Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Green Party disintegration / split

2456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,560 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    That intro line from the article implies that Nicoullaud is also SDCC - she's actually DCC; so its not like its even two councillors that worked together.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I am not sure what the Green Party could have done to keep these people on board. This bit is telling:
    he felt it was inevitable he would resign at some point after the Greens entered government


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    There was a report in the paper the other day regarding the use of plastics in Ireland. Been an issue for years. Not a peep out of the Greens. Could it be some members are wondering why they are in with FF/FG if they aren't doing good works?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Bowie wrote: »
    There was a report in the paper the other day regarding the use of plastics in Ireland. Been an issue for years. Not a peep out of the Greens. Could it be some members are wondering why they are in with FF/FG if they aren't doing good works?

    Party already published a significant waste reduction strategy as part of its commitments from the PfG. It will take time to implement, but the plan to deal with the problem is in place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,560 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Drip drip drip....

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40213634.html

    Sitting Cllr and future TD hope for them gone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Can't be too long before they lose an actual TD at this rate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    L1011 wrote: »
    Drip drip drip....

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40213634.html

    Sitting Cllr and future TD hope for them gone.

    the party seems to be quite militant on the inside in both the pro and anti pfg groupings.

    the cracks are definitely showing. Some of the more moderates will likely roll into FF or FG and get 'environment spokesperson' etc.. as a title, the further left ones will leave for their own alphabet soup party leaving Ryan and some diehards to go down with the ship.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,560 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Can't be too long before they lose an actual TD at this rate.

    At least some of them won't vote for CETA and that could cause the split


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,594 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    These type of parties like the Greens just don't belong in government. They are an opposition party, a protest movement.

    When they get into government, they fall apart because they have to make decisions.

    The People Before Profit, Socialist crowd understand this and will never enter government.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    the cracks are definitely showing. Some of the more moderates will likely roll into FF or FG and get 'environment spokesperson' etc.. as a title, the further left ones will leave for their own alphabet soup party leaving Ryan and some diehards to go down with the ship.
    The cracks were showing even before the ink was dry on the coalition agreement. Only surprise is how long they have lasted already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    PommieBast wrote: »
    The cracks were showing even before the ink was dry on the coalition agreement. Only surprise is how long they have lasted already.

    they were always going to be the party to lose in this coalition, I think its just the elected reps jumping ship before it hits the iceberg.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    As green policy becomes more mainstream across all political parties (in Ireland at least), one wonders what the point of the Green Party is?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,350 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There was a report in the paper the other day regarding the use of plastics in Ireland. Been an issue for years. Not a peep out of the Greens. Could it be some members are wondering why they are in with FF/FG if they aren't doing good works?

    There has been no report published regarding the use of plastics in Ireland. There has been a Eurostat release on data regarding waste recovery across the EU 27, that might be what you are mistakenly thinking about, here is a link to the material:

    https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Packaging_waste_statistics#Conclusions

    The first thing to note is that this relates to the period to 2018, so excludes all of the changes that the Greens have made. It covers a period when FG were in government.

    There are some very interesting conclusions. On the positive side, Ireland has the seventh highest recovery and recycling rate of the EU27 at 90.9%(see Table 1). This is a good result and reflects well on the government for having ensured that recycling and recovery arrangements are in place. Our private waste collection service obviously operates well. There is some room for improvement and we should be aiming to get above 95%.

    Where the country doesn't perform as well is in the area of generating waste. Per capita we generate the fourth highest amount of packaging waste in the EU27. A lot of this poor performance can be laid at the feet of business and consumers. For example, one difference between an Irish supermarket and one in France or Spain is that there are far less loose vegetables and fruit available in Irish supermarkets as the consumer prefers packages. Similarly, businesses in Ireland also over-packaging. Government responses are limited - but arguably a lot more could be done in respect of education and awareness-raising.

    To be fair to the Greens, they have already moved on these issues, getting rid of single-use plastics, increased education and awareness campaigns, new levies and enforcement. To become more aware of the issue, you should read the plan:

    https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/eb955-minister-ryan-launches-waste-action-plan-for-a-circular-economy/

    So some good work done by the previous government and a lot more being worked on by the Greens in government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,246 ✭✭✭friendlyfun


    The current set up is the best the Green Party will ever get imo. Those social justice warrior types need stop clowning around. They're only wounded themselves and their cause by creating splits and dissension.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    As green policy becomes more mainstream across all political parties (in Ireland at least), one wonders what the point of the Green Party is?

    Pointing out the reality that the supposedly Green mainstream policy is nowhere near enough to deal with the scale of the crisis we face. The previous governments utter failure to even live up to the requirements of the Paris agreement shows this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,365 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    Pointing out the reality that the supposedly Green mainstream policy is nowhere near enough to deal with the scale of the crisis we face. The previous governments utter failure to even live up to the requirements of the Paris agreement shows this.

    Ireland were what 95% off meeting the emissions target for 2019.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    All that will be left is the Tory's on bicycles from South Dublin with their lovely new cycle lanes and electric BMW SUV's


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    All that will be left is the Tory's on bicycles from South Dublin with their lovely new cycle lanes and electric BMW SUV's

    Oh no, not cycle lanes, god forbid... :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    Oh no, not cycle lanes, god forbid... :rolleyes:

    I'm a cyclist btw


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,870 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I'm a cyclist btw

    I thought Greens were re-cyclists.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    https://twitter.com/greenparty_ie/status/1355215215374315530


    Should be an interesting conversation


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    What a load of utter bollox they sold out they support greyhound racing grants 19 million, coursing all the things they spoke out against in the name of power no better than FF or FG cronyism and vote getting speel. They are just as Ivan Yates said 'once in power all you do is work out how you can retain your seat near power'. Sell out ****ers no green votes from us ever again. I hoped green would mean kind to animals and the environment not a bit - green wash thats all they talk no morals no nothing they actually stand for nothing but a few cycling helmets !

    The Green party pushed for an end to funding for Greyhound industry, and a ban on coursing in PfG talks, as per their long held policies on both. FF/FG refused to consider these measures and they were not able to get it into the PfG as a result.

    The PfG is a compromise that the Green party entered into for the sake of getting some of their policies implemented. Getting everything they wanted over the line was never going to happen.

    You can rant about that being a sell out all you like, but it does make you look rather naive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,132 ✭✭✭Augme


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    The Green party pushed for an end to funding for Greyhound industry, and a ban on coursing in PfG talks, as per their long held policies on both. FF/FG refused to consider these measures and they were not able to get it into the PfG as a result.

    The PfG is a compromise that the Green party entered into for the sake of getting some of their policies implemented. Getting everything they wanted over the line was never going to happen.

    You can rant about that being a sell out all you like, but it does make you look rather naive.

    I think the Green party are the ones who look navie tbh. They should have been far smarter and realised that the FG/FF would have to give in on climate policies as there is huge support for them. The Green party had a great bargaining position to then push for other policies, like the greyhound one, to be implemented but they didn't.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Augme wrote: »
    I think the Green party are the ones who look navie tbh. They should have been far smarter and realised that the FG/FF would have to give in on climate policies as there is huge support for them. The Green party had a great bargaining position to then push for other policies, like the greyhound one, to be implemented but they didn't.

    They did though, for weeks, and got some significant concessions, such as an end to Direct Proviaion. But they were never ever going to get everything. It's very easy now to pick out the things they could not get over the line and accuse them of selling out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    my vote for them was on the strength of the animal issues and they didnt fight hard enough the fianna failers are all invested in coursing & racing so thats why, FF votes matter.


    i am not naive i am an animal lover and our country has the name of being the cruelest and most uncaring country in the EU fueling puppy farming, 6000 P/A culled greyhounds thousands of ethnic horses all living on council lands with no fodder and no one prepared to fight for a little mercy and law enforcement.



    We are a joke there are 60 horses in limerick on a developers property starving and the guards or the dept of agric wont break the locks so volunteer hay can be brought in. They fed them 3 weeks ago and a new padlock has been fitted what is the point of having laws if certain communities go without punishment.

    I micro chip my dog my horse has a chip and passport why do i comply and they dont have too . Our governance is nothing. law enforcement a joke and therefore the elected smug gits are useless in my opinion..

    Do you really think if the Greens had tried extra special hard they would have convinced FF/FG to go along with defunding the Greyhound industry and banning coursing?

    I don't. The Greens did actually push hard on these issues, and it became very clear that it was a red line for FF/FG that they would not shift from. You can take the view that the Greens should not have gone into government on principle as a result, but that would still not have changed anything as far as greyhound funding or hare coursing is concerned.


  • Registered Users Posts: 728 ✭✭✭bertiebomber


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    Do you really think if the Greens had tried extra special hard they would have convinced FF/FG to go along with defunding the Greyhound industry and banning coursing?

    I don't. The Greens did actually push hard on these issues, and it became very clear that it was a red line for FF/FG that they would not shift from. You can take the view that the Greens should not have gone into government on principle as a result, but that would still not have changed anything as far as greyhound funding or hare coursing is concerned.


    tragically you are right all that matter to FG & FF are votes nothing else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,900 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    my vote for them was on the strength of the animal issues and they didnt fight hard enough the fianna failers are all invested in coursing & racing so thats why, FF votes matter.

    A vote for the green party was for them to get a subset of their policies implemented as part of a coalition government. Depending who they went in with, different polices would have been part of the PfG, SF, for example, would have been unlikely to give any concession on taxes that hit home heating using highly polluting fossil fuels (among other items).

    You are rather naïve if you voted for them under other pretences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,132 ✭✭✭Augme


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    They did though, for weeks, and got some significant concessions, such as an end to Direct Proviaion. But they were never ever going to get everything. It's very easy now to pick out the things they could not get over the line and accuse them of selling out.


    Even if the Green's weren't in Government Direct Provision would very highly have ended. There was already significant pressure to end DP with a previous report by an Oireachtas Joint Committee stating it wasn't fit for purpose. The public had made it quite clear they didn't like the system, it was a vote loser for Fine Gael and Fianna Fail while there being no political benefit for both FF/FG to retain DP.

    As I said, I think they were naive and let themselves be convinced that concessions given to them were because the Green Party demanded them rather than FF/FG being in a position were they would have to change those no matter who went in Government with them. If they were smarter they could have used this position to their advantage to extract more, but they didn't. It was all a bit amateur from them I felt.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Augme wrote: »
    Even if the Green's weren't in Government Direct Provision would very highly have ended. There was already significant pressure to end DP with a previous report by an Oireachtas Joint Committee stating it wasn't fit for purpose. The public had made it quite clear they didn't like the system, it was a vote loser for Fine Gael and Fianna Fail while there being no political benefit for both FF/FG to retain DP.

    As I said, I think they were naive and let themselves be convinced that concessions given to them were because the Green Party demanded them rather than FF/FG being in a position were they would have to change those no matter who went in Government with them. If they were smarter they could have used this position to their advantage to extract more, but they didn't. It was all a bit amateur from them I felt.

    Thats very easy to say, but is not actually based on any evidence or facts of any kind, it's just an unfounded opinion.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,900 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    Thats very easy to say, but is not actually based on any evidence or facts of any kind, it's just an unfounded opinion.

    "We would have negotiated better" is what every party says all of the time, and it's never true, in every case more concessions in another equally painful area have to be given. Look at Brexit, which, in the end, became a "give us the deal that makes us look least stupid publicly".

    The other point to note, if you're publicly announcing how you would negotiate better, and what you will get, then, on average, you will always get a worse deal, because the other side will know which areas you will pay more for.

    Of course, everybody believes they are the Delboy Trotter of the making deals world (funny how nobody thinks they're a trump, but that's probably for another thread :)).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    In Ireland we have a voting system where it is unlikely that a party will ever from a government on their own (despite what happened in the past). I find it very frustrating that in the leadup to elections nobody seems to acknowledge this fact. Instead we have party leaders boxing themselves in about who they will not go into government with and parties saying what they will do as part of their platform but not what they are willing to compromise on when they inevitably have to enter coalition talks.

    The net result of this is that they are short-changing their own voters by giving them unrealistic expectations of what they can achieve in government (or who they will actually go into government with) - which often ends up hurting them in the long run.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    In Ireland we have a voting system where it is unlikely that a party will ever from a government on their own (despite what happened in the past). I find it very frustrating that in the leadup to elections nobody seems to acknowledge this fact. Instead we have party leaders boxing themselves in about who they will not go into government with and parties saying what they will do as part of their platform but not what they are willing to compromise on when they inevitably have to enter coalition talks.

    The net result of this is that they are short-changing their own voters by giving them unrealistic expectations of what they can achieve in government (or who they will actually go into government with) - which often ends up hurting them in the long run.

    This is very true. I think declaring that you will or will not enter coalition with another given party is fair enough (especially if it is followed through) as it gives the electorate a fair estimate of the options on the table. That does not mean it was a good idea for FF/FG in the last election as it ended up boosting SF.

    Some countries regularly have parties form proto-coalitions before an election and present a draft PfG to the electorate for approval. It would be interesting to see compeating coalitions in play here rather than the likes of PBP launching a manifesto pretending that they can form their own government in the run up to an election.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,870 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    This is very true. I think declaring that you will or will not enter coalition with another given party is fair enough (especially if it is followed through) as it gives the electorate a fair estimate of the options on the table. That does not mean it was a good idea for FF/FG in the last election as it ended up boosting SF.

    Some countries regularly have parties form proto-coalitions before an election and present a draft PfG to the electorate for approval. It would be interesting to see compeating coalitions in play here rather than the likes of PBP launching a manifesto pretending that they can form their own government in the run up to an election.

    In the eighties and nineties, Lab/FG would only form a Gov in coalition with each other, and FF refused to contemplate coalition. So a vote for Lab or FG was a vote against a FF government. Simples.

    Now with fifty shades of parties or indos, there is no guaranty who would be in the mix to form a mixem gatherem coalition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,364 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The Greens. Haven't the stomach for real politics. Much rather sit in common rooms and coffee houses talking about the sacrifices that must be made, the cost of which will be borne by others.

    I mean what sort of political advisors do they have that can't get them to build around this programme for Government, see the bigger picture, take the small wins and forge momentum, sell them to a party membership that needs a totem.

    Bunch of soppy zealots to a man, clinging on to a rudderless heap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,350 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    astrofool wrote: »
    "We would have negotiated better" is what every party says all of the time, and it's never true, in every case more concessions in another equally painful area have to be given. Look at Brexit, which, in the end, became a "give us the deal that makes us look least stupid publicly".

    The other point to note, if you're publicly announcing how you would negotiate better, and what you will get, then, on average, you will always get a worse deal, because the other side will know which areas you will pay more for.

    Of course, everybody believes they are the Delboy Trotter of the making deals world (funny how nobody thinks they're a trump, but that's probably for another thread :)).


    You know all those opposition parties whinging about the Greens going into coalition with FF and FG - they could have offered the Greens a better deal.

    They didn’t, so we are where we are.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    blanch152 wrote: »
    You know all those opposition parties whinging about the Greens going into coalition with FF and FG - they could have offered the Greens a better deal.

    They didn’t, so we are where we are.

    Once FF/FG both ruled out coalition with SF, there was no realistcally possible government that did not include both FF and FG, the only question was who would go in with them. Lab/SD could have gone in instead of the Greens, but there was never a chance of a left government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    Once FF/FG both ruled out coalition with SF, there was no realistcally possible government that did not include both FF and FG, the only question was who would go in with them. Lab/SD could have gone in instead of the Greens, but there was never a chance of a left government.
    I thought ruling out SF was specific to MM rather than FF in general and I was honestly expecting MM to get the boot in order to enable a SF+FF tie-up. Not sure if MLMcD would have gone with it though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    PommieBast wrote: »
    I thought ruling out SF was specific to MM rather than FF in general and I was honestly expecting MM to get the boot in order to enable a SF+FF tie-up. Not sure if MLMcD would have gone with it though.

    MM actually wavered the day after the election when he was interviewed outside the count centre in Cork. He said something like "We will have to consider the decision of the voters" when asked was he still ruling out in SF.

    It was actually some of his TDs (I specifically remember Jim O' Callaghan throwing a fit at the prospect) who definitely ruled it out and led MM to his ultimate decision.

    There were other FF members, such as Eamon O'Cuiv who would have preferred SF over FG but they were in the minority.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,870 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    MM actually wavered the day after the election when he was interviewed outside the count centre in Cork. He said something like "We will have to consider the decision of the voters" when asked was he still ruling out in SF.

    It was actually some of his TDs (I specifically remember Jim O' Callaghan throwing a fit at the prospect) who definitely ruled it out and led MM to his ultimate decision.

    There were other FF members, such as Eamon O'Cuiv who would have preferred SF over FG but they were in the minority.

    The result was not clear at that time. The RTE exit poll suggested 25% for FF FG and SF - give or take - suggesting a two party solution was not enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    The CETA ratification will have the wolves at Ryan's door...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    The CETA ratification will have the wolves at Ryan's door...

    I hadnt read much in to ceta but after reading this : https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-40219565.html , CETA sounds fantastic, ratcheting in market liberalisation and privatisation and its going to bury the greens, how can one trade deal deliver so much good


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    I hadnt read much in to ceta but after reading this : https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-40219565.html , CETA sounds fantastic, ratcheting in market liberalisation and privatisation and its going to bury the greens, how can one trade deal deliver so much good

    To the people who got the affluent gardeners 10 seats its a concerning development added with fact it was supposed to be in for a vote Christmas week when we we're all concerned over Brexit with very little debate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    To the people who got the affluent gardeners 10 seats its a concerning development added with fact it was supposed to be in for a vote Christmas week when we we're all concerned over Brexit with very little debate.

    it always puzzles me when you have Green Party supporters oppose something like this treaty under the guise of 'workers rights' when they themselves or the people they stand shoulder to shoulder with in support are the ones hiring au-pairs paid half nothing or mistreating cleaners etc.. workers rights only matter when its not their workers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,486 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    it always puzzles me when you have Green Party supporters oppose something like this treaty under the guise of 'workers rights' when they themselves or the people they stand shoulder to shoulder with in support are the ones hiring au-pairs paid half nothing or mistreating cleaners etc.. workers rights only matter when its not their workers.

    Sounds like you have some pantomime-villain version in your head of the average green party voter. Let me guess they have the following traits:
    • Obnoxiously tells everyone about how virtuous they are
    • Delights in informing their friends and colleagues about the many ways in which they are killing the planet through their own actions
    • Lives in a wealthy area but patronises working class people
    • Doesn't actually practice what they preach (flies a lot, drives a big car etc)
    • Generally can't see the wood for the trees


    You do realise that the above is a caricature right? Half of my family and a lot of my own friends voted for the Greens in the last election and none of the above applies to any of them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    it always puzzles me when you have Green Party supporters oppose something like this treaty under the guise of 'workers rights' when they themselves or the people they stand shoulder to shoulder with in support are the ones hiring au-pairs paid half nothing or mistreating cleaners etc.. workers rights only matter when its not their workers.

    100%, Ryan and the wealthy gardeners forget it was the #VoteLeftTransferLeft campaign that helped them out big time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Sounds like you have some pantomime-villain version in your head of the average green party voter. Let me guess they have the following traits:
    • Obnoxiously tells everyone about how virtuous they are
    • Delights in informing their friends and colleagues about the many ways in which they are killing the planet through their own actions
    • Lives in a wealthy area but patronises working class people
    • Doesn't actually practice what they preach (flies a lot, drives a big car etc)
    • Generally can't see the wood for the trees


    You do realise that the above is a caricature right? Half of my family and a lot of my own friends voted for the Greens in the last election and none of the above applies to any of them.

    the handful of outspoken green voters I've ever met in my life always fit the same profile

    lives in a wealthy Dublin suburb
    cycle on the weekend for fun
    2x new SUV in the driveway on pcp changed every 3 years
    au-pair or house cleaner or both a few days a week
    females of the house vegan or veggie and tell you about it.
    Irish times bought every day.
    Not a shred of knowledge of how the ordinary person can't live like them.

    Obviously theres a lot of green voters who are the student or 20 something children of people like this who do not yet have that lifestyle , but its always a similar outcome.

    The Green Party is there for upper middle class city dwellers and suburbanites who already have great access to services and public transport.

    There is literally no apetite for the greens in rural, working class or outside m50 commuter demographics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,933 ✭✭✭kksaints


    the handful of outspoken green voters I've ever met in my life always fit the same profile

    lives in a wealthy Dublin suburb
    cycle on the weekend for fun
    2x new SUV in the driveway on pcp changed every 3 years
    au-pair or house cleaner or both a few days a week
    females of the house vegan or veggie and tell you about it.
    Irish times bought every day.
    Not a shred of knowledge of how the ordinary person can't live like them.

    Obviously theres a lot of green voters who are the student or 20 something children of people like this who do not yet have that lifestyle , but its always a similar outcome.

    The Green Party is there for upper middle class city dwellers and suburbanites who already have great access to services and public transport.

    There is literally no apetite for the greens in rural, working class or outside m50 commuter demographics.

    Carlow-Kilkenny has elected Greens a few times including this election and it's a strong rural economy and community minded constituency.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,280 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    kksaints wrote: »
    Carlow-Kilkenny has elected Greens a few times including this election and it's a strong rural economy and community minded constituency.

    That was down to Mary White herself rather than any specific green voting, her replacement got in on the 10th count by the skin of his teeth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    That was down to Mary White herself rather than any specific green voting, her replacement got in on the 10th count by the skin of his teeth.

    Probably on Kathleen Funchion's transfers also


  • Advertisement
Advertisement