Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Showers draining Water Storage Tank

  • 26-06-2020 4:19pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭


    Hi,

    We have a Maxipod 210 Direct which is heated up every morning via a Grant boiler. If a shower (of 7-10min duration) is taken then the tank drops from 70degC to just over 40degC. So, there is either an issue with the tank heating or that water usage is too high.

    I've timed the flow at the shower heads and it is putting out 2L per 12s, so 10L/min which from reading about does not appear to be excessive.

    What should I be looking at here?

    Could this be related to a previous (and still unresolved issue) with heat being lost overnight: https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=109388798


    Thanks.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    I remember the other thread well.

    Re present problem....You say that the Grant heats the cylinder each morning to 70C, so that means there should be ~ 200 litres of water available at 70C, it drops to 40C after taking the shower so simple calc shows that the tank gave up, 200*(70-40)/860, 6.98 kwh while the shower (assuming 45C showering temperature) required 100*(45-10)/860, 4.07 kwh so theoretically the cylinder lost 2.91 kwh or 18% of its stored capacity. In the other post we calculated that the cylinder was loosing ~ 2.5C/hr so to it would take ~ 5 hrs to loose that 2.91 kwh, would it be reasonable to assume a 5 hr delay between the grant off (cylinder heated to 70C) and the shower usage?. If so, then you are back to your original problem I think which we thought may have been thermo syphoning through the stove.

    Where is the cylinder temperature that you are quoting measured?.

    How long is the boiler programmed for in the morning.

    Am I correct in saying that the cylinder thermostat for the Grant is located near the bottom of the cylinder?.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    1. Delay between Grant off to shower approx 2hrs. Although if i have a slightly longer shower it will drop by end of shower to 40degC.
    2. Cylinder gauge located 2/3 way up tank.
    3. Boiler programmed for 30 minutes.
    4. Yes, thermostat located in bottom 1/5 of tank.

    We forewent an electric shower in ensuite under the impression that the power required to drive the electric shower could be taken from the hot water tank which would only require topping up in the mornings by the Grant.

    I believe setup is something like the following:

    maxipod-installation-diagram.svg


    A - Expansion tank
    B - Cold feed
    C - Blending valve
    D - Hot out
    E - Cold in

    F - Oil/Gas boiler stat set at 70°+
    G - To radiator or under floor heating
    H - 28mm expansion
    I - Flow
    J - Oil/Gas boiler

    K - Pipe stat set at 50°C
    L - Pump
    M - 28mm flow/expansion (copper pipe)
    N - 28mm return (copper pipe)t

    O - Low flow connection
    P - Metal expansion tank


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    From the above info, the grant is heating ~ 150 litres to "70"C, if one assumes that the tank temp was 40C initially then it would require 150*(70-40)/860, 5.23 kwh and assuming the grant output at 25 kw and firing continuously then it would only fire for 13 mins before cutting out, if the tank temp was 25C it would fire for 19 mins.
    But it is impossible in either case to have the the temperature at the probe and the temp at the thermostat the same (70C) due to the temperature rise through the grant which will depend on the flow rate through it, I wouldn't expect the flow rate to be > 30 LPM which results in a deltaT of 12 C which means that IF the cylinder stat SP is 70C then the cylinder temp will end up at 82C which I think you mentioned in your other thread? If the grant is cutting out at a indicated cylinder temp of 70C then it means that the cylinder stat is operating at ~ 58/60C. or else the grant is cutting out on its own boiler stat and you actually havn,t got 150 litres at 70C after 30 mins.

    To try and pin this down, I would suggest just run running off some hot water until you see a cylinder temp of 40C then stop, fire up the grant for exactly 30 mins, note how long it is actually firing for during this 30 mins, it may just fire continuously for one period or a number of times which you can add together and you will then get a very good feel for what's going on.
    Also, try and see the output of your grant or at the very least its output range.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    Just a thought, could the blending valve be incorrectly set pulling too much heat from the tank?
    I suppose the only way to check would be to run heat the tank and run a tap onto a thermometer...?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    The blending valve could be incorrectly set but should'nt affect the amount of heat taken from the cylinder, if too high then more cold water has to added somewhere else, ie at the shower, if too low, then you will certainly know that when under the shower but even if defective it won't cause any energy imbalance.

    I think a more accurate test would be to keep draining off hot water after your shower(s) with boiler off until the cylinder is filled with cold water, then run the boiler until the cylinder is 70C while monitoring the burner running time. It should require ~ 14 kwh and a burner (total) run time of ~ 32 minutes. (assuming a 26 kw boiler). You may find that the burner fires continuously which would make the monitoring far easier, if you havn't the time/inclination, just write down the cylinder temperature before & after say a continuous burner run time of 10 minutes.

    Have you seen the cylinder temperature higher than 70C without the stove in service??

    What is the Grant boiler Setpoint temperature now?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    Initial temp: 37degC

    30min temp: 68degC (continuous firing)

    34min temp: 70degC
    (boiler then cuts out)

    I thought that was that. Left it on boost for the remainder of the time (26 min) - not sure if it fired up again or not.

    Two hours onwards from hitting 70deg, tank gauge now showing 52degC.
    Took a five min shower. Gauge now hovering around 40degC.

    The start on boiler does not show figures just a progressively thicker mark as the knob is screwed. Sitting at almost max. Return pipe not lagged for approx 0.7m.

    Just to add, system was pressure tested during install and was said to be okay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    John.G wrote: »
    Have you seen the cylinder temperature higher than 70C without the stove in service??

    What is the Grant boiler Setpoint temperature now?

    No. Boiler turns off at bang on 70degC. Stove would put it over a bit and then fire excess around zone 2 rads. Don't know exact figure it goes over 70degC by as we've not been using stove recently in this weather.

    Boiler temp is an unknown as it is a thickening line scale and not graduated numerically. How've, knob is turned round to almost max setting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    Would I be best heating back up to 70degC and then turning off the boiler and the mains water into the house. That way if there was a leak when water turned on again I should hear/feel the tank filling again?

    Or what is my next step?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    Would I be best heating back up to 70degC and then turning off the boiler and the mains water into the house. That way if there was a leak when water turned on again I should hear/feel the tank filling again?

    Or what is my next step?

    Yes, that would be the way to go initially I think. You could do a quick, say 1 hour test first and that is to isolate the cold water (mains) supply to the coil in the cylinder, there should be a isol valve at the cylinder, if there is a leak in the domestic hot water somewhere in the house then that will very quickly identify it.

    What is the Grant model, age and output?, normally given in something like 20/26 kw or 70/90.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    John.G wrote: »
    Yes, that would be the way to go initially I think. You could do a quick, say 1 hour test first and that is to isolate the cold water (mains) supply to the coil in the cylinder, there should be a isol valve at the cylinder, if there is a leak in the domestic hot water somewhere in the house then that will very quickly identify it.

    What is the Grant model, age and output?, normally given in something like 20/26 kw or 70/90.

    Is a 50/90 (15/26).

    Testing now. Was sitting at 60degC after morning heating and some usage. I typed it up and when it clicked off the temp was 74degC.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    John.G wrote: »
    Yes, that would be the way to go initially I think. You could do a quick, say 1 hour test first and that is to isolate the cold water (mains) supply to the coil in the cylinder, there should be a isol valve at the cylinder, if there is a leak in the domestic hot water somewhere in the house then that will very quickly identify it.

    What is the Grant model, age and output?, normally given in something like 20/26 kw or 70/90.

    Couldn't get the isolation valve to move so didn't force it. Ended up turning off the mains.

    The grant boiler is only 1 year old. This is a new build.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    That's fine, suggest leaving for a hour or so then check temp, re open mains and listen for header tank filling through ball cock or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    No difference. I've turned on mains again and left to see if that makes any change.
    Definitely was a 14degC drop last night as I've photos to show it and both others in house swear they didn't use the hot water.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    If there is no cylinder temperature difference? then that is "good" in one sense, if the temperature does fall again now with mains open then that will mean that you can start narrowing down the suspects, the first thing I would do is isolate the mains and change that seized DHW coil inlet isol valve, then carry out the test with the mains restored and that valve closed.

    Its a bit surprising that a one year old valve is seized, a gate valve if fitted may need a little more force.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    So turned mains back on.

    11:02am - 70degC
    11:30am - 66degC
    12:05pm - 61degC

    Is this leak territory or could it be a thermosyphon? I've went to the stove and both pipes flow/return at back of stove are hot - one moreso than the other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    12:30pm - 60degC


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    01:03pm - 56degC


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    So turned mains back on.

    11:02am - 70degC
    11:30am - 66degC
    12:05pm - 61degC

    Is this leak territory or could it be a thermosyphon? I've went to the stove and both pipes flow/return at back of stove are hot - one moreso than the other.

    Logically, thermosyphon is not the culprit as the thermosyphon is still active when the mains is off as long as the header tank is full and you don't seem to have any make up going to that after re opening the mains?, you mentioned in your other thread that you have a isolation valve on the stove return, shut that with mains restored and repeat the test but make very very certain that you re open it immediately after the test.

    A leak in the DHW (maybe under ground) seems the most likely but I wouldn't be entirely happy that it is unless I can isolate it at the cylinder and then re run the test again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    Okay - will try that after lunch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    Stove IV CLOSED
    13:57 - 71degC
    14:19 - 71degC
    14:25 - 71degC
    14:57 - 71degC
    15:50 - 71degC
    STOVE IV OPEN
    15:56 - 71degC (Pipes at back of stove luke warm)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    16:21 - 70degC (Pipes at back of stove hot)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    "Average" was 9C/hour with mains open and stove return open.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    16:48 - 70degC


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    Something strange going on as no huge drop through the stove just now, presume mains is open?, so perhaps monitor for another hour or so. In the other thread you said the stove flow was connected to the lower of the two connections which maxipod recommend but only if it loops upwards first and then downwards to prevent a thermosyphon, see pic "maxipond stand" in post #8, of that thread and attached below.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    17:30 - 70degC

    No, I think stove should be connected to lower, but it is connected to upper. Connects to upper stove flow rises and would seem to go along attic before dropping into the stove. I'd need to confirm this route with the plumber though. However, it definitely rises directly upwards through the ceiling.

    Upper connection point should only be for maxipod in floor above or attic location. When both are on same level, I believe that the lower connection should be used - which is not the case here.

    I'm wondering if the drop is not happening as the temp in the room with stove is sufficiently warm now with people/cooking that there is insufficient heatsink for the syphon to occur?
    I'll open windows now to see if that drops the temperature sufficiently to draw the heat out out of the maxipod.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    17:30 - Windows open
    18:00 - 68degC


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    20:05 - 62degC


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    20:35: 60degC


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    I think that if that stove flow was moved to the low connection that it may cure that thermosyphon as the water will be cooler there.
    Before doing anything I would suggest leaving the stove return closed for a day or two (attach a large notice to the stove that it must not be lit and the reason why not) and monitor the cylinder temperature overnight/for a few days using your normal routine, then re open it and monitor it again.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    22:04 - 54degC

    Valve closed and note added. I'll keep an eye on it over the next few days and see what happens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    Water heated at 7am to 70degC.
    Shower, washing, dishes, etc and tank is now at 55degC.

    Will need to put on central heating tonight for parents as it is a bit cold for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    The real test is after its heated to 70C say in the morning and then see what it falls to in ~ 2 hours before shower or any other usage with boiler off.

    Should also have maybe added that if you had 200 litres of water at 70C and it fell to 55C assuming no losses then you would have used 86 litres of hot water at 45C.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    Heating turned off at 7:30am. Tank at 70degC.
    9:40am and tank is still at 70degC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    Whilst we are looking at this:

    Should all pipes in the press be lagged up to tank entry - or is it normal to leave some/all unlagged to warm the press?

    At outlets, should the piping also be lagged there?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    I would lag every where there is access.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    What about at sinks etc?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    I have everything lagged as its cheap and you can split it to go around the pipe(s) without disturbing anything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    Took a shower using the fixed shower head and it drained tank by 10degC.
    Anything recommended to reduce the flow rate at the shower unit?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    You might be able to get a restrictor to fit in the shower head, you said in your first post that you are getting ~ 10 LPM from some of the showers, if this is a different shower then just measure the flow rate like before, = or > 10 LPM is considered a power shower and a lot now come with restrictors fitted to give 6 LPM, a 9 kw electric shower by comparison will flow 3 to 4 LPM to give a comfortable showering temperature.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    Well, the water heating issue seems to be resolved by turning off the valve to the stove. I might want to do something to reduce the flow to the showers, but I can do that myself - I think.

    My plan is to get the plumber back to reconnect the stove to the low flow connection and lag all the pipes.
    Would it be best to put in an anti syphon loop when he is at it?
    If so, what form do these take?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    Well, the water heating issue seems to be resolved by turning off the valve to the stove. I might want to do something to reduce the flow to the showers, but I can do that myself - I think.

    My plan is to get the plumber back to reconnect the stove to the low flow connection and lag all the pipes.
    Would it be best to put in an anti syphon loop when he is at it?
    If so, what form do these take?

    The Loop is as shown in the attachment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    John.G wrote: »
    The Loop is as shown in the attachment.

    So it is the rise that stops the thermosyphon? I didn't realise that that was all needed. Should be a simple job for plumber then just to extend down to the low flow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    I think that's the way its supposed to work, my only fear is that because the stove flow pipe goes up then down that it might interfere with the natural convection forces when the stove is on, because hot water likes to rise, you could consider just connecting the flow straight into the low connection, the worst that can happen then is that you get reverse thermosyphon but with a much reduced volume of hot water due to the reduced height between the stove low flow connection and the oil boiler return as there will be little or no hot water below this with the oil boiler on only.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    The high flow connection does not appear to require venting. Why is that?

    maxipod-installation-diagram.svg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    The cylinder (store) vent is venting the store, the oil boiler and the stove as they are all the same body of water.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭GinSoaked


    I know its only a diagram OP but there is no need to make the connection quite so high on the hot water cylinder from the boiler.

    If you bought a plain direct cylinder for connecting to a stove then you would have normally have 2 connections for the boiler only about 6 inches apart near the bottom of the tank. -O in your diagram is still a little high but about where I would expect to see the top connection on a traditional direct hot water tank.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    My own view but I don't think it's a great idea having both the boiler and stove connected directly to the store, when the boiler is running on its own then I feel that the circ pump is also going to cause circulation in the stove leading to further losses apart from the above syphon losses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,415 ✭✭✭funkey_monkey


    John.G wrote: »
    My own view but I don't think it's a great idea having both the boiler and stove connected directly to the store, when the boiler is running on its own then I feel that the circ pump is also going to cause circulation in the stove leading to further losses apart from the above syphon losses.

    How would you do it?
    I'm inclined to go with what the supplier states as that way they have to stand over the product.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭John.G


    I would have a separate coil for/from each heat input.


Advertisement