Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mystery double-header

Options
  • 19-03-2019 11:48am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭


    I recently came across this strange postcard on eBay and remember discussing the card many years ago with fellow enthusiasts but can't remember the explanation. Anybody? :)

    Strange%2BDoubleheader%2Bpostcard.jpg


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Captain Chaos


    The B101 is most likely dead or failed. The A class is just rescuing the train.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    The B101 is most likely dead or failed. The A class is just rescuing the train.

    You're missing the point - why is the second loco disguised as a van? Notice the windows?

    Better pic here: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/FOUR-DIFFERENT-COLOURED-POSTCARDS-IRISH-TRANSPORT-SERIES-IRISH-RAILWAYS/202627835360?hash=item2f2d8f65e0:g:aokAAOSwuVpcjop-


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,142 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Location is White Rock, just south of the Dalkey tunnel

    It doesn't look long enough to be a B101 as they ran on 6 axles,

    Could it be a Bulleid design unpainted 2 axle luggage van? http://silverfoxmodels.co.uk/ir-ie-bullied-hooded-luggage-van/ There are clearly 3 windows door, 3 windows which matches


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    No, it's definitely a loco - note the red buffer beam, bogies, indicator lights etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,142 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    I'd agree normally but the side is not a locomotive and the roof has no exhausts or cooling hatches

    All the B101's had the void under the cab window for the staff snatcher, it was never plated over and that is missing and the roof is completely clean


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 80 ✭✭sporty56


    Vague recollection of a diesel being disguised as a coach for film work pushing a unfit to steam 184 1n early 70s


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    sporty56 wrote: »
    Vague recollection of a diesel being disguised as a coach for film work pushing a unfit to steam 184 1n early 70s

    Correct - "Darling Lili" on the Navan branch but this is a 1950s postcard.


  • Registered Users Posts: 61 ✭✭haulier


    A long shot, but was there an A class plus coaches used by Ardmore Studios to film on the Harcourt Street road between the closure and final track recovery - Caricckmines & H/St come to mind. [ JOHNNY NOBODY ??] The train could have been returning back to town.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    haulier wrote: »
    A long shot, but was there an A class plus coaches used by Ardmore Studios to film on the Harcourt Street road between the closure and final track recovery - Caricckmines & H/St come to mind. [ JOHNNY NOBODY ??] The train could have been returning back to town.

    No, I'm almost positive that this was a publicity/official posed photograph. I don't understand the crude imposing of the van image on top of what is obviously a locomotive.


  • Registered Users Posts: 61 ✭✭haulier


    DM is right - A16 + PR's were used in publicity photo's on the Killiney side of Doyles Crossing - beside present sewage works & appeared on the front of the Public Timetables in the early 1960's.

    The filming at Carrickmines was about May 1960 - when, I'm told, there was only a single line left to Foxrock


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 119 ✭✭Seanmk1


    I reckon that's a four-wheel heating van. A whole bunch of them were produced in the mid-50s.


    Most of them were sheeted in unpainted aluminum to match the new locomotives from Metrovick. The two axles are clear to see as well as the big oil/water tank mounted underneath.


    When the Metrovicks started to look filthy, everything was repainted in a new livery.


    The photo is confusing because somebody has 'touched it up' with a bit of colour to make it look nicer. Absolutely no consideration for a bunch of internet lackeys sixty years later. :P


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    The reason I posted the card was that years ago, pre-internet, I had a discussion with someone about the picture and they explained it. Sadly, the passage of time and an excess of Guinness has erased the explanation from my memory.

    Untitled.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 968 ✭✭✭railer201


    A driving van trailer by any chance - wasn't the innovative Bulleid in Inchicore at that period ? It is clearly not in use as a a driving trailer on that particular train but it does appear like a full cab front on one end of a heating van, so were they experimenting with push-pulls at the time ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,994 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    It's not one of the aforementioned luggage vans, it's a 4 wheel P+T van. Note that there is no vents on the top of the "loco", the inset door and the grill of the box underneath.

    59eb7da36fef1_P7T2001.jpg.9a2da9157e6f59798b7c10a82f7b6603.jpg

    As to why it was painted this way? The set was used for photos on the camera friendly and tunnel heavy Wicklow region. The van was mocked up as a loco to give the photographers an extra chance of photographing a cab at either end of the set as it entered tunnels. The alternative was for endless waiting and guessing when it would emerge from a tunnel on the return leg. The photo here would have been taken on the home leg of the trip.

    You may well ask why they didn't use a second loco. A P&T van was far lighter and thus cheaper to haul than the hefty weight of a second loco. A second loco would have required a second driver on hand as well. With the A Class already experiencing low availability it was going to a stretch to justify using two on the day.


  • Registered Users Posts: 119 ✭✭Seanmk1




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,796 ✭✭✭Isambard


    It's not one of the aforementioned luggage vans, it's a 4 wheel P+T van. Note that there is no vents on the top of the "loco", the inset door and the grill of the box underneath.

    .

    well it's not that van anyway. It has 6 windows and a recessed centre door or has been made to look that way. I think the photo has been doctored, the front end is certainly a 101


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,796 ✭✭✭Isambard


    Seanmk1 wrote: »

    that's a dead ringer as far as the side goes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,799 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    It's a "tin van", photo is doctored, colour and shadows look off.

    Why it was altered, god knows.
    It's not the "Darling Lili" van/disguised loco, that ran in B n T and would obviously be the same length as the loco, not noticeably shorter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,142 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    It's a "tin van", photo is doctored, colour and shadows look off.

    Thanks, seems my original post was correct.

    The 101 grafted on doesn't look convincing either as its windscreen was a lot more flush to than the recessed ones in the postcard.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,473 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    not a reflection of the loco in the tin of the van end by any chance?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    not a reflection of the loco in the tin of the van end by any chance?

    When did you last see any CIE vehicle clean enough to reflect anything? :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,473 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Del.Monte wrote: »
    When did you last see any CIE vehicle clean enough to reflect anything? :D

    that photo :pac::pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    It is a perfectly normal 4 wheel luggage van.

    Someone may have photoshopped the end of the van.

    The photo must have been taken soon after introduction of the A Class in 1955, as the silver paint deteriorated rapidly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,363 ✭✭✭✭Del.Monte


    tabbey wrote: »
    It is a perfectly normal 4 wheel luggage van.

    Someone may have photoshopped the end of the van.

    The photo must have been taken soon after introduction of the A Class in 1955, as the silver paint deteriorated rapidly.

    As I stated in the OP it has obviously been doctored - back in the 1950s - but why?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭GM228


    I'll put this to bed, there are other pictures of this particular move in B&W and this is a retouched picture which has gone OT of the reflection of A16 on a "tin van" behind it, not another engine.

    It was a Dublin-Bray-Dublin publicity run in June 1957 to showcase the then new Park Royals..


Advertisement