Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Irish language - Revamp in Education.

  • 13-07-2009 11:27pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭


    Just something I've been study for a while. Looking for people's ideas towards revamping the Irish language in school.

    This thread is not for people to offer negative thoughts on what their perceive to be a dead language. It is purely for the discussion on how we can change the education in order to ensure that the language is obtained.

    Firstly - My opinion on the language. I think that the entire curriculum is failed because it focuses purely on language study rather than language acquisition. You might ask - Well, what is the difference? Study is where you take on the language in a structured format, while acquisition relies heavily on language immersion where you acquire the language by using it and listening to it.

    To combat this - I suggest that a subject should be taught through the Irish language, or an Irish conversational class be introduced to school. Preferably, both for much more productive results.

    I would argue for this being optional for secondary school, at least for leaving cert level - to let those who like the language keep up with it, and those who have developed a stigma for it to lose that stigma, and hopefully pick it up later in life (Like I have). Perhaps the standard Irish class could remain mandatory, but it's up for debate (as always).

    I'm looking for your thoughts on how we can revamp the curriculum, and for new and creative ways for improving the visibility of the language in school.

    Le meas,
    dlofnep


«1

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭me_right_one


    I say just bite the bullet and make all primary schools teach everything through Irish. Wasn't that the whole idea of making primary teachers have fluent Irish in the first place? There's never been a better time. Gaelscoilanna are the most popular they've ever been, most adults under 40 have a decent level of Irish so they could continue to converse with their kids in Irish when they get home, and it wouldn't cost the govt a thing! DO IT COWEN!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    the increase of marks for the oral was a good/great move

    it will increase to 40% in 2010 - add that to 15% aural and the sylabus will be 55% useful for learning the language as a language!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    I think the increase in marks had little to no bearing on the overall visibility or promotion for the language.

    Firstly, for those who have problems with Irish - it may create a stigma for them if they can't get into college, based on the results of their Irish.

    Secondly - unless focus is placed in class on actual conversational Irish, then increasing the marks for it won't really do all too much. Just my opinion. I think radical change is needed from day 1 in the classroom, rather than at the end of it all at the exams.

    I don't even believe that exams in Irish are all that important. I would argue that removal of mandatory examination may put less stress on people and may entice more people to learn the language. Perhaps examination could be optional for those who wanted to attend courses which required Irish. I'm not 100% on this yet though, so don't quote me. Still pondering about it as I read about linguistics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,057 ✭✭✭Krusader


    I say just bite the bullet and make all primary schools teach everything through Irish. Wasn't that the whole idea of making primary teachers have fluent Irish in the first place? There's never been a better time. Gaelscoilanna are the most popular they've ever been, most adults under 40 have a decent level of Irish so they could continue to converse with their kids in Irish when they get home, and it wouldn't cost the govt a thing! DO IT COWEN!!


    I always thought this should be done aswell
    and have more secondary Gaeilscoileanna


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,912 ✭✭✭pog it


    I'd love to see that coming into being- all primary schools made Gaelscoileanna- but I don't reckon you'd have enough teachers able to xo everything in Irish.. As it is, and this is going by a friend of mine who's a primary school teacher and who is really passionate about it, one of the problems is that the teachers themselves are weak at Irish.

    I'm definitely not saying it's a waste of time teaching Irishat primary school obviously- the earlier the exposure the better, but I think we should be concentrating on quality. So I'd like to see really passionate Irish language speakers and teachers going in for a couple of hours a week and giving really good Irish tuition that would have the same effect as 20 hours of their normal teacher.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭me_right_one


    You should start a petition dlopfen


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    I'd rather just get a discussion going on the topic for now :) See what fresh ideas are out there!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    well if students have 55% for being able to hold a decent convo for 10 minutes and answer simple questions on a 10 minute aural comphrension they will do the work

    the teacher will of course concentrate more on these two as they are by far the biggest parts in relation to marks and ease of getting those marks


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    dlofnep wrote: »

    I don't even believe that exams in Irish are all that important. I would argue that removal of mandatory examination may put less stress on people and may entice more people to learn the language. Perhaps examination could be optional for those who wanted to attend courses which required Irish. I'm not 100% on this yet though, so don't quote me. Still pondering about it as I read about linguistics.

    that will not work

    for example, me, i would not have sat the irish exam 2 years ago and now i would be one of the biggest advocates of irish and am doing it in college.

    people just wont sit and therefore not study/learn a subject/language if they dont have to

    fair enough about the underlined part :)

    primary school needs to buck the **** up in regards to irish

    i was in college before i knew about the tuiseal ginideach (actualy knew about it - obviously i used it in phrases but only like a parrot) and 1/4 of the tenses ffs


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    I think it's debatable when you think of how many people can't hold a conversation 6 months after finishing their oral.

    Like I said, I'm not 100% yet on it - I'm still studying and coming to different conclusions everyday. But perhaps if we made exams optional at leaving cert level, it would take the pressure away from learning exam related stuff like poems - and give more time to relax and learn conversational type stuff. An optional exam would be there for someone who wanted to do it. Extra marks may still be considered. Not sure yet.

    It's worth discussing at least.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭me_right_one


    If all the primary schools did everything exclusively in Irish, then after 8 years, the secondary schools could follow suit. The first of the totally Irish speaking generation, who would be coming through to secondary, could just seamlessly transition into secondary and continue their education, and their everyday spech, through Irish. Then there would be no need for an Irish exam at all, or a least not one like the present one. It would be more akin to the current english exam. No extra points or anything like that. Irish wold be this generations' mainstream language.

    Then, when we're all in our eighties, and everybody in the republic is speaking as Gaeilge, they would be saying things like "Poor aul me_right_one, talking english through his senility. Sure thats what he knew", in Irish of course! And they would be discussing english orals on boards!:D

    I'd love to see the day.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    if the exam is optional - 1% or less would do it and people would not optionaly learn to speak irish in place of studying for the exam

    me_right_one - i would honestly give me left one to see that happen but it is not feasible and not even remotely likely to happen, ever.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭me_right_one


    I'd give them both and jump on them aswell. It'll happen if people want it to. Who would've thought only 150 years ago, when the tables were completely the other way round, that we'd all be here using english!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭B0X


    If all the primary schools did everything exclusively in Irish, then after 8 years, the secondary schools could follow suit.

    This assumes that all secondary teachers speak fluent Irish which is far from reality.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    it was more than 150 years ago when we were all speaking irish


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Redbhoy


    i was in college before i knew about the tuiseal ginideach (actualy knew about it - obviously i used it in phrases but only like a parrot) and 1/4 of the tenses ffs


    I agree with a previous poster. Bite the bullet and convert all primary schools to Gaelscoileanna. If this happened we wouldnt have to worry about the Tuiseal Ginideach or Modh Conniollach as it would just come natural.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭Dionysus


    Now we are talking about a thread with huge potential. I'm just after coming back from teaching English this morning. As you all probably know, CLT, Communicative Language Teaching, is used to teach English as a second language in most classrooms today.

    It was only when I did the ACELS CELT qualification that I realised that the way Irish was taught in UCD was via CLT (I did the Dioplóma Sa Ghaeilge Fheidhmeach). The grammar book in UCD for that course was easily the best grammar book I have ever read. It was designed by the staff in UCD's School of Irish. It really utilised all the latest teaching techniques. Everybody I have loaned it to has said the same. It was never published; just printed and binded by UCD for UCD DsaGF students.

    Anyway, my spoken Irish was abysmal when I began the course but by the end of it Seosamh Watson and the late Ciarán Ó Con Cheanainn interviewed me for c. 20 minutes in the Irish. Yes, I made mistakes but I felt so proud to have held my own with the two of them for so long. They were really kind and encouraging to me through it, and that matters.

    I really think the way Irish is taught on UCD's Dioplóma Sa Ghaeilge Fheidhmeach should be replicated in every single post primary and primary school where Irish is taught.

    As for dlofnep's point that 'I think it's debatable when you think of how many people can't hold a conversation 6 months after finishing their oral', I'd have to disagree. I went into UCD yesterday to talk about going back and doing the BA this September and I managed to hold a 15 minute conversation in Irish. It was, once again, liberating. It's a new experience, but 'liberating' is precisely the word. I think it comes back to you fairly quickly once you have been in an environment where Irish was spoken intensively. But I agree that something needs to be in place to keep the conversation going after the Oral. I'm thinking of joining Na Cnocadoirí (http://www.cnocadoiri.com/) now just to go hillwalking (which I love) with a group who speak Irish. I've decided I'm going to do the Irish from September so this is it. It's sink or swim now. I'm off to Ard na Caithne as well in the next month to immerse myself beforehand.

    It's amazing how useful the CLT has been to me in not only teaching English to others but in learning Irish for my own benefit. I was totally oblivious to the way to teach language, and therefore to learn it, until I did it.

    PS: Without digressing from this very good thread, does anybody know what happened Ciarán; he died at 27 years of age earlier this year having won the Corn Uí Riada last year (http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/obituaries/2009/0228/1224241983518.html)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    Dionysus wrote: »
    As for dlofnep's point that 'I think it's debatable when you think of how many people can't hold a conversation 6 months after finishing their oral', I'd have to disagree.

    In the context where people study for the oral, and learn a specific set of answers for questions - I think they do forget quite alot within a 6 month timeframe.

    Essentially, when you rely on extra marks for the oral as a means to improve the Irish curriculum - what you are doing is leaving the work to the end of the year, instead of progressively focusing on conversational Irish throughout the school curriculum.

    What I mean is - There is no point in giving extra marks for the oral, if the curriculum does not reflect it. Unless something radical is changed within the curriculum, you can give extra marks for the oral all you want - but the end result will be the same because the educational methods remain the same.

    That diploma looks very interesting by the way. I might have a peek after I finish college next year..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,912 ✭✭✭pog it


    I agree with that. I did Bord na Gaeilge classes while I was doing my postgrad in UCD and they used material from that. It was very very good for conversation and learning grammar as you go along. Excellent for day to day use. I still have a lot of the notes and got great stuff from them.
    It would be very effective for secondary school.

    [Quote: Dionysis: PS: Without digressing from this very good thread, does anybody know what happened Ciarán; he died at 27 years of age earlier this year having won the Corn Uí Riada last year (http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/obituaries/2009/0228/1224241983518.html)[/quote]

    Ar dheis Dé go raibh a anam. I'm so so sad to hear that he passed. He was such a beautiful and talented singer. God that's awful news.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    Dionysus wrote: »

    PS: Without digressing from this very good thread, does anybody know what happened Ciarán; he died at 27 years of age earlier this year having won the Corn Uí Riada last year (http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/obituaries/2009/0228/1224241983518.html)

    all that was said was he died suddenly. he was an amazing singer, and an amazing lecturer and just an all round nice person and so open and cool.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Hi9CbYNCV8

    ucd irish dept is quite good i must say - they are very helpful
    they give out their own grammar book aswel in first year (ba)

    there is no way we can revert all primary schools to irish - that should have been done when irish was still compulsary for most posistions then it would have been possible but still hard work

    now it is impossible and never going to happen - i would love to see it - hell it might get me the ever elusive job!;)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    I think we are kidding ourselves if we think all primary schools will be operated as Gaelscoilenna. Firstly, I don't think the provisions are there, and one could question if public support was there for total language immersion. Secondly, with my Irish being better than "some" primary school teachers - I think it brings to question on whether primary school teachers would be qualified to offer true immersion classes.

    I think from a realistic standpoint, we should be aiming for at least one class taught through the Irish medium. While most teachers would be capable for this, perhaps a designated Irish teacher might be allocated to each school to assist with the process. After a year or two - those teachers who were initally not comfortable with the classes operated entirely through Irish, would obviously become more fluent and comfortable as time progress, so it would be an initial transition period that we would have to get past.

    Not only will the immersion environment assist the pupils, but also the teachers. Everyone gains from it.

    Also - perhaps an integration program between English medium schools and Gaelscoilenna - where the pupils from the English medium school could spend a day in a Gaelscoil so they can get a feel of what language immersion environments are really like. This would also help the teacher see how teachers in Gaelscoilenna operate each class.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    i think we should aim for 2 gaelscoileanna in each town first - primary and secondary

    then with the 55% of lc and junior cert based on actual using the language within 20 years or so dlofneps above proposal would be possible and would do wonders


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭me_right_one


    it was more than 150 years ago when we were all speaking irish

    Not outside the pail it wasnt. The famine was the death knell of it though.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭me_right_one


    i think we should aim for 2 gaelscoileanna in each town first - primary and secondary

    then with the 55% of lc and junior cert based on actual using the language within 20 years or so dlofneps above proposal would be possible and would do wonders


    Now you're thinking along the right lines! Its all possible!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭Dionysus


    Not outside the pail it wasnt. The famine was the death knell of it though.

    Interestingly, even in so-called 'Pale' counties like Meath there was a very conspicuous cultural and linguistic difference right up to An Gorta Mór. In north Meath, where the land is more mountainous, Irish was still very widely spoken in 1845 but the 'spailpíní' and poor generally of course suffered much more and with it the language.

    Also, when John O'Donovan did his travel around Meath for the Ordnance Survey in 1836 there was sufficient Irish spoken across the entire county for him to record the spoken Irish in each place at the time for his placenames. (http://openlibrary.org/b/OL3997030M/Ordnance-Survey-letters-Meath)

    North Meath is still quite different from southeast Meath, with cockfighting, céilithe, smuggling and subversion stronger near Meath's border with Cavan and Monaghan.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    Not outside the pail it wasnt. The famine was the death knell of it though.

    ok - the famine worsened the situation but it wasnt all irish speaking before that

    ----
    an all irish speaking population is not possible - face facts

    but with baby steps and gradual gains - we could get everyone comfortable (80%) with irish
    everyone one able to hold a conversation in irish with no bother

    but to revert to using it daily for anymore than 10% of the pop is impossible, sorry addidas.

    ----
    last speaker of leinster irish in omeath died in the 1920's i think - so they would have been born in say 1840 maybe later maybe earlier

    ---
    garret fitzgerald did extensive work on the decline of irish


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,912 ✭✭✭pog it


    The survival of Irish is going to be down to the middle classes when (okay if) it dies out in the Gaeltacht in say 3000AD or whatever!

    Does anyone know who is actually in charge of changing the Irish language curriculum? I'm guessing it's long-serving teachers?
    Is there enough discussion and interaction between these people, and say the folks in the Dept. Education to manage overall Irish education policy? Seems to me we'll need these two groups working together with the same agenda.

    Like with their work on the Caighdeán, I'd be afraid they'll be too laissez-faire about it to do anything with serious long term vision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭FruitLover


    As we all should already have learned, making Irish compulsory for schoolchildren will not lead to mass fluency. I went to all-Irish primary and secondary schools, and I don't know a single person who still speaks Irish fluently. I do, however, know plenty of people who resent having Junior and Leaving Cert Irish exams forced upon them.
    most adults under 40 have a decent level of Irish

    Absolute nonsense. I'd be amazed if even half of Irish people under 40 could hold a conversation in Irish.
    Irish wold be this generations' mainstream language.

    I can only hope that you're typing out a pipe dream here, rather than a genuine expectation of the future of Irish. Because this would be laughable.
    It'll happen if people want it to.

    This is the fundamental problem - not enough people want it to happen. Don't get me wrong, I certainly agree that Irish language education needs to be revised for those who are interested in it, but Irish will never again be a widely-spoken language in this country, it'll always be a niche interest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    Try to keep things more positive Fruitlover. You can get across your points in a more polite manner. :) I do take onboard your points in regards to compulsory Irish not leading to mass fluency, as I myself have made this point in a previous thread. But it only holds true with the current curriculum - and would not be the case with a revised curriculum.

    Still - we can debate the issue of optional areas for the leaving cert - such as exams, or subjects being taught through Irish. I'm all for removing the stigma (which isn't entirely widespread) held by some for the Irish language. I think if we all work together, we can come to a compromise that makes everybody happy.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    exactly about 10% would be a ballpark figure. certainly not much more and quite possibly a good bit less for daily use

    what is possible is havin maybe 80% of the country comfortable with irish - eneough to be actualy bilingual should they use it more than weekly, monthly, yearly or even a few times is another thing all together


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    dlofnep wrote: »
    I'm all for removing the stigma (which isn't entirely widespread) held by some for the Irish language.

    i have not met one person who was anti irish language and not anti irish in general

    that is to say - and there are polls to back this up - about 90% of ireland would support irish
    they wouldnt use it daily or even yearly, but they have a genuine grá for it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭me_right_one


    Whoa, relax there fruitlover! We're only talking!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Redbhoy


    ----
    an all irish speaking population is not possible - face facts


    Nothing is impossible. Check out Eliezer Ben-Yehuda's efforts with the Hebrew language

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_language


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭An gal gréine


    Yes, the polls have always been positive but we dont have the WILL that the Jews had in the 1940's to bring it back. I think there's still a certain shame attached to it, which goes back to the immediate post-famine when the language was associated with poverty and backwardness. The Gaelsciolleanna boom has been very encouraging but it cant stand alone in society.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Redbhoy


    Maybe if we revise our history of the 1840s and interpret it as what really happened,

    http://skinflicks.blogspot.com/2009/01/lets-all-stop-denying-holocaust.html

    we'll have enough anger to want to be a proud nation of Irish rather than people with an inferiority complex.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭An gal gréine


    Great piece of writing, Redbhoy. Yes, it boils down to how deeply do we want it. Our citizens tell the polls of their grá for the language but if there was any passion there, the whole situation would be transformed, fairly quickly too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Redbhoy


    Just in case you're crediting me with that blog, I only posted the link. Cant take credit for someone elses work. :(

    Anyone I know or speak to say that they want to be able to speak Irish and they would love to see everyone speaking it but when I tell the about the various ways in which they could learn it they cry off bein gtoo busy in work or with other things.
    Maybe this reccession might get people turning their backs on the God of Money and ploughing some of their time into their language, heritage and culture?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    hebrew and irish are not comparable - on any level

    and i hope we dont have to do what they ''had'' to do to get their language and ''country'' back - in short ****ing israeli's

    mass graves, mass killings, mass emigration - plus it was not the first time they were persecuted

    as oppossed to the famine - which was terrible and a large part to blame on the food being exported and the british in general

    but you cant compare the two


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭An gal gréine


    Nobody was comparing the 2 languages and politics did'nt have to be brought into it. They had the will and the passion to revive their language. We are lacking in this department.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    ''look at what .... did with hebrew''
    and
    a link comparing the famine to the holocuast

    ye - my bad no one was comparing the two and no one brought politics into it

    my point is it was a lot more than they had the will to do it and we dont - a lot more


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭An gal gréine


    hebrew and irish are not comparable - on any level


    My point is that your comparing of the 2 languages is irrelevant, and de-politicising it can only be a help.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    i wasnt the one to compare the two - i was stating they can not be compared

    also - irish is not politicised


  • Registered Users Posts: 67 ✭✭Cjoe


    Hey lads have a look at blas on the bbc northern ireland website. Great refresher course with almost 30 ten minute shows you can download.
    Giota beag and giota beag eile are the downloadable shows
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/northernireland/irish/blas/index.shtml

    I really love irish, and can hold a conversation now after doing a few refresher courses. I find myself throwing in a few words and sentences among friends and after the initial "what are you at" look i have the girlfiend and friends doing the same because I know they want to. You just have to get over the initial hurdle of embaressment. The big thing i believe is parents. Once a child is brought up with Irish ealy that is a fantastic start. Then a decent education system would help!
    Maybe 4 compulsory weeks during a school year in a ghealtacht would help (which everyone ends up enjoying).At the start of the year, two weeks in the middle and final week there aswell. That would be a good start without upsetting too many things/people and then take it from there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭conchubhar1


    money ^

    otherwise great idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Redbhoy


    I agree with conchubar1 there. Money would be an obstacle as regards sending kids to the Gaeltacht for 4 weeks a year.
    I try and stick a cupla focail into sentences when speaking to friends and a few of them would add in a few when replying. If more people could get over the initial awkward/embarassed feeling we could soon spread those cupla focail into more elaborate phrases... and then onto fluency ;) .


  • Registered Users Posts: 67 ✭✭Cjoe


    money ^

    otherwise great idea.

    Money would no doubt be a problem. But it will appeal to both sides. THose who really want immersion learning will be happy about such a positive step towards a more Irish orientated schooling and people who are un decided or really dont care surely wont mind the few weeks out of a school year to let their kid study in a ghaeltacht.
    It is such shame the goverment hasnt a penny in its pockets to put money towards something like this.
    Maybe all the un employed teachers out there who have half decent Irish should get on their thinking caps about going acorss the country and doing an after school irish class. There is a market there for it i feel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,953 ✭✭✭deirdremf


    Rather than trying to turn all schools into Gaelscoileanna overnight, what I think we need is for education through Irish on demand - in other words, the same as is now available in English.
    If you want a gaelscoil for your child, well just go to the nearest inspector's office (or write to them) and state that is what you want. This should be a right, but it is not at the moment.
    Until we get that service, we need to collect money to set up our own gaelscoil in each district.
    My suggestion here is that we could collect money through the schools that are already in existence, say ask each family to make a small donation each week (maybe one euro), with 30,000 kids attending gaelscoileanna at present, and say 3 kids per family, that would work out at €10,000 per week, multiply by 30 school weeks a year (or is that 39?) and you could collect up to €300,000 per annum if everyone chipped in.
    Even at €100,000 per annum, you could part-fund a few schools - and as soon as a school is up and running, the local politicians will press for recognition of the school, as they will not want to antagonise the parents who are potential voters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Turning all primary schools into Gaelscoileanna is simply not possible over a short time frame. The pool of teachers capable of teaching entirely through Irish is simply too small,

    The best way forward is for new gaelscoileanna to be recognized on the basis of demand for them, In areas where there is enough demand for a gaelscoil to justify setting one up then they should be supported by the state, Demand for gaelscoileanna is well ahead of supply and there is no sign of this demand slacking, Should this policy be adopted I think that the Gaelscoil movement would grow steadily. Following on from this, the parents of children from Primary level can then go on to set up secondary level schools.


    As far as the rest of the education system is concerned, I think that the teaching of Irish needs to be throughly reformed, The system in place now is clearly failing to teach people Irish.

    Personally I think the priority of the Education system with regards to Irish should be to teach people how to speak Irish, In my opinion the Curriculum is simply not capable of doing this and needs to be reformed, Far too much emphasis is placed on rote learning poetry and stories, most students do not have a conversation in Irish till their oral examination, A ridiculous situation. Students spend most of their time reading through Stories and learning how to answer questions on comprehensions.

    In my opinion, the best way forward is In primary level to focus more on spoken Irish, and for a second subject(PE or art etc) to be thought through Irish so that Irish is the vehicle of learning. The standard of Irish among Primary school teachers needs to be addressed, Personally I thing CnaG's proposal that students training to be primary school teachers spend the Equivalent of One year learning through Immersion in Irish is the most practical solution to this because while The Standard Of Irish will be improved
    It would not come at the cost of other subjects as they could still be learned in this time but through Irish instead of English.

    In Second level I think that Irish should be split into Two Subjects, A Conversation based subject that focuses mainly on spoken Irish that would be compulsory to LC, And a literature subject,focused on Poetry, Essays and Reading Comprehension that would be optional.



    I dont have a problem with deirdremf's proposal that the gaelscoil movement could support the creation of new gaelscoils from within its self, The need for which has been shown by the situation in Rath Tó, though I am unsure as to how this could be organised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭An gal gréine


    Turning all primary schools into Gaelscoileanna is simply not possible over a short time frame. The pool of teachers capable of teaching entirely through Irish is simply too small,

    The best way forward is for new gaelscoileanna to be recognized on the basis of demand for them, In areas where there is enough demand for a gaelscoil to justify setting one up then they should be supported by the state, Demand for gaelscoileanna is well ahead of supply and there is no sign of this demand slacking, Should this policy be adopted I think that the Gaelscoil movement would grow steadily. Following on from this, the parents of children from Primary level can then go on to set up secondary level schools.


    As far as the rest of the education system is concerned, I think that the teaching of Irish needs to be throughly reformed, The system in place now is clearly failing to teach people Irish.

    Personally I think the priority of the Education system with regards to Irish should be to teach people how to speak Irish, In my opinion the Curriculum is simply not capable of doing this and needs to be reformed, Far too much emphasis is placed on rote learning poetry and stories, most students do not have a conversation in Irish till their oral examination, A ridiculous situation. Students spend most of their time reading through Stories and learning how to answer questions on comprehensions.

    In my opinion, the best way forward is In primary level to focus more on spoken Irish, and for a second subject(PE or art etc) to be thought through Irish so that Irish is the vehicle of learning. The standard of Irish among Primary school teachers needs to be addressed, Personally I thing CnaG's proposal that students training to be primary school teachers spend the Equivalent of One year learning through Immersion in Irish is the most practical solution to this because while The Standard Of Irish will be improved
    It would not come at the cost of other subjects as they could still be learned in this time but through Irish instead of English.

    In Second level I think that Irish should be split into Two Subjects, A Conversation based subject that focuses mainly on spoken Irish that would be compulsory to LC, And a literature subject,focused on Poetry, Essays and Reading Comprehension that would be optional.



    I dont have a problem with deirdremf's proposal that the gaelscoil movement could support the creation of new gaelscoils from within its self, The need for which has been shown by the situation in Rath Tó, though I am unsure as to how this could be organised.

    + 1


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 2,503 Mod ✭✭✭✭dambarude


    In my opinion, the best way forward is In primary level to focus more on spoken Irish, and for a second subject(PE or art etc) to be thought through Irish so that Irish is the vehicle of learning.
    Must agree with this. PE can be taught very easily through Irish, as can Music and Art. The focus of An Curaclam Gaeilge in the primary school is already meant to be on spoken Irish. As far as I can see in my (fairly limited at this stage) experience in primary schools, this is not always the case in the classroom. A lot of time is spent on reading comprehensions and writing. These contribute to language competence, but are not as important as actually using the spoken language.
    Personally I thing CnaG's proposal that students training to be primary school teachers spend the Equivalent of One year learning through Immersion in Irish is the most practical solution to this because while The Standard Of Irish will be improved
    It would not come at the cost of other subjects as they could still be learned in this time but through Irish instead of English..
    There are obstacles to this happening. Unfortunately many lecturers in the colleges of education wouldn't have the language abilities themselves to deliver third level content through the medium of Irish (in Mary I at least, and I'm sure others are similar). I've posted here about other issues relating to teaching practice inspection and the teaching of Irish in particular.

    The impact that learning through a second language would have on unrelated subject areas could be significant. It could be argued that for a student teacher, as a student, that their potential to do well in their degree overall shouldn't be overly influenced by their ability or lack thereof in one particular subject. That said, at the moment it appears to be much too easy to get through a B.Ed/Postgrad with very poor Irish. In my experience it is anyway.
    In Second level I think that Irish should be split into Two Subjects, A Conversation based subject that focuses mainly on spoken Irish that would be compulsory to LC, And a literature subject,focused on Poetry, Essays and Reading Comprehension that would be optional.
    .
    The most logical option, I don't know why the DES/NCCA aren't running with this.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement