Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

No business class for fat people

2»

Comments

  • #52
    weldoninhio
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    easypazz wrote: »
    https://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/world/we-were-utterly-humiliated-thai-airways-tells-plus-size-women-theyre-too-big-for-business-class-seats/ar-BBZpbnp?ocid=spartanntp

    Thats them in the picture AFTER weight reduction surgery?? :eek::eek::eek:


  • #53
    weldoninhio
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Hammer89 wrote: »
    You've some hearing.

    If you are on a Ryanair plane sitting in 1B and you can't hear what the person in 1C is saying, i'd say you've a problem with your hearing.


  • #54
    mikhail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    weldoninhio wrote: »
    Thats them in the picture AFTER weight reduction surgery?? :eek::eek::eek:
    It's likely a gastric band or something of the sort. It's surgery to make weight-loss highly probable by making it difficult to overeat, rather than physically removing fat. If it's effective, the weight loss will be over time.


  • #55
    topper75
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    It never bothered Andre.

    ...

    An 'awful man' for the sup was André.

    Sam Beckett drove him to school. No lie.


  • #56
    Hoboo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭Hoboo


    easypazz wrote: »
    Its not like they tried to get a free upgrade, they were happy to pay for it, same as yourself.

    Im not happy to pay for it, thats the point. If I dont pay for extra legroom because Im tall, I dont fit in the seat, I dont fly. They dont offer me extra legroom like they offer seatbelt extensions.


  • #57
    JohnCleary
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,209 ✭✭✭✭JohnCleary


    Hoboo wrote: »
    Im not happy to pay for it, thats the point. If I dont pay for extra legroom because Im tall, I dont fit in the seat, I dont fly. They dont offer me extra legroom like they offer seatbelt extensions.

    If I'm flying economy shorthaul, I just pay for the extra legroom seats, worth every penny for comfort... what's the big deal?

    What used to bug me when I flew economy long haul was that you couldn't purchase bulkhead (bassinets for babies) or exit row, it was a dose. Thankfully this is no longer an issue for me.

    I'm not sure if that is still a thing as I was able to purchase exit row seats for a family member flying to Canada recently, but it was certainly not available a few years back when I tried to book with the Middle East airlines (phoning them didn't help, either).

    If you can't purchase the exit row / bulkhead, get to the airport early and explain the issue re. Height and that you'd like an exit row/ bulkhead.

    Failing that, do as I do and get a seat at the front of the plane.

    Fat people don't pay for extenders, extenders don't offer any more comfort. Extra legroom seats do, hence you pay for them. (Or you're lucky)


  • #58
    Hoboo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭Hoboo


    JohnCleary wrote: »
    If I'm flying economy shorthaul, I just pay for the extra legroom seats, worth every penny for comfort... what's the big deal?

    What used to bug me when I flew economy long haul was that you couldn't purchase bulkhead (bassinets for babies) or exit row, it was a dose. Thankfully this is no longer an issue for me.

    I'm not sure if that is still a thing as I was able to purchase exit row seats for a family member flying to Canada recently, but it was certainly not available a few years back when I tried to book with the Middle East airlines (phoning them didn't help, either).

    If you can't purchase the exit row / bulkhead, get to the airport early and explain the issue re. Height and that you'd like an exit row/ bulkhead.

    Failing that, do as I do and get a seat at the front of the plane.

    Fat people don't pay for extenders, extenders don't offer any more comfort. Extra legroom seats do, hence you pay for them. (Or you're lucky)


    Shorthaul, grand. Transatlantic is 100 each way. That's taking the piss when you've no choice. Return flights go up 25%. Running the risk of turning up on the day isn't an option, no legroom then I'm not flying. Can't sit side saddle with legs in the aisle for take off and landing.


  • #59
    raze_them_all_
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,768 ✭✭✭raze_them_all_


    I'm a fat 18 stone and have a 38 inch waist.... The **** has a 56 inch waist


  • #60
    NSAman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭NSAman


    raze_them_all_ wrote: »
    I'm a fat 18 stone and have a 38 inch waist.... The **** has a 56 inch waist

    A ball!


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    Obvious Desperate Breakfasts
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    mobileforest wrote: »
    Had a friend who was moving her life across the world a number of yrs ago. She told me she wished airliners made passengers stand on the scale with their luggage and pay accordingly. She was annoyed because she had to pay for every extra kg of luggage (as weight is the key issue for planes with regards to fuel etc) yet her seat cost her the same as it did for blokes 50+ more kg in weight than her. Imagine the outcry if an airliner brought that in.

    That’s hardly fair, is it? I mean, should a healthy weight super tall broad guy have to pay more? It’s a human, not a gathering of inanimate objects. Moving stuff costs money. Pretty petty of your friend.


  • #62
    JohnCleary
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,209 ✭✭✭✭JohnCleary


    Hoboo wrote: »
    Shorthaul, grand. Transatlantic is 100 each way. That's taking the piss when you've no choice. Return flights go up 25%. Running the risk of turning up on the day isn't an option, no legroom then I'm not flying. Can't sit side saddle with legs in the aisle for take off and landing.

    It's not taking the p1ss. *I* have a choice, and if I was stuck in economy for a transatlantic flight, 100 wouldn't bother me in the slightest for comfort.

    Heck, i'm just after paying 200 euro for my father to have legroom seats for a flight to Canada soon (Sister booked him Economy, I refuse to send an old man that long in Economy, but she had already bought the tickets) - I don't even get to reap the rewards, but it's just the done thing if you want comfort.

    100 extra for a 6 hour flight is under 20 euro an hour for comfort.... you must not value your comfort.


  • #63
    Hoboo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭Hoboo


    JohnCleary wrote: »
    It's not taking the p1ss. *I* have a choice, and if I was stuck in economy for a transatlantic flight, 100 wouldn't bother me in the slightest for comfort.

    Heck, i'm just after paying 200 euro for my father to have legroom seats for a flight to Canada soon (Sister booked him Economy, I refuse to send an old man that long in Economy, but she had already bought the tickets) - I don't even get to reap the rewards, but it's just the done thing if you want comfort.

    100 extra for a 6 hour flight is under 20 euro an hour for comfort.... you must not value your comfort.


    You're missing my point.

    You have a choice, because you fit in the chair. I have NO choice but to pay the extra because my knees would be up at the top of the seat in front. Thats not permitted for take off or landing.

    Its not about comfort, it's about not being unable to take the same flight as your dad UNLESS I pay the 200.

    It's a form of discrimination. Extra legroom seat should be available to tall people free of extra charges. Its akin to charging for disabled toilets (cue outrage).


  • #64
    easypazz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭easypazz


    Hoboo wrote: »
    You're missing my point.

    You have a choice, because you fit in the chair. I have NO choice but to pay the extra because my knees would be up at the top of the seat in front. Thats not permitted for take off or landing.

    Its not about comfort, it's about not being unable to take the same flight as your dad UNLESS I pay the 200.

    It's a form of discrimination. Extra legroom seat should be available to tall people free of extra charges. Its akin to charging for disabled toilets (cue outrage).

    Has any tall person ever been booted out of a plane because they could not fit in an economy seat?

    Never heard of it.


  • #65
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    As someone who’s 6’4”, I have enjoyed the very many benefits of being tall and regard paying a few euro extra on a short haul flight and even a few more on a long haul for an emergency exit row as money well spent, and would travel business class longhaul whenever I can afford what I consider to be a treat.

    And i seriously don’t want someone’s obese body spilling over into the space I’ve booked and paid for


  • #66
    bucketybuck
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    If I had a 56" waist I would feel humiliated too.


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    JohnCleary
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,209 ✭✭✭✭JohnCleary


    Hoboo wrote: »
    You're missing my point.

    You have a choice, because you fit in the chair. I have NO choice but to pay the extra because my knees would be up at the top of the seat in front. Thats not permitted for take off or landing.

    Its not about comfort, it's about not being unable to take the same flight as your dad UNLESS I pay the 200.

    It's a form of discrimination. Extra legroom seat should be available to tall people free of extra charges. Its akin to charging for disabled toilets (cue outrage).

    Flying isin't a right, get over it.

    Discrimination my hoop.

    But thanks for giving me a laugh :pac:


  • #68
    Obvious Desperate Breakfasts
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    Hoboo wrote: »
    You're missing my point.

    You have a choice, because you fit in the chair. I have NO choice but to pay the extra because my knees would be up at the top of the seat in front. Thats not permitted for take off or landing.

    Its not about comfort, it's about not being unable to take the same flight as your dad UNLESS I pay the 200.

    It's a form of discrimination. Extra legroom seat should be available to tall people free of extra charges. Its akin to charging for disabled toilets (cue outrage).

    Am, yeah, that means less seats on each plane in order to provide more seats with extra legroom (long-legged people not exactly being that rare). And that will see fares rising for everyone to make up the difference from the reduced available seating.

    And, to be honest, you’re the one who sounds outraged.


  • #69
    mikhail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    Obvious Desperate Breakfasts wrote: »
    Am, yeah, that means less seats on each plane in order to provide more seats with extra legroom (long-legged people not exactly being that rare). And that will see fares rising for everyone to make up the difference from the reduced available seating.

    And, to be honest, you’re the one who sounds outraged.
    It's not much of an issue. In the USA for example (just because the stats are easier to find), someone who's 6' 3" is in the top 2% of men by height. Women that height are vanishingly rare. It's should be relatively easy to make minor accommodations for 1% of your passengers. To be clear that I'm not speaking in self-interest here, I'll mention that I'm not 6' 3" +.


  • #70
    Hector Savage
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    gmisk wrote: »
    I'm kind of surprised if they were that size they could fit in economy?

    Imagine the poor fecker that would have to sit beside one of those fat pigs on the way back ???


  • #71
    mikemac2
    Registered Users Posts: 2,972 ✭✭✭mikemac2


    Peregrinus wrote: »
    - Much of their network consisted of island-hopping routes flown by comparatively small aircraft where weight distribution matters, so passengers would have to be weighed even if they weren't being charged by the kilo.

    A number of airlines weigh all passengers and allocate seats based on weight (again, these are airlines flying small aircraft)

    Inverin in Conemara do this.

    Step up on the scales for all to see and get told where you will be sitting to balance the plane over to the Aran Islands :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    Obvious Desperate Breakfasts
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    mikhail wrote: »
    It's not much of an issue. In the USA for example (just because the stats are easier to find), someone who's 6' 3" is in the top 2% of men by height. Women that height are vanishingly rare. It's should be relatively easy to make minor accommodations for 1% of your passengers. To be clear that I'm not speaking in self-interest here, I'll mention that I'm not 6' 3" +.

    You don’t have to be that tall for your leg room to be severely restricted on flights. It depends on your proportions. For example, a woman might be 5’ 7” but have a high waist and therefore long legs and find herself just as cramped as a 6’ 0” man who happens to have a long torso and short legs. I have the same leg length as my father despite being five or six inches shorter than him. We’re both short so that example is purely for illustrative purposes but it just shows that people’s proportions can differ greatly. I’ve seen people who are kinda tall but not massively so be very cramped on flights.

    So I think a lot of extra legroom seats would need to be provided to give anyone affected extra legroom for free. And if they only decided it purely by height and that you have to very tall, that would be a pretty crude measure. AND what about a flight where there are lots of tallies? For example, a travelling basketball team or a plane load of Dutch folks. Which of those tallies get the extra legroom? So it’s just not really a workable proposition. It would be hassle to organise on each individual flight. And no airline will be willing to provide more than a handful of extra legroom seats because of the lost revenue.


Advertisement