Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Charlie’s Angels Reboot.

Options
2»

Comments

  • Options
    #32
    pah
    Registered Users Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭pah


    Agent Coulson wrote: »

    Thank goodness they informed me on the 5 second mark that the trailer was about to start NOW I think I would have missed it otherwise

    FML WHO CAME UP WITH THE MINI TRAILER TEASE BEFORE THE TRAILER THING? I HOPE THEY DIE IN THEIR OWN PISS


    Edit: I'll be giving this a miss.

    Edit2: Unless I get woke before it's released


  • Options
    #33
    donegal_man
    Registered Users Posts: 5,720 ✭✭✭donegal_man


    Oh this looks terrible. I can only imagine Patrick Stewart did it for the money or as a favour to somebody.


  • Options
    #34
    Guy:Incognito
    Registered Users Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    donegal_man wrote: »
    I can only imagine Patrick Stewart did it for the money .
    I hate to break it to you but thats how most acting jobs work.


  • Options
    #35
    pixelburp
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 35,941 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Given Stewart was happy to voice the poop emoji in The Emoji Movie, the ship for sniffing at his acting choices, or considering them flawless, has already sailed ;)


  • Options
    #36
    donegal_man
    Registered Users Posts: 5,720 ✭✭✭donegal_man


    Guy:Incognito wrote: »
    I hate to break it to you but thats how most acting jobs work.


    Gee thanks for the snark!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #37
    JP Liz V1
    Registered Users Posts: 85,351 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    I don't think it will even make half it's budget back, bombing
    https://forumofgames.com/




  • Options
    #38
    El Duda
    Registered Users Posts: 868 ✭✭✭El Duda


    "I really hope they reboot Charlies Angels again" - Literally no one.


  • Options
    #39
    EoinMcLovin
    Registered Users Posts: 8,905 ✭✭✭EoinMcLovin


    El Duda wrote: »
    "I really hope they reboot Charlies Angels again" - Literally no one.

    Sure they tried to reboot the TV show back in 2011 but it was so bad that it was cancelled after 4 episodes.


  • Options
    #40
    silverharp
    Registered Users Posts: 17,849 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Get woke go broke!

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Options
    #41
    B.A._Baracus
    Registered Users Posts: 11,179 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    I watched it tonight.
    It's actually alright. It is what you expect it to be. It's no way a 4.2 IMDB rating. I'd say it's a 6. Not the best movie you will see however not the worst.

    I say it was victim to the "anti all-women cast movie" you see on the internet. Out of the 21,000 votes on IMDB it's rating is not fair. That's b movie ratings. So I reckon a lot didn't even see it.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #42
    bendip
    Registered Users Posts: 9 ✭bendip


    B.A._Baracus wrote: »
    I watched it tonight.
    It's actually alright. It is what you expect it to be. It's no way a 4.2 IMDB rating. I'd say it's a 6. Not the best movie you will see however not the worst.

    I say it was victim to the "anti all-women cast movie" you see on the internet. Out of the 21,000 votes on IMDB it's rating is not fair. That's b movie ratings. So I reckon a lot didn't even see it.

    i enjoyed it more than the barrymore..diaz..liu movies.. hardly a ringing endorsement..but not the worst night at cineworld we've had lately (the upside..the goldfinch)..there are drawbacks to having an unlimited pass..!


  • Options
    #43
    nix
    Registered Users Posts: 4,909 ✭✭✭nix


    B.A._Baracus wrote: »
    I watched it tonight.
    It's actually alright. It is what you expect it to be. It's no way a 4.2 IMDB rating. I'd say it's a 6. Not the best movie you will see however not the worst.

    I say it was victim to the "anti all-women cast movie" you see on the internet. Out of the 21,000 votes on IMDB it's rating is not fair. That's b movie ratings. So I reckon a lot didn't even see it.

    I reckon the majority of those down votes came after the sh!t that spewed out of Elizabeth Banks's mouth.. :(


  • Options
    #44
    B.A._Baracus
    Registered Users Posts: 11,179 ✭✭✭✭B.A._Baracus


    nix wrote: »
    I reckon the majority of those down votes came after the sh!t that spewed out of Elizabeth Banks's mouth.. :(

    Yeah I read that comment. She shouldn't have said it.
    If anyone is gonna make an all female-cast movie of something just act like the internet nay-sayers don't exist. Don't mention things.


  • Options
    #45
    jill_valentine
    Registered Users Posts: 7,090 ✭✭✭jill_valentine


    B.A._Baracus wrote: »
    Yeah I read that comment. She shouldn't have said it.
    If anyone is gonna make an all female-cast movie of something just act like the internet nay-sayers don't exist. Don't mention things.

    I think it's becoming apparent by now it doesn't massively matter what you say or don't though - Youtube will decide what it wants you to have said based on how much it wants you to fail, and people who want to believe it will accept it at face value.

    What Banks said and how it was reported - and accepted, and repeated - have a fairly distant relationship. It was always going to be something.


  • Options
    #46
    JP Liz V1
    Registered Users Posts: 85,351 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Jonathan Tucker the the only saving grace of this awful film, needed him on screen more, terrible female castings of the angels, end credits cameos were good
    https://forumofgames.com/




Advertisement