 36 Claim The Frame


    I think it's mental that he was asked for his login details that is taking things way too far!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Why the need to lie?

    If he asked him to show his penis, would he say he didn't have one? Or just say no because it's not appropriate?

    Lie? So you think everyone has a Facebook account?

    It is natural and correct to assume that most men have a penis. But only a select bunch of cocks will have a Facebook account.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    Interviewer: Can I please have your Facebook username and password?
    Interviewee: No.

    Interviewer: And why not?
    Interviewee: I'm very security conscientious and don't feel comfortable giving my log in details to anyone.

    Interviewer: Well, can you please login for me then?
    Interviewee: No.

    Interviewer: And why not?
    Interviewee: As my friends have set their accounts to private as well I wouldn't feel comfortable giving access to their pages to someone who they are not familiar with.

    Interviewer: You know what?
    Interviewee: What?

    Interviewer: You seem like exactly the type of guy we need here at Generic Business Ltd. Would you like a pay increase?
    Interviewee: I haven't even accepted the job yet.

    Interviewer: Hmm, how about a blowjob then?
    Interviewee: Okay.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭subway


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    "Hi there Subway. I think that you have been stealing and putting said items up your arse! Take off your clothes, bend over and spread your arse-cheeks apart.......

    ........ well if you've nothing to hide then what's the issue?"
    your name has me worried, i think you put them there :(


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭Rabidlamb


    Don't join Facebook, live in the real world & have real friends.
    There's a lesson here for everyone & I hope we've all learned it.

    or

    When you set up an account use your nickname, initials, dogs name . . . it's not just HR people that snoop.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    "Oh that's no problem Mr. Biggins. I completely understand your refusal. Ok . . . well thanks for coming. We'll er . . . we'll call you."

    ...And I wouldn't personally lose sleep over it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Why the need to lie?

    If he asked him to show his penis, would he say he didn't have one?
    Well if his facebook is anything like my facebook he could have just took out his penis and showed the interviewer what it looks like from various angles and states of arousal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭RichieC


    No problem, sir, my password is tortious_interference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,256 ✭✭✭✭MrStuffins


    Lie? So you think everyone has a Facebook account?

    It is natural and correct to assume that most men have a penis. But only a select bunch of cocks will have a Facebook account.

    The question was "Why didn't HE just say he didn't have a Facebook account?"

    The article said he DID have one and it was private.

    I never said anything of the like about everyone having a Facebook account. Try reading what's going on there buddy yeah?

    Oh and a "I'm too cool for Facebook" comment. You must be invited to all the best parties!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Millicent


    subway wrote: »
    surely if you've got nothing to hide you wouldnt have an issue...

    Would you hand over your phone to a company if they asked? Or your email log-in details? Your Boards details?

    Since he had his profile set to private, it would be a reasonable assumption that he views his profile as private and only shares it with friends. Why should he hand that info over?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 143 ✭✭Kaner2004


    Here you go

    Username : private
    Password : private

    Whats Facebook?


  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭Viral Vector


    Will Bebo suffice?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭subway


    Millicent wrote: »
    Would you hand over your phone to a company if they asked? Or your email log-in details? Your Boards details?

    Since he had his profile set to private, it would be a reasonable assumption that he views his profile as private and only shares it with friends. Why should he hand that info over?
    because he has nothing to hide...

    I dont know how long i can keep this up, i thought someone who actually believes this would have taken over by now


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭RichieC


    just to be clear:
    tortious interference
    The classic example of this tort occurs when one party induces another party to breach a contract with a third party, in circumstances where the first party has no privilege to act as it does and acts with knowledge of the existence of the contract. Such conduct is termed tortious inducement of breach of contract.

    Sharing your Facebook account breaches the ToS of Facebook.
    They are hoping most people arent lawyers or good at knowing things and stuff.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭MonkeyTennis


    I have a work account. They can go nuts on that. Im quite the conference attender


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭foxyboxer


    "My password? Sure no problem. It's Ilovebuttsex! with a capital I"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,128 ✭✭✭✭aaronjumper


    I would say no. I have a fake name on facebook so that potential employers cannot see what I do in my own time. Business and private life should be kept apart.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,556 ✭✭✭Deus Ex Machina


    If they asked me for my Facebook login details I'd just roll my eyes back in my head, fake a seizure and shout fucking DERP!!! and then dive across the desk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 317 ✭✭Casillas


    Oh great! No non-facebookers need apply.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,041 ✭✭✭Seachmall


    Another reason not to share your password is if you use the Shocking Nonsense method of choosing a password.

    "`Shocking nonsense` means to make up a short phrase or sentence that is both nonsensical and shocking in the culture of the user, that is, it contains grossly obscene, racist, impossible or other extreme juxtaposition of ideas. This technique is permissable because the passphrase, by its nature, is never revealed to anyone with sensibilities to be offended.

    Shocking nonsense is unlikely to be duplicated anywhere because it does not describe a matter-of-fact that could be accidentally rediscovered by anyone else and the emotional evocation makes it difficult for the creator to forget. A mild example of such shocking nonsense might be: `mollusks peck my galloping genitals.` The reader can undoubtedly make up many far more shocking or entertaining examples for himself or herself.
    "

    - Passphrase FAQ

    Giving out your password, which is chosen solely because of how secure it is, could lead to embarrassment or worse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭subway


    ive decided that this story is bull****, if your profile is properly private on facebook it doesnt show up on searches.
    the lad probably doesnt have any mates and is making this up so people will try "add him"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,144 ✭✭✭Katgurl


    Are people here for real? "if he had nothing to hide etc" that is an insane request, I have worked in HR for years. He should sue the hole off them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,128 ✭✭✭cynder


    I was reading where a mother is suing a school in America because they forced a 12 year old to give them her log in details and password to her facebook and email accounts. Present were the local Sheff armed with a taser, the school counselor and the principle and 1 other member from the school staff, no parent was present or informed about the situation. The child was forced to give them the details initially she refused, this was because the school found out that she said 'i hate the hall monitor' on her facebook page (they had a screen shot) and decided to punish her.

    cant link it but if you look up 12 year old facebook Minnesota it should pop up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Millicent


    subway wrote: »
    because he has nothing to hide...

    I dont know how long i can keep this up, i thought someone who actually believes this would have taken over by now

    What's that got to do with anything? You never answered my question--would you hand over your phone, for example, or your email log-in?

    ETA: You git! I just saw the whited out bit now. :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭subway


    Millicent wrote: »
    What's that got to do with anything? You never answered my question--would you hand over your phone, for example, or your email log-in?

    you got me, i surrender!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    subway wrote: »
    ive decided that this story is bull****

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46791850/ns/business-careers/#.T2tT1cWqBoo
    SEATTLE — When Justin Bassett interviewed for a new job, he expected the usual questions about experience and references. So he was astonished when the interviewer asked for something else: his Facebook username and password.
    Bassett, a New York City statistician, had just finished answering a few character questions when the interviewer turned to her computer to search for his Facebook page. But she couldn't see his private profile. She turned back and asked him to hand over his login information.

    Bassett refused and withdrew his application, saying he didn't want to work for a company that would seek such personal information. But as the job market steadily improves, other job candidates are confronting the same question from prospective employers, and some of them cannot afford to say no.

    In their efforts to vet applicants, some companies and government agencies are going beyond merely glancing at a person's social networking profiles and instead asking to log in as the user to have a look around.
    "It's akin to requiring someone's house keys," said Orin Kerr, a George Washington University law professor and former federal prosecutor who calls it "an egregious privacy violation."

    Questions have been raised about the legality of the practice, which is also the focus of proposed legislation in Illinois and Maryland that would forbid public agencies from asking for access to social networks.
    Since the rise of social networking, it has become common for managers to review publically available Facebook profiles, Twitter accounts and other sites to learn more about job candidates. But many users, especially on Facebook, have their profiles set to private, making them available only to selected people or certain networks.

    Companies that don't ask for passwords have taken other steps — such as asking applicants to friend human resource managers or to log in to a company computer during an interview. Once employed, some workers have been required to sign non-disparagement agreements that ban them from talking negatively about an employer on social media.

    Asking for a candidate's password is more prevalent among public agencies, especially those seeking to fill law enforcement positions such as police officers or 911 dispatchers.
    Back in 2010, Robert Collins was returning to his job as a correctional officer at the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services after taking a leave following his mother's death. During a reinstatement interview, he was asked for his login and password, purportedly so the agency could check for any gang affiliations. He was stunned by the request but complied.

    "I needed my job to feed my family. I had to," he recalled.
    After the ACLU complained about the practice, the agency amended its policy, asking instead for job applicants to log in during interviews.
    "To me, that's still invasive. I can appreciate the desire to learn more about the applicant, but it's still a violation of people's personal privacy," said Collins, whose case inspired Maryland's legislation.

    Until last year, the city of Bozeman, Mont., had a long-standing policy of asking job applicants for passwords to their email addresses, social-networking websites and other online accounts.
    And since 2006, the McLean County, Ill., sheriff's office has been one of several Illinois sheriff's departments that ask applicants to sign into social media sites to be screened.
    Chief Deputy Rusty Thomas defended the practice, saying applicants have a right to refuse. But no one has ever done so. Thomas said that "speaks well of the people we have apply."

    When asked what sort of material would jeopardize job prospects, Thomas said "it depends on the situation" but could include "inappropriate pictures or relationships with people who are underage, illegal behavior."
    In Spotsylvania County, Va., the sheriff's department asks applicants to friend background investigators for jobs at the 911 dispatch center and for law enforcement positions.
    "In the past, we've talked to friends and neighbors, but a lot of times we found that applicants interact more through social media sites than they do with real friends," said Capt. Mike Harvey. "Their virtual friends will know more about them than a person living 30 yards away from them."

    Harvey said investigators look for any "derogatory" behavior that could damage the agency's reputation.
    E. Chandlee Bryan, a career coach and co-author of the book "The Twitter Job Search Guide," said job seekers should always be aware of what's on their social media sites and assume someone is going to look at it.
    Bryan said she is troubled by companies asking for logins, but she feels it's not a violation if an employer asks to see a Facebook profile through a friend request. And she's not troubled by non-disparagement agreements.
    "I think that when you work for a company, they are essentially supporting you in exchange for your work. I think if you're dissatisfied, you should go to them and not on a social media site," she said.

    More companies are also using third-party applications to scour Facebook profiles, Bryan said. One app called BeKnown can sometimes access personal profiles, short of wall messages, if a job seeker allows it.
    Sears is one of the companies using apps. An applicant has the option of logging into the Sears job site through Facebook by allowing a third-party application to draw information from the profile, such as friend lists.
    Sears Holdings Inc. spokeswoman Kim Freely said using a Facebook profile to apply allows Sears to be updated on the applicant's work history.

    The company assumes "that people keep their social profiles updated to the minute, which allows us to consider them for other jobs in the future or for ones that they may not realize are available currently," she said.
    Giving out Facebook login information violates the social network's terms of service. But those terms have questionable legal weight, and experts say the legality of asking for such information remains murky.

    The Department of Justice regards it as a federal crime to enter a social networking site in violation of the terms of service, but during recent congressional testimony, the agency said such violations would not be prosecuted.
    Lori Andrews, a law professor at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law specializing in Internet privacy, is concerned about the pressure placed on applicants, even if they voluntarily provide access to social sites.
    "Volunteering is coercion if you need a job," Andrews said.
    Neither Facebook nor Twitter responded to repeated requests for comment.

    In New York, Bassett considered himself lucky that he was able to turn down the consulting gig at a lobbying firm.
    "I think asking for account login credentials is regressive," he said. "If you need to put food on the table for your three kids, you can't afford to stand up for your belief.


    Loads of other examples on the net: https://www.google.ie/webhp?hl=en&tab=nw#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=employer+asked+for+facebook+password&oq=employer+asked+for+&aq=2&aqi=g3g-v1&aql=&gs_l=hp.1.2.0l3j0i15.1495l7027l0l9304l19l12l0l7l7l0l142l1299l5j7l19l0.frgbld.&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=2d4a72fe62cf8323&biw=1440&bih=785


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,059 ✭✭✭Sindri


    subway wrote: »
    you got me, i surrender!

    You cheese eating surrenderin' monkey bastid!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    subway wrote: »
    i hope Sean Sherlock gets you!

    Before I get him first? :cool: :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    MrStuffins wrote: »
    Did you just quote an entire article?

    I was wondering why I just saw the "Sean Sherlock" signal up in the sky!

    :D

    The OP link had the shortened tabloid version - less details.
    ...As for Sean Sherlock, he can kiss my ageing ass! :D

    (I have a donkey out the back of my home)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 12,333 ✭✭✭✭JONJO THE MISER


    Anyone who would put all there information up on Facebook is a fool, i dont nor never will have a Facebook account, people need to wise up and have a bit of cop on and common sense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Biggins wrote: »
    ........
    (I have a donkey out the back of my home)


    One can only imagine the horror Mrs Biggins felt when she realised she had married a Sex Pervert.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Nodin wrote: »
    One can only imagine the horror Mrs Biggins felt when she realised she had married a Sex Pervert.

    ...She finally found her perfect match! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,748 ✭✭✭Dermighty


    I'm not on Facebook as I find Facebook itself an egregious invasion of privacy :P


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,381 ✭✭✭Doom


    Source



    I think its fair enough to research someone before hiring them, but asking for there facebook login is a bit much IMO.
    Its basically like going through your phone or asking about your personal life, I don't see how its fully relevant to the employer.

    What do you think after hours?

    My answer ...sorry haven't used it in years, I cannot remember the password.
    simple :cool:


  • Advertisement
Advertisement