Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Friday

Options
  • 14-12-2018 12:10pm
    #1
    Francie Barrett
    Registered Users Posts: 16,398 ✭✭✭✭


    Dundalk 8:30 - This horse has cost me big time, but Rag Tatter has seen a huge swing in the weights since it ran against favourite Tyrconnell two runs ago. The juicy prices have been missed, but I think 7/1 an ok price consider it's back down in favoured trip and has a decent 7lb claimer on board. Hopefully it can break well, make all today, and run the opposition into the ground.


Comments

  • Options
    #2
    Slattsy
    Registered Users Posts: 15,775 ✭✭✭✭Slattsy


    I like the look of Knock House at Bangor. Back to hurdles after a wind op in a race the trainer likes to win.


  • Options
    #3
    Auroras_encore
    Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 568 ✭✭✭Auroras_encore


    Slattsy wrote: »
    I like the look of Knock House at Bangor. Back to hurdles after a wind op in a race the trainer likes to win.

    really like rag tatter meself also loch garmin aris in the 2nd at bangor


  • Options
    #4
    Auroras_encore
    Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 568 ✭✭✭Auroras_encore


    5.15 MAXIMUM POWER 12/1


  • Options
    #5
    Francie Barrett
    Registered Users Posts: 16,398 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Francie Barrett wrote: »
    Dundalk 8:30 - This horse has cost me big time, but Rag Tatter has seen a huge swing in the weights since it ran against favourite Tyrconnell two runs ago. The juicy prices have been missed, but I think 7/1 an ok price consider it's back down in favoured trip and has a decent 7lb claimer on board. Hopefully it can break well, make all today, and run the opposition into the ground.
    :cool:


  • Options
    #6
    Gringo180
    Registered Users Posts: 9,205 ✭✭✭Gringo180


    Francie Barrett wrote: »
    :cool:

    Gr8 shout that.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    Gavin "shels"
    Registered Users Posts: 17,963 ✭✭✭✭Gavin "shels"


    Cheers Francie! Rare I back an AW fancy!!


  • Options
    #8
    loco-colo
    Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭loco-colo


    Well Done Francie and Slattsy - Just a question - if you look at race cards on irishracing.com and results on same for this race they art showing completely different weights for these two horses ( and probably others). What is reason? Thanks.


    eg.

    Results
    silksRag Tatter (GB) 4, b g 8-8 (Ciaran Carvill)

    Racecard
    Rag Tatter (GB) 4,b g 9-1


  • Options
    #9
    Francie Barrett
    Registered Users Posts: 16,398 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    loco-colo wrote: »
    Well Done Francie - Just a question - if you look at race cards on irishracing.com and results on same for this race they arte showing completely different weights for these two horses ( and probably others). What is reason? Thanks.


    eg.

    Results
    silksRag Tatter (GB) 4, b g 8-8 (Ciaran Carvill)

    Racecard
    Rag Tatter (GB) 4,b g 9-1
    9-1 was the was before the jockey claim, 8-8 was after Nathan Crosse claimed his 7lb allowance.


  • Options
    #10
    NaiveMelodies
    Registered Users Posts: 3,172 ✭✭✭NaiveMelodies


    loco-colo wrote: »
    Well Done Francie - Just a question - if you look at race cards on irishracing.com and results on same for this race they arte showing completely different weights for these two horses ( and probably others). What is reason? Thanks.


    eg.

    Results
    silksRag Tatter (GB) 4, b g 8-8 (Ciaran Carvill)

    Racecard
    Rag Tatter (GB) 4,b g 9-1

    The result is including the jockies claim I'm pretty sure.


  • Options
    #11
    Mostly Harmless
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭Mostly Harmless


    loco-colo wrote: »
    Well Done Francie and Slattsy - Just a question - if you look at race cards on irishracing.com and results on same for this race they art showing completely different weights for these two horses ( and probably others). What is reason? Thanks.


    eg.

    Results
    silksRag Tatter (GB) 4, b g 8-8 (Ciaran Carvill)

    Racecard
    Rag Tatter (GB) 4,b g 9-1
    Jockeys claim. 9-1 with jockeys claim to be taken off. 8-8 with claim taken off.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #12
    loco-colo
    Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭loco-colo


    Thanks lads - confused as results still show jockeys claim after name even though it has already been deducted.

    Incidentally - is this still the same when you are looking up form in Racing Post etc - I hope not or I have been wrong all my life!


  • Options
    #13
    Francie Barrett
    Registered Users Posts: 16,398 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    loco-colo wrote: »
    Thanks lads - confused as results still show jockeys claim after name even though it has already been deducted.

    Incidentally - is this still the same when you are looking up form in Racing Post etc - I hope not or I have been wrong all my life!
    Racingpost is odd. The race card itself will give the weight before the claim, but if you check the result, the weight will be after the claim. Usually if you check the official rating, then you can get an idea if the claim has been applied.


  • Options
    #14
    akelly02
    Registered Users Posts: 3,133 ✭✭✭akelly02


    Well done Francine. I didn’t get on , but I agreed with your angle completely which hopefully bodes well for future bets


  • Options
    #15
    GoneHome
    Registered Users Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭GoneHome


    Francie Barrett wrote: »
    Dundalk 8:30 - This horse has cost me big time, but Rag Tatter has seen a huge swing in the weights since it ran against favourite

    'Thanks Francie, I'd put a few bob on this tonight, paid off, keep the tips coming ;)


  • Options
    #16
    Thedukester00
    Closed Accounts Posts: 36 ✭Thedukester00


    Francie Barrett wrote: »
    Dundalk 8:30 - This horse has cost me big time, but Rag Tatter has seen a huge swing in the weights since it ran against favourite Tyrconnell two runs ago. The juicy prices have been missed, but I think 7/1 an ok price consider it's back down in favoured trip and has a decent 7lb claimer on board. Hopefully it can break well, make all today, and run the opposition into the ground.

    Good Call Thanks


Advertisement