Anyone score highly in Section 2? Rate my attempt

So, the statement I took was:

We are imperfect – cannot expect a perfect government:
I banged this out in 30 minutes or less:
Is there an actual dude we can send this too to have him rate it?

**
The ultimate cop out. What is transpiring in this statement, is the supposed opinion that, the imperfection of each individual, is reflected in a “grand mal” collective sense, as far as what a government ultimately delivers.

This completely neglects the simply put point of view that – minds working together, devise superior, more diverse and enlightened solutions, that those working in isolation.

Historically – the despot or singular ruler, has been given the scope to indulge in a variety of the most unfortunate ways, as to his own personal flaws; be they bloodlust, inhumanity, greed, megalomania.
Centuries of evidence tell the tale. From Burma, to Italy, to Germany, dating within this century alone.

The statement that these individual flaws are exemplifed or potentially magnified under communal rule, in itself fails to account for the fact that – as humans, our very egocentric nature, the will for our own personal sense of validation – will lend itself to the collision of opinions and desires, such that there could not possibly be one singular outcome consistent with the thoughts of one individual alone.

Having factored this into our interpretation of this lunacy-contrived statement, we can clearly identify the inherent flaw in its nature.

The fact of the matter is – government, is tasked to put aside personal differences, and collectively establish a strategy for the greater good.
The greater good: man, woman, child, baby – those in a state of infancy such that their consciousness is in that blissful period of obliviousness to the deviancy and inherently morbid and torturous paradox that is encapsulated within human existence.

For this reason – not only do we not expect perfect – we demand it.
Put simply – we should settle for nothing less.

To date – democracy and the fascist like agenda – they're the figurative apples to the oranges, the pure to the depraved, the elastic to the plastic – in the humanitarian sense.

The individual leader, granted infallible, unquestionable, pre-eminent authority – let's say it like this: his big head will exhibit as much restraint and cognizance, as his little head, following a period of abstinance, only to be set free in a house of uninhibited self indulgence.
You get that I'm drawing the comparison to his carnal impulses – yes?

What we attain, and what we expect, may not converge – may never converge.

But it's our duty, our civic obligation – to never let that expectation faulter.

**

Is it long enough - for one?