Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Leinster Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread XI (The Finals Countdown)

19899101103104201

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    Surely Nacewa was left out for the clicks and the shares. It's beyond comprehension.

    Edit: I normally avoid these sorts of things on RTÉ and the like, and I remember seeing the Front, second and backrows, up on the site alright and never clicked in, but I can't see a full team or backs and Halves up there now. Any links?

    Voted by the fans. Clicks nothing to do with it.

    They didn't have anyone listed in two positions, so you had this odd situation in which either Nacewa or Kearney had to miss out, but James Lowe made it into the RTE team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    Afraid they're all on TikTok

    Remember when this was all fields and dancing Jesus? :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Voted by the fans. Clicks nothing to do with it.

    They didn't have anyone listed in two positions, so you had this odd situation in which either Nacewa or Kearney had to miss out, but James Lowe made it into the RTE team.

    I see that now alright.

    Kinda falls at the first hurdle really you'd think.

    That being said, there's going to be another one along in a few weeks anyway no doubt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,722 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    cbgR6P1_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

    In fairness they do reference Nacewa in the caption.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    You have to include Cullen though. The RTE-selected team went with Thorn and MOK, but Cullen was absolutely crucial to all of our success in 2009 - 2014.


  • Administrators Posts: 54,109 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    You have to include Cullen though. The RTE-selected team went with Thorn and MOK, but Cullen was absolutely crucial to all of our success in 2009 - 2014.

    Too right Former Former, the D4 trophy cabinet wouldn't be the same if it weren't for Cullen and his ability to cheat and get away with it.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not to take this too seriously but if were picking the best ever team then I presume were picking the best players at their peak.

    In that sense the team isn't far off. Who has played in the row for Leinster that is better than peak Brad Thorn?

    I'd have Nacewa and Lowe on the wings. Shoot me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    Not to take this too seriously but if were picking the best ever team then I presume were picking the best players at their peak.

    In that sense the team isn't far off. Who has played in the row for Leinster that is better than peak Brad Thorn?

    I'd have Nacewa and Lowe on the wings. Shoot me.
    but you have to take into account it's best ever team for leinster. Thorn was great but played 8 games for leinster.
    He is better than the others overall but it's best team for leinster and I would consider what Cullen, toner, Ryan ahead of him


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 490 ✭✭Scottmactom


    Hines was better for Leinster than Thorne.

    Lowe pretty overrated too if your picking him ahead of Horgan and Hickie.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,706 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    Hines was better for Leinster than Thorne.

    Lowe pretty overrated too if your picking him ahead of Horgan and Hickie.

    How about Luke Fitz? Won a GS, 3 HK and started a Lions test. Decent argument for him IMO. He still managed quite a lot considering his extensive injury history.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,300 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Hines was better for Leinster than Thorne.

    Yup, would agree.

    We can even ignore the number of games played - I don't have an issue with Elsom for example. But Elsom was truly exceptional for his period at Leinster and I'm not entirely convinced Thorn was that during his tenure.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Thorn only played in 8 games for Leinster :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,722 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    Thorn only played in 8 games for Leinster :confused:

    Was only here for 3 months as injury cover for Leo Cullen


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,219 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Yeah I remember but it's still only 8 games, he didn't even start all of them!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    but you have to take into account it's best ever team for leinster. Thorn was great but played 8 games for leinster.
    He is better than the others overall but it's best team for leinster and I would consider what Cullen, toner, Ryan ahead of him

    I guess we're answering two different questions.

    It's either:

    Who achieved the most for Leinster in each position

    Who achieved the highest ceiling in each position and had a Leinster cap

    They are two very different questions but it's the latter interpretation I'm working off.

    2005 Lote Tuquiri says hello by the way :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    Honestly, I don't really look back on Thorn's period here as anything special. In terms of contribution to Leinster, I'd have him behind Hines and Fardy and not on the same planet as MOK and Cullen.

    Sure, he's the best player out of all of them, but by that measure you'd be picking Christian Cullen in the Munster XV and Muliana for Connacht.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    I guess we're answering two different questions.

    It's either:

    Who achieved the most for Leinster in each position

    Who achieved the highest ceiling in each position and had a Leinster cap

    They are two very different questions but it's the latter interpretation I'm working off.

    2005 Lote Tuquiri says hello by the way :D
    it is two very different questions but it's the best leinster team of the era not the best players to have played for leinster.
    I think if what they did for leinster then thorn wouldnt even make a 23. I would have 4 second rows ahead of him for what they have done in the jersey.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    it is two very different questions but it's the best leinster team of the era not the best players to have played for leinster.
    I think if what they did for leinster then thorn wouldnt even make a 23. I would have 4 second rows ahead of him for what they have done in the jersey.

    Fair enough. If I was putting together a team of players, based on their best performances for Leinster who I felt would be the hardest team to beat:

    Healy
    Cronin
    Furlong
    Mal
    Ryan
    Elsom
    SOB
    Heaslip
    McGrath
    Sexton
    Lowe
    BOD
    Ringrose
    Isa
    Kearney

    Fitz, Horgan and Larmour nipping at a few sets of heels there. Elsom v Fardy a conversation. Mal v Thorn a conversation and honestly I feel bad leaving Toner and Cullen out but I always think of their contributions as adding up incrementally to best in class over a season, as opposed to changing a specific game on the day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,412 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    Fair enough. If I was putting together a team of players, based on their best performances for Leinster who I felt would be the hardest team to beat:

    Healy
    Cronin
    Furlong
    Mal
    Ryan
    Elsom
    SOB
    Heaslip
    McGrath
    Sexton
    Lowe
    BOD
    Ringrose
    Isa
    Kearney

    Fitz, Horgan and Larmour nipping at a few sets of heels there. Elsom v Fardy a conversation. Mal v Thorn a conversation and honestly I feel bad leaving Toner and Cullen out but I always think of their contributions as adding up incrementally to best in class over a season, as opposed to changing a specific game on the day.

    I know there’s an element of fitting people in but darcy at 12 over Ringrose at 13 any day of the week if your looking for a team that would be hard to beat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,223 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    That's a very good side, Venjur. I'd have Fardy in for Mal tho. Mal was an excellent footballer, but sometimes I felt he could have done more around pitch. Fardy is his equal skills wise and is just a pest everywhere on and off the ball.

    Would have Reddan in instead of Luke too. Think Luke is the better all rounder, but Reddan's speed to the ruck and quality of pass is miles better. O agree on the other 13 players tho.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 6,556 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sheep Shagger


    Hardly a secret but Rob K must be announcing his retirement shortly- his book is out in October just in time for the Christmas market...


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,300 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    it is two very different questions but it's the best leinster team of the era not the best players to have played for leinster.
    I think if what they did for leinster then thorn wouldnt even make a 23. I would have 4 second rows ahead of him for what they have done in the jersey.

    Even at that I would consider that it has to be based on their performances for Leinster. To me, Thorn was great, but didn't do anything that Hines or Fardy hasn't managed at times in a Leinster jersey. His performances in an AB jersey are irrelevant to the discussion. Elsom was hands down much better in a Leinster jersey than Thorn ever was and that is why he deserves his place,


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Richie_Rich89


    Do Leinster win in Bordeaux against Clermont in 2012 without Thorn? Doubtful, in my opinion. For that alone he's important in Leinster's legacy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,722 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    Hardly a secret but Rob K must be announcing his retirement shortly- his book is out in October just in time for the Christmas market...

    Yeah would generally indicate he's retiring considering most players wait to retire before publishing any sort of autobiography (Best, O'Connell, BOD all released theirs right after they retired, Heaslip and Ross the year after).

    The only exception I can think of would be Johnny's in 2013.

    He mentioned in an interview with Thornley last month he'd been looking at options outside of Ireland but everything was off the table once the seasons were postponed/cancelled.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,300 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Do Leinster win in Bordeaux against Clermont in 2012 without Thorn? Doubtful, in my opinion. For that alone he's important in Leinster's legacy.

    Like...maybe? Devin Toner is not exactly a **** player as his 70 Ireland caps attest to. He was far from the most important player in that victory.

    If Fofana had skipped arm day a couple times we would have lost. Should we put a statue to his gym work ethic up in the RDS?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Richie_Rich89


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Te’o walked out of Leinster and straight into the England squad for the Australia tour which they won, not sure how much he played in that end of season but for someone so awful it was amazing how quick he jumped nearly every Centre in England to walk into the squad :-)

    England used him almost exclusively as an impact sub if memory serves - a role he was well suited to. It's not as if he doesn't have his strengths. He's got useful pace for a big guy, and surprisingly good footwork. He's very dynamic and obviously has that offloading ability. Taking all that into consideration, does Gatland dropping him when he always preferred a big, powerful 12 not suggest that there were some serious deficiencies in other parts of his game?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,510 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Voted by the fans. Clicks nothing to do with it.

    They didn't have anyone listed in two positions, so you had this odd situation in which either Nacewa or Kearney had to miss out, but James Lowe made it into the RTE team.

    Contepomi was shortlisted at 12 and 10 so he could and should have been an option for both.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,510 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    So these were the options for the RTE voting. Unsure why Isa isn't an option on the wing given that Contepomi was in two categories. Only two options for 13.

    15: RK, Isa or Larmour
    14/11: Shane Horgan, Denis Hickie, Luke Fitzgerald, Fergus McFadden, Dave Kearney and James Lowe
    13: BOD, Ringrose
    12: Contepomi, D'arcy, Henshaw
    10 Sexton, Contepomi, Madigan
    9 Boss, Reddan, Whitaker

    8/7/6: Jamie Heaslip, Victor Costello, Sean O’Brien, Shane Jennings, Rocky Elsom, Rhys Ruddock, Trevor Brennan, Dan Leavy, Josh van der Flier
    5/4: Leo Cullen, Brad Thorne, Nathan Hines, Devin Toner, James Ryan, Malcolm O'Kelly
    3 Tadhg Furlong Mike Ross Stan Wright
    2 Sean Cronin, Richardt Strauss, Shane Byrne
    1 Cian Healy, Jack McGrath, Reggie Corrigan


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,635 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    England used him almost exclusively as an impact sub if memory serves - a role he was well suited to. It's not as if he doesn't have his strengths. He's got useful pace for a big guy, and surprisingly good footwork. He's very dynamic and obviously has that offloading ability. Taking all that into consideration, does Gatland dropping him when he always preferred a big, powerful 12 not suggest that there were some serious deficiencies in other parts of his game?

    Gatland dropped him from the Lions. You don't get there if you have "no understanding of running lines or how to time passes as an inside centre".

    Gatland also dropped Drico. Would you suggest there were serious deficiencies in other parts of his game?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    aloooof wrote: »
    Gatland dropped him from the Lions. You don't get there if you have "no understanding of running lines or how to time passes as an inside centre".

    Gatland also dropped Drico. Would you suggest there were serious deficiencies in other parts of his game?


    T'eo and then Tomane got picked out for special attention by that poster.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,037 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    clsmooth wrote: »
    How about Luke Fitz? Won a GS, 3 HK and started a Lions test. Decent argument for him IMO. He still managed quite a lot considering his extensive injury history.

    Luke Fitz is one of the most over rated players of Leinster's pro error. Lowe already has nearly as many tries as him in 100 less appearances.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 490 ✭✭Scottmactom


    Luke Fitz at his peak was an excellent player, will never know how good he could have been due to his injury problems.

    But he was on track to be a leinster great in 2009.

    Haven't had a young wing that talented come through the system since.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Yeah_Right wrote: »
    Luke Fitz is one of the most over rated players of Leinster's pro error. Lowe already has nearly as many tries as him in 100 less appearances.


    Luke Fitz was an incredible player. Problem was he couldn't stay fit. If he was fit all the time he would have been up with the Leinster greats


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,375 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Yeah_Right wrote: »
    Luke Fitz is one of the most over rated players of Leinster's pro error. Lowe already has nearly as many tries as him in 100 less appearances.
    I'd say if you were counting try assists, he'd rank very high. He was often the guy who made the break and got the team into a scoring position. Lowe comes off his wing a lot more and so gets a lot more ball than Luke would have done as a more 'traditional' winger.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Yeah_Right wrote: »
    Luke Fitz is one of the most over rated players of Leinster's pro error. Lowe already has nearly as many tries as him in 100 less appearances.

    Peak Fitzgerald was excellent and had more natural talent than Lowe. He played in a weaker team who didn't play such an attacking style but still made an impression. He was the best defender Leinster have had on the wing bar none. His peak years (2006-10) were played in a fairly defensive Leinster team which used their wingers completely differently. But he did show glimpses of his natural talent. Larmour is the only player who had a step in the same class. He was also far more rounded. He had a very decent left boot and was able to start at 12 against NZ just after his 21st birthday and look completely at home which Lowe simply couldn't do.

    Lowe is far more powerful and effective at scoring tries. He also has licence to play off the cuff rugby along with those around him which really suits him. He's a big fan favourite and deservedly but I'd say he also has a fairly high error count which goes hand in hand with his style.

    I still wouldn't have either in the best Leinster side of the pro era though. Nacewa and Horgan for me, I'd say.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 22,360 CMod ✭✭✭✭Dravokivich


    Do Leinster win in Bordeaux against Clermont in 2012 without Thorn? Doubtful, in my opinion. For that alone he's important in Leinster's legacy.

    Do they win without the drop kick at goal?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    Would we have won in Clermont without Thorn? If we'd replaced him with Fardy, Ryan or Hines, I think so.

    Cullen was just as good as him that day too. He was immense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Cullen outplayed Thorn for me on that day. Thorn was very good in his 8 games. That's it, for me. He probably wasn't quite at the level he was 9 months previously but was still an excellent player.

    8 games of being consistently very good does not get him into the best side of the era. Elsom has a case because he was exceptional for a full season i.e. MOTM in about a dozen games.

    In those closing minutes under our own posts in Bordeaux, Cullen's performance was more important than Thorn, for me. He was sensational in that spell.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 490 ✭✭Scottmactom


    Toner - 244 appearances
    Cullen - 219 appearances
    MOK - 184 appearances
    Fardy - 58 appearances
    Hines - 46 appearances
    Ryan - 37 appearances
    Thorne - 8 appearances

    Toner & Hines underrated?
    Thorne overrated?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    Buer wrote: »
    In those closing minutes under our own posts in Bordeaux, Cullen's performance was more important than Thorn, for me. He was sensational in that spell.

    I'll never forget Julien Bardy headbutting Cullen, disguising it as rucking and trying to draw a penalty, Cullen just wouldn't react when most lads would have lashed out.

    Edit; 8.35 in this clip
    https://youtu.be/qjxFow0FLRQ?t=517


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,860 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    I'll never forget Julien Bardy headbutting Cullen, disguising it as rucking and trying to draw a penalty, Cullen just wouldn't react when most lads would have lashed out.

    Edit; 8.35 in this clip
    https://youtu.be/qjxFow0FLRQ?t=517

    that would be 6 weeks these days....

    he went back for seconds and thirds and Cullen still didnt reaact


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,870 ✭✭✭✭mfceiling


    Luke Fitz at his peak was an excellent player, will never know how good he could have been due to his injury problems.

    But he was on track to be a leinster great in 2009.

    Haven't had a young wing that talented come through the system since.

    L'Armour?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 490 ✭✭Scottmactom


    mfceiling wrote: »
    L'Armour?

    Fitz was better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,569 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Buer wrote: »
    Peak Fitzgerald was excellent and had more natural talent than Lowe. He played in a weaker team who didn't play such an attacking style but still made an impression. He was the best defender Leinster have had on the wing bar none. His peak years (2006-10) were played in a fairly defensive Leinster team which used their wingers completely differently. But he did show glimpses of his natural talent. Larmour is the only player who had a step in the same class. He was also far more rounded. He had a very decent left boot and was able to start at 12 against NZ just after his 21st birthday and look completely at home which Lowe simply couldn't do.

    Lowe is far more powerful and effective at scoring tries. He also has licence to play off the cuff rugby along with those around him which really suits him. He's a big fan favourite and deservedly but I'd say he also has a fairly high error count which goes hand in hand with his style.

    I still wouldn't have either in the best Leinster side of the pro era though. Nacewa and Horgan for me, I'd say.


    I think he would have usurped D'Arcy at 12 if he hadn't been so injury riddled. He showed his talent against NZ. Would've been seriously good partnership with BOD.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,706 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    I remember thinking he should have replaced Payne in the starting 15 at the 2015RWC although I think he’d mainly been playing great stuff at 12 for Leinster that season. He played some of his best rugby that year. What year was the Bath Xmas game at Aviva? 2012? Remember him being electrifying that night too.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    mfceiling wrote: »
    L'Armour?


    Luke was better....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,569 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    clsmooth wrote: »
    I remember thinking he should have replaced Payne in the starting 15 at the 2015RWC although I think he’d mainly been playing great stuff at 12 for Leinster that season. He played some of his best rugby that year. What year was the Bath Xmas game at Aviva? 2012? Remember him being electrifying that night too.

    Agree, would've complimented Henshaw very well. Himself and O'Malley had the makings of a good midfield, outside of Madigan. Wish we would've gotten a chance to see it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 490 ✭✭Scottmactom


    Agree, would've complimented Henshaw very well. Himself and O'Malley had the makings of a good midfield, outside of Madigan. Wish we would've gotten a chance to see it.

    would have been ugly enough... Madigan should have played 9

    9. Madigan
    10. McKinley
    12. Fitzgerald
    13. O'Malley


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,569 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    would have been ugly enough... Madigan should have played 9

    9. Madigan
    10. McKinley
    12. Fitzgerald
    13. O'Malley

    That's a quality what if lineup alright


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    clsmooth wrote: »
    I remember thinking he should have replaced Payne in the starting 15 at the 2015RWC although I think he’d mainly been playing great stuff at 12 for Leinster that season. He played some of his best rugby that year. What year was the Bath Xmas game at Aviva? 2012? Remember him being electrifying that night too.

    He'd have had a hat trick but for a marginally forward pass IIRC. At his best Luke was sensational. Very clever player as well as the talent. Injury messed him about but he probably also struggled for form at times when he needed it. Remember that spell in 2011 when he was awful? That sort of thing sticks in peoples heads. He admits himself too that he probably focused on some areas of his game to the detriment of other areas and would feel he never really made the best of what he had as a result.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement