Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump presidency discussion thread V

Options
1261262264266267335

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 557 ✭✭✭Walter Bishop


    As mentioned previously, kudos to Ben Carson for demolishing the myth that you need to be intelligent to be a brain surgeon.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 35,941 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    The WaPo has obtained a secret memo from the IRS which says "[Trump's] tax returns must be given to Congress unless the president takes the rare step of asserting executive privilege"
    But according to the IRS memo, which has not been previously reported, the disclosure of tax returns to the committee “is mandatory, requiring the Secretary to disclose returns, and return information, requested by the tax-writing Chairs.”

    The 10-page document says the law “does not allow the Secretary to exercise discretion in disclosing the information provided the statutory conditions are met” and directly rejects the reason Mnuchin has cited for withholding the information.

    Full article:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/confidential-draft-irs-memo-says-tax-returns-must-be-given-to-congress-unless-president-invokes-executive-privilege/2019/05/21/8ed41834-7b1c-11e9-8bb7-0fc796cf2ec0_story.html?utm_term=.e5a35784a540

    Of course, this won't matter a jot because Republicans are embedded in the Sunk Cost hole they've dug for themselves. If this drags on, it may yet coincide with the 2020 elections, which would make for some potentially damaging information...


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,060 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Deal struck between the DOJ and Schiff. Docs will be handed over to the Intelligence Committee. Schiff has warned however that the subpoena remains in effect should there be any further obfuscation


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,284 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Trump just held an impromptu press conference outside the White House in response to the Democrats impeachment calls and Pelosi's comments about how he's engaging in a cover-up, basically calling himself the most transparent president in history, how the Mueller report cleared him, it's all a hoax etc.

    And he did it in front of this sign...
    https://twitter.com/steveholland1/status/1131221427162689537

    Didn't seem to mention the number of guilty pleas and convictions on it. Maybe it was on the back of it.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Penn wrote: »
    Trump just held an impromptu press conference outside the White House in response to the Democrats impeachment calls and Pelosi's comments about how he's engaging in a cover-up, basically calling himself the most transparent president in history, how the Mueller report cleared him, it's all a hoax etc.

    And he did it in front of this sign...
    https://twitter.com/steveholland1/status/1131221427162689537

    Didn't seem to mention the number of guilty pleas and convictions on it. Maybe it was on the back of it.

    So , we're supposed to believe that he had every intention of having a meaningful meeting about Infrastructure but because of comments made by Pelosi 5 minutes before it started he cancelled and just happened to have that spanky poster knocking around to put in the Rose garden for his "impromptu" press conference??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭Stallingrad


    Oh God that is tragic, mayor Quimby all over. Pity the intern that has to lash that poster together. Typically he didn't have the guts or mental acuity to face down Peloso and Chuck, he'll do that later via the safety of Twitter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 39,511 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Oh God that is tragic, mayor Quimby all over. Pity the intern that has to lash that poster together. Typically he didn't have the guts or mental acuity to face down Peloso and Chuck, he'll do that later via the safety of Twitter.

    let's not sully the name of Diamond Joe Quimby by comparing him to Trump.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    let's not sully the name of Diamond Joe Quimby by comparing him to Trump.

    That's Mayor Joseph Fitzgerald O'Malley Fitzpatrick O'Donnell The Edge Quimby to you Sirrah!!

    And for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever, Diamond Joe hails from a long line of politicians whose Brahmin roots were cultivated by such notables as the Kennedys (mostly Teddy, and earlier by John & Robert F). True Democrats one and all! And role models par excellence for propriety in the #MeToo age....

    :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,060 ✭✭✭✭everlast75




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭relax carry on


    Penn wrote: »
    Trump just held an impromptu press conference outside the White House in response to the Democrats impeachment calls and Pelosi's comments about how he's engaging in a cover-up, basically calling himself the most transparent president in history, how the Mueller report cleared him, it's all a hoax etc.

    And he did it in front of this sign...
    https://twitter.com/steveholland1/status/1131221427162689537

    Didn't seem to mention the number of guilty pleas and convictions on it. Maybe it was on the back of it.

    How pathetic can you get. Has any other POTUS come even remotely close to being as unsuitable for the job as Trump is?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 39,511 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    How pathetic can you get. Has any other POTUS come even remotely close to being as unsuitable for the job as Trump is?

    Probably not. Nixon is getting a great reassessment of his presidency though. He wasn't perfect by any means but it's clear he had a policies on important issues whereas Trump just doesn't.


  • Registered Users Posts: 39,511 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    everlast75 wrote: »

    If the stories are true about the management of Deutse bank being told about issues regarding Trump and Kushner and money moving between them and Russian people then handing over documents to congress may be the Least of the upper managements problems.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,060 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    If the stories are true about the management of Deutse bank being told about issues regarding Trump and Kushner and money moving between them and Russian people then handing over documents to congress may be the Least of the upper managements problems.

    Plus that Bill was signed into effect today in NYC.

    https://twitter.com/jessemckinley/status/1131248655200116736?s=19


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,262 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    More political theatre by The Democrats. The decision will get shot down on appeal.

    On the off chance that it does not, then the door has basically been opened to a Police State, invited by people who can't see beyond their own hatred for DT.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    This is getting more like Watergate, denial and refusal by the President and his AG.In 1972 Deep throat told the WaPo reporters to stop what they were doing, look at the important thing and follow the money trail which started with CREEP [no joke] the Nixon equivalent to Don's election campaign. Which reminds me, is anyone looking into the gathering of monies to fund Don's intended re-election campaign?


  • Registered Users Posts: 39,511 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    aloyisious wrote: »
    This is getting more like Watergate, denial and refusal by the President and his AG.In 1972 Deep throat told the WaPo reporters to stop what they were doing, look at the important thing and follow the money trail which started with CREEP [no joke] the Nixon equivalent to Don's election campaign. Which reminds me, is anyone looking into the gathering of monies to fund Don's intended re-election campaign?

    Didn't creep stand for the campaign for reelection of the president ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 39,511 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    manual_man wrote: »
    More political theatre by The Democrats. The decision will get shot down on appeal.

    On the off chance that it does not, then the door has basically been opened to a Police State, invited by people who can't see beyond their own hatred for DT.

    How is it political theatre ? It's a legally issued subpoena from the US congress. Both parties have and will continue to use subpoenas if necessary. So the judiciary is making it a police state then is it ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,693 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    manual_man wrote: »
    More political theatre by The Democrats. The decision will get shot down on appeal.

    On the off chance that it does not, then the door has basically been opened to a Police State, invited by people who can't see beyond their own hatred for DT.

    Police state.

    You clearly don't know the meaning of the word


    It's general people lapping it up in social democracies where they've enjoyed next to free education and free healthcare that spout the most stupid nonsense.

    Oh look


    Here's one.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    manual_man wrote: »
    More political theatre by The Democrats. The decision will get shot down on appeal.

    On the off chance that it does not, then the door has basically been opened to a Police State, invited by people who can't see beyond their own hatred for DT.


    You should put down the Q-pipe. It didn't help Roseanne and it won't help you either.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    manual_man wrote: »
    More political theatre by The Democrats. The decision will get shot down on appeal..

    Sorry, but I'm confused... What is "the decision" that will get "shot down" on appeal?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    Didn't creep stand for the campaign for reelection of the president ?

    Yes. One has to say it was possibly the best bit of political satire that century, given it came from within the campaign. The money/funding is an important trail in the 1st Trump campaign to see who [besides himself] benefitted financially by getting him into the job.

    Ta: TomOnBoard for the correction on the own goal and Dem seizure of the opportunity.


  • Registered Users Posts: 39,511 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    aloyisious wrote: »
    Yes

    I've read too much us political history clearly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,253 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    manual_man wrote: »
    More political theatre by The Democrats. The decision will get shot down on appeal.

    On the off chance that it does not, then the door has basically been opened to a Police State, invited by people who can't see beyond their own hatred for DT.

    Trump has brought all of this on himself with his public idiocy, lies, dodgy dealings and general incompetence. If the decision is upheld (which it should be) then if anything it'll finally establish beyond any doubt that even the President is not above the law, even though Trump obviously thinks he is. He's behaving like a spoilt child and I hope the Dems nail him to the wall.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Has any other POTUS come even remotely close to being as unsuitable for the job as Trump is?

    No.
    How pathetic can you get.

    Well, that's a completely different question. When the leaders of the House and Senate are coming into the White House, in order to meet the President to discuss the Infrastructure project, aaaaand they chose on the way INTO the meeting to state "We believe that the President of the United States is engaged in a cover-up", then why would the President sit and meet with them?

    That was simply grandstanding on Schumer/Pelosi's part. They had absolutely NO intention of having a meaningful meeting. They poked the hornet's nest and the hornet obliged,by pissing off, thereby yet again handing the Dems a PR win.

    That is certainly nooo way (by either party to the discussion) to deal with an Infrastructure Problem that is claiming human lives by the day.

    Edit: I was totally incorrect in my characterisation of Schumer/Pelosi making statements about Presidenria! cover-up on the way in to the WH meeting on Infrastrucrure. As I now understand it, Pelosi used the term 'cover-up' with her own Democratic members earlier in the day, which is perfectly acceptable behaviour. Trump's c!early orchestrated hissy fit, including signs he made earlier, is the demeaning piece of the day's dramatics.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    Itssoeasy wrote: »
    Didn't creep stand for the campaign for reelection of the president ?

    :D The Committee to Re-Elect the President was actually designated as the CRP. The Democrats, seizing on an obvious mis-step on the part of the GOP in its choice of acronym, propagated CREEP some time after..

    One of the great Home Team own goals that was converted into a solid Away Win in US Politics....


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,109 ✭✭✭TomOnBoard


    everlast75 wrote: »
    He is hemorrhaging votes in the rust belt.

    I get the Farmers' (in places like Kansas) being royally pissed off with Trump for having had much of the weight of agricultural tarriffs placed on their shoulders, but I must be missing out on general polls that suggest Trump is haemorrhagging votes in the Rust Belt.

    OK, I also get that some ppl may be much less in love with a 2020 Trump than they might have been in 2016. However, into what does that diminution in love translate? A vote for some entirely as yet unknown candidate to surface at some point in 14 months or so from the Democrat Primary process that is currently dealing with 22 or 23 possibles? Sure, how can anybody reasonably argue that Trump is haemorraging votes to a shadow?

    I'm sorry but I don't buy that argument!

    I still think he needs to be "Gooooone Girl!", but let's all be real here"!


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    manual_man wrote: »
    More political theatre by The Democrats. The decision will get shot down on appeal.

    On the off chance that it does not, then the door has basically been opened to a Police State, invited by people who can't see beyond their own hatred for DT.
    I'm sorry but this is ridiculous.

    Firstly, Congress, as a co-equal branch of government, has the authority to issue subpoenas - that does not make it a "Police State" - it makes it a democracy.

    Secondly, what Trump's team will be actually looking for is a stay on the order pending appeal; this has been rejected already (twice) as Trump is unlikely to win his appeal (his legal team have been basically laughed out of every Court because their argument is Executive Privilege outweighs Congressional powers - which it doesn't and in any event EP doesn't apply to these documents). There is no legal rationale for an appeals court to grant a stay. Trump could get the Supreme Court to step in here, but that would be grounds for impeachment in itself as he would unduly use Executive power to obstruct justice by using the Supreme Court to obstruct justice and break the hell out of separation of powers.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    manual_man wrote: »
    More political theatre by The Democrats. The decision will get shot down on appeal.

    On the off chance that it does not, then the door has basically been opened to a Police State, invited by people who can't see beyond their own hatred for DT.
    I'm sorry but this is ridiculous.

    Firstly, Congress, as a co-equal branch of government, has the authority to issue subpoenas - that does not make it a "Police State" - it makes it a democracy.

    Secondly, what Trump's team will be actually looking for is a stay on the order pending appeal; this has been rejected already (twice) as Trump is unlikely to win his appeal (his legal team have been basically laughed out of every Court because their argument is Executive Privilege outweighs Congressional powers - which it doesn't and in any event EP doesn't apply to these documents). There is no legal rationale for an appeals court to grant a stay. Trump could get the Supreme Court to step in here, but that would be grounds for impeachment in itself as he would unduly use Executive power to obstruct justice by using the Supreme Court to obstruct justice and break the hell out of separation of powers.

    And it's too late now anyway , Banks have already begun to release the paperwork to the congressional committees.

    WASHINGTON — A key congressional committee has already gained access to President Donald Trump’s dealings with two major financial institutions, two sources familiar with the House probe tell NBC News, as a court ruling Wednesday promised to open the door for even more records to be handed over.

    Wells Fargo and TD Bank are the two of nine institutions that have so far complied with subpoenas issued by the House Financial Services Committee demanding information about their dealings with the Trump Organization, according to the sources. The disclosures by these two banks haven’t been previously reported. Both TD Bank and Wells Fargo declined to comment for this story.

    Wells Fargo provided the committee with a few thousand documents and TD Bank handed the committee a handful of documents, according to a source who has seen them. The committee, led by Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., is especially interested in the president’s business relationship with Russia and other foreign entities.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,026 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    And, Trump the pacifist (/sarcasm) has become the first president to pardon murderers. Note that others have commuted sentences, if no one died in the crimes for which the perpetrators were convicted. Not Trump. So, even if US Military tribunals actually find soldiers guilty of war crimes, if POTUS45 thinks his campaign can benefit from it, he'll pardon them. He knows more than Military Tribunals, based on his lengthy career in the military I guess.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/23/politics/war-crimes-pardons-trump/index.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭eire4


    Igotadose wrote: »
    And, Trump the pacifist (/sarcasm) has become the first president to pardon murderers. Note that others have commuted sentences, if no one died in the crimes for which the perpetrators were convicted. Not Trump. So, even if US Military tribunals actually find soldiers guilty of war crimes, if POTUS45 thinks his campaign can benefit from it, he'll pardon them. He knows more than Military Tribunals, based on his lengthy career in the military I guess.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/23/politics/war-crimes-pardons-trump/index.html

    The Americans are infatuated with their military. They constantly describe their soldiers as hero's regardless and arrogantly go on about themselves as the leaders of the "free World" etc. Their military devours an enormous amount of their economic resources and lets face it their record of nasty deeds all around the world is a very long one sadly but thats a reality most Americans either ignore refuse to accept or are ignorant of and which of course would not fit in with their glorification of the military.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement