Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Complete N00b but getting house rewired

  • 18-09-2018 3:38pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭


    Hey folks,

    I am renovating a house at the minute, the plumbing is being re-done and the house is being completely rewired.

    So I'd love to put in some form of heating control/automation at a minimum but am not sure about what to go with. Hive, Nest etc. Can one of these control multiple zones?

    Are there other things I should be considering when the house is at this stage i.e. rewiring? (I am putting Ethernet ports in most rooms)


«1

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,008 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    - Put lots of ethernet cables in, as much as you can reasonably afford, they are very useful
    for multiple applications.
    - You might want to put some ethernet cables in the ceiling for wireless access points.
    - You might want to run ethernet to locations that you might want to put CCTV cameras
    - You probably want to run 3 cat6 cables to anywhere you plan on having a TV.

    All these should run back to a central location. This central location should also have a cat6 cable running to where your phone line/broadband enters the house.

    Make sure to run a neutral cable to each light switch and use deep backboxes for the switches.

    Maybe cabling for a wired security system.

    Use GU10 fittings for downlighters. Use E27 fittings for standard light bulbs.

    Lots of plugs, can never have too many.

    You may also want to run multiple coax cables from the roof to that central location for satellite/aerial and then run 3 coax from the central location to each TV point. If you decide to do HDMI over cat6, then you can avoid the second part, but no harm in having coax for flexibility.

    Hive and Nest both support multiple zones as long as your home is plumbed for multiple zones. Though I'd recommend Tado as offering more options then either of those as Tado supports multiple zones and smart TRV's.

    This is not an exhaustive list, but just some things to think about.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,679 Mod ✭✭✭✭Rew


    bk wrote: »
    Maybe cabling for a wired security system.

    Talked to an alarm fitter recently and he said go wireless, as good as wired and much cleaner install.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,008 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Rew wrote: »
    Talked to an alarm fitter recently and he said go wireless, as good as wired and much cleaner install.

    Then he doesn't know what he is talking about!

    I've wireless myself now, but given an option wired is definitely superior.

    Cleaner install - If adding to an already built house, yes it is certainly much easier for an installer, but that should not be an issue for a renovation/rewiring like the OP, their walls will be open anyway.

    Wireless has come on a long way, but it definitely isn't as good. A wireless signal can easily be jammed by a cheap device from China by more sophisticated thieves. Some alarm systems have jam detection, but not all and it isn't perfect. Why risk it if you have the option.

    Also the Home Security forum is full of threads of people having issues with wireless sensors failing due to wireless interference. This is particularly imporant to those of us into Home Automation. We are filling our homes with wireless bulbs and switches and thermostats and motion sensors, etc. many of which will be operating on the same wireless frequencies as alarm sensors.

    In the past wireless alarm sensors were ok because not much else was usign the same frequencies, but that is quickly changing now and 866Mhz is getting crowded and I suspect it is causing issues and will end up causing a lot more in future.

    Finally wired sensors avoid the trouble of having to replace batteries every few years, definitely a benefit.

    As I said, I've wireless myself, so it is ok, but if you can I'd go wired if doing a renovation/new build.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,277 ✭✭✭kenmc


    bk wrote: »
    Then he doesn't know what he is talking about!
    Sounds like he knows exactly what he's talking about, and that's making life as simple as possible with no regard to the client. Wireless means he can lob a sensor wherever is convenient, no wiring to tidy, no mess to cleanup. In and out, thanks for the cash.

    Go wired if you possibly can - and not just for alarms, but for networking too, as much as possible, for TV, sat boxes etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    On The coax side, I would say define your tv locations as "Primary" and "Secondary"

    Primary TV points are where you want full availability of saoirview, multichannel/stb/sky/virgin, Netflix, Gaming, surround sound, full high def etc.

    Secondary TV points are where you want good quality TV, with access to all channels, netflix etc, but where surround sound etc is not a requirement.


    Then from a wiring perspective:

    Primary TV points
    4 x coax cables, 3 for sky/sattelite/stb, and 1 for redistribution around the house.
    4 eth/cat 6 cables, wired back to a single/central point. These will be used for ethernet connections to Smart TV, Set top box/sky/virgin, gaming maching, and a spare point.

    Secondary TV points
    1 single coax cable to each TV, fed back to central location.
    2 x Ethernet/cat6 for smart tv and STB

    I would note that in the near future, TV is pretty much going to go streaming for all services, so the longer term view is that coax and HDMI distribution etc will be replaced by ethernet and streaming.

    With that in mind, you have 2 options of distributing your set top box around the house.

    1) HDMI over cat6
    2) HDMI modulated over coax.

    Option 1, IMHO, is more expensive, wastefull of cat6 cable (a dedicated cat6 is required for each tv just for HDMI over cat6). It may give you a superior picture, but these are "secondary tv" points, so is this soemthing that is needed ?

    Option 2 is, again IMHO, cheaper (about €2-300 for a good quality modulator), and utilises the coax you are putting in that will distribute freeview/saorview etc. It also will carry IR control back to your STB as well. The quality of the picture will be comparible to terrestrial saorview, I dont think there is any issue around quality with a good quality hdmi modulator.


    Security:- Def go wired, if you have a chance to avoid wireless, then grab it.

    Internet/CAT6:- As BK said, cat6 for tv points, CCTV locations, your front door, and additional in ceiling points for wifi access.
    Cat 6 cables to your attic also, one or 2 will never go amiss.
    Outdoor WIFI AP's also.
    External buildings, sheds etc, put ethernet in also.

    The golden rule on internet, the same as with the alarm system, is wired first...always. Every wired point you put in gives you better performance, better speed, and actually improves your wireless performance by "unloading" it.

    Wireless is fine for browsing, tablets/phones, music streaming, smart speakers, some IOT devices etc.

    Heating:- Decide what type of heating you are putting in first, then look at the options for control.

    Audio:- Multiroom Audio...def can go wireless with this, but plan for location of speakers (sonos,google,lg etc lots of options on the market)
    Do you want outdoor speakers ?

    Lighting:- BK mentioned neutral in the lightswitch, and deep back boxes already, but if you are looking at smart lighitng, have a think about what type you would like, consider whether a wireless or wired smart lighting system is the way you would go. Look at the options for control (and I mean how it will be controlled manually as well as remotely). I agree with BK 1000% on the netural and deeper backbox, but I would investigate a bit further, cat6 to wall switches is also something to consider for ligthing control.

    Power:- Outdoor sockets, often overlooked. Sockets in your garden, and outdoor lighting.

    Lawnmower:- How big is your lawn ? Smart electric lawnmowers are one of the best smart devices you can put into your home, they do a far better job than you or I could do. There are some things that you can do with regards your lawn layout to make using one easier.

    Not all of this will float your boat, but worth throwing them all in the mix for you to consider.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    Thanks a million folks. Lots to think of there, good shout with the Ethernet cables being cat 6. Would never have thought of that.

    Also didn't have a clue with regards the light fittings.

    The house already has an alarm, mostly wired, with a few wireless components, which I may replace now.

    Yeah heating is going to have multiple zones, my brother if the plumber so I can be as demanding as I can get away with :p I'll look into the Tado


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    Vegeta wrote: »
    I'll look into the Tado

    So just watched a few videos on this folks, needless to say the installs demonstrated were on quite simple setups. Single thermostat downstairs and maybe hot water control too. Are these generally run using a single thermostat?

    I think my heating will have 3 zones, underfloor downstairs, rads upstairs and hot water. But I was thinking of putting more than a single thermostat upstairs to control individual bedroom temperatures.

    How well do rad thermostats work? They're right beside the rads so do they get distorted sense of how warm the room actually is?

    Also it seems all stats are battery powered? Is battery life good on these?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,122 ✭✭✭dam099



    Secondary TV points
    ....

    With that in mind, you have 2 options of distributing your set top box around the house.

    1) HDMI over cat6
    2) HDMI modulated over coax.

    Option 1, IMHO, is more expensive, wastefull of cat6 cable (a dedicated cat6 is required for each tv just for HDMI over cat6). It may give you a superior picture, but these are "secondary tv" points, so is this soemthing that is needed ?

    Option 2 is, again IMHO, cheaper (about €2-300 for a good quality modulator), and utilises the coax you are putting in that will distribute freeview/saorview etc. It also will carry IR control back to your STB as well. The quality of the picture will be comparible to terrestrial saorview, I dont think there is any issue around quality with a good quality hdmi modulator.

    I take the point about wasting CAT6 runs but how is Option 2 cheaper,? I havent used HDMI over CAT6 myself but the baluns seem to run around £30? Maybe for a large number of secondary points as I suspect the modulators are one to many but wouldnt IR control still need magic eye type receivers at each location?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,122 ✭✭✭dam099


    bk wrote: »
    - Put lots of ethernet cables in, as much as you can reasonably afford, they are very useful
    for multiple applications.
    - You might want to put some ethernet cables in the ceiling for wireless access points.
    - You might want to run ethernet to locations that you might want to put CCTV cameras
    - You probably want to run 3 cat6 cables to anywhere you plan on having a TV.

    All these should run back to a central location. This central location should also have a cat6 cable running to where your phone line/broadband enters the house.

    I would second this. Just had a renovation myself this summer and ran 4 points to the main living room TV area. Already using 3 of them, 1 from a switch back to the router for smart devices to access internet, 1 with an RCA balun to distribute Zone 2 audio from my AV receiver to speakers in another room and 1 for telephone back to the telephone port on my ISPs router.

    The telephone one saved me losing use of the DECT basestation for a handset as I hadnt considered it when hiding my modem away on top of a high kitchen cabinet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    dam099 wrote: »
    I take the point about wasting CAT6 runs but how is Option 2 cheaper,? I havent used HDMI over CAT6 myself but the baluns seem to run around £30? Maybe for a large number of secondary points as I suspect the modulators are one to many but wouldnt IR control still need magic eye type receivers at each location?

    The assumption is that those are already in place, you already have a coax distribution system in place.

    Assuming you already have coax distribution throughout the house, fed via an IR passthrough compatible amp/spliter (most are these days anyway), then the only additional cost is the HDMI modulator, where you get 1 output, split to many (entirely dependent on the number of outputs on your amp/splitter.

    You would need to split the HDMI signal first also.

    So for HDMI Modulator approach you would need.

    HDMI output to
    2W hdmi splitter (one output for local tv, the second feeding your modulator
    HDMI Modulator output to
    4 or 8W dist amp to
    4, 8 or more Remote TV's (and IR eye as you said).



    With the cat/hdmi solution, you then have a pair of balun for every tv, plus would you not need a hdmi splitter as well, it seems quite messy to me, and I am not sure for what gain, considering also the restrictions on cable length for hdmi over cat.

    So the HDMI over Cat solution would be

    HDMI output to
    4 w or 8w HDMI splitter to
    4 or 8 TX baluns to
    4 or 8 RX baluns.

    The cabling setup for this is also much more complicated than with a straightforward coax setup.

    There probably is a cut off point dependent on the number of tv's you have. If you are adding just one or 2 tv points, then maybe HDMI over cat makes more sense from a cost perspective, but IMHO still much more complex,


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,008 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Vegeta wrote: »
    So just watched a few videos on this folks, needless to say the installs demonstrated were on quite simple setups. Single thermostat downstairs and maybe hot water control too. Are these generally run using a single thermostat?

    I think my heating will have 3 zones, underfloor downstairs, rads upstairs and hot water. But I was thinking of putting more than a single thermostat upstairs to control individual bedroom temperatures.

    In this configuration you would buy:
    - 1 Tado Smart Thermostat Starter Kit - For downstairs
    - 1 Tado Smart Thermostat (if out of stock you can get a second starter kit I think, it would just give you an extra unneed bridge). - For Upstairs rads
    - 1 Extension Kit - For hotwater

    Of course you should double check this with Tado, they seemingly have very good support for answering questions like this.
    Vegeta wrote: »
    How well do rad thermostats work? They're right beside the rads so do they get distorted sense of how warm the room actually is?

    Also it seems all stats are battery powered? Is battery life good on these?

    The Tado TRV's are optional, though at the very least a good idea to get at least basic TRV's installed with any new rads, you can always add the Tado TRV's later.

    Yes each TRV has it's own thermostat built into it. I'm not sure if it would be perfect, but if the room felt a little colder then the reported temp, then easy enough, just set the rooms temperature a bit higher and the rad will turn on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭ImportMeHappy



    1) HDMI over cat6
    2) HDMI modulated over coax.

    Really appreciate all the advice in this and other threads.
    I've a question regarding options 1) and 2) above or just using 3) HDMI.

    We're re-insulating the front rooms and hall under the suspended wooden floors (not rewiring) so was thinking it would be a good opportunity to move all the boxes under the telly (amp, stb, shield, router etc) to a cabinet under the stairs (approx 7m) and run just a single HMDI cable from the tv out on the amp back to the Telly. I'd run a couple of cat6 cables too to handle any other network needs, but the video signal would be over the HDMI cable. Similarly run dedicated audio cables directly under the floor boards from the AMP to the various speaker points around the room. All controlled via a Harmony hub.

    The question is, in my case where you're just talking about one room why would you choose options 1) or 2) above instead of just a single HMDI cable?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,008 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The question is, in my case where you're just talking about one room why would you choose options 1) or 2) above instead of just a single HMDI cable?

    I wouldn't, under your specific circumstances I'd run a high quality 4K Supporting HDMI cable. Note ideally HDMI 2.1. It is what I've done myself.

    HDMI over cat6 or Coax is usually HD only, not 4k. Well strictly speaking there are 4k over HDMI systems, but they cost hundreds of euros and are very high end gear. In your case a €30 HDMI cable will do the same job just as well.

    Usually you would do HDMI over cat6/coax where the distances are much further, beyond the length of a HDMI cable or if distributing to multiple rooms.

    BTW still really good idea to run a few cat6 drops to the TV location. For ethernet, to allow you send IR signals back to the cabinet and maybe for changes in technology in future.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭The high horse brigade


    bk wrote: »
    I wouldn't, under your specific circumstances I'd run a high quality 4K Supporting HDMI cable. Note ideally HDMI 2.1. It is what I've done myself.

    HDMI over cat6 or Coax is usually HD only, not 4k. Well strictly speaking there are 4k over HDMI systems, but they cost hundreds of euros and are very high end gear. In your case a €30 HDMI cable will do the same job just as well.

    Usually you would do HDMI over cat6/coax where the distances are much further, beyond the length of a HDMI cable or if distributing to multiple rooms.

    BTW still really good idea to run a few cat6 drops to the TV location. For ethernet, to allow you send IR signals back to the cabinet and maybe for changes in technology in future.

    I'd even go as far as running a fibre cable for future use


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭ImportMeHappy


    Thanks guys, very much appreciated. Cheers!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    Really appreciate all the advice in this and other threads.
    I've a question regarding options 1) and 2) above or just using 3) HDMI.

    We're re-insulating the front rooms and hall under the suspended wooden floors (not rewiring) so was thinking it would be a good opportunity to move all the boxes under the telly (amp, stb, shield, router etc) to a cabinet under the stairs (approx 7m) and run just a single HMDI cable from the tv out on the amp back to the Telly. I'd run a couple of cat6 cables too to handle any other network needs, but the video signal would be over the HDMI cable. Similarly run dedicated audio cables directly under the floor boards from the AMP to the various speaker points around the room. All controlled via a Harmony hub.

    The question is, in my case where you're just talking about one room why would you choose options 1) or 2) above instead of just a single HMDI cable?

    As others said, HDMI straight connection is your soltuin for just the one room.

    Don't forget to run coax as well though, for terrestrial etc. Even if it's just for ir control to avoid you having to help a cupboard open or point the remote away from the tv. Using the remote eye on the coax meens you can also control your hidden av equipment


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭ImportMeHappy


    As others said, HDMI straight connection is your soltuin for just the one room.

    Don't forget to run coax as well though, for terrestrial etc. Even if it's just for ir control to avoid you having to help a cupboard open or point the remote away from the tv. Using the remote eye on the coax meens you can also control your hidden av equipment

    The plan is to use my Harmony elite with the Hub for IR control, but will run a coax too, no harm. Thanks, appreciate all your comments in the various threads, very informative.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,008 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The plan is to use my Harmony elite with the Hub for IR control, but will run a coax too, no harm. Thanks, appreciate all your comments in the various threads, very informative.

    Yep, that is what I do in my setup, but no harm in having other options if it doesn't work out.

    I'd also advise running a long 3.5" audio cable from the cupboard to the TV. This can then be used to control the TV with a IR blaster from the hub. This allows you to use the Harmony remote without actually pointing it at the TV, which is very handy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 66 ✭✭ImportMeHappy


    bk wrote: »
    Yep, that is what I do in my setup, but no harm in having other options if it doesn't work out.

    I'd also advise running a long 3.5" audio cable from the cupboard to the TV. This can then be used to control the TV with a IR blaster from the hub. This allows you to use the Harmony remote without actually pointing it at the TV, which is very handy.

    Cheers, will do. So thats..

    Understairs cabinet to TV location
    1. 2 HDMI 2.1 (1 for redundancy)
    2. 2 CAT6 (1 for TV, 1 spare)
    3. 1 COAX
    4. 1 3.5” AUDIO (IR Blaster)
    5. 1 Optical (Future proofing)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭The high horse brigade


    Cheers, will do. So thats..

    Understairs cabinet to TV location
    1. 2 HDMI 2.1 (1 for redundancy)
    2. 2 CAT6 (1 for TV, 1 spare)
    3. 1 COAX
    4. 1 3.5” AUDIO (IR Blaster)
    5. 1 Optical (Future proofing)

    I'd run more cat6 and forget about the second HDMI for redundancy, even just have it there don't terminate it as 2 cat6 can be used to send HDMI, you never know what new standard will come about in future


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭druss


    Interesting thread! I've a deposit on a new build and I've already asked about the possibility of making some requests on the wiring set up.

    As the house is early stages of construction, it IS apparently possible to make changes. Now i just need to figure out what it is that I might actually want out of this!

    It's a bungalow and will be in a Fibre to Home area. My opening view was just to ask for more Cat 6 and more actual plug sockets. Now I know I should add coax to that as well.

    I was thinking of going with a Multisat/Saorview set up. I have a Vu Duo2, Nvidia Shield, Xbox, Nintendo Switch, Google Home etc and if there is a way of tidying up the wiring/or housing most of the stuff in a cooled media cabinet, then I'm all ears!

    Probably will be two or three tvs. Living room, kitchen, spareroom. But, using the Primary TV/Secondary TV setup described by wexfordman2, I'd be treating the first two as "primary".

    Spent the last few days looking up expensive options on home security, home audio and smart lawnmowers. I need more money!


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,008 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    druss wrote: »
    I was thinking of going with a Multisat/Saorview set up. I have a Vu Duo2, Nvidia Shield, Xbox, Nintendo Switch, Google Home etc and if there is a way of tidying up the wiring/or housing most of the stuff in a cooled media cabinet, then I'm all ears!

    Is there somewhere in your home that you can designate as your media center location. Perhaps under a stairs or in a utility room?

    If you can, that is the ideal place to put all the gear and then have all the wiring run too and from this central location.

    So aerial/satellite/broadband/power into it and then cat6/coax/hdmi/audio cables out of it to various other rooms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭druss


    bk wrote: »
    Is there somewhere in your home that you can designate as your media center location. Perhaps under a stairs or in a utility room?

    If you can, that is the ideal place to put all the gear and then have all the wiring run too and from this central location.

    So aerial/satellite/broadband/power into it and then cat6/coax/hdmi/audio cables out of it to various other rooms.

    No stairs. I will have a utility room, so I suppose I can see if I can make that work.

    Presume I'll need to consider placement a bit away from the washing machine/dishwasher etc. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,466 ✭✭✭Tinder Surprise


    I find a lot of people get hung up on the idea and unsightly look of many network points on a wall, and it discourages running extra CAT6 cable

    You're probably never gonna get this chance again to pull cable.

    I'd run as many as I could and don't forget you can always leave excess cable runs in wall voids hidden away and out of sight for future use.

    Cable is relatively cheap (i dont mean buy cheap cable..never!) so as far I am concerned run in lots of redundancy

    One caveat; Do use cable tubing/conduit where possible (its really cheap) as you're doubling down on future proofing.
    If the cable type needs to be changed in the future it will be a hell of a lot easier swap out if cable conduit was used.

    Identifying the network points is easy but think of CCTV etc.
    Tip: run a CAT6 cable to the four furthest corners of the attic and add another 5metres looped and left there - you'll be nearly guaranteed to have covered any upper floor CCTV cable requirements, and more!

    Also think of wireless A.P points in central ceiling locations - again run cable to them. If you use them in the future good, if not easily reassigned to other needs.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,008 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    druss wrote: »
    Presume I'll need to consider placement a bit away from the washing machine/dishwasher etc. :)

    Yes, ideally if you can put a bit of space between these and your networking and AV electronics.

    BTW if you have a dryer of some sort, you ideally want it vented to outside the room or a condensing dryer type. You don't want a cheap dryer that just vents into the rooms air, that causes high humidity and mold, which would be bad for both your home and your AV/networking gear.

    If hang drying clothes in that room, use a dehumidifier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    So I am definitely running at least two Cat6 cables to nearly all rooms. That will add up to a decent number of connections. Do people just bang these into an Ethernet switch and then plug the switch into the router/modem? Any recommendations on switches?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭The high horse brigade


    Vegeta wrote: »
    So I am definitely running at least two Cat6 cables to nearly all rooms. That will add up to a decent number of connections. Do people just bang these into an Ethernet switch and then plug the switch into the router/modem? Any recommendations on switches?

    The right thing to do is get a 6u or 9u cabinet, a patch panel and use factory patch leads to a switch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    The right thing to do is get a 6u or 9u cabinet, a patch panel and use factory patch leads to a switch.

    I know what you mean, ordinarily I would agree, but in a domestic situation, terminating the cat cable and plugging I to a good sized switch would be nearly enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    The right thing to do is get a 6u or 9u cabinet, a patch panel and use factory patch leads to a switch.

    Any decent Irish suppliers of this stuff? They don't seem mad money so probably worth doing now while I can.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    Vegeta wrote: »
    Any decent Irish suppliers of this stuff? They don't seem mad money so probably worth doing now while I can.

    Depends where you are based. In cork, pcs systems have a reasonable supply of stuff. Wood communications in Dublin, I've got stuff from them before and found they have a good range


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭The high horse brigade


    Vegeta wrote: »
    Any decent Irish suppliers of this stuff? They don't seem mad money so probably worth doing now while I can.

    Kellihers for the cabinet and patch panel, they're nationwide
    http://kellihers.com/

    Tp link do decent affordable rackmount switches, get a gigabit unmanaged one on Amazon 16, 24 or 48, I'm not sure how many ports you need. It can be added later you could get something cheap and cheerful and add better later


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    Walls being chased today. Just wanted to bump this thread to say thanks for all the input.

    Any last minute pearls of wisdom for me?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,008 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Vegeta wrote: »
    Walls being chased today. Just wanted to bump this thread to say thanks for all the input.

    Any last minute pearls of wisdom for me?

    Enjoy your lovely new home :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,033 ✭✭✭spaceHopper


    Vegeta wrote: »
    Walls being chased today. Just wanted to bump this thread to say thanks for all the input.

    Any last minute pearls of wisdom for me?

    We did a renovation back in almost a year. Biggest regret is not putting in HDMI cabling. Even if it's only for 1080p. HDMI over a matrix using HDBaseT is much more expensive than pure HDMI.

    If you can run one (two if you can) HDMI's 2.0 to the TV points to a central location. Keep them short 8m or have active repeaters

    Also make sure there is a phone line or something so you can get fiber to the home BB later.

    We have
    5 coax from attic down.
    3 Coax from central location to each of three TV points.
    Each TV point has two cat6 cables.
    Cable or 5.1 Surround in ceiling of main TV Room

    Currently only using one TV point but plan to set up a second before christmas.

    Currently have Virgin Media over cat6 but have Saoirview antenna in attic. And a freesat dish. Both hooked up to main TV and working will get rid of VM Box but keep their Broad band


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    Can I ask what would the advantage of HDMI cabling be?

    Were you hoping to store all your boxes in a central location and if so, what would the plan be for controlling the boxes?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    Vegeta wrote: »
    Walls being chased today. Just wanted to bump this thread to say thanks for all the input.

    Any last minute pearls of wisdom for me?

    Yep,

    Make sure all the Chase's are external :-)

    Only kidding, enjoy

    Can't remember, did you say it was a bungalow or not ?

    One mistake I made was not thinking enough about the central wiring Point my atric.

    I let the plumber out the water tank at a place that.makes it as awkward as Feck to get to. And the older and fatter I get, the harder it gets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    It's a dormer bungalow, luckily someone advised moving all water storage out into the shed for access, serviceability and damage mitigation in the event of a leak. Downside is insulated pipe back into the house but it leaves some extra space in the house too so I think it is worth it.


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 12,603 Mod ✭✭✭✭2011


    I'm going to try not to repeat the excellent advice given by the other posters, but here are a few considerations:
    bk wrote: »
    - Put lots of ethernet cables in, as much as you can reasonably afford, they are very useful

    +100

    A few more points to add to this:

    1) This should be wired in star i.e. each point should be wired back to a common point allowing each to be connected to the switch.

    2) Think about a good central location for the switch, I often recommend the utility room.

    3) In many cases depending on the size of the house and what the walls are made of it is advantageous to have more than one wifi router installed. The best was to achieve this is to wire each wifi router point back to the switch. Natural each router will require a socket outlet, so install this beside the network point.

    4) I would suggest that you wire all ethernet using CAT6.
    Rew wrote: »
    Talked to an alarm fitter recently and he said go wireless, as good as wired and much cleaner install.

    I disagree. From an alarm installers point of view it is a quicker and easier install. It also generates more revenue in the loner term as it guarantees more call backs as batteries in various devices fail.

    Advantages:

    1) Reduced messing around with fiddly cabling.
    2) A device can instantly be installed anywhere without the requirement for a cable to be in place first.
    3) Maximum flexibility.

    Disadvantages
    1) As above each device needs a battery and batteries have a limited lifespan.
    2) Devices such as shock sensors are far less discreet as they require lots of fancy electronics as well as a battery. So they can look pretty ugly on you expensive new windows.
    3) Cost of each device. I am not in the trade, but I can buy a high quality HKC shock sensor for less than €10. The wireless equivalent is around 10 times the cost.
    4) A wired bellbox can be brightly illuminated at all times providing a superior visual deterrent.

    In summary if you can wore it do.

    There is a never ending debate on the home security forum about which alarm is best that I don't want to get into. My preference would b the HKC hybrid one. This can take wired as well as wireless sensor giving you the best of both worlds in addition to app control. It allows me to add all sorts of fancy gadgets like PIRs that send pictures to my app. Like the OP I keep a number of firearms in my home and the Gardai passed my security inspection with flying colours.

    If you have an external building such as a shed you can add this to the same alarm system. My HKC alarm allows me to arm and disarm different zones with different codes, so for example my gun cabinet and shed can be armed while the house is disarmed.
    Cable or 5.1 Surround in ceiling of main TV Room

    Yes, to me sound is very important. Modern extra thin flat screen TVs produce poor quality sound. It is best to select your sound system first and then wire accordingly. You could spend a fortune on a sound system and the sound quality could suffer due to poor positioning of speakers.

    I also wired a pair of ceiling speakers in my kitchen to my main sound system in my sitting room. I can now stream from my phone directly to my kitchen and the sound quality is amazing.

    Doorbell:
    Check out the Nest Hello or the Ring equivalent video doorbells. This is the next must have on my list. Position the doorbell wiring to best suit the fact that a camera is built into the button itself.

    Generator socket:
    If in a rural area that suffers from power outages you may want to consider a generator changeover switch and socket for same. The genny can simply be wheeled out and plugged in when required at a later stage. With a small 6 kVA genny you would be able to do a lot.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym



    If you can run one (two if you can) HDMI's 2.0 to the TV points .

    there is no such thing. cables are labelled either standard or high speed. for peace of mind buy properly certified cables, which means they have been tested, and if they have, they won't be labelled 2.0.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    ceiling speakers for surround sound are not a great choice. they are perfect for the height channels in an atmos setup, but you;d be much better going with inwalls if you want discreet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    mossym wrote: »
    ceiling speakers for surround sound are not a great choice. they are perfect for the height channels in an atmos setup, but you;d be much better going with inwalls if you want discreet.

    Have to say, I built my house with ceiling speakers in six rooms, fed by 6 Sonos amps.

    Got rid.of the ceiling speakers about 2 years ago (albeit after about 15 years in total). Reason I got rid if them, mainly, draughty, and sound quality.

    My advice, avoind cutting holes in your walls and ceilings to cater for electronic devices that won't last as long as your walls.and ceilings.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    Have to say, I built my house with ceiling speakers in six rooms, fed by 6 Sonos amps.

    Got rid.of the ceiling speakers about 2 years ago (albeit after about 15 years in total). Reason I got rid if them, mainly, draughty, and sound quality.

    My advice, avoind cutting holes in your walls and ceilings to cater for electronic devices that won't last as long as your walls.and ceilings.

    Would 100% agree with you, I'd go for proper bookshelves or floorstanders every time if any priority placed on audio performance. However some prefer asthetics over sound, or simply cannot accommodate separate speakers, and in that case in wall rather than in ceiling every time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,555 ✭✭✭wexfordman2


    mossym wrote: »
    Would 100% agree with you, I'd go for proper bookshelves or floorstanders every time if any priority placed on audio performance. However some prefer asthetics over sound, or simply cannot accommodate separate speakers, and in that case in wall rather than in ceiling every time.

    Def agree with the wall speakers instead if the ceiling. Ceiling speakers are a bad idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,747 ✭✭✭niallb


    2011 wrote: »
    ... Natural each router will require a socket outlet, so install this beside the network point. ...

    If you're bringing them back to the utility closet, you can choose from the growing number of wireless access points that can be powered over ethernet. It could make things look a lot neater throughout the house. Just pick a POE enabled switch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,393 ✭✭✭✭Vegeta


    niallb wrote: »
    If you're bringing them back to the utility closet, you can choose from the growing number of wireless access points that can be powered over ethernet. It could make things look a lot neater throughout the house. Just pick a POE enabled switch.

    This is current plan for the house, a few poe wireless access points in areas where wifi is useful but wire as much as possible


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 12,603 Mod ✭✭✭✭2011


    mossym wrote: »
    ceiling speakers for surround sound are not a great choice.

    Agreed, I just have a pair in my kitchen ceiling for stereo sound from my main system in the sitting room.

    they are perfect for the height channels in an atmos setup, but you;d be much better going with inwalls if you want discreet.

    I wouldn't be a fan of in wall speakers.
    niallb wrote: »
    If you're bringing them back to the utility closet, you can choose from the growing number of wireless access points that can be powered over ethernet.

    Are POE wifi routers any good? I assumed that they would lack range as the power available over ethernet is so much less. I have never used them so I am open to correction.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭The high horse brigade


    Ethernet had much more power. Poe is up to 48v, most residential routers have a 12v power supply. Check out the Ubiquiti Unifi wireless access points

    https://www.ubnt.com/unifi/unifi-ap/
    Ubiquiti Networks - UniFi® AP


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 12,603 Mod ✭✭✭✭2011


    Ethernet had much more power. Poe is up to 48v, most residential routers have a 12v power supply. Check out the Ubiquiti Unifi wireless access points

    https://www.ubnt.com/unifi/unifi-ap/
    Ubiquiti Networks - UniFi® AP

    Voltage and power are two very different things.
    A higher voltage does not necessarily mean more power.

    However the specifications on the Ubiquiti units suggest that they have quite a range, nice :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,456 ✭✭✭The high horse brigade


    Unifi are amazing. They're access points though, you still need a router


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    2011 wrote: »

    I wouldn't be a fan of in wall speakers.

    .

    an inwall setup of M&K's or B&W CWM8's will blow away 95% of the setups you'll see in most peoples houses. easily. for me they struggle against their equivalents in separate cabinets though (not everyone would agree). i wouldn't trade my b&w's in for inwalls, but i'd pick those inwalls over a lot of other speakers.

    cheap in walls are worse than cheap cabinets. good inwalls can be very very good.

    anyway, if the op is asking in the home automation forum about speakers i don't think they are considering M&K or equivalent...:)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement