Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Energy infrastructure

Options
11415171920173

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,553 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    And the technology went to sleep for 50 years. Hmmmmm.


    If you want to make nuclear weapons (which they did at the time) , thorium MSR are not good.

    The Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor: Why Didn't This Happen (and why is now the right time?) :




    China chases thorium




    India chases thorium MSR



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    celtic_oz wrote: »
    so trivial to build a small new plant burning up the old waste at the old plant site, where all the power grid is connected.

    The word trivial is rarely associated with anything nuclear


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,553 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    The word trivial is rarely associated with anything nuclear

    agreed,

    Though in terms of placating the torch wielding villagers the advantages of MSR are

    1. walk away passively safe, cannot melt down
    2. can potentially use old waste
    3. compared to LWR, waste is insignificant, a lot is commercially viable for medical instrumentation
    4. abundant supply throughout the world
    5. much cheaper to build ( 99% of the safety precautions are not necessary )
    6. Process heat can be used as backup of renewables

    watch from about 8 minutes in : https://youtu.be/0X16g14Aark?t=478

    More info on Thorcon : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qtJE7VmyoU

    More info on FLibe : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SvFxe-izhA

    More info on Moltex : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=En_fwXNGu_I


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    celtic_oz wrote: »
    agreed,

    Though in terms of placating the torch wielding villagers the advantages of MSR are

    1. walk away passively safe, cannot melt down
    2. can potentially use old waste
    3. compared to LWR, waste is insignificant, a lot is commercially viable for medical instrumentation
    4. abundant supply throughout the world
    5. much cheaper to build ( 99% of the safety precautions are not necessary )
    6. Process heat can be used as backup of renewables

    watch from about 8 minutes in : https://youtu.be/0X16g14Aark?t=478

    More info on Thorcon : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qtJE7VmyoU

    More info on FLibe : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SvFxe-izhA

    More info on Moltex : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=En_fwXNGu_I

    Still never going to be built in Ireland and therefore will not be part of the energy infrastructure of Ireland so I'm not sure I see the point of discussing it in this thread.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,811 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Improving on existing nuclear isn't easy or cheap. The Japanese spend 20 billion dollars trying to develop a breeding cycle and failed. Thorium is essentially the same

    Insane amounts of money have been thrown at nuclear by the military too, getting better bombs and submarine reactors was pretty high on the agenda all through the cold war.

    Materials science has improved but fission physics is still the same.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,404 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    roadmaster wrote: »

    That was always a risk when we rely on wind. We live a climate that can have high pressure areas sitting over Ireland that can last for a week or more. In the summer this creates glorious heat wave weather but in winter, it creates very cold weather with no wind.

    That is a very real risk when we rely on wind as our only source of renewable power. We need storage, or biomass, or hydro as a least a backup. Plus a connector to Europe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,615 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    That was always a risk when we rely on wind. We live a climate that can have high pressure areas sitting over Ireland that can last for a week or more. In the summer this creates glorious heat wave weather but in winter, it creates very cold weather with no wind.

    That is a very real risk when we rely on wind as our only source of renewable power. We need storage, or biomass, or hydro as a least a backup. Plus a connector to Europe.

    Untill any if that happens we need to keep Moneypoint


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,404 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    roadmaster wrote: »
    Untill any if that happens we need to keep Moneypoint

    Well, in the IT report, it says that two of the three turbines are currently spinning.

    We should keep the turf plants serviceable as well. They can burn biomass as well as turf.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,774 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    Well, in the IT report, it says that two of the three turbines are currently spinning.

    We should keep the turf plants serviceable as well. They can burn biomass as well as turf.

    It is unintuitive but burning coal in Moneypoint does not lead to any extra carbon emissions overall. This is because of how the emissions trading system works.

    The same applies for turf but turf plants have their own issues for conservation and economic viability as biomass plants (I believe, I don’t know a lot about it.)


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    We should keep the turf plants serviceable as well. They can burn biomass as well as turf.

    Already refused permission so won't be happening


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    roadmaster wrote: »

    Very misleading headline

    What actually occurred
    The Single Electricity Market Operator (SEMO) issued an amber alert to power suppliers, meaning there was expected to be enough energy to meet demand, but possibly not enough in reserve should something go wrong.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,811 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    That is a very real risk when we rely on wind as our only source of renewable power. We need storage, or biomass, or hydro as a least a backup. Plus a connector to Europe.
    Gas turines are already in place.

    Hydro not a chance here. All the low hanging fruit was taken yonks ago.
    Besides our power usage goes up by an Ardnacrusha on average every year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,615 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Gas turines are already in place.

    Hydro not a chance here. All the low hanging fruit was taken yonks ago.
    Besides our power usage goes up by an Ardnacrusha on average every year.

    Was there a few years back some lad that wanted to build Hydro projects in connamara ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,786 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    big power outage in North Wicklow / South Dublin last night - lasted for about 2 hours. All the mobile networks also went down. A taste of things to come?

    (this led me to looking at the Eirgrid dashboard this morning, and surprisingly despite low levels of wind, we're currently exporting power over the interconnectors.)


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,774 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    loyatemu wrote: »
    big power outage in North Wicklow / South Dublin last night - lasted for about 2 hours. All the mobile networks also went down. A taste of things to come?

    This had nothing to do with the Yellow Alert.
    (this led me to looking at the Eirgrid dashboard this morning, and surprisingly despite low levels of wind, we're currently exporting power over the interconnectors.)

    Did you look at electricity prices on both sides of the Sea? This is theoretically what you would expect to determine the direction of the interconnector.

    Before Brexit the interconnectors were automatically aligned based on day-ahead prices. This automatic coupling is now gone as I understand it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,616 ✭✭✭Nermal


    We need storage, or biomass, or hydro as a least a backup.

    The largest pumped storage system on earth would satisfy demand here for about 8 hours.

    That's current demand. When we've replaced every ICE with an EV, every gas hob with an induction ring, every boiler with a heat pump... :rolleyes:

    Storage will never be a solution to the intermittency problem of renewables.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,655 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Nermal wrote: »
    The largest pumped storage system on earth would satisfy demand here for about 8 hours.

    That's current demand. When we've replaced every ICE with an EV, every gas hob with an induction ring, every boiler with a heat pump... :rolleyes:

    Storage will never be a solution to the intermittency problem of renewables.

    What's the storage capacity of all the EVs ?

    For calculation's sake, lets say the average EV's battery of the future is 70kWh (better get my units right), so all (2.13m) cars would have a maximum storage capacity of almost 150 GWh (did I calculate that correctly?).
    You won't ever have all that available; not everyone will have a fully charged EV all the time and they won't all be willing to sell it all back to the grid.

    In Nov, our daily usage was 90GWh I think.

    So in reality, the EVs feeding back to the grid would only keep the lights on for less than a day?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,127 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Nermal wrote: »
    The largest pumped storage system on earth would satisfy demand here for about 8 hours.

    That's current demand. When we've replaced every ICE with an EV, every gas hob with an induction ring, every boiler with a heat pump... :rolleyes:

    Storage will never be a solution to the intermittency problem of renewables.

    Don't agree with this at all.
    If you build enough solid hydrogen storage and generate enough wind power, we would be able to store large amounts of electricity in the form of solid state hydrogen vis electrolysis.

    However to do that we need to be generating much more clean renewable electricity than the whole grid consumes atm!


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,127 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    josip wrote: »
    What's the storage capacity of all the EVs ?

    For calculation's sake, lets say the average EV's battery of the future is 70kWh (better get my units right), so all (2.13m) cars would have a maximum storage capacity of almost 150 GWh (did I calculate that correctly?).
    You won't ever have all that available; not everyone will have a fully charged EV all the time and they won't all be willing to sell it all back to the grid.

    In Nov, our daily usage was 90GWh I think.

    So in reality, the EVs feeding back to the grid would only keep the lights on for less than a day?

    not sure this is the answer as the LV network is limited by the size of the current carrying capacity of the physical wires.
    if everyone converted to EV's, electric hobs electric heating, the LV network would melt!
    we need to be capturing the excess electricity at transmission level where the capacity is and where you minimise losses.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,127 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    That was always a risk when we rely on wind. We live a climate that can have high pressure areas sitting over Ireland that can last for a week or more. In the summer this creates glorious heat wave weather but in winter, it creates very cold weather with no wind.

    That is a very real risk when we rely on wind as our only source of renewable power. We need storage, or biomass, or hydro as a least a backup. Plus a connector to Europe.

    Even with high pressure, there is a certain amount of wind out at sea that could be captured by anchored wind farms.
    What they would generate I'm not sure but it would be interesting to know.

    We defo need interconnectors, but also storage (i know i keep harping on about this solid state hydrogen but it seems to be an answer) and enough storage to get us over the low wind energy periods.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,217 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    Still never going to be built in Ireland and therefore will not be part of the energy infrastructure of Ireland so I'm not sure I see the point of discussing it in this thread.

    Broadens the mind and shows how backward thinking we are as a nation, now governed , at least 1/3 in the current troika, by greenies

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Broadens the mind and shows how backward thinking we are as a nation, now governed , at least 1/3 in the current troika, by greenies

    Paint it whatever suits you, but it does not change the fact that nuclear will never figure into Irelands energy mix (France's supply through the interconnector notwithstanding)


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,127 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Broadens the mind and shows how backward thinking we are as a nation, now governed , at least 1/3 in the current troika, by greenies

    Why would we build nuclear when we have a massive bank of wind energy to harness?
    Solve the storage issue and we are as energy rich as the oil rich Middle East only with renewables as opposed to oil and gas.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 7,813 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Why would we build nuclear when we have a massive bank of wind energy to harness?
    Solve the storage issue and we are as energy rich as the oil rich Middle East only with renewables as opposed to oil and gas.

    I'm always surprised we don't invest more in a Galway based sea energy centre of excellence. I suspect we'll crack large scale wave power before we get to true interseason energy storage.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    liamog wrote: »
    I'm always surprised we don't invest more in a Galway based sea energy centre of excellence. I suspect we'll crack large scale wave power before we get to true interseason energy storage.

    I would love to see ocean power generation cracked and have followed its progress for years. It really does seem like a no brainer but its incredibly difficult to do.

    Its really down to what type of generation you use. There are a load of small scale trials ongoing all over the world, but many, like in Carlingford's SeaGen turbine, focus on tidal which is a VERY niche generation method. But there are others, some wacky and some looking very promising. See below

    538812.jpg

    I think with this, as with anything renewable, spreading the method of generation across multiple types & sites will be the way to go.

    538813.gif


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,553 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    Taken from https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/01/08/irish-esb-to-add-100-mwh-of-fluence-storage-to-its-portfolio/
    Irish state-owned utility Electricity Supply Board (ESB) has kicked off the year by signing a deal over two storage projects with a combined capacity of nearly 100 MWh. With the agreement, the utility enters the club of Irish utility-scale battery owners for the first time. The company said it would further expand its storage project portfolio in the future.

    Taken from : https://www.pv-magazine.com/2020/01/31/innogy-announces-60-mw-storage-project-in-ireland/
    The company said that it has made a final decision to invest €25 million in the construction of a 60 MW lithium-ion plant near Lisdrumdoagh, in Ireland's County Monaghan.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,774 ✭✭✭Apogee


    Apogee wrote: »
    Originally Posted by Irish Examiner
    Work has begun planning an offshore wind project near the Kinsale Gas Fields that could produce up to 1GW of energy through 67 floating wind turbines. Simply Blue Energy (Kinsale) has lodged a foreshore licence application to carry out survey works off the Cork coast as part of its Emerald Project which it says has the potential to replace 16.5% of current fossil fuel-derived electricity in Ireland. The investigative foreshore licence application lodged with the Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government seeks consent to conduct surveys to investigate options for bringing cables ashore, for a wind farm that would be located between 35km to 60km from the Cork coast in depths of water of around 85 to 90m.


    Shell have bought a 51% stake in this:
    https://www.echolive.ie/corknews/arid-40215236.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,576 ✭✭✭Yellow_Fern


    tom1ie wrote: »
    Why would we build nuclear when we have a massive bank of wind energy to harness?
    Solve the storage issue and we are as energy rich as the oil rich Middle East only with renewables as opposed to oil and gas.

    This is untrue.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,854 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/feb/04/denmark-strikes-deal-on-25bn-artificial-wind-energy-island

    Very interesting seeing what the Danes are up to.

    20 years since I first flew into Copenhagen and I was amazed at all the wind turbines I could see.


Advertisement