Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Irish Rail plan level crossing closures on Cork line

  • 25-10-2018 11:02pm
    #1
    Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Irish Rail have tendered for consultants to assist in the closure of level crossings along the Cork line.

    There are still a number left around Ballyhea in Cork.

    https://irl.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicTenders/ViewNotice/208813


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Is this normal practice for automating crossings?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    Are these public road crossings, as at Buttevant, or just farmer's accomodation crossings?.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    tabbey wrote: »
    Are these public road crossings, as at Buttevant, or just farmer's accomodation crossings?.

    There is no farm crossings left, all public roads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,574 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Do they not have their own engineers for this type of design work,? Or is it an assurance type thing, (our engineer watches the consulting engineer who watches the building companies engineer who watches the builders)

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Markcheese wrote: »
    Do they not have their own engineers for this type of design work,? Or is it an assurance type thing, (our engineer watches the consulting engineer who watches the building companies engineer who watches the builders)

    Would have thaught they did and don't remember such tenders for other routes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    They may be short on engineering staff due to the design work for the Maynooth and Northern electrification


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,229 ✭✭✭LeinsterDub


    Markcheese wrote: »
    Do they not have their own engineers for this type of design work,? Or is it an assurance type thing, (our engineer watches the consulting engineer who watches the building companies engineer who watches the builders)

    What would this engineer do from one end of the year to the next? It's not like Irish Rail have many of these projects


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,965 ✭✭✭trellheim




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    trellheim wrote: »

    Its closing or automation. They will unlikely get many fully closed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    L1011 wrote: »
    They may be short on engineering staff due to the design work for the Maynooth and Northern electrification

    No I don't think this is a factor or it shouldn’t be. Leave this work to external people if its the case.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    CIE have begun a pre-railway order consultation with An Bord Pleanala for the replacement of seven manned crossings between Limerick Junction and Mallow

    http://www.pleanala.ie/casenum/305149.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,491 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    trellheim wrote: »

    You don't have to. They could provide a road along the side of the railway connecting to a bridge - existing or new - elsewhere.

    Buttevent may be a greater problem because of the hill, but doing it right might mean they could close the roads under the low bridges to the south.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,475 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    marno21 wrote: »
    CIE have begun a pre-railway order consultation with An Bord Pleanala for the replacement of seven manned crossings between Limerick Junction and Mallow

    http://www.pleanala.ie/casenum/305149.htm

    Surprised there’s that many manned level crossings on that line? The Waterford line is lower priority and I think all the level crossings are auto now for some time


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,551 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    road_high wrote: »
    Surprised there’s that many manned level crossings on that line? The Waterford line is lower priority and I think all the level crossings are auto now for some time

    Automation is expensive - very expensive. If you know you're going to remove the crossing entirely it may not pay back in staff savings quickly enough to bother


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    road_high wrote: »
    Surprised there’s that many manned level crossings on that line? The Waterford line is lower priority and I think all the level crossings are auto now for some time

    Waterford was done in conjunction with a signalling upgrade, i.e. there was budget and it makes sense due the integration between the systems. But they mainly upgraded not eliminated.

    There are now no level crossings between Limerick Junction and Dublin nor are there are Dublin to Newry

    Mallow - Limerick Junction is the least used section of the Dublin Cork line, not more than 2 trains an hour on average over the business day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,756 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Still 3 manual on Waterford.

    The only fully automated line is Mallow-Tralee AFAIK.

    If they eliminate all these on Cork there will still be one just north of Limerick J (automated). Probably controlled from Mallow (?).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,976 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    Waterford was done in conjunction with a signalling upgrade, i.e. there was budget and it makes sense due the integration between the systems. But they mainly upgraded not eliminated.

    There are now no level crossings between Limerick Junction and Dublin nor are there are Dublin to Newry

    Mallow - Limerick Junction is the least used section of the Dublin Cork line, not more than 2 trains an hour on average over the business day.

    Grange LC is between LJ and Thurles on the Cork Mainline.

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭theguzman


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    Still 3 manual on Waterford.

    The only fully automated line is Mallow-Tralee AFAIK.

    If they eliminate all these on Cork there will still be one just north of Limerick J (automated). Probably controlled from Mallow (?).

    https://goo.gl/maps/XvhQCcuQFt2VGUhU6

    This is outside Rathmore on the Killarney side, I presume it is still there as the Google Maps are from 2009, I remember nervously crossing it once in 2008.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    theguzman wrote: »
    https://goo.gl/maps/XvhQCcuQFt2VGUhU6

    This is outside Rathmore on the Killarney side, I presume it is still there as the Google Maps are from 2009, I remember nervously crossing it once in 2008.

    It is still there.

    IE have planning permission to close the crossing and route the road through a farmers crossing a few hundred metres further west but this hasn't been advanced yet

    The N72 along there is to be realigned away from there too which will make a difference


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭theguzman


    marno21 wrote: »
    It is still there.

    IE have planning permission to close the crossing and route the road through a farmers crossing a few hundred metres further west but this hasn't been advanced yet

    The N72 along there is to be realigned away from there too which will make a difference

    That stretch of road immediately outside Barradubh village towards Mallow is a disgrace and it has more twists and turns than a hula hoop dancer. It would badly want upgrading and the road bridge they built back around 10-15 years should see the engineers shot at dawn for the ridiculousness of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    I imagine most of the crossings involved would be automated. There is one at Ballyhea that is closed at night, I imagine that could be closed permanently. I think the planning consent would be needed for the changes to the road and it's markings.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Options published

    https://www.irishrail.ie/About-Us/Iarnrod-Eireann-Projects-and-Investments/Cork-Line-Level-Crossings-Project

    1 outright closure, 1 upgrade to 4 barrier CCTV and 5 replacements with new road alignments


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    interesting spelling of Ballyhea.


  • Registered Users Posts: 351 ✭✭Okon


    Isambard wrote: »
    interesting spelling of Ballyhea.


    FWIW I have seen it on some old maps as Ballyhay before...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    but this is a new map.....I wonder do IE have to use the names set out in the original Act of Parliament...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    Isambard wrote: »
    interesting spelling of Ballyhea.

    Ballyhay is the correct name (and before that it was Ballyhaura), there seems to be some uncertainty as to where Ballyhea came from, writings from 1837 are the first to use Ballyhea and now both seem to be used.

    The LC is officially named Ballyhay which is the officially recorded place name for the townland and civil parish under the OSI and the Loganim database, Ballyhea may be in common use but it is not the official place name.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    IE have lodged a Railway Order Application with An Bord Pleanala for this job:

    https://www.pleanala.ie/en-ie/case/310286

    Documents attached to the above link.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    GM228 wrote: »
    Ballyhay is the correct name (and before that it was Ballyhaura), there seems to be some uncertainty as to where Ballyhea came from, writings from 1837 are the first to use Ballyhea and now both seem to be used.

    The LC is officially named Ballyhay which is the officially recorded place name for the townland and civil parish under the OSI and the Loganim database, Ballyhea may be in common use but it is not the official place name.

    Indeed, and it's spelled Ballyhay in "Irish Railways today" of 1967.

    Ballyhay is the only one to be upgraded to a four barrier crossing controlled by CCTV. The other six are to be eliminated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,741 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    marno21 wrote: »
    IE have lodged a Railway Order Application with An Bord Pleanala for this job:

    https://www.pleanala.ie/en-ie/case/310286

    Documents attached to the above link.

    Seems like an awful lot of work / compliance / documents / assessments, just to remove a few LC.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    Geuze wrote: »
    Seems like an awful lot of work / compliance / documents / assessments, just to remove a few LC.

    Yes, bureaucracy gone mad.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Geuze wrote: »
    Seems like an awful lot of work / compliance / documents / assessments, just to remove a few LC.

    Railway order provides for CPO so Irish Rail can get this done, otherwise it is a never ending game with landowners who refuse to cooperate.

    It also takes the decisions out of the hands of local authorities, who have held up previous attempts to close some of these crossings.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,461 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Three years just to get to tender stage ...shocking.



Advertisement