Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Q-sort method, thoughts?

  • 06-02-2006 11:04pm
    #1
    ST*
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭


    Quick question about the Q-sort method, does anyone have any thoughts on the theory that we find our 'gap' between self concept and ideal self?

    I'm doing an essay at the moment, and I feel that situation dependant, this may not be accurate. If answering these kinds of questions in a more relaxed environment one might answer the questions as honestly as possible.

    However, if put under any sort of pressure when answering the same questions for e.g. as part of an interview - would one not be likely to answer falsely taking social desirablility bias into consideration?

    Thoughts would be greatly appreciated - t/y.


Comments

  • #2
    Dr. Octagon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 56 ✭✭Dr. Octagon


    Shock_treatment wrote:
    Quick question about the Q-sort method, does anyone have any thoughts on the theory that we find our 'gap' between self concept and ideal self?

    I'm doing an essay at the moment, and I feel that situation dependant, this may not be accurate. If answering these kinds of questions in a more relaxed environment one might answer the questions as honestly as possible.

    However, if put under any sort of pressure when answering the same questions for e.g. as part of an interview - would one not be likely to answer falsely taking social desirablility bias into consideration?

    Thoughts would be greatly appreciated - t/y.

    Obviously in an interview situation people will portray themselves as being much closer to their ideal self than they reallyare. For example, most people have average communication skills (on average!) yet nearly everyone claims to be an excellent, efficient communicator to a board of interviewers.

    I don't think that the Q-sort method is very good. I think that most peoples self concept will have an imaginary component and that they will return answers based on a lesser version of their ideal self which aren't completely honest. In short, I don't think that many people are 100% honest with themselves. As a preliminary measure it is alright but I wouldn't entirely trust the results of these tests.


  • #3
    ST*
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭ST*


    Dr. Octagon wrote:
    I don't think that the Q-sort method is very good. I think that most peoples self concept will have an imaginary component and that they will return answers based on a lesser version of their ideal self which aren't completely honest. In short, I don't think that many people are 100% honest with themselves. As a preliminary measure it is alright but I wouldn't entirely trust the results of these tests.

    This was my feeling, to be honest. I did wonder why it still got a mention in psychology books, considering its reliability - but in hindsight Im thinking that the key point here is probably noting the difference between the two. Actual self and ideal self. *I wonder if people thought about their own 'gap' once in a while would that make them more assertive with all aspects of their lives?*

    Food for thought.. thanks for that! :)


Advertisement