Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

LinkedFinance - new website

13839404244

Comments

  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,438 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    boardzz wrote: »
    Hi I'm looking to start investing some money and I'm looking at Linked Finance.
    Can somebody explain to me how often and how much I would get net from bidding 10K on something like this offer:

    Amount: €150,000
    Term: 60 months
    Grade: A
    Rate: 8.95%

    Are you a specialist in sub-prime lending? Because that is what you are doing, you are lending your money to someone who for one reason or another are locked from the normal credit providers. In other words, you, the amateur, are lending money to people the experts would not touch.

    There is one basic rule that never changes, higher returns always requires you to take on risks beyond that of other asset classes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 693 ✭✭✭brianomc


    As with most here, I wouldn't touch Linked Finance anyway and am withdrawing my money. The loan recipient might make 2 repayments and then decide not to bother anymore. Linked will give the occasional rubbish explanation of contacting the borrower, sending letters, etc. Their loan guarantors don't seem to have to pay it back.

    Which is a real pity as I think most here would have loved to see an Irish peer-to-peer lending company make a success of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,284 ✭✭✭Scottie99


    boardzz wrote: »
    Hi I'm looking to start investing some money and I'm looking at Linked Finance.
    Can somebody explain to me how often and how much I would get net from bidding 10K on something like this offer:

    Amount: €150,000
    Term: 60 months
    Grade: A
    Rate: 8.95%

    Try Mintos. Guaranteed return and no charges for taking money out. I’m averaging about 10.24% on 3 month loans. I tend to stick with A or B class lenders, instead of the C/D/E ones.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11 bopter


    brianomc wrote: »
    As with most here, I wouldn't touch Linked Finance anyway and am withdrawing my money. The loan recipient might make 2 repayments and then decide not to bother anymore. Linked will give the occasional rubbish explanation of contacting the borrower, sending letters, etc. Their loan guarantors don't seem to have to pay it back.

    Which is a real pity as I think most here would have loved to see an Irish peer-to-peer lending company make a success of it.

    What about the other one www.Flender.ie
    I’ve a couple of defaults but still averaging nearly 9% on flender.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,438 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Scottie99 wrote: »
    Try Mintos. Guaranteed return and no charges for taking money out. I’m averaging about 10.24% on 3 month loans. I tend to stick with A or B class lenders, instead of the C/D/E ones.

    So why exactly would an agency who facilities subprime lending be in a position to guarantee the return of your principle and deliver a return beyond that offered else where? Hell they should have no problem offering it as a securitisation to most institutions.... They can't because somewhere in there, you are taking on far more risk than you think. No one offers you that kind of a deal because they are nice guys.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,284 ✭✭✭Scottie99


    Jim2007 wrote: »
    So why exactly would an agency who facilities subprime lending be in a position to guarantee the return of your principle and deliver a return beyond that offered else where? Hell they should have no problem offering it as a securitisation to most institutions.... They can't because somewhere in there, you are taking on far more risk than you think. No one offers you that kind of a deal because they are nice guys.

    When the notification came in, I thought it might be you (Mr Happy)

    I do know the risks, that’s why I mentioned you only lend with Companies that have high ratings.
    You’ve also to spread the risk..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,284 ✭✭✭Scottie99


    Jim2007 wrote: »
    So why exactly would an agency who facilities subprime lending be in a position to guarantee the return of your principle and deliver a return beyond that offered else where? Hell they should have no problem offering it as a securitisation to most institutions.... They can't because somewhere in there, you are taking on far more risk than you think. No one offers you that kind of a deal because they are nice guys.


    ..and I wouldn’t see these levels % are particularly high. One of the reasons, I only go short term, is to get out quick IF need be.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,382 ✭✭✭FFVII


    Scottie99 wrote: »
    ..and I wouldn’t see these levels % are particularly high. One of the reasons, I only go short term, is to get out quick IF need be.

    You won't get out of P2P quick.

    When she blows, you're going down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,284 ✭✭✭Scottie99


    FFVII wrote: »
    You won't get out of P2P quick.

    When she blows, you're going down.

    You’re assuming every Company blows at once, then yes we’re all f....d.

    But It is currently one of the biggest peer 2 peer platforms in Europe, both in terms of investors as well as in terms of loan originators.

    It’s all about minimising risk, you don't lend all your money to one borrower. Instead, hedge your bets by lending just a bit of money to many borrowers. As I said, I only loan to top grade companies which are vetted mitigating the risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭garrettod


    Never fear, 5 year loans are here... Yipee!!!

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2020/0127/1111143-linked-finance-launches-new-5-year-business-loans/

    "Linked Finance said it applies a rigourous credit checking process to vet loan applications which allows lenders with a well-diversified loan portfolio to earn net returns of 7-8%"

    I don't know what's worse, the possibility that LF might actually believe that they carry out "rigourous credit checking", or the fact that RTE just published that without questioning LF on exactly what they do, when carrying out" rigourous credit checking " :-(

    Then there is the question of how you can earn 7%-8% return net, with a well diversified portfolio.

    ... I would just love to see how LF explain that one.

    For a start, it's misleading, as the returns that LF pay, are subject to tax (so are not" net").

    Then there's the question about how you get that average return, what level of risk do you have to take in the diversified profolio, have hey netted out the likely losses on higher risk land, then deducted their fees etc.

    Thanks,

    G.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭Peter File


    "a five-year unsecured business loan for Irish SMEs"
    So no comeback if they decide not to pay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,394 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    PrettyBoy wrote: »
    Am I right in saying that nowadays banks will give loans to SME's at rates from 5.5-7%? And Linked finance would charge borrowers more than this (7-15%)?

    If a bank has refused to loan you money then you have to go try the next lowest interest rate. According to creditunion.ie the average interest rate from CU loans in the Republic is 10.66%, and afaik the credit union will make you hold 1/3 of the loan amount as a cash reserve in your account, so a linked finance loan certainly sounds better than that option. But from a lender point of view the big questions are what sort of checks they do on the businesses, and how transparent that whole process will be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭Darc19


    PrettyBoy wrote: »
    Am I right in saying that nowadays banks will give loans to SME's at rates from 5.5-7%? And Linked finance would charge borrowers more than this (7-15%)?

    The lowest "real" rate from linked finance is about 11% as they have a fee of 5% (you can haggle to 4) on top of the lending rate. This fee is paid immediately.

    Banks are lending to most well run business at 5-7% and that is problem for LF


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭garrettod


    PrettyBoy wrote: »
    Am I right in saying that nowadays banks will give loans to SME's at rates from 5.5-7%? And Linked finance would charge borrowers more than this (7-15%)?

    My understanding is that Banks will lend at cheaper rates than that, subject to the loan size, financial strength of the borrowing entity, security etc.

    Banks and LF differ in a few key ways :

    - Banks are regulated by the Central Bank, so take longer to process applications, require more documentation etc.

    - Banks are unlikely to lend to parties with bad credit records (unless they can be convinced that the Borrower has turned the corner, dealt with their legacy issues properly etc.)

    - Business Borrowers would be extremely well advised to review the SBCI's website and the various facilities available, through the Banks. Some great rates (3%-4.5% deepening on the loan product). Also, the SBCI provide the Banks with a Guarantee for part of the loan, so this often satisfies the Banks security requirement.

    Thanks,

    G.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5 GGBC


    Question I would like to ask folks for their opinion as I seen the Small Firms Assicoation including a key point in their manifesto on SME finance and access to the same.

    90% of business owners in Ireland still see the banks as their first stop when there is a finance need, 10% go to non bank - seen this number in the media. Comparing that to UK which approx 50%/50% split and in the US I seeing someone mention 75% in non banks favour.

    Q: Prentend 100% of the business owners in Ireland understood companies like Linked Finances, Flenders, Grenke, Bibby etc's product offering - Would they still choose the banks products and services, and why?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 738 ✭✭✭at9qu5vp0wcix7


    GGBC wrote: »
    Question I would like to ask folks for their opinion as I seen the Small Firms Assicoation including a key point in their manifesto on SME finance and access to the same.

    90% of business owners in Ireland still see the banks as their first stop when there is a finance need, 10% go to non bank - seen this number in the media. Comparing that to UK which approx 50%/50% split and in the US I seeing someone mention 75% in non banks favour.

    Q: Prentend 100% of the business owners in Ireland understood companies like Linked Finances, Flenders, Grenke, Bibby etc's product offering - Would they still choose the banks products and services, and why?

    First off I'm not a business owner, so I can't speak from experience. However, it looks like banks offer a much cheaper interest rate (people here often forget that the business pays an extra percentage to LF on top of the percentage interest you receive). Aside from the interest rate, banks have a much greater flexibility in the amount of money that can be lent and the repayment schedule and timeframe.

    Eg banks can provide very long or very short loan terms, facilitate balloon payments, provide loans smaller or bigger than those on offer from LF etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5 GGBC


    First off I'm not a business owner, so I can't speak from experience. However, it looks like banks offer a much cheaper interest rate (people here often forget that the business pays an extra percentage to LF on top of the percentage interest you receive). Aside from the interest rate, banks have a much greater flexibility in the amount of money that can be lent and the repayment schedule and timeframe.

    Eg banks can provide very long or very short loan terms, facilitate balloon payments, provide loans smaller or bigger than those on offer from LF etc.

    Bank money will always be cheaper of course but I mean if a non bank provide can give an business access to funds in a matter of days, is it not worth the fee. All very interesting, I think 2020 will be an interesting year for non bank providers, big oppurtuniutes coming their way I suspect.

    p.s Which bank do you work for? joke! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 738 ✭✭✭at9qu5vp0wcix7


    GGBC wrote: »
    Bank money will always be cheaper of course but I mean if a non bank provide can give an business access to funds in a matter of days, is it not worth the fee. All very interesting, I think 2020 will be an interesting year for non bank providers, big oppurtuniutes coming their way I suspect.

    p.s Which bank do you work for? joke! :D

    I'll be in the P2P lending world 5 years this coming year, I'm firmly on its side! However, it is clear to me that when it comes to P2P lending in Ireland, only one of the 3 parties involved in a loan is getting a great deal - and it's not the customer nor the investor.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,019 ✭✭✭ct5amr2ig1nfhp


    I wouldn't mind hearing any insights you have in your p2p journey from the last 5 years. Care to add some feedback in the general P2P thread?
    I'll be in the P2P lending world 5 years this coming year, I'm firmly on its side! However, it is clear to me that when it comes to P2P lending in Ireland, only one of the 3 parties involved in a loan is getting a great deal - and it's not the customer nor the investor.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,438 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    GGBC wrote: »
    Bank money will always be cheaper of course but I mean if a non bank provide can give an business access to funds in a matter of days, is it not worth the fee. All very interesting, I think 2020 will be an interesting year for non bank providers, big oppurtuniutes coming their way I suspect.

    p.s Which bank do you work for? joke! :D

    Dress it up any way that makes you happy, but in the end you are an amateur lending money to subprime borrowers. You are getting a higher return because you are taking on a much higher risk that other lenders in the market.

    And when the next recession hits, the subprime lenders will get hammered like they always do. The agents will fine because they got the fee, the borrower will be fine because he got your cash and the only looser will be you the borrower, because you are the only one in the game taking any real risk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5 GGBC


    Jim2007 wrote: »
    Dress it up any way that makes you happy, but in the end you are an amateur lending money to subprime borrowers. You are getting a higher return because you are taking on a much higher risk that other lenders in the market.

    And when the next recession hits, the subprime lenders will get hammered like they always do. The agents will fine because they got the fee, the borrower will be fine because he got your cash and the only looser will be you the borrower, because you are the only one in the game taking any real risk.

    Subprime is an interesting word to use - Do you think these lenders are only dealing with sub prime businesses? I seen Chopped got large amount of funding on the Linked Finance market place, from what I see they are rapidly expanding business, why Linked and not the banks?
    There seems to be a lot of institutional lending and banks involved as well on these platforms, what do you seen coming recession wise that they might be missing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭Darc19


    GGBC wrote: »
    Subprime is an interesting word to use - Do you think these lenders are only dealing with sub prime businesses? I seen Chopped got large amount of funding on the Linked Finance market place, from what I see they are rapidly expanding business, why Linked and not the banks?
    There seems to be a lot of institutional lending and banks involved as well on these platforms, what do you seen coming recession wise that they might be missing?

    Chopped would be subprime.

    Fast growing company and a lot of potential though getting a little tired now but sustainable.

    Banks look at past figures and current figures and whilst they will take something from potential, it can be a big stumbling block.

    This is where LF do have an advantage, but such clients are few and far between


  • Registered Users Posts: 5 GGBC


    HSK Limited getting lending on Flender - Did they not default with Linked Finance a while back? Maybe different company


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 395 ✭✭whampiri


    Yes they did. They didn't owe much but this is crazy! How can a company be allowed do that? Might send an email to Flender. :mad:


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,438 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    GGBC wrote: »
    Subprime is an interesting word to use - Do you think these lenders are only dealing with sub prime businesses? I seen Chopped got large amount of funding on the Linked Finance market place, from what I see they are rapidly expanding business, why Linked and not the banks?
    There seems to be a lot of institutional lending and banks involved as well on these platforms, what do you seen coming recession wise that they might be missing?

    Subprime is exactly what you are dealing with and Chopped is subprime. And as for banks and other financial institutions, in case you are too young to remember banks got burned badly in the subprime lending business the last time around. For example UBS, one the Swiss pillar banks got hit for $40b!

    Like I said, you are the only one it his P2P lending game taking any risk and you are also the lest experienced player.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭garrettod


    whampiri wrote: »
    Yes they did. They didn't owe much but this is crazy! How can a company be allowed do that? Might send an email to Flender. :mad:


    I doubt that they'll give a sh1t...

    Remember a certain golf tour crowd popping up all over the place, LF couldn't roll out loans for them fast enough, then they were on Grid, then they were gone and we were all out of pocket.

    None of the P2P lenders have the competence, or credit skills, to be involved in business lending, from what I've seen to date. There is no due diligence of any substatnce. The just want to roll out loans and get their set up fees etc.

    Thanks,

    G.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭garrettod


    Hi,

    I see Sinead Ryan wrote a piece for the Indo recently, entirely "Pros and cons of P2P investing", but it was little more than a promo for LF, and a chance for her to get an autograph from Jamie Heaslip, when askiing him about Flender.

    Clearly one lady journalist who couldn't be bothered to do much research.... Its a shame she didn't ask Charlie Weston to run the eye over her article before going to print, as he's usually well versed and might have directed her to a couple of websites where she could get some info from real investors etc.

    You'd think that the newspapers would be doing more to ensure accurate reporting, after all the problems that their plugging of foreign investment properties helped cause, in times past.

    Thanks,

    G.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,788 ✭✭✭Cute Hoor


    There has been an update this morning (pretty incredible, as they appear to have totally given up on chasing defaulters) on Bow Lane Cocktail Bar.

    "We have spoken to the borrower regarding this and we expect this account to be back up to date in the first week of March. A further update will be published upon reciep of funds."

    There will probably be an update on one of the other defaulters before the end of March


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 233 ✭✭Strettie11



    You could fertilize your garden with the contents of that article.

    How does he get away with it

    It s amazing the fanfare they had about the approval in the UK and no information given when they reversed out of the UK. Only for the usual eagle eyed observers on here we would never of heard about it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 738 ✭✭✭at9qu5vp0wcix7


    Logged in for the first time in quite a while - didn't make for pleasant viewing :/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭garrettod


    Looks like they are giving payment holidays out like candyfloss, to anyone that asks for one...

    I was quite surprised by some of the business types that were being granted payment holidays, as not all were in sectors that I would have expected to have run out of cash, at least not yet...

    They should be agreeing reduced payments wherever possible, with complete payment holidays only for the borrowers in more extreme difficulty.

    Dare I ask, but what additional interest do we get, in return for accepting a delay in the return of funds from each loan ?

    Thanks,

    G.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,438 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    garrettod wrote: »
    Looks like they are giving payment holidays out like candyfloss, to anyone that asks for one...

    I was quite surprised by some of the business types that were being granted payment holidays, as not all were in sectors that I would have expected to have run out of cash, at least not yet...

    They should be agreeing reduced payments wherever possible, with complete payment holidays only for the borrowers in more extreme difficulty.

    Dare I ask, but what additional interest do we get, in return for accepting a delay in the return of funds from each loan ?

    You are dealing with subprime lenders for heavens sake, there are only two choices give them a payment holiday or you go under. In P2P lending there are only two sure winners the loan agent and the borrower. People need to learn the lesson or expect to loose more money.

    Amateurs lending money to entities that even the professionals don't want to touch.... if it's just a game to you then go lend it on something like kiva.org, at least there you'll have the satisfaction of doing some good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭Peter File


    Jim2007 wrote: »
    You are dealing with subprime lenders for heavens sake, there are only two choices give them a payment holiday or you go under. In P2P lending there are only two sure winners the loan agent and the borrower. People need to learn the lesson or expect to loose more money.

    Amateurs lending money to entities that even the professionals don't want to touch.... if it's just a game to you then go lend it on something like kiva.org, at least there you'll have the satisfaction of doing some good.

    This comment above should be pinned to the start of the thread.
    These are unsecured loans and if a business fails you will be at the back of the queue of creditors.
    Be very careful with p2p lending.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 738 ✭✭✭at9qu5vp0wcix7


    Mintos schedule extension system means that the borrower pays interest only for an agreed number of months - I can't find official information from Linked Finance outlining their policy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,818 ✭✭✭Inspector Coptoor


    What I found interesting last week was one of my loans was cleared early with around 5 months of repayments left.

    Thought it was odd in the current economic climate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭garrettod


    Jim2007 wrote: »
    You are dealing with subprime lenders for heavens sake, there are only two choices give them a payment holiday or you go under

    It's far from that simple.

    Its about credit management, amongst other things. Some of the businesses are still trading, some are still collecting trade debt due to them etc. You've no idea about specific cases, so jumping to a general conclusions this quickly seems a little foolish to me.

    Put some time into looking at the various Borrowers on the LF platform, and you'll see that there's a mix of all sorts - the good, the bad and the ugly.
    Jim2007 wrote: »
    In P2P lending there are only two sure winners the loan agent and the borrower. People need to learn the lesson or expect to loose more money

    No issue with point about there being two sure winners, but there can be a third winner, if that person puts some time into unstanding the risks that they are putting money into.

    What's really important though, is that those who invested stand up for themselves and don't just let the P2P provider take the easy option every time, without giving even a second thought to the investors /lenders.

    If a P2P provider knows that it won't be challenged, then it's more likely to do a bad job, or take the lazy approach.

    On the other hand, if the P2P provider sees that it will have to deal with thousands of difficult lenders / investors, then its more likely to do all it can, to represent the lenders interests.
    Jim2007 wrote: »
    Amateurs lending money to entities that even the professionals don't want to touch....

    Maybe some are amateurs, maybe others are not. Again, you've no idea, but hey, don't let that stop you from quickly jumping to your own conclusions.

    You also don't know that "the professionals" didn't want to do business with some of the Borrowers - the Borrowers may have gone to LF for a faster turnaround, more flexible terms, a cheaper loan rate, a personal relationship with Peter O'Mahony etc. That's not to say that some couldn't get Bank credit, for one reason or another, and are sub prime Borrowers.
    Jim2007 wrote: »
    if it's just a game to you then go lend it on something like kiva.org, at least there you'll have the satisfaction of doing some good.

    I've absolutely no idea where you came up with that last bit from, you think it's a game to me?


    I'm far from a fan of how LF assess, secure and price their loans and you'll quickly find evidence of that, of you read some of my previous posts on this thread.

    Thanks,

    G.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭garrettod


    What I found interesting last week was one of my loans was cleared early with around 5 months of repayments left.

    Thought it was odd in the current economic climate.

    I've seen that happen on a number of occasions. Sometimes, it's a professional firm, such as a law firm or accountancy firm, who simply can afford to pay off the debt early, so they do. On other occasions, it's actually part of a strategy, in preparation for getting a new, larger loan.

    Thanks,

    G.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,438 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    garrettod wrote: »
    Maybe some are amateurs, maybe others are not. Again, you've no idea, but hey, don't let that stop you from quickly jumping to your own conclusions.

    My conclusions are based on actual experience of having to close down or restructure businesses back in the 80s while working in corporate finance for one of the big 4.

    Then in about 1989/92 a chap called David Solo and some backroom boys we now call ‘financial engineers’ had the bright idea of packing up crappie loans and flogging them to the public for a fee of course and so securitization of subprime lending was born. As I happened to be at SBC at the time I got my fingers into that one as well...

    And of course there was dotcom, when corporate valuation finally became detached from reality....
    I've absolutely no idea where you came up with that last bit from, you think it's a game to me?

    Yes it’s a game, one in which you don’t even seem to know the rules, the borrower has nothing to loose, the agent gets a fee and the lender is the patsy ready to take the fall should it all go wrong.

    Now you can dress it up anyway that makes you feel comfortable, but in the end you are the one with the least knowledge of the situation, no control over the situation and the most to loose.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3 leaveLF


    I've no problem with companies getting a payment break or getting an extension on the payment break. I just find what Linkedfinance are doing is very misleading

    Example Loan

    Last repayment 11/Mar/2020

    They got a payment break and next repayment was due 11/Jun/2020

    "Payment Break" category was removed from this loan in early May (it appears LF removed loans from Payment Break 31 or 32 days before any payment is received)

    Now its early June and the payment due date has moved forward to 11/July/

    This loan is still NOT in the category of 'Payment Break' and no update given on the loan.


    So I have 130+ loans which haven't made a repayment since March 2020.

    65 of these are in the category of ''Payment Break"

    The other 65+ loans were removed from the "Payment Break" category 31 or 32 days before the payment due date even though no payments were made. Then on the payment due date for some loans, the date is brought forward 1 month but no update on the loan and its still not showing as 'Payment Break', just showing as a normal 'Repaying Loan'

    Linkedfinance shoudn't be removing 50% of loans from payment break when no payment has been received. Its very misleading. Also changing the payment due date without adding an update to the loan.

    Maybe one of the regular posters here can check their loans and confirm what I've stated is correct?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 738 ✭✭✭at9qu5vp0wcix7


    I've got Finished or Default, nothing in between!


  • Registered Users Posts: 487 ✭✭Jim Root


    leaveLF wrote: »
    I've no problem with companies getting a payment break or getting an extension on the payment break. I just find what Linkedfinance are doing is very misleading

    Example Loan

    Last repayment 11/Mar/2020

    They got a payment break and next repayment was due 11/Jun/2020

    "Payment Break" category was removed from this loan in early May (it appears LF removed loans from Payment Break 31 or 32 days before any payment is received)

    Now its early June and the payment due date has moved forward to 11/July/

    This loan is still NOT in the category of 'Payment Break' and no update given on the loan.


    So I have 130+ loans which haven't made a repayment since March 2020.

    65 of these are in the category of ''Payment Break"

    The other 65+ loans were removed from the "Payment Break" category 31 or 32 days before the payment due date even though no payments were made. Then on the payment due date for some loans, the date is brought forward 1 month but no update on the loan and its still not showing as 'Payment Break', just showing as a normal 'Repaying Loan'

    Linkedfinance shoudn't be removing 50% of loans from payment break when no payment has been received. Its very misleading. Also changing the payment due date without adding an update to the loan.

    Maybe one of the regular posters here can check their loans and confirm what I've stated is correct?

    I stopped using them about a year ago due to their misleading reporting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 913 ✭✭✭sceach16


    Wow....This means they won't have any defaults for a while. its just a payment break :confused:





    I only have defaults (10% of my loans) left with them. :mad:


  • Registered Users Posts: 62 ✭✭FinanceDublin


    sceach16 wrote: »
    Wow....This means they won't have any defaults for a while. its just a payment break :confused:





    I only have defaults (10% of my loans) left with them. :mad:

    Think my one final loan has had about 2 payments outstanding for circa 15 months now. Never got a single proper update from LF.

    Clear as day LF are, with regard to a great many loans like this, going to blame a lot of this on Covid. It’s a tremendously disingenuous stance.

    Wouldn’t touch LF again in truth. Whole thing set off down a dodgy path with the effective requirement of autobids some years back: suddenly the lender couldn’t individually assess loans, meant documentation became effectively irrelevant etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 54 ✭✭ShareShare


    Pulling my money out of them for the last 2 years. I had a sizable amount in them but i found the lack of chasing bad loans to be terrible. When they hired that woman who took care of it, I felt like it got alot better.. but overall i still found too many cracks in the system. I think part of it is just Ireland's large structures around it.
    Now that covid is happening. I reckon ill see very little of the remaining problematic loans again. Shame. It was a great platform i felt at the start. Felt the quality of the loans got worse as time went on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 324 ✭✭louis346789


    The autobid system was the beginning of the end. Just a lottery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 913 ✭✭✭sceach16


    Having heard nothing from them for years, I have now got three emails which have gone straight to my junk folder.


    It might be Linked or it might be a scam !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,512 ✭✭✭Wheety


    sceach16 wrote: »
    Having heard nothing from them for years, I have now got three emails which have gone straight to my junk folder.


    It might be Linked or it might be a scam !

    I have 2 emails. The sender email is nel.quere@hotmail.fr and has a picture of a woman with a kitten. The name of the account is Dummy User.

    Very strange. I'm addressed by first name in the email but that could have been taken from my email address.

    Weird. Sounds dodgy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 913 ✭✭✭sceach16


    Wheety wrote: »
    I have 2 emails. The sender email is nel.quere@hotmail.fr and has a picture of a woman with a kitten. The name of the account is Dummy User.

    Very strange. I'm addressed by first name in the email but that could have been taken from my email address.

    Weird. Sounds dodgy




    Delete all...(suggestion!).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,512 ✭✭✭Wheety


    sceach16 wrote: »
    Delete all...(suggestion!).

    Aye it's definitely a scam. Have another couple since.


Advertisement