Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Green Bay Packers Thread

1757678808193

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 407 ✭✭LMHC


    Sure I did……vague nebulous stuff.

    Rodgers is paid to play QB, Gutekunst/Murphy/LeFluer are paid to manage.

    When the players want to take over the management role it’s trouble.

    In the last 10 years other than the Pats, the Packers have been the most successful and consistent team in the league.

    They don’t do that with bad management.

    Management can't run plays with out a competent QB. Chiefs mahomes, Bucs TB , Cardinals Kyler , Green Bay Aaron.

    Execution comes from the QB he should be appeased.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    LMHC wrote: »
    Management can't run plays with out a competent QB. Chiefs mahomes, Bucs TB , Cardinals Kyler , Green Bay Aaron.

    Execution comes from the QB he should be appeased.

    Depends how much ‘appeasement’ he wants.

    Where have the Chiefs, the Bucs, the Cards been over the past 15 seasons

    Nowhere is the answer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 407 ✭✭LMHC


    Depends how much ‘appeasement’ he wants.

    Where have the Chiefs, the Bucs, the Cards been over the past 15 seasons

    Nowhere is the answer.

    Do you believe we would be as successful without Aaron.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭Blut2


    LMHC wrote: »
    I agree I was totally on his side but its just dragging on its not good for team or fans nor him. I pray to god he stays Love doesn't do it for me.


    How exactly has Love not done it for you in his 0 games to date?


  • Registered Users Posts: 407 ✭✭LMHC


    Blut2 wrote: »
    How exactly has Love not done it for you in his 0 games to date?

    You think I've not seen Love play, hahah OK listen I'll leave the threads the casual vibes here is a bit much for me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    LMHC wrote: »
    You think I've not seen Love play, hahah OK listen I'll leave the threads the casual vibes here is a bit much for me.

    Very strange answer. Bar college he hasn't played a single game. I suppose you probably hopped on a flight and have been in the trenches watching him work out in Green bay the last two weeks while us meer fools are stuck in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Jofspring wrote: »
    Very strange answer. Bar college he hasn't played a single game. I suppose you probably hopped on a flight and have been in the trenches watching him work out in Green bay the last two weeks while us meer fools are stuck in Ireland.

    This guy, LM is, in my opinion, is ‘flim-flamming’ and got caught out.

    Rodgers is a great QB but is not above the team

    The team need Rodgers,but Rodgers also needs the team.

    This issue has been festering for too long.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭Blut2


    LMHC wrote: »
    You think I've not seen Love play, hahah OK listen I'll leave the threads the casual vibes here is a bit much for me.


    If you've somehow seen Love play competitively for the Packers I'd love to know how. If only to get something of whatever it is you're smoking...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Packers need to sort this out soon.

    Get rid of Rogers, before the poison goes all through the team.

    Pull the trigger Murphy.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    No real urgency on the Packers to do anything really. Anything they get in a trade would only be 2022 draft picks so they may as well wait it out

    Either he comes back and plays or he sits out the season, which is pretty unlikely.

    Either way his trade value will be just as high next off-season as it is now, possibly higher and more potential trade partners, more teams with cap space etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    adrian522 wrote: »
    No real urgency on the Packers to do anything really. Anything they get in a trade would only be 2022 draft picks so they may as well wait it out

    Either he comes back and plays or he sits out the season, which is pretty unlikely.

    Either way his trade value will be just as high next off-season as it is now, possibly higher and more potential trade partners, more teams with cap space etc.

    What I was getting at ADRIAN , was not really Rodgers himself, but the effect this stuff has or may have on the team.
    One of the many great strengths the Packers organisation have is they connect with the town, the fans, and the State.

    These people won’t like unrest being fomented from within, and certainly won’t like a player who has been with the team for so long being involved.

    This stuff is bound to cause unrest and that’s the reason I would be apprehensive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,911 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    The relationship between the team and the players is exactly the same as every other team in the league, a business relationship where decisions are made based on business principles. The Packers aren't special. Unrest among fans doesn't make a lick of difference to the teams success, and nobody on the team gives a **** if the fans are restless. If the team is winning they'll soon settle down, if the team is losing, then the fans will turn on them. So if they cut Rodgers and then lose a lot, the fans certainly won't be praising the team for cutting him and settling the matter. And if they win the fans will forget about rodgers. Whatever the opinion of fans is now is irrelevant and can be ignored, their opinion will be determined for them by results.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,139 Mod ✭✭✭✭adrian522


    You've always had your finger on the pulse of packer nation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,488 ✭✭✭AdrianII


    I seen him on instagram promoting some golf game with Phil mick and Tom brady.

    GB really need to sort this out, shafted him last year with the picks and he got to a conf final, really need him back to work with this offense,C could go all the way this year.

    Or he doesn't come back and i don't know how low we go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    The relationship between the team and the players is exactly the same as every other team in the league, a business relationship where decisions are made based on business principles. The Packers aren't special. Unrest among fans doesn't make a lick of difference to the teams success, and nobody on the team gives a **** if the fans are restless. If the team is winning they'll soon settle down, if the team is losing, then the fans will turn on them. So if they cut Rodgers and then lose a lot, the fans certainly won't be praising the team for cutting him and settling the matter. And if they win the fans will forget about rodgers. Whatever the opinion of fans is now is irrelevant and can be ignored, their opinion will be determined for them by results.

    I wouldnt agree with that summing up, but of course you are entitled to your opinion.

    To suggest that unrest amongst the fans “doesn’t make a lick of difference”
    to the teams success and nobody gives a ****, is difficult to justify.

    The Packers have a unique set up in management structure,different to every other team in the league.

    They had this before with Favre, and the bitterness is still there to an extent.

    I would suggest that a resolution to the issue would be prudent before sides are taken and the team spirit is damaged, maybe not now but further down the line.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They had this before with Favre, and the bitterness is still there to an extent.

    Think Favre was more popular...and that's gotta sting Rodgers. There were pro Favre protests outside Lambeau.

    Favre was more of a wears heart on sleeve type. I think this time around, amongst Packers fans, there is a perception that Rodgers has tried to engineer this, and been a bit too clever by far and arrogant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Most people realised in Favre's last few years he really was just that indecisive about retiring or not. He wasn't playing some subtle mind game, he was just very conflicted about it himself.

    Obviously thats still incredibly frustrating for an organization, a fanbase, and a young QB-to-be waiting in the wings. But there was no malice in it. Which is probably why people forgave him quite quickly once he'd actually moved on.

    The Rodgers debacle is a lot more complicated, with a lot more political maneuvering on his part. I personally think his reputation will come out of it a lot worse because of that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Blut2 wrote: »
    Most people realised in Favre's last few years he really was just that indecisive about retiring or not. He wasn't playing some subtle mind game, he was just very conflicted about it himself.

    Obviously thats still incredibly frustrating for an organization, a fanbase, and a young QB-to-be waiting in the wings. But there was no malice in it. Which is probably why people forgave him quite quickly once he'd actually moved on.

    The Rodgers debacle is a lot more complicated, with a lot more political maneuvering on his part. I personally think his reputation will come out of it a lot worse because of that.

    I agree totally with your observation there.

    Personally I feel that Brady’s bought in win for Tampa Bay has influenced a lot of this stuff.

    If it can be done for Brady why can’t it be done for me ?

    Forget about long term, forget about fan base, forget about tradition, just blow your wad on one big campaign, and prepare to spend years in the wilderness.

    Not the Packers way of doing things, and I would fully support their modus operandi.

    Hope the ethos of the team always remains in those parameters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Yup, agreed, I'd say thats a big factor.

    It'll take an older QB (Rodgers? Wilson?) playing hardball, moving to an all-in team that goes nowhere, and getting a bit screwed to reset the market in that regard I'd say.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Blut2 wrote: »
    Yup, agreed, I'd say thats a big factor.

    It'll take an older QB (Rodgers? Wilson?) playing hardball, moving to an all-in team that goes nowhere, and getting a bit screwed to reset the market in that regard I'd say.

    A lot will depend on how Tampa Bay perform next season and following one.

    If they do well and contend, I can see aging QBs getting restless and hankering to Jack in their team for a last chance of bought in glory.

    Not a good outlook , in my opinion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 981 ✭✭✭Lionbacker


    A lot will depend on how Tampa Bay perform next season and following one.

    If they do well and contend, I can see aging QBs getting restless and hankering to Jack in their team for a last chance of bought in glory.

    Not a good outlook , in my opinion.

    It's already happened in Detroit, with Stafford getting fed up with the Lions inability to build a contending team. He has since mentioned seeing Brady move on and see instant success kinda swayed him to do the same.
    Actually don't blame him at all. Would like to see him do well & maybe finally get to the latter stages of the playoffs.

    As for the Lions they are starting a rebuild, but very happy with the new regime thus far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,911 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    A lot will depend on how Tampa Bay perform next season and following one.

    If they do well and contend, I can see aging QBs getting restless and hankering to Jack in their team for a last chance of bought in glory.

    Not a good outlook , in my opinion.

    I can understand why any guy with only a couple of years of play left in him would want to go somewhere that they are set up to succeed now instead of focusing on a longer term that won't include them. BUT! Will other aging QBs be willing to take smaller paychecks to enable the team to surround them with talent? Seems like a lot of these guys overlook that Brady takes less money than they do when they are envying his success. Can't see Aaron Rodgers accepting Brady's level of pay.

    I know Brady is in a nice position financially to do this stuff, but either way, no team could put together a roster like in Tampa that quickly if they had to pay Rodgers' current wages.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    I can understand why any guy with only a couple of years of play left in him would want to go somewhere that they are set up to succeed now instead of focusing on a longer term that won't include them. BUT! Will other aging QBs be willing to take smaller paychecks to enable the team to surround them with talent? Seems like a lot of these guys overlook that Brady takes less money than they do when they are envying his success. Can't see Aaron Rodgers accepting Brady's level of pay.

    I know Brady is in a nice position financially to do this stuff, but either way, no team could put together a roster like in Tampa that quickly if they had to pay Rodgers' current wages.

    Valid points for sure….


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,131 ✭✭✭cosatron


    tomorrow is the first day of training camp, will he show up, i doubt it. but himself and adams tweeted a picture of MJ and Pippen referencing the last dance but it was taken down. so who knows. I think if they come an agreement of 1 more season and go for a superbowl and trade him at the end of the year and i dont think we going to pay adam top wr money as we can't afford it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Looks like Rogers is going to be the starting QB for the Packers in 2021.

    Reliable sources say will start for the 21/22 season and then “we’ll see’, apparently he will be under contract but the Packers can’t tag him so they can trade him.

    What I was always afraid of was that ‘unrest’ would spill over into the rest of the team,and it seems it had with Adams, ZSmith, and even Bakctiari rumbling a bit.

    Training camp starts tomorrow Wed. and it would be good to be ‘stabilized’ before the end of tc.

    Some talks about Randall Cobb coming back too.

    All reportage right now, let’s see how it pans out………😫


    sorry training camp starts Tue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Reccomend this pad for Packers fans in the coming season.

    Purely based on personal listening



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,131 ✭✭✭cosatron




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Ok so the Packers lost against the Texans,but I’m not concerned.

    Texans had a lot of starters playing, Packers were working the bottom of the roster.

    I’m not panicking.😃



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Ya was pretty much a complete 3rd string. Love did well all things considered. Seems to have picked up an injury though and might not be playing this week against the Jets. Would be nice to see him get one game olin pre-season with a strong offensive line and a few first team receivers.

    Josh Jackson traded to the Giants for Issac Yiadom. Can't say I know anything about him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Not exactly stellar, it seems but worth a punt.

    Injury not bad apparently, got it when stripped of the ball while throwing.

    Would like to see him behind a stronger OL and better receivers if only for a couple of series.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Devin Funchess released……pity …. was looking forward to his contribution for 2021.

    ESB might have dodged a bullet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Ya such a pity about Funchess. I think himself and Rodgers would have done serious damage and taken a little heat off Davante. Can't really see another top WR in the team at the moment. Could be relying heavily on Tonyan and Cobb now.

    Lazard is decent and MVS has looked ok at times but can't be relied on.

    Would be great to pick up another WR before the season starts but don't think it will happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Bakhtiari out for the first 6 weeks. Left on the PUP list. Huge loss for the Packers. Better to have him miss the first six though and hopefully available for a run in from there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar



    Reckon Elgton Jenkins will fill the gap pretty well.

    I certainly would trust him.

    I’m pretty happy about the 52 they stripped it down to.

    Some new faces in there who show promise.

    Surprised that Jk was cut but apparently he was paying more attention to his church in Alabama

    than preperation for the new season and his NFL career.

    There ya go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,773 ✭✭✭jimmytwotimes 2013


    Stupid question, thinking of subbing to nfl gamepass. I know full highlights will be available which will be a great way to watch the Packers games but will some of the live games be blocked?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    They are supposed to have games on sky sports blacked out but I don't think I have ever seen one blacked out over the last 4 years. Get a cousin in Brazil to sign up for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Right can of pïss display in Jacksonville.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    It was shocking to watch last night. Absolutely desperate all over the place.


    I'm just hoping that's the kick in the arse the team needed because leading up to it and even during the game it seemed like a team waiting for it to just happen for them or that they had the god given right to come away with the win. Lots of talk before the game but nothing backed up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,131 ✭✭✭cosatron


    luckily for us the nfc north went 0-4. I won't pass any judgement on any players or coaches until after the lions game, hopefully it was just a once off sh*tshow.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The funny thing is, Rodgers thought he was very cute and handled everything well, his silence as rumours grew, the selective leaks of his thoughts through friends, his snide contempt for the media, his attempts to win over players like Adams.

    And it seems to be backfiring spectacularly. It's as if he forgot his silent tantrum and behind the scenes politicking could damage the team as well. And that, ultimately, matters far more than who said what in a tweet.

    Judging by the reaction after the weekend, if that level of performance continues, he could find that any support left disappears very quickly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    I'm with you on that .

    This team took the field an Sunday as a bunch of individuals, not a team.

    Everybody seemed to expect ‘someone else ‘ to do their job.Rogers just sat on the sideline and seemed to give the impression of not caring and little leadership that I saw on the screen

    Game to an extent was like the Bucs games, tight man to man coverage and when a GB receiver or runner got the rock he was immediately cut down for small or no gain.

    Saints let’s not forget made excellent athletic receptions on numerous occasions, the kind that GB could not make.

    SAints also had Kamara at full speed before hitting the Packers tacklers and could get three or four more yards after contact., whereas both Dillon and Jones were barely off their line.

    Huge improvement needed for Lions game, particularly in energy attitude and enthusiasm.

    Nothing other than a dominating performance will convince me that the Packers will figure in the final playoff picture this season.

    MVS hinted that some “other things “ influenced the poor display, but when asked to elaborate declined to do so.

    Will the week sort it out………we will have to wait and see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The Saints are a particularly well coached team, with a lot of quality players, who a lot of people were underestimating going to this season. So while that was awful to watch, and the team played terribly, I wouldn't be as pessimistic as some. The Saints absolutely took apart the Bucs last season and beat them 38-3 too, and Bucs still managed to win a Superbowl.

    With all the psychodrama with Rodgers and a new defensive coach coming in a bit of rust coming into the first game was to be expected, too.

    Though if theres a repeat of last week (or anything close to it) against the Lions we'll be in real, real trouble for the season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    You have good points there Mr B

    Respected(up to last week) pundits were predicting easy victory for the Packers.

    They were discounting the Saints O line yet apart from Zs hit ,Packers D couldn’t really get to JW.

    Nothing new there says you!!

    Memo to J Barry….. get to the QB because even a mediocre QB can do damage untouched.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    After the debacle in Jax, it’s the Lions in Lambeau next.

    Many are expecting a win, some an easy win, but I feel this will be a bit of a battle.

    Lions have a new set up, lot of x Packers , competent QB in Goff and in my opinion won’t be a pushover.

    Home advantage should shade it for the Pack but based on the Jax performance, defeat isn’t out of the equation.

    Another lack lustre performance would be worrying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    While I'm certainly not expecting a walkover victory given the shambolic performance against the Saints, the Lions already had a competent (arguably better) QB in Stafford. Stafford had a bigger arm, was better under pressure, looked a more accurate passer into coverage. I know the Lions are building an O-line that looks like it could be very good, but I don't rate Goff as an improvement over Stafford.

    Fully agree about the alarm bells going if it's a comparable performance to last weekend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Had a look at the Lions Niners game and Lions are competent.

    Stafford wanted out …. so good decision to let him go.

    A lethargic performance certainly won’t beat the Lions.

    one score win for the Packers?


    🤩



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The bookies reckon the Packers by 12pts, so they're fairly confident in Rodgers coming out swinging. I'd agree (optimistically!), I expect a big performance in Lambeau and a comprehensive win.

    (but I do agree that [i]if[/i] its a shambles again it really will be very, very worrying and probably indicate the season is lost)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I think a proper stomping is needed to get a bit of confidence back in the team; a win in a game that isn't put to bed well before the 4th quarter will inevitably be met with, 'it's only the Lions', no matter how much better Detroit look than in previous years.

    No disagreement whatsoever that they were right to let Stafford go, and Goff is hardly a c-rate replacement, I just read your, 'competent QB' phrase as a suggestion that they didn't previously have a competent QB.

    All that being said, I'm still only thinking Packers by 4.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,736 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    No, sorry if I gave that impression, I always rated Stafford very highly, a very good QB on an average team.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Nice to be on the same side of a discussion for once, Brendy. Maybe we'd do better together sticking to sports.



Advertisement