Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Greenland Glacier Sheds Massive Ice Island

Options
  • 10-08-2010 10:08am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭


    capt.28e274bf8f3f49388450f885cd8b05de-28e274bf8f3f49388450f885cd8b05de-0.jpg?x=360&y=345&q=85&sig=u_yHkSQLqbndMQfwS7Lckw--

    It’s been over four decades since Greenland lost an ice chunk like the one “born” last week. The ice island – four times the size of Manhattan – calved off of northern Greenland’s Petermann glacier on August 5th.

    At its thickest parts, the ice island is half the height (excuse all the NYC-centric comparisons) of the Empire State building. A loss at that scale hasn’t occurred since 1962. One immediate danger is that the glacial rupture will pave the way for currents to strengthen in the area, leading to increased rupture rates: a vicious cycle.

    Andreas Muenchow, a glaciologist at the University of Delaware, studies the Nares Strait, and gained practically real-time access to NASA’s data on the event. He expects the mass to “follow along the coasts of Baffin Island and Labrador, to reach the Atlantic within the next two years.”
    If the ocean is a glass of water, that’s one heck of an ice cube to drop in. And the freshwater stored in that ice cube, says Muenchow, “could keep the Delaware or Hudson rivers flowing for more than two years,” or “keep all U.S. public tap water flowing for 120 days.”
    Despite the epic proportions of the glacial event, Muenchow warns environmentalists not to jump the gun and point to climate change as a cause, before hard data can support that assertion.

    “Global warming and climate change are very real and challenging problems,” Meunchow said, “but it is foolish to assign every ‘visible’ event to that catch-all phrase. It cheapens and discredits those findings where global warming is a real and immediate cause for observable phenomena. Details matter, in science as well as in policy.”

    Interview here
    http://www.rte.ie/news/morningireland/player.html?20100809,2799888,2799888,real,209

    VIDEO
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G7L6T_rYcY


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,134 ✭✭✭✭maquiladora


    The%20Day%20After%20Tomorrow.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Meh, was global warming an issue 50 years ago? Nope. If a giant chunk falls off now should we read anything more into it than a chunk falling off decades earlier?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,234 ✭✭✭thetonynator


    before any climate changists come in, this is called summer time. the weather heats up, and ice melts. then it comes back in the winter again. no need for another carbom tax because of it!!


Advertisement