Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Woman arrested for calling a transgender woman a man on Twitter

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Vincent Vega


    Of all the people you could target, I think you'd want to be especially dense to dedicate your time to harassing a lawyer online.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,593 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Of all the people you could target, I think you'd want to be especially dense to dedicate your time to harassing a lawyer online.


    I could understand Graham Linehan getting into an argument with Stephanie Hayden because he's well-known but Kate Scottow isn't. So why did Kate into an argument with Stephanie?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,807 ✭✭✭Jurgen Klopp


    Of all the people you could target, I think you'd want to be especially dense to dedicate your time to harassing a lawyer online.

    Isn't he/she the same one whos there's no record of their supposed legal qualifications and was actually challenged by a transexual real solicitor to prove their credentials and wouldn't?

    Whatever about this case, this Hayden one is an odious individual when you look into it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,092 ✭✭✭The Tetrarch


    Calling a trans person their old name.
    Thanks for clearing that up. (Puts away mass card)
    Why not former-naming?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,255 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Dante7 wrote: »
    Stephanie Hayden? Would that be the same Stephenie Hayden who used to be known as Anthony Halliday and was convicted of assault with a golf club amongst other crimes. But shush, we can't talk about that as that was their previous identity. In fact, what I have just posted is what people are being charged with.
    You can talk about it and I'm sure Stephanie would be happy to talk about it too and the place she was in when she did that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,593 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Isn't he/she the same one whos there's no record of their supposed legal qualifications and was actually challenged by a transexual real solicitor to prove their credentials and wouldn't?

    Whatever about this case, this Hayden one is an odious individual when you look into it


    Then why did Karen Scottow get into an argument with Stephanie Hayden on Twitter? There's no indication that Karen has ever met Stephanie in person.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Vincent Vega


    Isn't he/she the same one whos there's no record of their supposed legal qualifications and was actually challenged by a transexual real solicitor to prove their credentials and wouldn't?

    Whatever about this case, this Hayden one is an odious individual when you look into it

    To be honest, I really don't have much of a clue about who this person is, and have only just googled a bit about her now.

    Regardless of what type of person she might be, my point was that I think spending a significant amount of your time devoted to harassing a person online is quite a stupid and petty way to spend your life.

    But to go one further, and to target somebody who either is a lawyer, or if not, someone who is going to make themselves busy enough to demonstrate they know their law in order to screw you over, just seems next level silly.

    I just don't understand how people can be so infuriated by other people's text so as to get so involved to their own detriment. :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,430 ✭✭✭RWCNT



    Imagine the psychological harm that children born from trans men (e.g. Thomas Beattie) may suffer because of the circumstances of their conception.


    Just because surgeons can make pregnancy take place in these cases it doesn't mean they should.

    Why would the circumstances of their conception psychologically harm them?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭MrFresh


    RWCNT wrote: »
    Why would the circumstances of their conception psychologically harm them?


    Presumably because some people will go to great pains to explain to the child how abnormal they are. We had the same arguments against gay adoption. Basically, "It's unfair on the child because people like me will be forced to slag them for having two daddies."


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,593 ✭✭✭political analyst


    MrFresh wrote: »
    Presumably because some people will go to great pains to explain to the child how abnormal they are. We had the same arguments against gay adoption. Basically, "It's unfair on the child because people like me will be forced to slag them for having two daddies."


    They won't have to - because children conceived in that way will start asking all by themselves.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    To be honest, I really don't have much of a clue about who this person is, and have only just googled a bit about her now.

    Regardless of what type of person she might be, my point was that I think spending a significant amount of your time devoted to harassing a person online is quite a stupid and petty way to spend your life.

    But to go one further, and to target somebody who either is a lawyer, or if not, someone who is going to make themselves busy enough to demonstrate they know their law in order to screw you over, just seems next level silly.

    I just don't understand how people can be so infuriated by other people's text so as to get so involved to their own detriment. :confused:

    Discussion it used to be called. Debate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭rgodard80a


    Sweet Jaysus... is this still going on ?

    Arguing against the majority on reality is never going to end well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,430 ✭✭✭RWCNT


    They won't have to - because children conceived in that way will start asking all by themselves.

    And then what? Children, in my experience, tend to be accepting of things that may seem very unusual to you or I, as their world view isn't cemented yet. I think it's fair to say that you're engaging in baseless concern trolling. As you were.
    filters wrote: »
    Sure a lefty website, Vox, Vice or Huff post, can't remember which one, published a guide on how to preform Cunnilingus on pre-op M-F transexuals, sure you could not make it up, the mental gymnastics these folk go through are unbelievable

    Wow, the MtF pre-op setup is so different to the normal kind you have to do gymnastics to go down on someone? Sounds fascinating. Seriously though what point are you trying to make here?


Advertisement