Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Harvesting Asteroids

  • 28-04-2017 8:12pm
    #1
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭


    Remember Earth-skimming DA14 asteroid? L-type asteroid. 50 meters wide. Could proposed Fire Fly or equivalent spacecraft catch such asteroids? Drag them into Earth orbit. Harvest them using robotics. Estimated $195 billion of minerals. DA14 passed at distance of 17,200 miles in 2013. Practical with today's technology? Your thoughts? 0315344a58aab963e85830cc0a099cbc.jpg


«1

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Prospect asteroids? Or prospect Earth? Asteroid mining expensive. Earth mining cheaper. Ceres Earth-observation program. 10 satellites. Low flying orbits. Measuring wavelengths. Infrared to visible. Discover potential mining sites for oil, gas, etc. Similar tech for examining asteroids. So why bother with asteroids?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,342 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    Fathom wrote: »
    Prospect asteroids? Or prospect Earth? Asteroid mining expensive. Earth mining cheaper.
    Therein lies the questions. Extraordinary minerals that may be discovered on asteroids might justify such mining.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Rare minerals. Asteroid discoveries. Justified. Otherwise, harvest Earth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    The first major problem is our economy. If you went to an asteroid and found a load of something rare, lets say gold, the act of bringing it back to earth would devalue the market. It's expensive because it's rare and if you make it less rare it's worth less. So the better they got at it the less money they'd make.

    The next problem is transferring stuff from earth to space and visa versa is expensive. Earth doesn't really need the stuff that's in space.

    Mining asteroids makes sense if you're living in space, then you don't need earth to supply you with expensive materials. If you want to build a giant city in space it would make sense to mine asteroids for the materials. I don't think there's any value to mining asteroids for use on earth, but it will be an essential part of living in space and being independent.

    There are probably all kinds of safety reasons too, like losing control of 20 tons of iron ore on reentry, or the possibility of introducing alien microbes, or just dumping waste on earth that's not needed.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    ScumLord wrote: »
    Mining asteroids makes sense if you're living in space
    Minerals & water.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭MySandwich


    ScumLord wrote: »
    The first major problem is our economy. If you went to an asteroid and found a load of something rare, lets say gold, the act of bringing it back to earth would devalue the market. It's expensive because it's rare and if you make it less rare it's worth less. So the better they got at it the less money they'd make.

    I don't really think this is an issue. These minerals have industrial uses and lower commodity costs benefits most people, and would ultimately facilitate economic growth


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Asteroids containing platinum. Rare on Earth. Planetary Resources plans to mine them someday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭MySandwich


    Fathom wrote: »
    Asteroids containing platinum. Rare on Earth.
    Planetary Resources plans to mine them someday.

    I read somewhere that we're running out of helium also, so I guess we gotta go to space for that too


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Harvesting helium-3 on Moon? Rare element on Earth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,529 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    Aren't the Chinese looking at doing this soon?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭MySandwich


    Probably, should be an interesting race between the US and China


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Property rights problem. China, or other nations claiming rights over others. 1967 Outer Space Treaty. 100 nations signed. Individual or business rights? Global corporation claims? Without property rights, would businesses invest in Moon or asteroid mining?


  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭MySandwich


    Fathom wrote: »
    Property rights problem. China, or other nations claiming rights over others. 1967 Outer Space Treaty. 100 nations signed. Individual or business rights? Global corporation claims? Without property rights, would businesses invest in Moon or asteroid mining?

    I'm sure that will all be ironed out, even if there is a bit of friction. The empires of old were able to draw up treaties and carve up the world


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    MySandwich wrote: »
    I'm sure that will all be ironed out, even if there is a bit of friction. The empires of old were able to draw up treaties and carve up the world
    Today. Scarce resource. South China Sea oil. Drilling rights. China vs Vietnam vs Philippines. China building naval fleet. Same old story. Will such a story continue when harvesting asteroids or Moon?


  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭MySandwich


    Fathom wrote: »
    Today. Scarce resource. South China Sea oil. Drilling rights. China vs Vietnam vs Philippines. China building naval fleet. Same old story. Will such a story continue when harvesting asteroids or Moon?

    Those disputes are set against historical territorial claims and previous wars, outer space is essentially free of these grudge matches


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    MySandwich wrote: »
    Those disputes are set against historical territorial claims and previous wars, outer space is essentially free of these grudge matches
    Americas? War between Native Americans and USA. Latter wins. Treaty signed. Gold discovered in Black Hills. USA violates treaty to mine scarce resource. Profits not treaties rule? On Earth and in mining scarce asteroid or Moon resources?


  • Registered Users Posts: 71 ✭✭MySandwich


    Fathom wrote: »
    Americas? War between Native Americans and USA. Latter wins. Treaty signed. Gold discovered in Black Hills. USA violates treaty to mine scarce resource. Profits not treaties rule? On Earth and in mining scarce asteroid or Moon resources?

    A more appropriate example is in the scramble for Africa, where the conference of Berlin divided up the untouched continent without major conflict


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    MySandwich wrote: »
    A more appropriate example is in the scramble for Africa, where the conference of Berlin divided up the untouched continent without major conflict
    Depends on how "major" is defined? Examples. Boar War. Afrikaners vs British Empire. October 11, 1899 to May 31, 1902. North Africa campaign WWII between Germany, UK, and USA. Suez canal (trade route for resources). Oil scarce resource. Long list of wars. For resources. For independence. Africa has almost been in continuous war. Will competition for scare resources in space resemble Earth history? "In the last 3,421 years of recorded history only 268 have seen no war." Durant & Durant, Lessons of History, History & War chapter. Will human history repeat itself in space?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    MySandwich wrote: »
    I don't really think this is an issue. These minerals have industrial uses and lower commodity costs benefits most people, and would ultimately facilitate economic growth
    I think they're are all sorts of issues with our economy, space travel and even manufacturing going into the future.

    It doesn't matter if an industry needs a mineral, if another company has to mine the minerals for profit then they're not going to invest the money if they'll get less and less returns on each load they sell. They'd literally be kicking the stool out from under themselves and every method a company has for improving factories like improving efficiency can't over come the problem of the more they produce the less it's worth.

    Then take into account what kind of settlement you'll need to mine asteroids. Even if you have robots doing a lot of the hard work you'll need people. Those people will need some forms of renewable food production and even the ability to manufacture.

    Manufacturing is presenting a new problem for our economies and could present another problem for people living in space. CNC and 3d printing is becoming better and cheaper by the day. It's now possible for a one man shop to produce stuff that would have either been impossible 30 years ago, or massively expensive. This is going to make low production customised products much much cheaper and undermine the market share of companies that mass produce.

    The other issue is if that mining colony can produce pretty much any piece of technology they want on site they don't need earth. If they're producing food they'll only need earth for luxuries and things they can't produce like textiles. As that colony grows it could get to the stage where they don't need earth, earth has nothing they want, and they may just decide it's not worth trading with us.

    That could happen over and over again with groups of people becoming more and more self sufficient and having less reasons for trade. It's possible every space city could be more than capable of mining enough raw materials to sustain itself and has no need for the trade network we have on earth.

    Trade is a fundamental part of the human condition, it's probably been with us since before we were humans. We find it extremely hard to operate without it but I can see it becoming redundant when we start living in space.

    I'm sure it will still exist, there will always be experts in their fields and so on, but what do you trade in space when minerals are easy to come by and you can probably automatically whip up just about any piece of technology by pressing a button?

    I'm pretty sure any big company that's looked into space mining has seen that it's an industry of diminishing returns because of the abundance.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    MySandwich wrote: »
    I read somewhere that we're running out of helium also, so I guess we gotta go to space for that too
    We aren't running out of Helium.

    We are running out of cheap Helium. It can be extracted from air.


    But it's a lot cheaper when you have natural gas wells with a high concentration of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    ScumLord wrote: »
    I'm pretty sure any big company that's looked into space mining has seen that it's an industry of diminishing returns because of the abundance.
    Aluminium used to be more valuable than gold.

    Over the last few thousand years we've pulled less than two hundred thousand tonnes of Gold out of the ground.

    We're close to extracting nearly that much Aluminium every day.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Several space mining companies formed. Pie-in-the-sky? Or future mining of asteriods, Moon, etc.? Talk "space mining industry."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Fathom wrote: »
    Several space mining companies formed. Pie-in-the-sky? Or future mining of asteriods, Moon, etc.? Talk "space mining industry."
    Mining the moon for helium 3 isn't a bad idea. Mostly because they only need a few dozen grams of helium 3 to power the entire earth for a year.

    For everything else the earth needs to much for it to be viable. If you go to space to mine minerals for electronics you're in competition with a kid from Africa. The kid from Africa probably gets paid less than a dollar a day, the space mission is going to have to bring back enough to last decades to cover the cost of the mission.

    I guess it makes some sense for rare elements but if it's rare there's probably not much of a market for it.

    Our markets and economy is at odds with space colonisation. I don't think we can depend on private enterprise to do anything other than turn low earth orbit into a holiday destination.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    ScumLord wrote: »
    Mining the moon for helium 3 isn't a bad idea. Mostly because they only need a few dozen grams of helium 3 to power the entire earth for a year.
    Helium-3. Appears frequently in literature. Claimed justification for space mining. Asteroids. Moon.
    ScumLord wrote: »
    I don't think we can depend on private enterprise to do anything other than turn low earth orbit into a holiday destination.
    Holiday fights. Tens of thousands of dollars. Long list already. Short space flights. Also on NBC news. Few days ago. Launch capsule of cremated ashes into low Earth orbit. Returns as shooting star. Foolish people with money to waste.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    ScumLord wrote: »
    Mining the moon for helium 3 isn't a bad idea. Mostly because they only need a few dozen grams of helium 3 to power the entire earth for a year.
    Make that tens of tonnes at least.

    and that's not counting the energy needed to harvest the He.
    or that we still haven't gotten fusion reactors to work
    here on earth the oceans contain enough uranium to power us for ages, except it takes a lot of energy to harvest it.

    solar panels work and are getting cheaper all the time. what we need is energy storage.

    that's all He would be by the time it's brought back and only for those living beneath clouds and you could probably use orbital mirrors on the moon
    right now we are using solar panels as far as Jupiter

    China and Japan have recently announced improvements in harvesting methane hydrates from the sea floor. Not carbon free but could totally undercut coal


    as an aside this film was about harvesting He on the moon with an interesting way of paying work bonuses
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1182345/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Make that tens of tonnes at least.
    Maybe I misheard it as a city for a month or something?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    ScumLord wrote: »
    Maybe I misheard it as a city for a month or something?
    http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-05/former-apollo-astronaut-says-moon-mining-could-solve-global-energy-crisis
    Schmitt says a two-square-kilometer swath of lunar surface mined to a depth of roughly 10 feet would yield about 220 pounds of helium-3. That's enough to run a 1,000-megawatt reactor for a year, or $140 million in energy based on today's coal prices. Scale that up to several reactors, and you've got a moneymaking operation.

    10 feet is about 3 meters in real money. And 220 pounds is 100Kg.

    So that's processing 6 million m3 of moon per GW year
    guesstimate the regolith density as 1.6 thingy's and that a mass of a million tonnes

    To get 8.766 TWh , one estimate of our energy usage back in 2012 was 157.5 PWh so that would require processing 18 Billion tonnes mass of moondust.


    Global iron production is about 3.2 billion tonnes and coal production is 7.8 billion tonnes

    IIRC moondust contains 0.1 or 1% native iron so that would be a useful byproduct but the whole scheme is a non starter unless I've missed a few zeros somewhere


    And there is the efficiency to figure out
    And the small problem of not having a working He 3 fusion reactor


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    So there still isn't any reason to import materials from space to earth?

    I think many countries will be opposed to importing anything from space, especially if it will negatively impact local economies.


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 11,362 ✭✭✭✭Scarinae


    Mining water from the Moon or from asteroids could potentially be more valuable than mining minerals, as it can be used to make hydrogren propellant. The cost of fuel is one of the biggest factors holding back NASA's aim of sending humans to Mars in the 2030s.

    Planetary Resources, one of the companies looking into mining asteroids, made this video a few years ago explaining the fuel problem:



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    ScumLord wrote: »
    So there still isn't any reason to import materials from space to earth?

    I think many countries will be opposed to importing anything from space, especially if it will negatively impact local economies.

    Maybe if you arranged to drop a small platinum rich asteroid in a desert area ?

    Otherwise the costs of heatshielding on the way down might disrupt the economics.


    But in the main the reason to mine asteroids is to save costs on getting stuff out of our gravity well.

    Long term a solar powered rail gun or maglev on the moon could get stuff into orbit easily. Escape velocity is only 2.38Km/s so orbital velocity is 1.68Km/s which is 6,000 Km/Hr

    I suspect that asteroid dust , like moon dust is very sharp and unfriendly to mechanical stuff. So might need to make gear out of something with a harder surface than aluminium.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    I suspect that asteroid dust , like moon dust is very sharp and unfriendly to mechanical stuff. So might need to make gear out of something with a harder surface than aluminium.
    I was watching a video on a guy who's been tasked with making concrete out of moondust, I think he's worked out a way of making it but it was surprising just how unfriendly that moon dust is to just about anything.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    ScumLord wrote: »
    I was watching a video on a guy who's been tasked with making concrete out of moondust, I think he's worked out a way of making it but it was surprising just how unfriendly that moon dust is to just about anything.
    The secret of concrete is to keep it wet until it fully cures.

    curing_fig1.jpg

    http://www.cement.org/learn/concrete-technology/concrete-construction/curing-in-construction


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    C-type asteroids. Dark. Carbon-rich. High abundances of water. Not relevant mining for water-rich Earth. Relevant to distant space travel. Ref: https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/new-nasa-mission-to-help-us-learn-how-to-mine-asteroids


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    I wonder how many asteroids you'd need to survive in space? Would one asteroid have a lot of different materials in them? Or would they be somewhat specialised? IE: One asteroid has a range of metals, another one would carbon and silica and so on? So you'd need to either travel between them or toe them together.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    ScumLord wrote: »
    I wonder how many asteroids you'd need to survive in space?
    Hundreds of thousands of asteroids exist. Sizes ranging from a few yards to hundreds of miles across. NASA’s OSIRIS-REx. Stands for Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security and Regolith Explorer. Planned asteroid sample return mission. Many asteroid types. Dark color C-type contain water. Also organic carbon and phosphorous for fertilizer. Help grow food in space stations or flight. Ref: https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/new-nasa-mission-to-help-us-learn-how-to-mine-asteroids


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Fathom wrote: »
    Dark color C-type contain water. Also organic carbon and phosphorous for fertilizer. Help grow food in space stations or flight.
    I think I heard at one point that we've also hit peak phosphorus.

    I don't think that would mean we should import it, it would be a better plan to just move a few billion people into space.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    ScumLord wrote: »
    I think I heard at one point that we've also hit peak phosphorus. I don't think that would mean we should import it, it would be a better plan to just move a few billion people into space.
    A surplus Earth has: People. 7 billions. Is SpaceX the beginning? Spread of private sector space flight? Look back 40 years from now. Yawn. Wonder why others did anticipate harvesting asteroids to aid space living and flight?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    I'm still unsure on how private companies are going to get people into space. They'll solve some problems when it comes to the cost of getting into orbit but outside of that we're going to run into some real hurdles. If you pay a wage to someone living in space that money is pretty much worthless in space, your food will likely have to be provided, it's not like if you run out of money on a ship with 100 people that they'll just let you starve to death, or that they'd allow a handful of people to have most the food because they're richer.

    The social structure will be more like a stone age groups of people, groups of 150 people or less that are entirely dependant on eachother maintaining the group. Individuality will go out the window and the group will take precedence. Something humans don't have to do that often in the modern world. At what stage does that group of people decide they're not doing something like mining and handing off all the profits to an earth based parent company when all the parent company does is provide for their survival?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,342 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    "Harvesting asteroids" to supplement space flight resources may have some merit someday, but today there are concerns about humans living for prolonged time in space, as opposed to living on Earth. Especially if such lengths of time in space lack artificial gravity (e.g., Mars mission), where human anatomy may suffer degenerative affects. I can envision a space gym with exercise equipment, but will that be sufficient to sustain all the physiological needs for prolonged periods of space flight if artificial gravity was not present?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    ScumLord wrote: »
    I think I heard at one point that we've also hit peak phosphorus.

    I don't think that would mean we should import it, it would be a better plan to just move a few billion people into space.
    Like many peaks it just means we are running out of low hanging fruit.

    At present usage of present sources we may run low in a century.
    Or we could reduce usage and increase recycling of it. Or target lower quality ores.

    The earth's crust is a tenth of a percent phosphorus so not exactly rare if you dedicate energy to recover it.



    TBH I'd be more worried about trace elements. Like Selenium
    https://www.ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2017/02/selenium-deficiency-promoted-by-climate-change.html
    Selenium (Se) is essential for human health and has to be obtained from dietary sources. As an antioxidant, it scavenges free radicals, thus supporting the immune system. It is also required for the synthesis of numerous proteins. Up to 1 billion people are thought to be affected by low dietary selenium intake, which can cause cardiomyopathy. However, excessive intake of selenium can also be harmful, leading to vomiting, diarrhoea and liver damage.

    Too much selenium might be a problem if you are producing food off world.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    ScumLord wrote: »
    If you pay a wage to someone living in space that money is pretty much worthless in space
    Bitcoin economy?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Fathom wrote: »
    Bitcoin economy?
    Speed of light means Bitcoins can only extend so far before you loose synch.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Speed of light means Bitcoins can only extend so far before you loose synch.
    You captured my imagination Capt'n. Prompted daydream. Humor too. Will play with this in my mind. Thanks! :cool:


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,342 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) plans to redirect asteroids to orbit Moon, and perhaps Mars someday, and to harvest water and minerals needed to host space flights and space stations. Once in space about Moon or Mars, it may be less expensive to harvest asteroids than to resupply missions by launching resources from Earth.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Asteroid belt. Doughnut-shaped ring. Orbiting between Mars & Jupiter. Tens of thousands. Useful for spaceflight & Mars resupply?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    The asteroid belt is a bit out of the way for anything to do with Mars. I suppose the other problem with the asteroid belt is there are no big gravity wells to fling us back towards the inner solar system. We're probably going to need some fairly reliable ships to get out there and back. They will almost need to be some sort of brute force ships that can just power their way around the solar system without any kind of slingshots.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    ScumLord wrote: »
    The asteroid belt is a bit out of the way for anything to do with Mars.
    Found this rendering. asteroid-belt.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Mars would make a good base to work from if we are serious about mining asteroids. We'd probably need to find an asteroid that stays relatively close to mars kind of following its orbit.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,342 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    ScumLord wrote: »
    Mars would make a good base to work from if we are serious about mining asteroids. We'd probably need to find an asteroid that stays relatively close to mars kind of following its orbit.
    Or redirect several asteroids into Mars orbit so that they can be more easily mined from Mars perhaps?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,300 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Long shots? Space robots. Travel to asteroid belt. Pick promising asteroids using mineral wave lengths, etc. diagnostics. Redirect asteroids to Mars. Sling asteroids using Mars gravity to Earth orbit.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement