Quite possibly the best documentary I’ve viewed in ages.

It has got a few decent reviews on IMDB.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4798606/


3.5 hours is a long slog to get through.

NIMAN wrote: »

3.5hrs.....I'll pass.

Could you give us a summary to help us decide if its actually worth watching?

This. Even a small hint to what it's about?

Hagar7 wrote: »

It’s about how the conmen throughout the years get people to die for them in exchange for absolutely nothing at all.
How the Skull and Bones (Masonic Lodge) cartel are laughing at everyone whilst dancing around a table killing an innocent victim,the richest people on earth making sure that wars are kept going,be it the Rothschild family,the Mafia the Royal Family,and especially the Bush Family,a good summary on how 8 people were posted on various areas to make sure JFK didn’t stand a chance of surviving,how Henry Ford helped the Germans in WW2 along with many others.

What about it was particularly interesting or convincing?

Did you do anything to verify that the facts presented in the documentary were actually true and accurately presented?
If so, what did you do to verify this.

If not, why did you find the documentary interesting or convincing?

You aren't doing a very good job of selling the idea of people investing 3 hours of their time on a random internet documentary.

There is a lot you don't understand .... Back of with the third degree interrogation method of debating... Watch the documentary, then come back and have a discussion about it...

Hagar7 wrote: »

It’s about how the conmen throughout the years get people to die for them in exchange for absolutely nothing at all.
How the Skull and Bones (Masonic Lodge) cartel are laughing at everyone whilst dancing around a table killing an innocent victim,the richest people on earth making sure that wars are kept going,be it the Rothschild family,the Mafia the Royal Family,and especially the Bush Family,a good summary on how 8 people were posted on various areas to make sure JFK didn’t stand a chance of surviving,how Henry Ford helped the Germans in WW2 along with many others.

Is the title of the documentary ‘Conspiracy Bingo’, by any chance?

We know know that we don’t need to bother watching the linked documentary. It has been proven. Everybody knows this.

nullzero wrote: »

Says an individual who has spent the last fourteen years on this site almost exclusively berating people for having opinions that disagree with their own.

Weird how personal people are getting on this thread.
Pretty telling that people are more interesting in taking a pop at me rather that talk about the documentary.

King Mob wrote: »

Weird how personal people are getting on this thread.
Pretty telling that people are more interesting in taking a pop at me rather that talk about the documentary.

Nothing personal it's just an observation about your posting history. You spend an inordinate amount of your time arguing with people who's opinions differ from yours. Surely you can see the irony of you insisting that three and a half hours of your life should not be wasted by watching a documentary about conspiracy theories when conspiracy theories are largely the focus of your attention here? The focus of your attention as it happens since April 2006.

King Mob wrote: »

I didn't insist anything. I expressed my opinion that the documentary doesn't seem worth the investment of time given how the op hasn't given a good reason to watch it.

I expressed my opinion about the topic at hand after asking the op to expand on their thoughts.

Do you have an opinion on the documentary?
Have you watched it?

If you'd prefer to just hijack this thread to discuss me, then I'm not very interested.

The documentary would appear to be on topic for this forum,although I haven't and probably will not watch it.

You said and I quote... "Did you do anything to verify that the facts presented in the documentary were actually true and accurately presented?
If so, what did you do to verify this.

If not, why did you find the documentary interesting or convincing?

You aren't doing a very good job of selling the idea of people investing 3 hours of their time on a random internet documentary."

This would appear to me and I would suggest anyone else passing through this forum to be a pointedly demanding post.

The OP shared a link to a documentary that is relevant to the topics one might expect to find being discussed on such a forum, you began to insist that they give you a good reason to watch it.

I'm as entitled to express an opinion on your frankly OTT response to this person as you are to post in the way you did. I feel your intention was to hijack this thread, which ironically you have accused me of doing for taking you to task, although I wouldn't begin back seat modding like you have done with me.

My point is valid, why complain about spending three and a half hours of your life watching a documentary about conspiracy theories when you have spent almost fourteen years of your life discussing that very topic?

nullzero wrote: »

The documentary would appear to be on topic for this forum,although I haven't and probably will not watch it.

You said and I quote... "Did you do anything to verify that the facts presented in the documentary were actually true and accurately presented?
If so, what did you do to verify this.

If not, why did you find the documentary interesting or convincing?

You aren't doing a very good job of selling the idea of people investing 3 hours of their time on a random internet documentary."

This would appear to me and I would suggest anyone else passing through this forum to be a pointedly demanding post.

The OP shared a link to a documentary that is relevant to the topics one might expect to find being discussed on such a forum, you began to insist that they give you a good reason to watch it.

I'm as entitled to express an opinion on your frankly OTT response to this person as you are to post in the way you did. I feel your intention was to derail this thread, which ironically you have accused me of doing for taking you to task, although I wouldn't begin back seat modding like you have done with me.

My point is valid, why complain about spending three and a half hours of your life watching a documentary about conspiracy theories when you have spent almost fourteen years of your life discussing that very topic?

Where did I complain about spending time on the documentary?

What was demanding or over the top about my questions?

Have you any thoughts on the documentary?

As I've explained before I am interested in conspiraxy theories, I just dont believe the vast majority are not true and not convincing.

Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »

Which conspiracy do you believe? I have been here awhile, not yet seen you accept one, as true?

Sorry, I have no interest in discussing myself further.

King Mob wrote: »

Where did I complain about spending time on the documentary?

What was demanding or over the top about my questions?

Have you any thoughts on the documentary?

As I've explained before I am interested in conspiraxy theories, I just dont believe the vast majority are not true and not convincing.

The interest you would appear to have is in the realm of disproving all and any conspiracy theories, which is perfectly fine by me, however your initial posts on this thread are demonstrably hostile and condescending in tone.

Surely if you have no intention of watching the documentary the best course of action for a person of your persuasion would be to simply allow others who have watched it to discuss its merits amongst themselves. Any deviation from this began with you, I felt it may be useful to hold a mirror up for you to appreciate how others appropriate your contributions.

My thoughts on the documentary have been outlined already, I most likely will not watch it, although I can appreciate why people posting on a conspiracy theory forum may find it interesting.

King Mob wrote: »

You aren't doing a very good job of selling the idea of people investing 3 hours of their time on a random internet documentary.

I'm quoting this again as it shows where you raised questions about the validity of watching the documentary. Just for your records.

King Mob wrote: »

Please demonstrate why they are hostile, condescending or otherwise "OTT".


Or I could ask the op a question?

And again given the responses before my post and after, and given the op responses to me and others, thr discussion you are imagining probably wasnt going to happen.

Why won't you watch it?

Why should I have to point out how something that you wrote and is demonstrably hostile and condescending when it is self evident that this is the case?

This is your problem, you demand answers from people as if you are owed something. All anyone has to do to understand the tone of your posts is read them. You posturing in your typical obstinate manner makes no difference to this.

I hadn't imagined any discussion as it happens, so I'm not sure where to go with that.

I won't watch the documentary because I generally don't have that type of time on my hands.

To be honest I just find it a little upsetting to see you here constantly fighting with people you look down your nose at in a never ending war of attrition that you have admittedly have become quite gifted at participating in. Surely there's more to life than arguing about things you feel you're too clever to believe in.

Woodsie1 wrote: »

so you havent got your own opinion,just parroting someone elses.

maybe lay off on the questions then until you watched it yourself.

Youre coming across pretty badly on these threads when you wont even look at something but fire out 101 questions interrogating anyone who dares go against youre spoon fed narrative.

Again weirdly personal and inaccurate.
Ive stated my opinion pretty clearly and I asked a grand total of two questions.

Woodsie1 wrote: »

Yes 2 questions.
Pretending to be confused.
Pretending that its all getting "personal".
Your modus operandi is plain to see for all but your devoted follower.

Yes, 2 questions followed by attempts to clarify inaccurate personal comments.

Again not interested in discussing myself as much as you guys are.

have just started watching it...got to the part where he states that the duke of edinburgh's brother was a nazi and head of the SS. never heard this before so googled it and it turns out it was his brother in law and he was a senior member of the ss, not the head...so slightly misleading facts right there...

Mod

Whatever King Mob's character is is not the topic of debate.

The questions were valid, as the OP details were vague and short at the time.

This back and forth is bringing thread off topic and ends here.