Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How do you convince people god exists?

1…910121415…21

Comments

  • #552
    Marhay70
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,916 ✭✭✭Marhay70


    nthclare wrote: »
    I hear what you're saying and I cannot say you're wrong.
    The way I'm looking at it is, the Catholic church isn't gaining much traction anymore and eventually it'll die away and fade.

    There's a lot of variables in the situation you can't just pull the carpet from underneath the education system, but it's happening and eventually it'll be no more...

    Let it happen... they'll never get a grip on us again....

    It's not happening quickly enough though. No matter who you think is responsible for imparting religious teaching in schools, the RCC is still a powerful force in education, young children hang on every word their teachers say and if what teachers are saying is propaganda for the RCC then it stands to reason that children will ingest that.
    Religion needs to be taken out of the educational equation completely, it won't be easy because of the collusion of Church and State in the early days but a start needs to be made and not just a token one.


  • #553
    karlitob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭karlitob


    nthclare wrote: »
    People also think statue's and pictures are watching them too.

    People think about a lot of things.

    People all kinds of strange things, poltergeists, strange sounds in the sky.
    Different realms and dimensions etc

    I’m not sure what your point is but you’re certainly proving mine.


  • #554
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    smacl wrote: »
    Really, care to list those tenets for us?

    Faith in the absence of God without any proof of same and then being so convinced of its truth that everyone else is wrong.

    Self belief to the extent that a supernatural entity isn't required or needed.


  • #555
    nthclare
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭nthclare


    karlitob wrote: »
    I’m not sure what your point is but you’re certainly proving mine.

    Great, I'm happy enough with that conclusion.
    We're on solid ground now.

    I find it hard to figure myself out,so it's good to know I've provided you with a stencil to prove your own point and there's more than two ways to sharpen a hook...to catch a fish.

    I'm kind of perplexed as to why we set off respectfully discussing a subject and then out of nowhere you suggest I'm a trool.

    I didn't undermine any of your post's.

    Is it because I said something about unsolved mysteries and other things that are way out there ?

    Or is it something else ?


  • #556
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    karlitob wrote: »
    My best favourite argument. Since your presume that a magic man in the sky is the source of morality, and that all good things come from him or her or whatever pronoun they wish to be known by. Therefore, you condescend that I can believe whatever I want but really if I don’t murder someone then it’s must be god.

    I’ve news for you. Morality is not sourced from a made up man in the sky.

    You also forgot a few other commandments
    - though shalt not have other gods before me
    - though shaky not have strange idols.

    For the creator of the universe, he (or she or they) must have a bit of an inferiority complex that the first two commandments - his 10 rules for living relate to this.


    Not to mention the thought crime - though shalt not covet they neighbours wife and thy neighbours goods.

    So I’m happy not to steal, lie or murder (the commandment is murder and not killing). And you can worry about a magic man policing your thoughts.

    Youre entitled to your opinion.
    what I'm saying is that if someone tells me their a Christian then I want to see what that word entails being out worked in their lives
    If I don't see it I'll be as disbelieving as any atheist on this forum.

    Btw, Jesus brought it further by saying hate was the same as murder. Lust, as adultery.
    Didn't forget any of the commandments, just referred to those that effected those around us.


  • #557
    Pherekydes
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,190 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    Faith in the absence of God without any proof of same and then being so convinced of its truth that everyone else is wrong.

    Self belief to the extent that a supernatural entity isn't required or needed.

    I'd just like to point out that this is post #666 of this poster.

    Do you believe in Frigg?

    This is your position:

    Faith in the presence of gods without any proof of same and then being so convinced of its truth that everyone else is wrong.

    You believe in a god. We don't. It's that simple. The faith required is all on your side.


  • #558
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    I'd just like to point out that this is post #666 of this poster.

    Do you believe in Frigg?

    This is your position:

    Faith in the presence of gods without any proof of same and then being so convinced of its truth that everyone else is wrong.

    You believe in a god. We don't. It's that simple. The faith required is all on your side.

    Whats the number of posts got to so with it?
    I've over 15k posts on boards.
    Your lack of faith is as much faith like it or not. No atheist has ever been able to proved to me that God doesn't exist, despite my asking.


  • #559
    Liamo57
    Closed Accounts Posts: 157 ✭✭Liamo57


    No one knows if any God exists and it doesnt matter a fuke to anyone about what people believe in. Thats what caused most strife in the world. Women in the Muslim world are treated like shtie, wearing head scarves for fuke sake, why dont men wear scarves, the fukers


  • #560
    Pherekydes
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,190 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    Whats the number of posts got to so with it?
    I've over 15k posts on boards.
    Your lack of faith is as much faith like it or not. No atheist has ever been able to proved to me that God doesn't exist, despite my asking.

    Lack of faith is faith?

    Okay then.

    Do you believe in Frigg?

    (The one true god)


  • #561
    Marhay70
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,916 ✭✭✭Marhay70


    Hotblack Desiato wrote: »
    Well we had the moving statues in the 80s :p

    There was a guy on Radio with Dermot Monteith a few weeks ago who said he was in regular contact with fairies, on the Cooley Peninsula I think it was. Very insistent he was, no accounting for what people hear and see.:)


  • Advertisement
  • #562
    karlitob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭karlitob


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    Faith in the absence of God without any proof of same and then being so convinced of its truth that everyone else is wrong.

    Self belief to the extent that a supernatural entity isn't required or needed.

    Then you’re the same as me. You’re just as much an atheist as I as you apply these ‘tenets’ to Zeus and Odin or any of the other 1000s of gods.

    But seriously, you can apply those same ‘tenets’ to pink unicorns, or anything that there’s no evidence for.


  • #563
    karlitob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭karlitob


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    No atheist has ever been able to proved to me that God doesn't exist, despite my asking.

    Come on - you know you can’t prove a negative.

    No Christian/Muslim/Jew/Miscellaneous has ever be able to prove to me that Pink Unicorns don’t exists, DESPITE my asking.

    It’s why you can’t ‘prove’ innocence, only not guilty.


    And besides, what sort of ego do you have to think it’s someones job to ‘prove’ to you that you’re made up god is not real. Why don’t you ask why don’t believe in Zeus? He had the same fervent believers as you do in your god. Surely he’s real and you’ve been praying to the wrong god all these years.


  • #564
    karlitob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭karlitob


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    Youre entitled to your opinion.
    what I'm saying is that if someone tells me their a Christian then I want to see what that word entails being out worked in their lives
    If I don't see it I'll be as disbelieving as any atheist on this forum.

    Btw, Jesus brought it further by saying hate was the same as murder. Lust, as adultery.
    Didn't forget any of the commandments, just referred to those that effected those around us.

    So you’ve decided which commandments are the important ones?

    But still not speaking to the point - Two of your gods commandments (not mine) are thought crimes. What kind of god polices your mind?

    Why does your god have an inferiority complex so much so that he made your first two commandments as a reminder to worship him. Seems strangely Vulnerable.


    And lastly, if someone tells me that they don’t steal, lie or murder - I see them as a normal human being with inherent and innate morality.


  • #565
    karlitob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭karlitob


    nthclare wrote: »
    Great, I'm happy enough with that conclusion.
    We're on solid ground now.

    I find it hard to figure myself out,so it's good to know I've provided you with a stencil to prove your own point and there's more than two ways to sharpen a hook...to catch a fish.

    I'm kind of perplexed as to why we set off respectfully discussing a subject and then out of nowhere you suggest I'm a trool.

    I didn't undermine any of your post's.

    Is it because I said something about unsolved mysteries and other things that are way out there ?

    Or is it something else ?

    What you said was so mad that I thought it must be trolling. You’ll also see that I apologised to the mod where I was wrong - something religions tend not to do.

    Regardless, it’s not disrespectful to say I don’t know what your point is.

    What are you trying to say about poultergeists?


  • #566
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    Lack of faith is faith?

    Okay then.

    Do you believe in Frigg?

    (The one true god)

    Faith is belief. You believe and are convinced that God doesn't exist. That's nothing but faith.

    As for Frigg, though she was cute in the Almighty Johnsons, I prefer the FSM ( pubh)


  • #567
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    karlitob wrote: »
    Come on - you know you can’t prove a negative.

    No Christian/Muslim/Jew/Miscellaneous has ever be able to prove to me that Pink Unicorns don’t exists, DESPITE my asking.

    It’s why you can’t ‘prove’ innocence, only not guilty.


    And besides, what sort of ego do you have to think it’s someones job to ‘prove’ to you that you’re made up god is not real. Why don’t you ask why don’t believe in Zeus? He had the same fervent believers as you do in your god. Surely he’s real and you’ve been praying to the wrong god all these years.

    I can tell you about Him. About His Characteristics, what He's done, how He's changed my life. I can live according to the ways He has said I should walk and hopefully you'll see something of what I've experienced. Can I show you God like I would a puppy.. No.

    Why am I asking you to prove a negative? You positively say God doesn't exist. Prove it!

    I never decided which commandments were important and which aren't. They all are but some are our relationship to Him. Others our relationship to other people. You'll see those ones much quicker than the first 3.


  • #568
    nthclare
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭nthclare


    karlitob wrote: »
    What you said was so mad that I thought it must be trolling. You’ll also see that I apologised to the mod where I was wrong - something religions tend not to do.

    Regardless, it’s not disrespectful to say I don’t know what your point is.

    What are you trying to say about poultergeists?

    I didn't say anything about poultergeists, but from where I'm standing it sounds like a type of poultry or a hybrid goose or something lol

    What you said was so mad that I thought it was trolling, maybe I'm slightly dyslexic but can you put that in layman's terms please ?

    I never said that it's disrespectful about you not knowing what my point is.

    There's a glitch in communication here I think.

    So you apologize to the mod.

    Fair play, what did you do to the moderator, to have to apologize ?


  • #569
    Pherekydes
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,190 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    Faith is belief. You believe and are convinced that God doesn't exist. That's nothing but faith.

    No. Stop misrepresenting my position. Lack of faith is not faith. Lack of belief is not belief.

    I do not believe god exists. I am not convinced that she exists.

    You are deliberately misrepresenting my position.


  • #570
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    No. Stop misrepresenting my position. Lack of faith is not faith. Lack of belief is not belief.

    I do not believe god exists. I am not convinced that she exists.

    You are deliberately misrepresenting my position.

    You adamantly believe a negative. No misrepresentation there. You believe God doesn't exist.


  • Advertisement
  • #571
    karlitob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭karlitob


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    You adamantly believe a negative. No misrepresentation there. You believe God doesn't exist.

    You don’t believe in pink unicorns. Is your lack of belief in pink unicorns - your faith in their non-existence - the same as your faith in your god?


  • #572
    karlitob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭karlitob


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    No. Stop misrepresenting my position. Lack of faith is not faith. Lack of belief is not belief.

    I do not believe god exists. I am not convinced that she exists.

    You are deliberately misrepresenting my position.

    “You don’t have enough faith,” Jesus told them. “I tell you the truth, if you had faith even as small as a mustard seed, you could say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it would move. Nothing would be impossible.” — Matthew 17:20


    Come on now. Have you not moved any mountains recently with your faith in the absence of a god - any god. Or does your ungodly (or is it non-godly) faith not allow mustard seed mountain moving?


  • #573
    nozzferrahhtoo
    Registered Users Posts: 9,348 ✭✭✭nozzferrahhtoo


    antiskeptic wrote: »
    The size of the IF isn't established by it's failure to jump through an arbitrary hoop.

    There is nothing arbitrary about it. It is key. Either such things have happened or they have not. If you can not establish any such thing has EVER happened, then it is not admissible as anything other than navel gazing fantasy.

    I have no issue with the claim you made. If a god reveals itself to a person that person's position on the existence of that god is going to be affected. If something happens that the person merely parses as a god revealing itself however, the effect is likely to be the same.

    So unless we can show in any way whatsoever a god actually has done this, then pointing out the "IF" in your statement is anything but arbitrary. We have zero way to show that it was the former, not the latter, that has occurred. And worse, we have many many examples of the latter happening to our species and zero examples of the former.

    This is an issue for your position on the existence of god, not mine.
    antiskeptic wrote: »
    You do know that it is only your claim about your philosophies that holds you afloat? They aren't to be proven. And philosophies and religions have a tendency to shape society. And so it's not quite a matter of live at let live. Is it.

    You are doing your usual vague dodge stuff here. You are complaining about my philosophies and positions without actually saying which view or position you are discussing. So you are flinging spears against which there is no defence given no one, probably not even yourself, knows what you are flinging them at.

    If you have an issue with a specific claim or position I have espoused then have the decency to be clear about which one it is when you are attacking it, so I know what I am responding to. The text from you above says precisely nothing, about anything. It is like the Dawkins discussion which you have seemingly now left. You were attacking positions YOU claimed he held while adamantly refusing to offer any actual specifics so we could see what it was you (thought you) were attacking.

    It is a very disingenuous, dishonest, and bad faith way to communicate and I really wish you would stop doing it.
    antiskeptic wrote: »
    We? We the folk who have the truth or some such?

    "We" as in anyone who has identified a harm is in play and feels motivated to remove it. This can, and hopefully should, include the believer themselves. If they themselves believe something and this belief manifests in their world, or the world around them, as a genuine harm.... then the "we" of which I speak can and I hope would include that believer too.

    As I said personal faith should remain personal, both in terms of the person who believes it and the people who do not, until such time as a genuine harm arises. The problem many/most/all atheists seem to have, especially in activist organisations like Atheist Ireland.... is not with the beliefs themselves but in how they manifest in our world and how they are used.
    antiskeptic wrote: »
    My approach - and it won't be the first time you will have heard me say it - is to stalemate.

    That would certainly explain the motivation behind the "disingenuous, dishonest, and bad faith way to communicate" I referred to above so it is nice of you to openly admit this. You basically admit you have no interest in open honest conversation. That your entire approach to conversation is to stale mate it. That says everything about you, and nothing about anyone else thankfully. Stalemating a conversation is.... to me at least.... indistinguishable from soap boxing however which is, as you know, against the forum charter here. So I will try to progress the conversation rather than stale mate it, so I at least do not fall foul of the mods.
    antiskeptic wrote: »
    You skip past that with your axe to grind

    I have no such axe that I am aware of. So you are straw manning again, likely just to stalemate. My only interest is in discourse, honesty, and truth. The former two being the best ways I know of to attain the latter one. All I want to know is what is true about the universe, our world, and our existence in it. I seek tools that are most likely to assist me in that endeavour, and I reject tools that are least likely to assist.

    Merely making things up, declaring them to be true by default, declaring that everyone else knows they are true by default, and then setting myself against the "sceptic" of my asserted truths..... is not an approach I can accept. It is YOUR approach demonstrably. But it is not an approach I have ever seen discern any actual truth about reality and so it is not a tool I seek to adopt.

    The only one who has an axe to grind therefore is you. It is right there in your username. You have an axe to grind in being "Anti" anyone who is sceptical of YOUR asserted and declared by fiat truths.
    antiskeptic wrote: »
    Does it mean God doesn't exist? No it does not.

    Wonderful therefore that I, and pretty much no one else on this thread, appears to be claiming god does not exist then. Just that we have seen ZERO (least of all from you) argument, evidence, data or reasoning that suggests it does.

    The only people, as you can see from a user nearly directly above me, claiming god does not exist is the occasional theists who wanders in to claim it vicariously on our behalf by putting words in our mouth and claiming to know what we think/believe better than we know it ourselves.

    Does it mean any thing at all. No it does not.


  • #574
    nthclare
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭nthclare


    Getting back to the original post.

    There's ways of convincing people that they might believe you that God exists.

    Take someone who's vulnerable and they're at rock bottom, such as an addict, alcoholic or just in plain old trouble and locked up in jail.

    They're introduced to Religion , told if they do certain rituals and believe in a diety their lives will prosper on an enhanced level, nothing to do with a better materialistic lifestyle but more towards peace of mind and self acceptance.

    Now they may end up leading a more trouble free lifestyle and let go of their past and build bridges and gain a meaningful standing in society.

    Does someone need a God to better themselves, of course they don't there's a lot of different ways of getting help and learn how to help themselves and redeem their character.

    I'm sure a lot of Atheists here know more about religion and Christianity than myself and some Christians that post here.
    And ye are probably blue in the face from debating about the existence of God.
    That's ok too.

    There's probably a lot of money to be made in America by being a superstar pastor and spouting lies to the masse's, many of us could do it.
    All it takes is courage and confidence, but none of ye would lie to people obviously.

    Organised religion is basically an organisation, there's always a leader and the majority of the time anyone who leads are more than likely control freaks and have alterior motives.

    So there's certain people who can be convinced that something that doesn't exist exists.

    Don't mind your Russell's teapot or spaghetti monster analogies, that's not going to work with a lot of Theists.

    The only way to salvation from the God head is self realization that there's no bearded man in the sky listening in or watching you constantly.


  • #575
    Pherekydes
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,190 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    You believe God doesn't exist.

    I do NOT believe that she does exist.


  • #576
    nozzferrahhtoo
    Registered Users Posts: 9,348 ✭✭✭nozzferrahhtoo


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    Examine the teachings of Jesus Christ and obey them, then you've a different story and effect in the world.

    I think that is an awful idea. To examine one human being and live exactly like them or "obey" them. We are enlightened and educated humans and get to do more than that. We get to look back at ALL the characters from our history, and their ideas, and construct a world view based on the best of them. INCLUDING the Nazarene.
    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    Btw, Jesus brought it further by saying hate was the same as murder. Lust, as adultery.

    That is one of the reasons I would not emulate him entirely. I agree with some of his ideas. I disagree with others. I would STRONGLY disagree with the above for example. The claims above parse as complete nonsense to me.

    Worse, he appeared to espouse a position against thought crime. Likening thoughts internally of things like lust and desire, to actual adultery. That is thought crime.

    No way, no how, no thanks. As the German song for children says "Die Gedanken sind frei". I can think and feel whatever the hell I like. My thoughts and feelings are not crimes. Nor are they immoral. It is what I DO with my thoughts and emotions and desires that define me as a moral being.

    What Christianity appears to be doing is creating an imaginary disease and a cure for that disease at the same time. A nice marketing ploy. If you convince people their perfectly natural thoughts and desires are some how thought crime, and then sell following the path of this Jesus guy as salvation from that..... that's a marketing move. Nothing more.
    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    Your lack of faith is as much faith like it or not. No atheist has ever been able to proved to me that God doesn't exist, despite my asking.

    Often you will find that this is because you are asking them to prove a position they neither hold, nor have espoused.

    I am not sure why we periodically get theists coming into this forum to tell us what we think. We want to hear what YOU think, that is how conversation works. But when you walk in and tell us what we think.... and then disagree with someone when they tell you what they actually think..... then you are not conversing. You are straw manning, misrepresenting, and engaging in bad faith. Is that you emulating Jesus somehow? If so, you can keep it.

    My position is not that I claim a god does not exist. My position is that I have never seen a shred of argument, evidence, data or reasons to suggest one DOES exist so I A) Do not believe there is one and B) proceed in life under the rubric that one does not exist.

    None of that is me claiming / believing there is no god. It is me operating without a belief in god. You would do well to learn the difference.

    Or you could continue to pretend to know what people think, better than they themselves do. Unsure how far / what that will get you however.


  • Advertisement
  • #577
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    I do NOT believe that she does exist.

    So you don't believe that God doesn't exist.
    That leaves 2 options.
    1. You don't know, whether God exists or no... Agnostic
    2. You believe God exists but refuse to acknowledge that existence.


    But if I was really to the letter, since you refer to God as "she", you're referring to a different entity that the one I refer to. Therefore you've not answered my original point.


  • #578
    karlitob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭karlitob


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    So you don't believe that God doesn't exist.
    That leaves 2 options.
    1. You don't know, whether God exists or no... Agnostic
    2. You believe God exists but refuse to acknowledge that existence.
    .

    So you don't believe that Pink Unicorns exist.
    That leaves 2 options.
    1. You don't know, whether Pink Unicorns exists or no... Agnostic
    2. You believe Pink Unicorns exists but refuse to acknowledge that existence.


  • #579
    smacl
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,777 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    So you don't believe that God doesn't exist.
    That leaves 2 options.
    1. You don't know, whether God exists or no... Agnostic
    2. You believe God exists but refuse to acknowledge that existence.

    Sorry, but that is flawed logic. If I say that "I don't believe God exists" what that means is that I have no reason to believe that god exists, there being no substantive or strong evidence to support such an assertion, but in the highly unlikely case that such evidence presents itself I will change my position. Note that you can substitute any piece of mythology, pseudoscience or random unevidenced fantasy for God in this argument and it remains the same.

    The difference between saying "I don't believe God exists" and "I believe God doesn't exist" is more than just semantic. The former is not a statement of belief, the latter is. For following well worn chart illustrates this, where my position above is one of moderate atheism

    atheist%2Bscale.png


  • #580
    Bannasidhe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    So you don't believe that God doesn't exist.
    That leaves 2 options.
    1. You don't know, whether God exists or no... Agnostic
    2. You believe God exists but refuse to acknowledge that existence.


    But if I was really to the letter, since you refer to God as "she", you're referring to a different entity that the one I refer to. Therefore you've not answered my original point.

    What exactly are you trying to achieve with this frankly schoolyard tactic of word twisting and semantics crushing?

    Do you think this is some amazing Gotcha moment and people here will think gosh, I never thought of it like that - my lack of belief is a belief therefore I believe and if I believe I must believe in the existence of God?

    It isn't.


  • #581
    robindch
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    Do you think this is some amazing Gotcha moment and people here will think gosh, I never thought of it like that - my lack of belief is a belief therefore I believe and if I believe I must believe in the existence of God?
    As somebody once said, if your only tool is a hammer, then every problem looks like a nail.


  • Advertisement
  • #582
    Hotblack Desiato
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,492 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Bannasidhe wrote: »
    What exactly are you trying to achieve with this frankly schoolyard tactic of word twisting and semantics crushing?

    Do you think this is some amazing Gotcha moment and people here will think gosh, I never thought of it like that - my lack of belief is a belief therefore I believe and if I believe I must believe in the existence of God?

    It isn't.

    It's very reminiscent of the posters who try to prove that atheism is really just another religion, or that atheists are just believers in denial or going through a very extended teenage rebellious phase... :rolleyes: or will convert if they find themselves in a foxhole, or on their deathbed :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    Needless to say, all of this has been heard here before hundreds of times, and is still as entirely unconvincing as it ever was... but theists do say "God loves a trier"...!

    Scrap the cap!



  • #583
    nthclare
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭nthclare


    Hotblack Desiato wrote: »
    It's very reminiscent of the posters who try to prove that atheism is really just another religion, or that atheists are just believers in denial or going through a very extended teenage rebellious phase... :rolleyes: or will convert if they find themselves in a foxhole, or on their deathbed :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    Needless to say, all of this has been heard here before hundreds of times, and is still as entirely unconvincing as it ever was... but theists do say "God loves a trier"...!

    Ah come on now, it wasn't so long ago when Atheism Ireland were trying to get together on a Sunday and have a secular gathering.

    In a day of the Sabbath too.

    Atheism seems to get mixed up in education, politics, sexuality debates, scientific evidence of whether there's a diety or dietys etc

    Maybe someday science will catch up with how people claim there's more to life than this realm.
    Until then it's in limbo.

    We've been programmed to think that there's more to life than this plane of existence.

    Ye are welcome to plagiarise scientists or send on links to provide evidence that there's nothing but the here and now.


  • #584
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    smacl wrote: »
    Sorry, but that is flawed logic. If I say that "I don't believe God exists" what that means is that I have no reason to believe that god exists, there being no substantive or strong evidence to support such an assertion, but in the highly unlikely case that such evidence presents itself I will change my position. Note that you can substitute any piece of mythology, pseudoscience or random unevidenced fantasy for God in this argument and it remains the same.

    The difference between saying "I don't believe God exists" and "I believe God doesn't exist" is more than just semantic. The former is not a statement of belief, the latter is. For following well worn chart illustrates this, where my position above is one of moderate atheism

    atheist%2Bscale.png

    I have to say, I'm very impressed that you have the tenets of your belief system so well mapped out.
    Where do you fall into this?

    There enough evidence to support intelligent design for those who are happy to believe that evidence. Those who don't believe we evolved from a primordial soup. Ive yet to see the evidence to support it. It's all hypothesis and supposition. Indeed much supports the nonsense of evolution but thats another thread.
    Evolution/ atheism is as much a religion as creationism / theism and requires s certain amount of faith.


  • #585
    Bannasidhe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    I have to say, I'm very impressed that you have the tenets of your belief system so well mapped out.
    Where do you fall into this?

    There enough evidence to support intelligent design for those who are happy to believe that evidence. Those who don't believe we evolved from a primordial soup. Ive yet to see the evidence to support it. It's all hypothesis and supposition. Indeed much supports the nonsense of evolution but thats another thread.
    Evolution/ atheism is as much a religion as creationism / theism and requires s certain amount of faith.

    I have to say you seem to have a lot invested in convincing yourself that lack of belief = belief and lack of faith = faith.
    Why is that?


  • #586
    Hotblack Desiato
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,492 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    nthclare wrote: »
    We've been programmed to think that there's more to life than this plane of existence.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_detection
    Agent detection is the inclination for animals, including humans, to presume the purposeful intervention of a sentient or intelligent agent in situations that may or may not involve one.

    Scrap the cap!



  • #587
    smacl
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,777 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    nthclare wrote: »
    Ah come on now, it wasn't so long ago when Atheism Ireland were trying to get together on a Sunday and have a secular gathering.

    In a day of the Sabbath too.

    Atheism seems to get mixed up in education, politics, sexuality debates, scientific evidence of whether there's a diety or dietys etc

    Maybe someday science will catch up with how people claim there's more to life than this realm.
    Until then it's in limbo.

    We've been programmed to think that there's more to life than this plane of existence.

    Ye are welcome to plagiarise scientists or send on links to provide evidence that there's nothing but the here and now.

    Atheist Ireland are an organisation that promote atheism and secularism in Ireland. The vast majority of atheists in this country however are not members of Atheist Ireland, nor do Atheist Ireland have any kind of mandate to speak for all atheists in this country beyond their direct membership.

    Given that most atheists in the country aren't members of Atheist Ireland it is wrong to point to this organisation as indicative of how atheists do or do not behave.


  • #588
    smacl
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,777 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    I have to say, I'm very impressed that you have the tenets of your belief system so well mapped out.
    Where do you fall into this?

    Which tenets are you talking about here? That atheists don't believe in a god or gods is not a tenet, it is no more nor less than the dictionary definition of the word atheist. That there are degrees of atheism and theism is also obvious and hardly construes a tenet of belief. If you ask someone if they believe in god, you'll gets as many saying 'kind of', 'sometimes' and 'not really' as yes or no.
    There enough evidence to support intelligent design for those who are happy to believe that evidence. Those who don't believe we evolved from a primordial soup. Ive yet to see the evidence to support it. It's all hypothesis and supposition. Indeed much supports the nonsense of evolution but thats another thread.
    Evolution/ atheism is as much a religion as creationism / theism and requires s certain amount of faith.

    Been done to death on this forum already over many years, I suggest having a gander at the origin of specious nonsense thread is you'd like to review the numerous arguments and counter arguments. Alternatively, nip over to Wikipedia and see what they say about Intelligent Design. Without wanting to spoil it for you too much, suffice to say that unlike the theory of evolution, ID is pseudo-scientific bunk.


  • #589
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    smacl wrote: »
    Which tenets are you talking about here? That atheists don't believe in a god or gods is not a tenet, it is no more nor less than the dictionary definition of the word atheist. That there are degrees of atheism and theism is also obvious and hardly construes a tenet of belief. If you ask someone if they believe in god, you'll gets as many saying 'kind of', 'sometimes' and 'not really' as yes or no.



    Been done to death on this forum already over many years, I suggest having a gander at the origin of specious nonsense thread is you'd like to review the numerous arguments and counter arguments. Alternatively, nip over to Wikipedia and see what they say about Intelligent Design. Without wanting to spoil it for you too much, suffice to say that unlike the theory of evolution, ID is pseudo-scientific bunk.

    A tenet according to Cambridge is

    the principles on which a belief or theory is based:

    You don't believe in God, fine. You have a reason for that I assume, a belief upon which that's based.

    To say you have none of the above is baloney.


    Someone asked why the theists wander in here. The same could be asked why the atheists wander into the Christianity forum.
    Apart from it not being one of the projected fora on boards and they are free to wander in, it seems to be just to tell the Christians how wrong they are.


  • #590
    nozzferrahhtoo
    Registered Users Posts: 9,348 ✭✭✭nozzferrahhtoo


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    Someone asked why the theists wander in here. The same could be asked why the atheists wander into the Christianity forum.

    Assuming for a small moment you are talking about me (apologies if you are not, but since you decided to simply ignore my post to you it is hard to tell), you have made a disingenuous misrepresentation of what I asked. I did not ask "Why do theists wander in here" I asked "Why do theists wander in here and do X".

    There is a huge difference between asking why theists wander in to do a particular thing..... and asking why they wander in AT ALL.

    I did the former. For good reason.

    You are pretending I did the latter. And I never would because theists are VERY welcome here in my view.

    By your fruits you shall know them indeed. If this is how Christians act, you can keep your religion thanks.


  • #591
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    nozzferrahhtoo wrote: »
    Assuming for a small moment you are talking about me (apologies if you are not, but since you decided to simply ignore my post to you it is hard to tell), you have made a disingenuous misrepresentation of what I asked. I did not ask "Why do theists wander in here" I asked "Why do theists wander in here and do X".

    There is a huge difference between asking why theists wander in to do a particular thing..... and asking why they wander in AT ALL.

    I did the former. For good reason.

    You are pretending I did the latter. And I never would because theists are VERY welcome here in my view.

    By your fruits you shall know them indeed. If this is how Christians act, you can keep your religion thanks.

    Couldn't remember who posted it and hadn't time to scroll back looking.

    As for wandering in. Ive been doing so since fairly early in the thread. Honestly , it's the same old rhetoric rehashed. I'm not sure if it has a purpose without the Christians wandering in.

    No one here can disprove God and always put it back on the believer to prove Him.

    I have my experience of Him. You don't and therefore He's not real to you or any other atheist. Lack of experience is not proof of non existence, it's just lack of experience.

    Same can be said for pink unicorns, though I'm not sure anyone here has experienced them so not sure what the fascination is with them.

    As for not replying to your post. There are other posts I didn't reply to either. Ive limited time so you're not special in not being responded to.


  • Advertisement
  • #592
    smacl
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,777 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    SouthWesterly wrote: »
    A tenet according to Cambridge is

    the principles on which a belief or theory is based:

    You don't believe in God, fine. You have a reason for that I assume, a belief upon which that's based.

    To say you have none of the above is baloney.

    I don't believe in the tooth fairy, the healing powers of crystals or Jedi mind force either. In fact there's a massive volume of superstitious, supernatural and nonsensical stuff that some people believe in that I don't and I'm guessing you don't either. This isn't a 'tenet of atheism', were such a thing to exist, it is a consequence of not believing wildly absurd assertions that are entirely unsupported by any sound evidence.

    At the same time I have many strongly held philosophical, political and personal leanings, but these have nothing to do with atheism. For example, as a secularist I believe in freedom of and from religious expression. I also believe we should promote and expand human rights both locally and internationally. Politically, according to a questionnaire on boards some years back, I'm a left leaning liberal. None of these are 'tenets of atheism' as they are not commonly held by all atheists. The only thing all atheists have in common is that they don't believe in a god or gods. As already stated to you by numerous posters here, a lack of a belief is not a tenet.


  • #593
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    smacl wrote: »
    The only thing all atheists have in common is that they don't believe in a god or gods. As already stated to you by numerous posters here, a lack of a belief is not a tenet.


    Some people believe in Reiki. I accept there is a force behind it which I don't want to get involved with.

    As for tooth fairies. We all know it's the Easter Bunny who takes the teeth. Too many sweets.
    To say you don't have a tenet of belief is as fictional as the Jedi. You have a basis upon which you believe God doesn't exist.
    Whether you accept that basis is a tenet or nots up to you but according to the dictionary it is or are you saying you have no basis for your belief in His non existence?

    Refusing to accept He exists without any basis for doing so is if course a different discussion.


  • #594
    nthclare
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭nthclare


    smacl wrote: »
    I don't believe in the tooth fairy, the healing powers of crystals or Jedi mind force either. In fact there's a massive volume of superstitious, supernatural and nonsensical stuff that some people believe in that I don't and I'm guessing you don't either. This isn't a 'tenet of atheism', were such a thing to exist, it is a consequence of not believing wildly absurd assertions that are entirely unsupported by any sound evidence.

    At the same time I have many strongly held philosophical, political and personal leanings, but these have nothing to do with atheism. For example, as a secularist I believe in freedom of and from religious expression. I also believe we should promote and expand human rights both locally and internationally. Politically, according to a questionnaire on boards some years back, I'm a left leaning liberal. None of these are 'tenets of atheism' as they are not commonly held by all atheists. The only thing all atheists have in common is that they don't believe in a god or gods. As already stated to you by numerous posters here, a lack of a belief is not a tenet.

    I hear you and I think similarly.
    But I love the idea of moving on to another existence, because I love life, different experiences and cultures.

    Love the land,ocean and cosmos and I like the fantasy of different realms and dimensions and the sidhe Fairy Folk etc

    I suppose God's to me are archetypes rather than real and I see how they've evolved in people's psyche and consciences...

    It's very interesting, even the DC and Marvel characters are like god's in their own right.

    Who's to say God's weren't superheroes of the old ?

    Some had a sad ending others had a more heroic ending...

    I can see how religion and mythology is so interesting, and to this day it's still popular.


  • #595
    karlitob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭karlitob


    nthclare wrote: »
    Ah come on now, it wasn't so long ago when Atheism Ireland were trying to get together on a Sunday and have a secular gathering.

    In a day of the Sabbath too.

    Atheism seems to get mixed up in education, politics, sexuality debates, scientific evidence of whether there's a diety or dietys etc

    Maybe someday science will catch up with how people claim there's more to life than this realm.
    Until then it's in limbo.

    We've been programmed to think that there's more to life than this plane of existence.

    Ye are welcome to plagiarise scientists or send on links to provide evidence that there's nothing but the here and now.

    Why do you find atheism so hard to understand. YOU are an atheist - you don’t believe in the existence of other gods. You’ve yet to acknowledge this point. It shouldn’t be too difficult to grasp that atheist just don’t believe in the existence of one more god than you.


  • #596
    nthclare
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭nthclare


    karlitob wrote: »
    Why do you find atheism so hard to understand. YOU are an atheist - you don’t believe in the existence of other gods. You’ve yet to acknowledge this point. It shouldn’t be too difficult to grasp that atheist just don’t believe in the existence of one more god than you.

    I'm an agnostic, and no I'm not a God.


  • #597
    SouthWesterly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,927 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    karlitob wrote: »
    Why do you find atheism so hard to understand. YOU are an atheist - you don’t believe in the existence of other gods. You’ve yet to acknowledge this point. It shouldn’t be too difficult to grasp that atheist just don’t believe in the existence of one more god than you.

    So you think you're a god!
    If you're a god then you worship yourself.

    As I said earlier, atheism is a religion. :D


  • #598
    karlitob
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭karlitob


    nthclare wrote: »
    I'm an agnostic, and no I'm not a God.

    So you’re agnostic about
    - Haile Selassie, the Emperor of Ethiopia between 1930 and 1974, as the Second Coming of Christ (Rastafarianism)
    - wanka tankan
    - Zeus
    - xenu
    - Odin
    - Bacchus


  • #599
    monkeysnapper
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,576 ✭✭✭monkeysnapper


    A lady at work was trying to convince me god exist one day in canteen.... I asked her did she believe in aliens.... she got quite offended and said that was nonsense.....

    I told her I didnt know if either exsist as I've had no personal experience with either but at least people have footage of some things that cant be explained.


  • #600
    smacl
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,777 Mod ✭✭✭✭smacl


    nthclare wrote: »
    I hear you and I think similarly.
    But I love the idea of moving on to another existence, because I love life, different experiences and cultures.

    Love the land,ocean and cosmos and I like the fantasy of different realms and dimensions and the sidhe Fairy Folk etc

    I suppose God's to me are archetypes rather than real and I see how they've evolved in people's psyche and consciences...

    It's very interesting, even the DC and Marvel characters are like god's in their own right.

    Who's to say God's weren't superheroes of the old ?

    Some had a sad ending others had a more heroic ending...

    I can see how religion and mythology is so interesting, and to this day it's still popular.

    I love the richness and complexity of different traditions, belief systems and mythologies but also believe that there's more to something being possibly true than wanting it to be true. A bit sad maybe, but there you go. I find that the notion of an afterlife leads some people to waste the one life they definitely do have. They live like they're playing a game of space invaders with more lives left if they wipe out without realising they're already on their last guy ;)


  • Advertisement
  • #601
    Bannasidhe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    smacl wrote: »
    I love the richness and complexity of different traditions, belief systems and mythologies but also believe that there's more to something being possibly true than wanting it to be true. A bit sad maybe, but there you go. I find that the notion of an afterlife leads some people to waste the one life they definitely do have. They live like they're playing a game of space invaders with more lives left if they wipe out without realising they're already on their last guy ;)

    An afterlife would be nice.
    Winning the lotto would also be nice.
    I'm not gambling on either.


Advertisement