Lock Step

Was Lock Step in 'Scenarios for the future of technology and international development', which was published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010, the blueprint for covid-19? People who claim that this is a plandemic rather than a pandemic have argued that Lock Step describes the world we're currently living in to a tee. What do you think?

https://fdocuments.in/document/scenarios-for-the-future-of-technology-and-international-development

The section entitled Lock Step begins on page 18.

Excerpts from Lock Step:

"A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback."

"In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults."

"China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power."

"At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests."

"By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them. Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish."

Doesn't the world described look remarkably similar to, if it's not identical to, what we have been living through since March? Things such as "the mandatory wearing of face masks" and "body-temperature checks". It's interesting that it says that post pandemic the control over citizens' lives intensified. That's what a lot of people fear. It also describes how citizens "willingly gave up some of their sovereignty ... to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability". That's definitely true of most people in the world.

The year 2025 is interesting when one considers deagel.com. It's a site that gives population forecasts for the year 2025. According to deagel the populations of Western countries are to be decimated by 2025. This ties in with a fear people have regarding these vaccines and population reduction. Deagel has the population of the US being reduced by 70% by 2025. In order to implement Agenda 21/2030, which many argue is the Great Reset, doesn't it require that much of the US be free of human beings?

And the Rockefeller Foundation recently got together with the Pope to push for inclusive capitalism, whatever that means. And they are also behind another reset (amazing how they all manage to use the same language and words, i.e. reset, build back better, new normal) called 'Resetting the Table'.

Yes, the factchecker crowd predictably dismissed it as a conspiracy theory, but is there something to the blueprint claims, do you think?