Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Labour Defence Manifesto

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    sparky42 wrote: »
    90% of what you post doesn't make sense with what we have or likely to have, nor what we'd use the DF for.

    90%??? :D:D:D:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭sparky42


    90%??? :D:D:D:D
    I thought I'd be diplomatic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Ah Sparky! Terrific series of points covered there in your penultimate post! Of course nobody in their right minds would even consider sending a P60 down the Gulf single handed on account of issues you raised! Hence my suggestion that it could have nipped down there to accompany the three frigates currently on station thanks to France Netherlands and Germany, which would provide any air cover or other sophisticated AA and AS defences. Independently there are also two UK/US frigates in the immediate area as well. I do take your point about the P60 being in need of an upgrade with some enhanced radar and missile capabilities bolted on. Worth considering two of the fleet for upgrading.
    All the same I think you are being a little harsh in your criticism of the ships capabilities as it has pretty good CIWS gear on board and an experienced crew. Considering the RN felt that the vastly inferior River class OPV would suffice for the maritime defence of the Falklands. Enjoy the rest of your day lads!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Ah Sparky! Terrific series of points covered there in your penultimate post! Of course nobody in their right minds would even consider sending a P60 down the Gulf single handed on account of issues you raised! Hence my suggestion that it could have nipped down there to accompany the three frigates currently on station thanks to France Netherlands and Germany, which would provide any air cover or other sophisticated AA and AS defences. Independently there are also two UK/US frigates in the immediate area as well. I do take your point about the P60 being in need of an upgrade with some enhanced radar and missile capabilities bolted on. Worth considering two of the fleet for upgrading.
    All the same I think you are being a little harsh in your criticism of the ships capabilities as it has pretty good CIWS gear on board and an experienced crew. Considering the RN felt that the vastly inferior River class OPV would suffice for the maritime defence of the Falklands. Enjoy the rest of your day lads!


    There's no threat to the Falklands at all (the Argentinean Navy is a non force). Nor does the P6 have a CWIS system at all, and Irish experience for joint operations is limited. And again, there's little value to saying "here's a OPV, would you mind making sure your frigates stay close enough to protect them".


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,105 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    All the same I think you are being a little harsh in your criticism of the ships capabilities as it has pretty good CIWS gear on board




    There is no CIWS on any Irish Naval Vessel. They do not have missiles fired at them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Well given the Labour returns, this isn't really going to be a thing anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I wasn't talking about missile defences. I was referring to secondary arnament such as the Rheinmetall cannon and the HMGs


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I wasn't talking about missile defences. I was referring to secondary arnament such as the Rheinmetall cannon and the HMGs


    Which are not a CWIS system, they are secondary weapons which would still be limited in any high intensity engagements.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Somehow me last post hot deleted. I was just pointing out that the 20 ml Rheinmetall cannon is very effective against AIRCRAFT. Thats why the Luftwaffe use it to defend their bases.
    Anyway. The chance of a squadron of Migs appearin over the hrizon are virtually nil on this mission. A few auld Arabs in RIBs with a Kalashnikov or two and a few hand grenades is a more likely scenario, so with the drone reconaissance vehicle on board and ready to detect any disreputable elements over the horizon then I reckon the lads could knock seven bells of Sh#t out of any threat with the HMGS and the 20 m and the oto melara. And with the air cover provided by other allied dorces sure there would be a flock of Apatches overhead on no time at all if needed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭sparky42


    So you're talking Sh!te again then.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Just another opinion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 180 ✭✭Lord Fairlord


    the_syco wrote: »
    We don't have the money to pay the existing soldiers, so you want to buy aircraft?

    We do have the money just not the will.
    Just one example of where money could be saved elsewhere; in other countries their equivalent of the dole tapers off over time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,105 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    sure there would be a flock of Apatches overhead on no time at all if needed.


    A flock of Apaches :pac::confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Well... I see Cathal Berry got elected as TD so I imagine even meself and Sparky could agree on that one and "Raise Three Rousin Cheers for Dan Kelly the Boy from Killan


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,243 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Somehow me last post hot deleted. I was just pointing out that the 20 ml Rheinmetall cannon is very effective against AIRCRAFT. Thats why the Luftwaffe use it to defend their bases.

    Why would a threat aircraft get to within range of a Rheinmetall 20mm on a ship?

    At least with runway denial munitions, you have to fly right over the target. Besides, that was a 1972 acquisition, they've been withdrawn from service. Something about missiles and radar-directed guns being better.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    Why would a threat aircraft get to within range of a Rheinmetall 20mm on a ship?

    At least with runway denial munitions, you have to fly right over the target. Besides, that was a 1972 acquisition, they've been withdrawn from service. Something about missiles and radar-directed guns being better.

    Because thats not how it's done in "Warlord" and "Battle and Action".


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,838 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I wouldn't pay much attention to Labour's plan. Their idealogy is all about the public sector and spending big on all aspects for employment and wage levels. The DF mention is just that,vote hunting. Didn't work in any case.

    Its excellent to have Cathal Berry as a TD nonetheless, both for pay and conditions as well as the profile and positioning of the DF in Irish society.


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭Leonidas BL


    Ah Sparky! Terrific series of points covered there in your penultimate post! Of course nobody in their right minds would even consider sending a P60 down the Gulf single handed on account of issues you raised! Hence my suggestion that it could have nipped down there to accompany the three frigates currently on station thanks to France Netherlands and Germany, which would provide any air cover or other sophisticated AA and AS defences. Independently there are also two UK/US frigates in the immediate area as well. I do take your point about the P60 being in need of an upgrade with some enhanced radar and missile capabilities bolted on. Worth considering two of the fleet for upgrading.
    All the same I think you are being a little harsh in your criticism of the ships capabilities as it has pretty good CIWS gear on board and an experienced crew. Considering the RN felt that the vastly inferior River class OPV would suffice for the maritime defence of the Falklands. Enjoy the rest of your day lads!

    I dont think you even read Sparkys explanation at all. One point was that the P60's cannot replenish underway. How the fork would a little OPV stay with three Frigates?? Think man, THINK FOR ONCE!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Simple. They would replenish from the main fleet. Or pop into a friendly harbour such Spain or Italy or Greece or even closer ports of call in area and bang bang bang! Job sorted!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Simple. They would replenish from the main fleet. Or pop into a friendly harbour such Spain or Italy or Greece or even closer ports of call in area and bang bang bang! Job sorted!


    OH FFS, No.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,838 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Simple. They would replenish from the main fleet. Or pop into a friendly harbour such Spain or Italy or Greece or even closer ports of call in area and bang bang bang! Job sorted!

    Just the 50 knots to catch up after so?

    Have you ever left the house?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    Just the 50 knots to catch up after so?

    Have you ever left the house?

    You mean the Home?


  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭Leonidas BL


    Simple. They would replenish from the main fleet. Or pop into a friendly harbour such Spain or Italy or Greece or even closer ports of call in area and bang bang bang! Job sorted!

    LMFAO

    Heeeeehawwwww


Advertisement