Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

TV license summons

  • 10-05-2013 4:41pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 14


    Hi,

    I'm in need of some advice. Bit of a strange situation.

    I got a leaflet in my door saying I had missed the post man and there was a registered letter to collect. The letter was addressed to my girlfriend who doesn't live with me. I gave her the leaflet and we went to collect the letter.

    Turns out it is a summons to court for not having a TV license at my address. I read through the letter and they claim to have called at a time we had someone staying at our house.

    Turns out she (the person staying with us) answered the door to the inspector. She said her name was my girlfriends name and said that she didn't live there. The letter we got states that the girl who answered the door "identified him/herself to them as being the occupier of the dwelling." This is not the case.

    We got no letters or notifications from the time they said they called until this summons. I rang up the solicitors office that the letter came from and they gave me a name and a number of someone at An Post that deals with this and suggested I ring him.

    I explained my case to this man (An Post) and he told me that it doesn't matter who answered the door or what name they gave, that the person who answers the door gets prosecuted. I asked if it had been, for example, an electrician doing work at my home and he answered the door would he have to go to court and he told me yes he would. I find this very hard to believe.. He told me the only other option is to pay an €80 strike out fee,

    I am about to go out and buy my TV license, but does my girlfriend really have to go to court for this?

    Any information/advice would be really appreciated.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,111 ✭✭✭ResearchWill


    Your girlfriend has been summoned to Court, so she must turn up if she does not she risks a finding of guilt and a fine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,982 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    I was in the same situation, got a licence and sent it off to the regional office, asking them for it to be struck out. It was.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 805 ✭✭✭SB2013


    shaun949 wrote: »
    Hi,

    I'm in need of some advice. Bit of a strange situation.

    I got a leaflet in my door saying I had missed the post man and there was a registered letter to collect. The letter was addressed to my girlfriend who doesn't live with me. I gave her the leaflet and we went to collect the letter.

    Turns out it is a summons to court for not having a TV license at my address. I read through the letter and they claim to have called at a time we had someone staying at our house.

    Turns out she (the person staying with us) answered the door to the inspector. She said her name was my girlfriends name and said that she didn't live there. The letter we got states that the girl who answered the door "identified him/herself to them as being the occupier of the dwelling." This is not the case.

    We got no letters or notifications from the time they said they called until this summons. I rang up the solicitors office that the letter came from and they gave me a name and a number of someone at An Post that deals with this and suggested I ring him.

    I explained my case to this man (An Post) and he told me that it doesn't matter who answered the door or what name they gave, that the person who answers the door gets prosecuted. I asked if it had been, for example, an electrician doing work at my home and he answered the door would he have to go to court and he told me yes he would. I find this very hard to believe.. He told me the only other option is to pay an €80 strike out fee,

    I am about to go out and buy my TV license, but does my girlfriend really have to go to court for this?

    Any information/advice would be really appreciated.

    Yes. She has been summonsed. If she doesn't arrive she may have a warrant issued for her arrest.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 shaun949


    Thanks for your replies.
    ebbsy wrote: »
    I was in the same situation, got a licence and sent it off to the regional office, asking them for it to be struck out. It was.
    Did you have to pay for it to be to be struck out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭Arciphel


    Why don't you have a TV licence?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭Realt Dearg Sec


    Arciphel wrote: »
    Why don't you have a TV licence?

    Because Ryan tubridy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭Dicky Pride


    Arciphel wrote: »
    Why don't you have a TV licence?

    How is that any of your business?


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 shaun949


    I live in a rented house and it was just after we moved in that we got this call. Didn't come to mind to get one until getting this letter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭Arciphel


    Then if you get one now it will be struck out as you can show you only just moved in. You'll have no problems there. Is it possible they might have called to your current house in the past and the previous occupants might have been less than co-operative to the licence inspectors?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭Arciphel


    And no, it won't cost you anything to have it struck out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Aced_Up


    Arciphel wrote: »
    Why don't you have a TV licence?

    Why would you have a TV licence?

    Personally, Its something I totally disagree with...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭Arciphel


    How is that any of your business?

    It's pretty relevant to the discussion actually. But don't let that get in the way of your edgy anti-establishment coolness.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 shaun949


    That's very possible as I'm sure is the case moving in to any rented property.

    It was November they called, now being May they are saying we've had ample warnings (which we have not) and time to have got it sorted. Do you think we will still have to pay this "Strike out fee"? I heard no one has the right to ask for these fees other than a judge..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭Arciphel


    I reckon if you buy the licence that that will be the end of it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 shaun949


    I hope so, thanks for your advice.

    Has any one else been in a similar situation, that can verify this?

    Last thing I want is cops calling to the door to arrest someone who doesn't live here!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    Aced_Up wrote: »
    Why would you have a TV licence?

    Probably because it's a legal requirement if you have a device capable of receiving a signal. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 shaun949


    Can we get off the whole should we should we not get TV licenses please. Not really helping. I'm sure there is a thread around here somewhere regarding that.

    Thanks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 92 ✭✭Aced_Up


    Paulw wrote: »
    Probably because it's a legal requirement if you have a device capable of receiving a signal. :rolleyes:

    No **** sherlock :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 548 ✭✭✭Wils110


    If your summonsed you have to go..go to court €90 quid fine don't go €350 fine...we couldn't make court as baby was in hospital so the latter happened anyone who was there got the 90 quid fine



    Theirs no warrant for your arrest unless you don't pay the court fine


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,858 ✭✭✭Bigcheeze


    You want legal advice? Never, ever collect registered letters. Good news does not get sent by registered letter.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 548 ✭✭✭Wils110


    Legal advice....here comes the ban ;-)


  • Registered Users Posts: 349 ✭✭Schnitzel Muncher


    I read through half of the original post, I suspect I know the answer, but here goes. Do you have a TV licence?


  • Registered Users Posts: 349 ✭✭Schnitzel Muncher


    How is that any of your business?

    How is it any of your business?


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 shaun949


    I read through half of the original post, I suspect I know the answer, but here goes. Do you have a TV licence?

    I do now. Didn't when they called the first time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Willbbz


    Got the same letter today. Live with my parents. Don't own a TV set personally. I only answered the door and now it's asking me to pay for the license or be summoned to court.

    Load of bollocks


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    Willbbz wrote: »
    Got the same letter today. Live with my parents. Don't own a TV set personally. I only answered the door and now it's asking me to pay for the license or be summoned to court.

    Load of bollocks

    :eek::eek:

    You can't say bollocks on here....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 934 ✭✭✭LowKeyReturn




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭cunnifferous


    Just gonna bump this because I'm in a similar situation at the moment. Just wondering what the OP ended up doing in the end.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 shaun949


    Best advice I've got is just buy the license then ring them up and tell them you have one. They will ask for some reference number and that should be it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭cunnifferous


    Had to call down to the TV licence office. Had to pay 290 euro in total. 160 for a new TV licence + 130 for a licence from Sempember (when the inspector called out originally) to now. Guess It could have been worse, but still doesn't feel great.


  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭ellinguistico


    Had to call down to the TV licence office. Had to pay 290 euro in total. 160 for a new TV licence + 130 for a licence from Sempember (when the inspector called out originally) to now. Guess It could have been worse, but still doesn't feel great.

    That's harsh, was there any way they would let you stagger the payment?


  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭paulztag


    Just got one of these nice letters telling me about going to court in Jan now.

    What is the easiest way out? I know I need to buy one now but can I buy a new one online and ring them to tell them I have one or do I need to backdate it?

    There has never been any licence in the house as its a new house that we moved into a year and a half ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,381 ✭✭✭✭Paulw


    paulztag wrote: »
    Just got one of these nice letters telling me about going to court in Jan now.

    What is the easiest way out?

    So you've been summonsed to court in Jan?

    Way out?? The way out is to have a license from the start.

    You need to buy a TV license, and also show up in court on the date listed in the summons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 424 ✭✭picturehangup


    Interesting one.
    We (family) moved to rented accommodation recently, had a license, purchased not long after we moved in. TV inspector arrived when my hubbie and I were out.
    Our son aged 22, and suffers from autism, answered the door. He told inspector we were out, and to come back, as he did not know where we kept the license. Inspector should have known my son had issues, and should have asked our names. Inspector then proceeded with issuing a very threatening letter addressed to my son, received a few days later, which knocked us for six. I feel this was a very heavy-handed and unnecessary, causing us all some distress, considering we did actually have a license. We felt intimidated and that this inspector took advantage of our incapacitated son at the time. Any thoughts on this? We have always complied with the law all of our lives, and had everything in order.
    We are very, very angry. Did complain to a supervisor, but he was very dismissive of our complaint, and refused to engage with the points I had raised in an email.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭tphase


    you do realise this is 5 year old thread?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 424 ✭✭picturehangup


    Hi tphase, yes I do realise that.
    But the TV licence will always be there, and folk will always have some issues with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Hi tphase, yes I do realise that.
    But the TV licence will always be there, and folk will always have some issues with it.

    Emailing or phoning is no good. You need to write to the supervisor and include a copy of the tv license which will show the date of purchase and question first of all why the inspector did not know that you had purchased a license and secondly why the inspector had not been trained to identify householders with special needs. Complain about the aggressive tone of the letter and ask to be responded to in 10 working days.
    Ultimately you can take thus to the Ombudsman


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,154 ✭✭✭893bet


    Interesting one.
    We (family) moved to rented accommodation recently, had a license, purchased not long after we moved in. TV inspector arrived when my hubbie and I were out.
    Our son aged 22, and suffers from autism, answered the door. He told inspector we were out, and to come back, as he did not know where we kept the license. Inspector should have known my son had issues, and should have asked our names. Inspector then proceeded with issuing a very threatening letter addressed to my son, received a few days later, which knocked us for six. I feel this was a very heavy-handed and unnecessary, causing us all some distress, considering we did actually have a license. We felt intimidated and that this inspector took advantage of our incapacitated son at the time. Any thoughts on this? We have always complied with the law all of our lives, and had everything in order.
    We are very, very angry. Did complain to a supervisor, but he was very dismissive of our complaint, and refused to engage with the points I had raised in an email.

    Your son is 22 and an adult and was treated as such. What advantage was taken of your son exactly?

    The threatening letter is I am sure a template sent to thousands. Don’t imagine it was personal.

    Move on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭tedpan


    Hi tphase, yes I do realise that. But the TV licence will always be there, and folk will always have some issues with it.


    I'd produce the TV license, then put in a letter of complaint if you feel your son was treated unfairly.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Duffryman


    What did the letter say? Did it basically just ask you to show proof of having a licence within a certain time, since the inspector couldn't see it when he/she called?

    If so, I don't understand your issue with it. Inspector calls to a door, is met by an adult who says I can't produce a licence, and then issues a letter (which I'm sure is a template) to ask to see proof of a licence before any further action becomes necessary. Would seem pretty standard to me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,373 ✭✭✭robwen


    What happens if the person who opens the door is not the homeowner, so refuses to give a name & closes the door on the inspector


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    robwen wrote: »
    What happens if the person who opens the door is not the homeowner, so refuses to give a name & closes the door on the inspector

    Then they just send the letter to “the occupier”.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 shaun949


    6 years later. I still await the return of my precious woman. I can not believe she has been imprisoned for this long for such a simple thing...

    Mod
    Time to close this


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement