Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Shane Ross (quite rightly) puts the boot into the NTA

  • 19-12-2011 8:08pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭


    Shane Ross had a right go at the No Trains Authority in yesterdays' Sunday Indo. As usual amongst all the waffle there are some valid points and there's no doubt that the NTA is just another quango which protects both CIE and their political masters. Until such time as the NTA has proper representatives from its shareholders it will remain an utterly useless creation but a nice little earner for its members. :D

    Shane Ross: Flabby CIE puts cost on to you

    http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/shane-ross/shane-ross-flabby-cie-puts-cost-on-to-you-2966902.html

    So you will be hit by the household tax? Your VHI premiums are about to rocket? You have a child at university? You drive a car?

    You ain't seen nothing yet. Worse is to come. And worse could have been prevented.

    The coalition cannot blame the troika, burn effigies of the IMF's AJ Chopra or beat up on the last government for this one. This is their own handiwork.

    The mother of all stings is waiting for you in January.

    On December 5, Minister Brendan Howlin announced that he was cutting the state subsidy to CIE by €21m.

    Not a bad idea as CIE has in recent years been exposed as a swamp of waste and skulduggery.

    Quangos like CIE and its three subsidiaries -- Dublin Bus, Bus Eireann and Iarnrod Eireann -- are in dire need of efficiencies. There is plenty of fat hidden in the darker corners of these bloated bodies.

    On December 9, just four days after Brendan had taken his brave step, a friendly quango rode to the rescue of CIE and its three little quango babes.

    The National Transport Authority quietly announced that it was giving the go-ahead for a whole range of rises in bus, train, Luas and Dart fares. Dublin Bus was given the green light for 15 per cent increases in cash fares. This little grenade was lost in the budget furore and European crisis.

    In one leap the three quangos had beaten the cuts. The reduction in the subsidy was neutered. There would be no need to take the axe to the wasters in the quangos. Ordinary commuters could make up the shortfall.

    Travellers on Dublin Bus and other routes had been picked off. They have no alternative but to travel on the monopolist's buses. Those who spend as much as €20 a week on bus fares will pay an extra €150 next year -- more than the €100 household tax. Many punters will pay both.

    It was a wonderful comradely gesture of the National Transport Authority quango to give such an uncharacteristically speedy response to the minister's attempt to put manners on CIE. Barely 72 hours waiting for a lifeline, CIE can continue to do what it does best: presiding over the overpriced shambles that affects to offer a public transport service. One good quango helps another.

    The friendly quango issued an explanation for its decision. It read like an apologia for CIE.

    Incredibly, the first paragraph offers the eight per cent cut in the state subsidy to CIE as the primary excuse for letting fares rip.

    Quango logic at its best. The response to Howlin's cutback to a spendthrift quango is to crucify the masses. Switch the burden on to the vulnerable. Spare the upper echelons at CIE. The apologia went on to list the economic downturn, increased fuel costs and earlier subsidy cuts as justifications for the punitive price increase.

    The NTA even blames emigration, immigrants returning home, unemployment, and lower tourist numbers. The NTA fingers everybody but CIE for the problems at the company, even boasting that it has not yielded to Dublin Bus's application for fare increases of between 25 per cent and 36 per cent!!

    The statement goes on to admit that the revenue from the increased fares will exceed the reduced subvention. So Dublin Bus was a net winner on the week. Quite a neat piece of sleight of hand.

    The Transport Authority frantically tried to shield itself from criticism by announcing the launch of the new Leap Card. This gimmick is public transport's belated gesture to the high-tech age, an integrated ticketing system to allow some commuters to soften some of the price hikes on some of the routes.

    A mysterious tortoise, this Leap Card creature. It suddenly appears on the platforms a few weeks before the January fare rises. Amazing how these things can be done so quickly in the slovenly semi-states. Especially as the Leap Card has taken nine years to create!

    Is the Leap Card value for money? The National Transport Authority did not tell us how much the Leap Card cost to develop.

    Guess: Was it €50,000 of taxpayers' money? €500,000? €5m? €55m?

    You got it in one. The total cost of developing the Leap Card, after nine years, was €55m.

    Most of the revenue from the fare increases in the first few years will be spent paying for the Leap Card. This little project must rank with E-Voting machines as one of the most reckless wastes of taxpayers' money in the last decade.

    Nevertheless CIE and its fellow quango are brazen enough to parade it as breakthrough.

    The NTA should have refused all fare increases, demanded an explanation why the Leap Card took nine years from start to completion and cost the taxpayer €55m. They should have satisfied themselves that all the malpractices at Iarnrod Eireann had ended before even considering a price rise for any CIE company.

    Instead they peddled the CIE line, supported by its downtown office -- the department of transport.

    The National Transport Authority is a captive, a quick learner of the quango culture. It was set up in 2009 to supervise Ireland's public transport shambles. It went native immediately. It has been highly politicised from Day One. Its board is picked by the minister for transport and includes at least one real Fianna Fail peach.

    Its annual report buries the names of its directors at the very back on the final page in the last appendix. It fails to give a single line about its well-paid board members (apart from their names) but we know they were chosen by former minister Noel Dempsey, a man who was never shy about promoting Fianna Fail favourites for quango gigs.

    The Fianna Fail peach is a Donegal FF councillor. Daithi Alcorn was appointed to the NTA board in the dying days of the last FF/Green coalition after already being a director of the National Roads Authority (NRA).

    Other NTA directors are beneficiaries of the quango merry-go-round.

    This NTA quango deserves recognition. It serves a real purpose. It shields the government from the political charge that it was the villain that put up public transport fares. Last week in the Dail, Tanaiste Eamon Gilmore answered a question about the fare hikes with the same NTA/CIE/ Department of Transport line: after brandishing the Leap Card he insisted that the government was detached from such a sensitive decision. It was not the government's business. The NTA set the bus fares!

    Not strictly true. The government has the power under legislation to issue guidelines or policies to the NTA. What better use of these powers than to freeze fares.

    Alternatively, they could require the political appointees on the board to stop the rises.

    The political appointees on the NTA board have already earned their five-figure fees. They are being shoved out there in the front line to take the flak for the Government.

    The Government has made a virtue of leaving income tax untouched. They did not need to. If you live in a house, you are clobbered. If you take a bus, you are impoverished. If you drive a car, you are crippled. If you save money, you are punished. If you have VHI cover, you may be mugged.

    There is still an alternative: we could burn the bondholders and throw the quangos on the same bonfire.

    - Shane Ross


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 218 ✭✭SilverLiningOK


    So the NTA is to Transport what the HSE is to Health ! A blocking exercise to protect the political elite from responsibility. Like in health it probably be used a back door cunning plan to privatisation. Then we will be even in more trouble. Public transport will become more expensive private transport owned by friends and backers of the regime.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,535 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    One thing that the NTA will have to do announce the rest of the directors on the board to see where they work and what they are paid.

    If they are all consultants, well it is the case that they are not worth the taxpayer's money to stay in it. That Simple. After all, they are worth on average around €200,000 to the state.

    CIE had no problem in announce their chairperson's for Irish Rail, Dublin Bus and Bus Eireann. The state should do that for the rest of the other boards, the names of directors, chairpersons and chief executives should be made public for the common good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick



    CIE had no problem in announce their chairperson's for Irish Rail, Dublin Bus and Bus Eireann. The state should do that for the rest of the other boards, the names of directors, chairpersons and chief executives should be made public for the common good.
    or like every private company because it's the law to name the directors of a limited company.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    One thing that the NTA will have to do announce the rest of the directors on the board to see where they work and what they are paid.

    If they are all consultants, well it is the case that they are not worth the taxpayer's money to stay in it. That Simple. After all, they are worth on average around €200,000 to the state.

    CIE had no problem in announce their chairperson's for Irish Rail, Dublin Bus and Bus Eireann. The state should do that for the rest of the other boards, the names of directors, chairpersons and chief executives should be made public for the common good.

    It's not exactly hidden or hard to find......

    http://www.nationaltransport.ie/board.html

    You do realise that a five figure sum does not add up to €200,000?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,920 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    So how is Jim Deegan (MD of Railtours Ireland, one of Irish Rail's biggest customers) not a suitable individual to be a board member of the NTA?

    I'd accept the criticism of the Donegal councillor, but to simply suggest that they are all not suitable is making a very sweeping statement.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    Not surprisingly Shane Ross doesn't actually make any concrete proposals for what the NTA could have done which would not have led to massive cancellation of services and/or strike action by the 3 companies?

    He also seems to have forgotten that the RPA got a fares increase too.

    The NTA it seems to me were left with a fait accompli by the Government in reducing the subvention, so they could either agree to increase fares (by less than what was requested by the companies) or they could have said no and services would have been immediately slashed which would have led to TDs from everywhere kicking and screaming about "their" local services being cancelled.

    I still think wages in the 4 companies (inc RPA) should be reduced in line with public sector wages, (that would save some money not as much as people think) but could also lead to significant IR issues, it's a tricky one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭syklops


    I'm getting pissed off with Shane Ross. He gets media attention, and speaks a lot about what the government is doing is wrong, but apart from that doesn't do anything. Go do something, and I'll listen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,084 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    I'm not acquanited with Shane Ross. But his obsessive use of "quango" makes me think he's just wanting to put the boot into them in general, and weakens whatever substantial arguments he might be making. (I flagged the article as "sensationalist tripe" before getting to any.)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,212 ✭✭✭Jaysoose


    Shane Ross is one of the very few people in irish politics that will tell the truth, just because he is drowned out by the rest of the spoofers and pension collectors doesnt mean he is sensationalist.

    Public transport in this country is a disgrace and fair play for him writing this piece to show it for what it is, an old boys club protected from on high.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    syklops wrote: »
    Go do something, and I'll listen.
    He did. He ran in the last general election and got elected. That's more than most people would do. How many posters on here ran in the general election for example.

    It's a huge pity that FG decided to go the Labour route, instead of getting a few like-minded Independents on board.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭syklops


    n97 mini wrote: »
    He did. He ran in the last general election and got elected. That's more than most people would do. How many posters on here ran in the general election for example.
    .

    FFS he was in a better situation than most considering he was a senator before hand and is an editor for the Sunday Independent.

    Its not like he is a goat herder in Mayo.

    Despite all that he has, he still doesn't do anything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,212 ✭✭✭Jaysoose


    syklops wrote: »
    FFS he was in a better situation than most considering he was a senator before hand and is an editor for the Sunday Independent.

    Its not like he is a goat herder in Mayo.

    Despite all that he has, he still doesn't do anything.


    Hang on a second what exactly can he do? these quangos are protected by the majority parties and are so entrenched as public servants they are practically untouchable.

    At least he is standing up and saying what is wrong with the system, which is a hell of a lot more than posting on a forum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    syklops wrote: »
    FFS he was in a better situation than most considering he was a senator before hand and is an editor for the Sunday Independent.

    Its not like he is a goat herder in Mayo.

    Despite all that he has, he still doesn't do anything.

    As as Senator he can't do anything, that's why he ran for the Dáil. Apart from providing a robust opposition he can't do anything there unless he is invited into Govt. I believe a lot of his constituents, and beyond, would have liked to have seen him in Govt. I know I would, and I am disappointed that FG chose Labour as their partners (as I think are most private sector people who voted FG), but that's not something that was in his power to control.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,360 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    syklops wrote: »
    I'm getting pissed off with Shane Ross. He gets media attention, and speaks a lot about what the government is doing is wrong, but apart from that doesn't do anything. Go do something, and I'll listen.

    T'is a problem I have with Irish politics in general, way to critical and not constructive in any way what so ever.

    Doesn't matter where their ass is seated in the Dáil / Seanad.

    Edit:

    And the article copied above doesn't do anything te make me think otherwise to be honest. He's pointing fingers, slating everything he talks about without offering anything of any value.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,337 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    My impression of Shane Ross having read some committee transcripts and read his "Wasters" book is twofold:

    1. He comes off in questioning CIE execs as if he's more interested in excoriating them for some numpty in a Depot flogging off 5,000 euro worth of sleepers than finding a way to grow revenue or shrink spending that might even take 1% off the annual operating deficit before subsidy.

    2. What he DOES do still makes it 10 times better than most of the Oireachtas in terms of interest and effectiveness in transport issues.

    Pretty sad overall really. There's a real need for someone who will truly specialise in keeping CIE honest rather than flitting from quango to semi-state looking for things to point and rage at for the weekly column or Oireachtas Report. Until then he'll do.

    {EDIT: it doesn't help that Ministers in the Republic refuse to be directly answerable for CIE operations the way their counterparts in NI are of Translink}


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭Judgement Day


    Personally I don't like Shane Ross but the enemy of my enemy is my friend. :D


Advertisement