Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Can I ask my landlord to replace the couch?

  • 17-04-2019 3:19am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1


    I’ve been living in the house for about 8 years. There is one small two seater couch that’s not aged well. I’m actually getting pain in my neck and back from it. I have bought so many pillows and supports to make it work, but it hasn’t helped me much.
    It doesn’t have removable pillows, so repairing or upgrading isn’t possible. Is it very cheeky to ask my landlord to replace it?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,760 ✭✭✭Effects


    You can ask, it's not going to cause any harm.


  • Site Banned Posts: 160 ✭✭Kidkinobe


    You could buy your own...one that you like to sit in, asking the LL will result in a crap sofa.


  • Registered Users Posts: 267 ✭✭overkill602


    Sure but u most give him 3 months notice and have 3 comparable examples of similar couch replacements


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,449 ✭✭✭✭pwurple


    Sure but u most give him 3 months notice and have 3 comparable examples of similar couch replacements

    Where is this from... I have replaced furniture for tenants before no problem, or disposed of one and let them get their own. Had not heard of this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 426 ✭✭Nikki Sixx


    pwurple wrote: »
    Where is this from... I have replaced furniture for tenants before no problem, or disposed of one and let them get their own. Had not heard of this.

    I think the poster was being tongue in cheek. This poster was assuming that people would jump down the original poster’s throat. On Boards.ie you will generally be crucified for making any remark that may affect a landlord’s pocket.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 267 ✭✭overkill602


    yes that sh!te is only for landlords


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,263 ✭✭✭bobbyss


    I’ve been living in the house for about 8 years. There is one small two seater couch that’s not aged well. I’m actually getting pain in my neck and back from it. I have bought so many pillows and supports to make it work, but it hasn’t helped me much. It doesn’t have removable pillows, so repairing or upgrading isn’t possible. Is it very cheeky to ask my landlord to replace it?


    Explain the situation to LL. Agree on a price range that he or she agrees to cover. Give the receipt .


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,407 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    Ask away.
    If they won't you can pick up perfectly good second hand couches cheap or free from any of the ad websites.

    Most landlords wouldn't quibble with a 8 year tenant in good standing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,658 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    8 years will have it depreciated to nil value. Ask away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,658 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    bobbyss wrote: »
    Explain the situation to LL. Agree on a price range that he or she agrees to cover. Give the receipt .

    If the landlord is getting it then he picks it


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 426 ✭✭Nikki Sixx


    ted1 wrote: »
    If the landlord is getting it then he picks it

    Are you a landlord Ted?;-)


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,794 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Nikki Sixx wrote: »
    Are you a landlord Ted?;-)

    Would that make any difference?


    If a LL is providing a sofa, then the most basic ne will be provided. Once that cannot break easy but can be cleaned easy.

    Even that is above and beyond for a LL to provide unless you specifically have a fully furnished lease and even at that, it wont go into the specifics of types of furniture.

    The big risk her is that if the OP asks the LL for a new sofa and one is provided, and the OP doesn't like that sofa, then he has no choice but to live with it.

    The other option is for the tenant to pick up their own, one that suits how they live and one that suits their personal taste and décor. They can then carry this to another tenancy should it be required.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,407 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    kceire wrote: »
    If a LL is providing a sofa, then the most basic ne will be provided. Once that cannot break easy but can be cleaned easy.


    The big risk her is that if the OP asks the LL for a new sofa and one is provided, and the OP doesn't like that sofa, then he has no choice but to live with it.

    Not every LL tenant relationship is adversarial. Any LL worth their salt know that if you buy cheap you buy twice.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,794 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Pawwed Rig wrote: »
    Not every LL tenant relationship is adversarial. Any LL worth their salt know that if you buy cheap you buy twice.

    I agree with this part alright. But most relationships wouldn't be like that.

    I bought my tenant a leather sofa in 2015. Its still in excellent condition today as it can be wiped cleaned. So I would never buy a fabric sofa as a LL just as I would never buy a leather sofa for my personal home, I hate them!


  • Registered Users Posts: 985 ✭✭✭arrianalexander


    I as a landlord would rather tenant to buy the sofa, especially if the tenant is long term

    Obviously I'd give the tenant a guideline of price and suitability.

    the tenant get a couch that they like and suits and the landlord is saved hassle of shopping around or annoying tenant by buying a couch they hate.

    The request OP will be a indication to the LL that you want to stay. And care about the rental.

    Hope it works out for you OP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,625 ✭✭✭Fol20


    Kidkinobe wrote: »
    You could buy your own...one that you like to sit in, asking the LL will result in a crap sofa.

    Do not but your own. It will cost you money and where do you store the ll couch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,625 ✭✭✭Fol20


    Pawwed Rig wrote: »
    Ask away.
    If they won't you can pick up perfectly good second hand couches cheap or free from any of the ad websites.

    Most landlords wouldn't quibble with a 8 year tenant in good standing.

    I would second this. If your a decent tenant, i would be more open to this. I have even paid for repairs where i know the tenant is ar fault just because of that relationship.

    If your on the naughty list, i would stop even small stuff below 50e


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If you do go and get your own (would be better in the long run for yourself, as the LL will buy the bare minimum) make sure to record the fact. Get agreement from the LL that the old sofa needs replacing, due to age, and get that agreement in email, make sure that the LL removes the old couch and agrees that you are not responsible for it.

    Otherwise you could get a chancer claiming, at the end of tenancy, that the property came with a couch and that you are responsible for it not being there and that he is keeping security deposit.

    Best option would be if the LL gives you a price guide and you get to purchase the sofa you like (find suitable), if the LL is agreeable to it, and reimburses you for it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭ashes2014


    I would definitely ask.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭Cryptopagan


    People keep saying “buy one yourself.” So what do they do with the one that’s there? Unless there is some place to store it, they will at least have to get the landlord to agree to remove it, and even if the landlord does remove it, he might insist on replacing it at the same time.

    Also if the OP buys one, when they move they have to move their own couch too, and the same problem comes up again—there is already a couch.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,236 ✭✭✭Up Donegal


    I have to agree with others who have suggested that the O.P. gets their own couch and to let the landlord know. When the existing couch is in the state it is, it would be very unreasonable of the landlord not to allow the tenant to do this. As someone who lived in rented accommodation for a few years, when I moved in, I told the landlord that I would rather have all my own electrical goods fridge, washing machine, dryer etc. Those that were in the house were well used. He agreed to move the same items that were in the house into storage without any quibble. Another reason for doing this was that I didn't want a situation to arise where one of these things would break down shortly before I moved out and that I would lose my deposit or maybe have to leave a brand new replacement item in the house for the landlord. The only difference between my case and that of the O.P. is that mine was a short time rental while I was building a new home.

    Anyway, I think the O.P. should ask the landlord to replace the couch.

    Ceist eile:
    If the O.P. were to 'develop back trouble as a result of using the couch', would the landlord be held liable??:confused::confused:


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,407 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    (would be better in the long run for yourself, as the LL will buy the bare minimum).

    How do you know this?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭q85dw7osi4lebg


    While you are renting the house, it is your house, and you get to enjoy all the benefits that come with that, so I'd be surprised if the landlord would replace the sofa, but no harm asking.

    Doubt the landlord has someone who would pay to replace their own sofa. etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,875 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    I'm very curious as to why LL's furnish property with couches, beds, tables, chairs etc etc when they are not legally obliged to?

    In the past, rentals were always furnished but people generally only rented for a few years. If people are going to rent for longer terms in future, it does not make sense that they don't have their own things.

    Afaik, the only requirement for a LL is to provide white goods - F/F, cooker, oven, microwave, w/m but I could be wrong.

    It seems to me that LL's should start sticking exactly to the law in every aspect. Be compliant and register the tenancy, give allowed rent increases, correct notice periods, allow peaceful occupation, fix the broken stuff they need to, etc etc

    Then maybe they should just do what the law says about furnishings also? It would save a lot of grief and avoid disputes over damage and deposits at the end of a tenancy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 268 ✭✭ShaneC93


    I'm very curious as to why LL's furnish property with couches, beds, tables, chairs etc etc when they are not legally obliged to?

    In the past, rentals were always furnished but people generally only rented for a few years. If people are going to rent for longer terms in future, it does not make sense that they don't have their own things.

    Afaik, the only requirement for a LL is to provide white goods - F/F, cooker, oven, microwave, w/m but I could be wrong.

    It seems to me that LL's should start sticking exactly to the law in every aspect. Be compliant and register the tenancy, give allowed rent increases, correct notice periods, allow peaceful occupation, fix the broken stuff they need to, etc etc

    Then maybe they should just do what the law says about furnishings also? It would save a lot of grief and avoid disputes over damage and deposits at the end of a tenancy.

    Probably comes down to the amount they can charge.

    Amazing what a bit of paint and well-placed furnishings can do to make a property look more attractive, you see some landlords nowadays buying tiny apartments with mix&match furniture on the cheap, refurnishing them and being able to rent them out for 2x the price were they'll make back the price of the upgrades within a few months.

    It's similar on the continent, most apartments in Germany, The Netherlands etc. would come unfurnished in the view that folks will stay there long term and want to make the place their own and then the properties that are furnished are priced at a luxury-let rate were you're paying for the good interior design essentially.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    There are rules in some countries where you return the rental completely empty and newly painted.

    It makes inspections and damage much easier no issues with furniture and contents.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,625 ✭✭✭Fol20


    Up Donegal wrote: »
    I have to agree with others who have suggested that the O.P. gets their own couch and to let the landlord know. When the existing couch is in the state it is, it would be very unreasonable of the landlord not to allow the tenant to do this. As someone who lived in rented accommodation for a few years, when I moved in, I told the landlord that I would rather have all my own electrical goods fridge, washing machine, dryer etc. Those that were in the house were well used. He agreed to move the same items that were in the house into storage without any quibble. Another reason for doing this was that I didn't want a situation to arise where one of these things would break down shortly before I moved out and that I would lose my deposit or maybe have to leave a brand new replacement item in the house for the landlord. The only difference between my case and that of the O.P. is that mine was a short time rental while I was building a new home.

    Anyway, I think the O.P. should ask the landlord to replace the couch.

    Ceist eile:
    If the O.P. were to 'develop back trouble as a result of using the couch', would the landlord be held liable??:confused::confused:

    Most ll would decline to move fridges etc. its more work for them and more importantly more cost especially if its only a short term let. Looks like you had a decent ll.

    I would actually prefer if we went to unfurnished route so then people can have their own taste on red or purple couches instead of me putting in boring black leather etc or white appliances. I wont get phonecalls for the cheapest crap i have to put in and you feel more at home


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    OP- you have nothing to lose by asking the landlord. If the item is worn and past it’s useful life, you are definitely entitled to ask the landlord to replace it.

    The best possible outcome would be that they agree to pay for it, but you get to choose it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    People keep saying “buy one yourself.” So what do they do with the one that’s there? Unless there is some place to store it, they will at least have to get the landlord to agree to remove it, and even if the landlord does remove it, he might insist on replacing it at the same time.

    Also if the OP buys one, when they move they have to move their own couch too, and the same problem comes up again—there is already a couch.

    How do you think people do this in their own homes? You arrange for collection of the old one when you buy a new one. ???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    beauf wrote: »
    How do you think people do this in their own homes? You arrange for collection of the old one when you buy a new one. ???

    You can't just get rid of someone else's property. The landlord still owns that sofa, and you would need their agreement to dispose of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,625 ✭✭✭Fol20


    I'm very curious as to why LL's furnish property with couches, beds, tables, chairs etc etc when they are not legally obliged to?

    In the past, rentals were always furnished but people generally only rented for a few years. If people are going to rent for longer terms in future, it does not make sense that they don't have their own things.

    Afaik, the only requirement for a LL is to provide white goods - F/F, cooker, oven, microwave, w/m but I could be wrong.

    It seems to me that LL's should start sticking exactly to the law in every aspect. Be compliant and register the tenancy, give allowed rent increases, correct notice periods, allow peaceful occupation, fix the broken stuff they need to, etc etc

    Then maybe they should just do what the law says about furnishings also? It would save a lot of grief and avoid disputes over damage and deposits at the end of a tenancy.

    I completely agree with you. The only reason why im forced to get furniture is because its the norm here for what tenants expect. If you go outside the norm, your advertising to a much smaller audience. The only way i can really see this coming into the mainstream is if legislation forces ll to change or if certain REITs create a monopoly or duopoly of the market and force the change on everyone else.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Pawwed Rig wrote: »
    How do you know this?

    I would suspect that most LL would be inclined to avoid spending much on furnishings that may suit one tenant but not another, and that may need to be replaced after a tenant moves out. I’ve had to replace sofas/chairs/beds/lockers, not because of the price paid for them, but because the tenants wrecked them. Now I buy low cost furnishings that I won’t mind replacing at the end of a tenancy.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,407 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    Dav010 wrote: »
    I would suspect that most LL would be inclined to avoid spending much on furnishings that may suit one tenant but not another, and that may need to be replaced after a tenant moves out. I’ve had to replace sofas/chairs/beds/lockers, not because of the price paid for them, but because the tenants wrecked them. Now I buy low cost furnishings that I won’t mind replacing at the end of a tenancy.

    The tenant has been there 8 years which negates your point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,658 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    beauf wrote: »
    There are rules in some countries where you return the rental completely empty and newly painted.

    It makes inspections and damage much easier no issues with furniture and contents.

    Not sure about that fresh paint can conceal slot if issues


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Pawwed Rig wrote: »
    The tenant has been there 8 years which negates your point.

    Actually the time scale makes no difference whatsoever unless I was trying to make the tenant pay for the damage, after 8 years wear & tear has to be expected and accepted.

    Most LLs will not spend big on furnishings in rentals, irrespective of whether the person is there one year or eight.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭skallywag


    In the past, rentals were always furnished but people generally only rented for a few years. If people are going to rent for longer terms in future, it does not make sense that they don't have their own things.

    Agree strongly with that.

    If Ireland is going to get to the point of having a mature rental market, e.g. compared to other countries where renting is very much the norm, then it needs to move to a model where the property is rented empty, apart from kitchen and bathroom. Those who wish to rent mid to long term are of course going to want to have their own furnishings, etc.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,407 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    If I had a tenant for 8 years and they were looking after the house well traditionally I would keep the rent low (as did large numbers of LLs my last one included). As one can no longer do that due to RPZ they need to be looked after in other ways. If this means spending a relative tiny amount more on furnishings then so be it. Whatever I spend on tenants only actually costs half (after tax) so generally not a huge concern.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,875 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    Fol20 wrote: »
    I completely agree with you. The only reason why im forced to get furniture is because its the norm here for what tenants expect. If you go outside the norm, your advertising to a much smaller audience. The only way i can really see this coming into the mainstream is if legislation forces ll to change or if certain REITs create a monopoly or duopoly of the market and force the change on everyone else.

    If a Part4 tenancy in a RPZ was finished, tenants moved out and LL removed everything except what they are legally obliged to provide, then advertised at the legally allowed rent, would there be no takers?

    I think there would be a lot of potential tenants for an unfurnished property but that's just my opinion.

    So many LL's talk about the costs of staying in the rental market and the headaches that go with it.

    Unfurnished would reduce turnaround times for LL between tenancies. They would not have the huge costs of re-fitting out an entire house or apartment for a new letting and the time that takes, there would be less paperwork and accounting fees - I'm sure there are other benefits.

    Maybe it would just take one or two LL's to start letting unfurnished and it would gradually change.

    Of course there could be other legal reasons for sticking with fully furnished that I don't know about :)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Pawwed Rig wrote: »
    If I had a tenant for 8 years and they were looking after the house well traditionally I would keep the rent low (as did large numbers of LLs my last one included). As one can no longer do that due to RPZ they need to be looked after in other ways. If this means spending a relative tiny amount more on furnishings then so be it. Whatever I spend on tenants only actually costs half (after tax) so generally not a huge concern.

    That is enviable. But I have found that most tenants are indifferent to how much it has cost you to replace furniture, they treat expensive and cheap furniture the same way as it does not belong to them, why spend more than you have to?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭skallywag


    I think there would be a lot of potential tenants for an unfurnished property but that's just my opinion.

    Most definitely.

    It is a mindset thing I would say, in that folk just see it as the accepted norm. If I was renting mid to long term myself though I would most definitely want to furnish it myself.

    If one tried to rent a furnished property on the continent you would actually struggle to do so usually.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,036 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    If a Part4 tenancy in a RPZ was finished, tenants moved out and LL removed everything except what they are legally obliged to provide, then advertised at the legally allowed rent, would there be no takers?

    I think there would be a lot of potential tenants for an unfurnished property but that's just my opinion.

    So many LL's talk about the costs of staying in the rental market and the headaches that go with it.

    Unfurnished would reduce turnaround times for LL between tenancies. They would not have the huge costs of re-fitting out an entire house or apartment for a new letting and the time that takes, there would be less paperwork and accounting fees - I'm sure there are other benefits.

    Maybe it would just take one or two LL's to start letting unfurnished and it would gradually change.

    Of course there could be other legal reasons for sticking with fully furnished that I don't know about :)

    Furniture or no furniture in a rental will make little difference to someone thinking of renting out. The fact that the system is completely biased to the tenants is what is stopping people from entering the market and the proposed legislation won't change that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,625 ✭✭✭Fol20


    skallywag wrote: »
    Most definitely.

    It is a mindset thing I would say, in that folk just see it as the accepted norm. If I was renting mid to long term myself though I would most definitely want to furnish it myself.

    If one tried to rent a furnished property on the continent that you would actually struggle to do so usually.

    You hit the nail, its a culture in mindset rather than a legal aspect.

    As another poster mentioned, if we need to get to a mature rental industry, we really need to go this way asap.

    One route i would like that would entice this method is unfurnished properties normally attract longer term tenants so in turn are long term rental. These could be taxed at a cheaper tax rate potentially. This would help tenants for long term stability and ll in terms of tax and hassle.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,648 ✭✭✭✭beauf


    dudara wrote: »
    You can't just get rid of someone else's property. The landlord still owns that sofa, and you would need their agreement to dispose of it.

    I kinda assumed no one would think otherwise ....


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Pawwed Rig wrote: »
    How do you know this?

    It would be what the landlord decides so, by default, will be what the landlord decrees as the bare minimum for the property/tenant, which may or may not be up to the expectations of the tenant.

    As to what that minimum is? In all my years renting I never came across a good quality and easily cleanable sofa, nor in friends/relatives rented properties.

    So slightly more than anecdotal evidence.

    I would also not be giving a tenant a 3grand corner unit. I would pay for something sturdy and long lasting (and that may not be the most comfortable or luxurious sofa, even in it's price bracket)


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,794 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    beauf wrote: »
    How do you think people do this in their own homes? You arrange for collection of the old one when you buy a new one. ???

    You cannot simply dispose of the LL's couch unless you have permission to do so.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    kceire wrote: »
    You cannot simply dispose of the LL's couch unless you have permission to do so.

    Also, stores take your old stuff (which is generally knackered).
    Don't think the LL would be happy with you trashing functional white goods


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,208 ✭✭✭The_Honeybadger


    I’ve been living in the house for about 8 years. There is one small two seater couch that’s not aged well. I’m actually getting pain in my neck and back from it. I have bought so many pillows and supports to make it work, but it hasn’t helped me much.
    It doesn’t have removable pillows, so repairing or upgrading isn’t possible. Is it very cheeky to ask my landlord to replace it?

    You can ask but god only knows what POS hand me down he will come up with. If you can afford it buy your own, even a good condition used one and at least you’ll know what you are getting and can take it with you if you move on.

    Obviously clear it with him first and ask him to take away the old one if he is agreeable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,625 ✭✭✭Fol20


    Im actually surprised at the amount of people saying get your own couch. I would have thought most would fob it off to the ll and in the rare occasion here, it is the ll responsibility for the couch not the tenant.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators Posts: 12,332 Mod ✭✭✭✭miamee


    Fol20 wrote: »
    Im actually surprised at the amount of people saying get your own couch. I would have thought most would fob it off to the ll and in the rare occasion here, it is the ll responsibility for the couch not the tenant.
    The effort and thought a landlord might put into choosing a couch for himself would not be the same effort and thought he'd put into choosing one for the tenant - she already has a literal pain in the neck from the current couch landlord has in the property so choosing one that suits her is probably the best idea to avoid another pain in the neck. I used to have a similar uncomfortable two seater yoke in a rental, it looked absolutely fine but sitting in it for any length of time was another story.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,407 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    So slightly more than anecdotal evidence.

    You haven't provided evidence at all. You dressed up an opinion and presented it as evidence. Big difference.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement