Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Practical Classics magazine featuring 90s/00s cars

  • 07-12-2019 8:01pm
    #1
    BrianD3
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭


    I don't buy car magazines anymore and rarely even browse them but today I was in Easons and had a quick look at Practical Classics. One of the cars featured was a Renault Scenic RX4, I was bemused that a car (and an ugly one at that) that was introduced in the year 2000 is now appearing in a classic car mag. Then again, 2000 is almost 20 years ago now and when I was buying mags years ago it was normal for 20 year old or younger cars to be featured.

    The point I'm trying to make here is that a lot of time has passed and I never thought I'd be seeing the likes of Mondeos, Primeras and Renault Scenics in this type of magazine!

    On the other side, is interest in cars from the 1960s and earlier dwindling as those who remember them when they were new pass away.


Comments

  • #2
    Arthur Daley
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,472 ✭✭✭Arthur Daley


    How long is a piece of string?

    But I always think 25 years is a threshold. Unless it's something super rare/desirable. For me something like the mk1 focus RS or a mid 90s Escort Cosworth or Honda 2000 would start to qualify soon.


  • #3
    horseofstone
    Registered Users Posts: 238 ✭✭horseofstone


    BrianD3 wrote: »
    I don't buy car magazines anymore and rarely even browse them but today I was in Easons and had a quick look at Practical Classics. One of the cars featured was a Renault Scenic RX4, I was bemused that a car (and an ugly one at that) that was introduced in the year 2000 is now appearing in a classic car mag. Then again, 2000 is almost 20 years ago now and when I was buying mags years ago it was normal for 20 year old or younger cars to be featured.

    The point I'm trying to make here is that a lot of time has passed and I never thought I'd be seeing the likes of Mondeos, Primeras and Renault Scenics in this type of magazine!

    On the other side, is interest in cars from the 1960s and earlier dwindling as those who remember them when they were new pass away.

    You make a good point,its hard to believe 20 years almost has passed.I drive a 00 nissan almera for everyday use and its still going strong.I think something like a ford puma would be a good investment if it was in good nick.


  • #4
    Guy:Incognito
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    For anyone that actually does buy it or is thinking about it, its on the readly app. Think I pay around a tenner a month, you get 100's of magazines of all types. Few on there for classics. I like Car Mechanics magazine too, used to get the paper version every month till I switched. Only for those on with a tablet mind, can only see it being painful on a phone :)

    Well worth it for anyone who would be inclined to buy a couple of magazines a month anyway.


  • #5
    carchaeologist
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    When I bought my first classic, my 1983 Chevette, it was 22 years old and no one would argue it wasn’t a Classic. By comparison, the MK1 Mondeo is 27 years old now, almost 30, and I remember well when it came out but if you saw one at a car show you would consider it a ‘new’ car still.
    I think the car magazine is slowly dying out as there is so much available online instantly now.


  • #6
    Thinkingaboutit
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,212 ✭✭✭Thinkingaboutit


    I've subbed to Practical Classics for a while. It's nice to read something on paper, as a person has to stare at screens all day at work. It's great for repair / mechanical features, although the rating difficulty must be rated at what a mechanic would find easy. PC certainly cover the newer cars, which is fair, and what makes a classic is in a way subjective. Thanks to environmentally dubious car dealership subsidising scrappage schemes a lot of somewhat older, ordinary cars and commercials vanished, which means that some cars at least become rare, even if to some, certain cars stretch the definition of 'classic.'


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Isambard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    horseofstone wrote: »
    You make a good point,its hard to believe 20 years almost has passed.I drive a 00 nissan almera for everyday use and its still going strong.I think something like a ford puma would be a good investment if it was in good nick.

    Puma's don't seem popular, with loads giving up their (1.7) engines to Fiesta's of similar age. I'd tip a Fiesta Zetec S 1.6 from 2000-2002 as an investment.


  • #8
    carchaeologist
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,318 ✭✭✭✭carchaeologist


    Isambard wrote: »
    Puma's don't seem popular, with loads giving up their (1.7) engines to Fiesta's of similar age. I'd tip a Fiesta Zetec S 1.6 from 2000-2002 as an investment.

    Because most were rotten( inner rear wheel arches), and most were only 1.4 here.


  • #9
    horseofstone
    Registered Users Posts: 238 ✭✭horseofstone


    Isambard wrote: »
    Puma's don't seem popular, with loads giving up their (1.7) engines to Fiesta's of similar age. I'd tip a Fiesta Zetec S 1.6 from 2000-2002 as an investment.

    Puma's are gone scarce its true.their quite an unusual looking car though which may intrigue future generations in years to come,hence my reasoning that to own one could be a good investment.


  • #10
    Isambard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    carchaeologist wrote: »
    Because most were rotten( inner rear wheel arches), and most were only 1.4 here.

    Fiestas rotted much the same. Even 1.4 is seen as better than 1.25 (not by me, the 1.25 is a lovely unit)


  • #11
    gfwd
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 291 ✭✭gfwd


    BrianD3 wrote: »
    I don't buy car magazines anymore and rarely even browse them but today I was in Easons and had a quick look at Practical Classics. One of the cars featured was a Renault Scenic RX4, I was bemused that a car (and an ugly one at that) that was introduced in the year 2000 is now appearing in a classic car mag. Then again, 2000 is almost 20 years ago now and when I was buying mags years ago it was normal for 20 year old or younger cars to be featured.

    The point I'm trying to make here is that a lot of time has passed and I never thought I'd be seeing the likes of Mondeos, Primeras and Renault Scenics in this type of magazine!

    On the other side, is interest in cars from the 1960s and earlier dwindling as those who remember them when they were new pass away.


    I don't think interest in 50s, 60s or 70s cars is necessarily dwindling but there is a lot of interest in 'modern' classics now (just look up the classic and vintage section on DoneDeal). Classic magazines have to follow the trend as they need to maintain a readership. PC is going for 40 odd years now and you can be sure it wouldn't have survived til now without featuring newer classics as it's trundled along. I'm not mad on reading about cars from the 90s tbh, at least not just yet, but that's the more affordable way in to the classic world now for most of us and so they should have their place.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement