Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

RTE Cutbacks The Plan

1235719

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    odyssey06 wrote: »
    Why is it getting any subsidy?
    What exactly irks you about people questioning why it exists?

    I couldn't give a flying fúck if they burn it down.

    I'm asking you why you think it should be closed down?

    Figures are good, revenue is good, it's making a slight loss, but that could be easily turned around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Boggles wrote: »
    I couldn't give a flying fúck if they burn it down.

    I'm asking you why you think it should be closed down?

    Figures are good, revenue is good, it's making a slight loss, but that could be easily turned around.

    It's been making a huge loss for years. The only reason the loss isn't larger in the accounts is that they've increased the proportion of license fee money it gets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,404 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    In my mind public broadcasting should be able to broadcast items in the public interest, or things that would not be commercially viable on their own. That's why the likes of Lyric should remain.

    Looking at 2FM and RTE2 though, they don't (apart from sport) currently have any obvious public interest, and same goes for being commercially viable. 2FM has local competitors as well as Today FM. Spin it out as a private entity maybe and see if it will remain (it won't).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    It's been making a huge loss for years. The only reason the loss isn't larger in the accounts is that they've increased the proportion of license fee money it gets.

    Is it a market where it is easy make a profit?

    What are the financials at Today Fm like?

    If today fm are making year on profits with the same listenship, then yes it could be time to cut it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    RTÉ should put their content on YouTube and strike a deal with them for advertising revenue. YouTube can GeoBlock it.

    I gave up on watching Eastenders because of the RTE Player. If there is a big Sporting event on and I was away from the home, I'd watch on an illegal stream. I wouldn't even chance RTE Player.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,512 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    zeebre12 wrote: »
    How often do the orchestras actually work? What do they do? Are many full time?

    Do they ever travel outside of the Pale?

    What use are they to taxpayers?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭nkl12xtw5goz70


    dulpit wrote: »
    In my mind public broadcasting should be able to broadcast items in the public interest, or things that would not be commercially viable on their own. That's why the likes of Lyric should remain.

    It's very evident that RTE is aggressively targeting classical music under this restructuring. But, as you say, that's one area that arguably should be maintained under the public service model.

    How much it cost to run a good classical station? Not much. You just need a few people who love classical music and are knowledgeable and passionate about it. The less talk and interruptions the better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,017 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    thats the best laugh I have had in years....
    RTE's regular sports coverage now consists of Women's football and Ireland's Strongest Man.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,869 ✭✭✭CrabRevolution


    RTÉs attitude reminds me of that of some farmers: "I've done it this way a long time and intend on continuing to do it this way, no matter how little demand there is for what I produce and how little money it makes. It's up to the rest of society to adapt and continue funding me "


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,931 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    What is PBH on about here...did he get the heave?

    https://twitter.com/boucherhayes/status/1192358380796596224


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Anyway, It's sad to see the end of Aertel.

    We had some good times.

    :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Boggles wrote: »
    I couldn't give a flying fúck if they burn it down.
    I'm asking you why you think it should be closed down?
    Figures are good, revenue is good, it's making a slight loss, but that could be easily turned around.

    If it's so easily turned around why hasn't it been turned around already by the highly paid and trained media professionals in RTE?
    It's been losing money for years.

    It doesn't meet RTE's public service remit. It is losing money so doesn't serve a commercial purpose.
    Shut it down.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭KildareP


    Boggles wrote: »
    It makes more from commercial revenue then subsidy AFAIK.

    It caters for a certain demographic and has a weekly listenership of around 880k on par with Todayfm.

    I haven't listened to 2fm in 20 years, but what exactly irks you that it needs to be nuked?

    For 2018:
    €5.2m of its €12.3m operating cost is met through commercial revenue.
    €6.7m was funded by the license fee.
    It posted a €300k operating loss (which ultimately ends up being met from the license fee).

    https://www.rte.ie/annualreport/pdfs/RTE_annual_report_2018.pdf - Page 109

    It has never been self-sufficient for the last decade, and has been primarily funded from the license fee for the last several years.

    It offers nothing that you can say isn't provided for elsewhere by the regionals (Spin 1038, Spin SouthWest, iRadio, Beat) - it has some of the shortest news bulletins on the air and a large majority of its off-peak schedule is automated.

    They held off releasing their most recent JNLR results for the last year at all citing schedule changes mean they're not relevant - doesn't inspire much confidence that they were in any way promising!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,512 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Boggles wrote: »
    Anyway, It's sad to see the end of Aertel.

    We had some good times.

    :(

    Cue flashback montage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    What is PBH on about here...did he get the heave?
    https://twitter.com/boucherhayes/status/1192358380796596224

    I remember one time I had to have similar rule about checking RTE news as they were leaking the beans about possible redundancies in my employer...

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,495 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Ray D'Arsehole is awful should not be on the telly or radio

    The salaries for all should be cut by 50%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    odyssey06 wrote: »
    If it's so easily turned around why hasn't it been turned around already by the highly paid and trained media professionals in RTE?

    I have no idea, like I said the figures are good.

    880k listen to it so it does fulfill something for the public.

    Cost and value for me are 2 separate things.

    Who knows maybe it is up next for the chop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Boggles wrote: »
    Anyway, It's sad to see the end of Aertel.
    We had some good times.:(

    Checking the latest scores in the football on a Saturday afternoon in a pre-internet era :):(

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,692 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Ryan Tubridy – €495,000
    Ray D'Arcy – €450,000
    Joe Duffy – €389,988
    Sean O’Rourke – €308,964
    Marian Finucane – €300,617
    Miriam O'Callaghan – €299,000
    Claire Byrne – €216,000
    Brian Dobson – €198,146
    George Hamilton – €186,195
    Mary Wilson – €185,679

    These are the top 10 earners in RTE


    I'd be happy to see a salary cap of say €100,000, and let anybody who wants to leave do so.


    I'd guess 95% would remain on reduced terms because nobody else would offer them more than that.


    If RTE said to Ray Darcy tomorrow that he can take or leave €100,000 a year, what other options does he actually have? Ireland is a small media pool and I doubt there is any interest in him from other countries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    odyssey06 wrote: »
    Checking the latest scores in the football on a Saturday afternoon in a pre-internet era :):(

    It was actually faster than the internet for the first few years.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,756 ✭✭✭Brock Turnpike


    What is PBH on about here...did he get the heave?

    https://twitter.com/boucherhayes/status/1192358380796596224

    Probably couldn't sleep


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Boggles wrote: »
    I have no idea, like I said the figures are good.
    880k listen to it so it does fulfill something for the public.
    Cost and value for me are 2 separate things.
    Who knows maybe it is up next for the chop.

    I think the point is the 2Fm have many similar offerings in the commercial space that those 880,000 can switch to.
    Spending 6-7 million of the licence fee as a subsidy on something like that does not make sense to me.
    If it was breaking even, there might be a case for it.

    I will miss RTE Gold, but I understand why it is being cut if it's making a loss.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    We regularly comment on the Liveline thread the choice of ads they play during the ad break, and half the time its for RTE services or for the TV license itself - and so bringing in little or no ad revenue.

    If they are making similarly bad choices of ad breaks on 2FM, then it's not fulfilling its commercial remit either.

    Something similar happened on RTE TV during the rugby world cup final. The first two ads on one of the breaks was related to RTE content.

    They are using prime time slots to advertise their own content.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,756 ✭✭✭Brock Turnpike


    Ryan Tubridy – €495,000
    Ray D'Arcy – €450,000
    Joe Duffy – €389,988
    Sean O’Rourke – €308,964
    Marian Finucane – €300,617
    Miriam O'Callaghan – €299,000
    Claire Byrne – €216,000
    Brian Dobson – €198,146
    George Hamilton – €186,195
    Mary Wilson – €185,679

    It really is impossible to justify the salaries these people are getting.

    Getting rid of Duffy and D'Arcy alone would save several jobs of ordinary workers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    odyssey06 wrote: »
    I think the point is the 2Fm have many similar offerings in the commercial space that those 880,000 can switch to.
    Spending 6-7 million of the licence fee as a subsidy on something like that does not make sense to me.
    If it was breaking even, there might be a case for it.

    I completely understand what you are saying.

    But those 880k might not want it closed down and would never engage with other shows on RTE that is turning a profit.

    I know the demographic is younger but there would still be a whole heap of people that use that station that pay the fee in good faith. Why should they suffer?

    If the station wasn't getting the figures I'd completely agree with you, but 880k is not to be sniffed at.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 667 ✭✭✭Balf


    What is PBH on about here...did he get the heave?

    https://twitter.com/boucherhayes/status/1192358380796596224
    No idea.

    Don't check your sources, either.
    http://www.tribune.ie/article/2009/apr/05/the-curious-case-of-pamela-izevbekhai/

    "RTÉ broadcast an interview with a man claiming to be Dr Joseph Unokanjo in 2005 and again replayed it last week. This newspaper has established that the man purporting to be Dr Unokanjo reads verbatim from this fake document (pictured right) that Izevbekhai now admits is a forgery.

    Philip Boucher-Hayes is the RTÉ broadcaster who conducted the radio interview. Boucher-Hayes has sworn an affidavit supporting Izevbekhai's claims for her legal case. He said through a spokeswoman last week: "In 2005, I rang international directory enquiries and got a number for the hospital in which Dr Unokanjo works.

    I rang the hospital and was put through to the person whose interview was aired."

    A phone number for Isioma hospital in Lagos was not available from international directory enquiries when contacted on several occasions this week. The address on the fake document gives a fake address and phone number for the hospital.
    The hospital's actual address is 11 James Robertson Street, Surulere, Lagos.

    In his sworn affidavit, Boucher Hayes said that when he telephoned Dr Unokanjo back some time later, Boucher Hayes he alleged to have been visited by a Nigerian army captain who threatened him for speaking publicly in support of Pamela Izevbekhai. Boucher Hayes was unavailable for comment."[/

    It's one thing to be fooled, or more accurately in this case blinded, because of "advocacy (rather than investigative) journalism" but it's another case entirely to assert that you did things like "independently contacting" the hospital by "international telephone directories" when you currently cannot contact that hospital in Lagos by this means, as per above attempt by the "Sunday Tribune". His supposed method of contacting Isioma hospital in Lagos cannot be replicated.

    Boucher Hayes interviewed a phony and claims to have been given a telephone number by international telephone directories which amazingly took him to the phone number of this phony doctor for his interview "verifying" Pamela Izevbekhai's story thus enabling him to disclaim responsibility for being thus fooled. How convenient.
    So any check on the title/name & address attached to the telephone # (presuming he didn't ring a mobile)that he actually rang in Lagos to conduct the interview with the phony "doctor"; which can, I'm sure, be traced in the records; (which is obviously different and not the correct location as visited by the Garda officer) is neatly made into a nullity. How convenient.

    Boucher Hayes goes on to assert that he had recontacted the "doctor" he first interviewed, ie,the phony, and been told by the "doctor" that he had been intimidated by a "Nigerian Army Captain".

    You have to hand it to this guy he clearly has Oscar potential in dispensing with inconvenient truths.

    Making "Sworn affidavits" is a very serious step to take.
    What it indicates to me is firstly an oversized ego of someone unable to process the information in his head that he has been fooled but much more serious an issue is the dogmatic adherence to an immigration agenda prevalent amongst his trendy right-on PC kind. The ideologues pursuing the multiculturalist agenda are willing to throw overboard any kind of journalistic ethics worth their name.

    The ego side of him feeds off an overdose of a superior feel-good smugness over and against the "bigoted" and "prejudiced" attitudes of the hoi-polloi and the ideological face is of PCDom which must be seen as correct at all times. By these means they intend to leverage into position an oppressive all-knowing all-embracing, no hiding place State, dispensing with opposition and if truth is a casualty that's No Problem.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    If they unplugged all that yak-yak-yak, and endless celeb-gossip-chitter-chat (nevermind the special 'ear sickness' that is the god awful 'drill rap hour') of 2FM,
    and plugged RTEGold in it's place, the world would be a much, much better place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭nkl12xtw5goz70


    odyssey06 wrote: »
    I think the point is the 2Fm have many similar offerings in the commercial space that those 880,000 can switch to.

    Agreed. It's also unfair that commercial radio stations have to compete with a taxpayer-subsidized entity. 2FM should be sold off as a private commercial station and forced to compete on a level playing field with Today FM and all the others. If it can't run profitably when others can, something is wrong.

    Numerous RTE offerings don't fall within the remit of "public-service broadcasting." Pop music radio, imported Australian soaps, imported US shows and movies that can easily be watched elsewhere, knock-offs like Dancing with the Stars, and on and on — that's not public-service broadcasting.

    RTE could be a very cost-effective public-service operation with one radio station and one TV channel, rather than the bloated behemoth that it became during its monopoly era.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,304 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Never understood why the orchestras don't come under the remit of the Arts Council.

    Maybe because the Arts Council is an advisory, grant-giving and regulatory body and isn't operationally involved in arts?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    odyssey06 wrote: »
    Yep, it's the same with soccer coverage. Back in the studio, an anchorman and 3 pundits discussing a game is way overkill.

    Should be 1 pundit for most games. I expect this kind of over-staffing occurs all the way down i.e. not just what we see on screen.

    Pundits got €5k a game for the last World Cup. So if there were 2 games on back to back and the used the same panel they got €10k, plus hotel accommodation (including meals and drinks) and flights in and out if needed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,806 ✭✭✭CFlat


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    Ray D'Arsehole is awful should not be on the telly or radio

    The salaries for all should be cut by 50%

    How would you like your wages cut by 50%? I'm not saying they're not overpaid inbut that's a big hit on your income when the life you live probably reflects that income.

    Let's not forget, none of the staff put a gun up to the head of the DG of RTE and forced them to pay that sort of cash. FFS they head hunted Ray D'Arcy and offered him that wedge. I think though they got the hump with Communicorp for poaching Pat Kenny and they would have paid D'Arcy anything to give the two fingers to them.

    Difficult times for everyone at the organisation. I worked for a company back in the day that had to lay off a whole pile of staff because of straightened times and it's not a very pleasant position to be in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    RTE could be a very cost-effective public-service operation with one radio station and one TV channel, rather than the bloated behemoth that it became during its monopoly era.

    There is several examples of this model in Europe, they died a death.

    No one watches them and any talent was hoovered up by the commercial stations.

    The reality is RTE has pretty much held it's own with 20 odd years of 30 odd billion of programming a lot of it FTA from across the sea. That's before you even get into online content.

    It needs to be tweaked, not nuked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,618 ✭✭✭celtic_oz


    close the whole thing down, sack everyone

    start again the following year with this for a start

    1. No one makes more than the Taoiseach, ever, period.
    2. Management staff percentage to content creators below industry standard in europe always


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 980 ✭✭✭Palmach


    Boggles wrote: »
    There is several examples of this model in Europe, they died a death.

    No one watches them and any talent was hoovered up by the commercial stations.

    The reality is RTE has pretty much held it's own with 20 odd years of 30 odd billion of programming a lot of it FTA from across the sea. That's before you even get into online content.

    It needs to be tweaked, not nuked.


    Terry Prone was interviewed by PK on Newstalk this morning. She says the so called talent at RTE have no where else to go. Foreign channels are simple not sniffing around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,249 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Just so I'm clear, if every household had an extra €160 per year, we wouldn't have a housing crisis?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,568 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Palmach wrote: »
    Terry Prone was interviewed by PK on Newstalk this morning. She says the so called talent at RTE have no where else to go. Foreign channels are simple not sniffing around.

    Bit of irony there considering who she was talking to.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Bob Harris wrote: »
    "The 200 jobs to be cut will be on a voluntary basis and a large portion of them will include the RTÉ symphony orchestra moving to the control of the National Concert Hall"




    If they can get the numbers accepting.
    I went through "voluntary" redundancy procedure. I was told I was redundant, with package A if I "accepted", or refuse and challenge and get package B (much reduced) if I ended up on forced redundancy (I would have been)

    This was from my union


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Ryan Tubridy – €495,000
    Ray D'Arcy – €450,000
    Joe Duffy – €389,988
    Sean O’Rourke – €308,964
    Marian Finucane – €300,617
    Miriam O'Callaghan – €299,000
    Claire Byrne – €216,000
    Brian Dobson – €198,146
    George Hamilton – €186,195
    Mary Wilson – €185,679

    It really is impossible to justify the salaries these people are getting.

    Getting rid of Duffy and D'Arcy alone would save several jobs of ordinary workers.

    those two must sicken the rest of the RTE staff


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭NSAman


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Maybe because the Arts Council is an advisory, grant-giving and regulatory body and isn't operationally involved in arts?

    And the orchestra is not under the control of a county council yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 387 ✭✭RunningFlyer


    I think the top presenters pay is a disgrace because it is designed in a tax-efficient way so they pay very little (if any tax) by creating companies that RTE happily pay into to avoid PRSI, PAYE contributions etc. On top of this, there are lots of other sneaky tax methods at play such as allowances, car allowances, accommodation which ultimately means they will retain most of the gross figures quoted previously.

    I actually wouldn't have as much as issue if all the presenters above were PAYE employees on those salaries because they would be returning a huge amount of their gross salaries back to the exchequer. Yet RTE, as a state company, has no problem with this tax dodging because they are all on the gravy train. It all came to light a few years ago in the UK and HMRC have been cracking down on it since with the BBC so why doesn't Revenue chase it up here?

    So effectively, our TV licence fee is a tax on us to help fund these presenters, yet their salaries contribute next to nothing to the exchequer in return! (I know the licence fee is distributed)

    Whilst I've no issue paying the licence fee (other countries Ive lived in have taken it from tax), the quality of presenters and programming in RTE is abysmal and I just don't understand how they have the same regulars being recycled for car-crash television programmes (Who watches them?). A massive cleanout is needed but the loyalty and arrogance of RTE means nothing fundamental will change ultimately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,933 ✭✭✭JDxtra


    They'd be bonkers to throw away the momentum they have with RTE Gold. Right now, RTE Gold has almost the same amount of online listeners as RTE 2FM. Other stations, like RTE Pulse, are justified for the axe - it has only 1.5% the audience online that RTE Gold has.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Boggles wrote: »
    There is several examples of this model in Europe, they died a death.

    No one watches them and any talent was hoovered up by the commercial stations.

    The reality is RTE has pretty much held it's own with 20 odd years of 30 odd billion of programming a lot of it FTA from across the sea. That's before you even get into online content.

    It needs to be tweaked, not nuked.

    The whole idea of public service broadcasting is that what it creates appeals to few people i.e. the stuff that's not commercially viable.

    A slimmed down RTE, not dependent on commercial revenue, dedicated to it's public service remit would seen appropriate. If it's not making celebrities out of it's presenters, who cares?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,931 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Maybe because the Arts Council is an advisory, grant-giving and regulatory body and isn't operationally involved in arts?

    Well, I kinda meant that the Orchestra's self operate and draw their subsidy from the Arts Council, like Ballet Ireland or the Abbey Theatre.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Something similar happened on RTE TV during the rugby world cup final. The first two ads on one of the breaks was related to RTE content.

    They are using prime time slots to advertise their own content.

    In fairness, they were only advertising their own content in this show because a commercial advertiser didn't take them.
    Sometimes it can be more cost effective to charge a higher price even if that means some slots dont get filled


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,810 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    The whole idea of public service broadcasting is that what it creates appeals to few people i.e. the stuff that's not commercially viable.

    A slimmed down RTE, not dependent on commercial revenue, dedicated to it's public service remit would seen appropriate.

    Could you convince the great unwashed to pay a licence fee to subsidise this kind of highbrow service though?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Could you convince the great unwashed to pay a licence fee to subsidise this kind of highbrow service though?

    News and current affairs, domestic and international sport (where there is an Irish angle)? Yeah, I think people would pay for it.

    It's quite clear what people dont want to pay for and that's endless reruns and/or imported content, that's largely already been aired on other broadcasters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,457 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    News and current affairs, domestic and international sport (where there is an Irish angle)? Yeah, I think people would pay for it.

    It's quite clear what people dont want to pay for and that's endless reruns and/or imported content, that's largely already been aired on other broadcasters.

    certainly don't like paying for RTE to be competing in the entertainment industry

    it's absurd

    i.e. is there anyone here happy to be bankrolling Amy Huberman's latest comedic offering? Don't see any other operators rushing to secure them!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,263 ✭✭✭bobbyss


    Lots of people lose their jobs every day. We don't hear much about them and their struggles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,967 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    Ryan Tubridy – €495,000
    Ray D'Arcy – €450,000
    Joe Duffy – €389,988
    Sean O’Rourke – €308,964
    Marian Finucane – €300,617
    Miriam O'Callaghan – €299,000
    Claire Byrne – €216,000
    Brian Dobson – €198,146
    George Hamilton – €186,195
    Mary Wilson – €185,679

    It really is impossible to justify the salaries these people are getting.

    Getting rid of Duffy and D'Arcy alone would save several jobs of ordinary workers.

    D'arcy 450k ?

    That is amazing.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    In fairness, they were only advertising their own content in this show because a commercial advertiser didn't take them.
    Sometimes it can be more cost effective to charge a higher price even if that means some slots dont get filled

    But why didn't they fill them? Why are they struggling to sell prime time ad slots?

    Surely they could offer a last minute cut price deal to fill those slots, as almost all commercial entities do.

    Advertise their own content at quiet times, no issue with that.

    But prime time slots and huge audience figures, to be advertising your own content is bizarre. What other commercial entity would get away with this, given they are in the business of maximising revenue.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement