What is a high court hearing?

Reggie. · 10-01-2019 2:38pm #1

As above.
Just received a letter stating my high court case is going for hearing in a months time. Solicitor states he'll be in contact at a later time to discuss further and a confirmed date.

Tried to Google the meaning but can't find a straight answer anywhere.

I'll take it that I'll have to attend?
What's involved in a hearing?
Thankfully not familiar with court procedures

Thanking in advance....

Mr. Incognito · 10-01-2019 2:38pm

Its a hearing in the High Courts

Usually at the Four Courts.

They are accessable to the public- feel free to wander in and have a look

thebiglad · 10-01-2019 2:42pm

This may help but your Solicitor is best positioned to advice you.

http://courts.ie/Courts.ie/library3.nsf/(WebFiles)/A15BCA388D64C09C80257DFC003EA21C/$FILE/Explaining%20the%20Courts%20Complete%20booklet%20for%20web.pdf

There are High Courts in all Provinces so does not necessarily have to be Dublin to which the OP is referring.

I would expect there will be a meeting with your Solicitor and Senior Counsel in advance of the court date at the Courts where it should be explained to you what will happen.

A lot depends on the reason for the High Court attendance and whether the case is in your name or you are a witness for another party.

If you get a date to attend at the High Court which is the same as expected date of the hearing then ask your Solicitor in advance to meet you or explain the process.

Reggie. · 10-01-2019 2:47pm

thebiglad wrote: »

There are High Courts in all Provinces so does not necessarily have to be Dublin to which the OP is referring.

I would expect there will be a meeting with your Solicitor and Senior Counsel in advance of the court date at the Courts where it should be explained to you what will happen.

A lot depends on the reason for the High Court attendance and whether the case is in your name or you are a witness for another party.

If you get a date to attend at the High Court which is the date of the hearing then ask your Solicitor in advance to meet you or explain the process.

Yes it's a personnel injury case from a car accident and it's in my name.

What is the purpose of the hearing?
I'm guessing it's to lay out the facts of the incident and to get a date set for the high court?

nuac · 10-01-2019 3:24pm

Mod
Poster,
It usually takes some years to get a personal injury action ready for a High Court hearing.
You really need to talk to your solicitor about all that is involved

Reggie. · 10-01-2019 3:47pm

nuac wrote: »

Mod
Poster,
It usually takes some years to get a personal injury action ready for a High Court hearing.
You really need to talk to your solicitor about all that is involved

Case is years old already and been through everything to get to this point. Just wondering what is involved in a hearing is what I'm asking.

Solicitor not available till a later date as I stated above. Was just looking for a layman's idea of what happens or what to expect. Maybe I came to the wrong place.

hullaballoo · 10-01-2019 4:08pm

It sounds like it's in for hearing. In layman's terms, that means you have a date for trial.

In real terms, that date is tentative but there is a chance your case could be heard in full at some stage in the week it's listed for hearing.

Reggie. · 10-01-2019 4:13pm

hullaballoo wrote: »

It sounds like it's in for hearing. In layman's terms, that means you have a date for trial.

In real terms, that date is tentative but there is a chance your case could be heard in full at some stage in the week it's listed for hearing.

Really that quick? I'm sure that instance is rare enough tho. I thought myself that the trial date would be well after the hearing as in weeks afterwards. That never occured to me that it could possibly be the same week. Thanks for the info hullaballoo.

hullaballoo · 10-01-2019 5:50pm

Just to clarify (with a caveat, of course!

)

Hearing = trial. So there isn't a hearing first and then a trial. The terms are sometimes used interchangeably and I think that is the case here.

At least that's what I'm getting from what you've posted.

The caveat is that it could be a hearing of another sort but tbh I would be very surprised in the context of what you have posted for there to be any other kind of hearing that your solicitor would notify you of using these words. I'd say the chances that it's anything other than the trial are so remote as to be non-existent imo.

10-01-2019 6:15pm

Reggie. wrote: »

As above.
Just received a letter stating my high court case is going for hearing in a months time. Solicitor states he'll be in contact at a later time to discuss further and a confirmed date.

Tried to Google the meaning but can't find a straight answer anywhere.

I'll take it that I'll have to attend?
What's involved in a hearing?
Thankfully not familiar with court procedures
Thanking in advance....

Just to add to the above advice you've been given you may have to give evidence as to what happened to cause the accident.

When you get to the court, you will be told that we operate a list system in Ireland, which means your case will be listed with several other cases for the same day. Depending on where you are on the list you may or may not be heard. You chances of being heard are higher if you are nearer the top of the list. The list rolls over from day to day so you should get progressively higher as the days go by. If it's not heard during the week allotted to it, it will be pushed back the next time the court is sitting.

This system allows for negotiation between the parties as they wait for the case to be called. Unfortunately this also entails long periods of waiting around, especially costly if experts are also waiting to give evidence.

Having everyone in the court building (as opposed to being in the court room) tends to focus people's mind as to whether this case can be settled by negotiations or if you need the court to determine it.

Reggie. · 10-01-2019 6:23pm

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Just to add to the above advice you've been given you may have to give evidence as to what happened to cause the accident.

When you get to the court, you will be told that we operate a list system in Ireland, which means your case will be listed with several other cases for the same day. Depending on where you are on the list you may or may not be heard. You chances of being heard are higher if you are nearer the top of the list. The list rolls over from day to day so you should get progressively higher as the days go by. If it's not heard during the week allotted to it, it will be pushed back the next time the court is sitting.

This system allows for negotiation between the parties as they wait for the case to be called. Unfortunately this also entails long periods of waiting around, especially costly if experts are also waiting to give evidence.

Having everyone in the court building (as opposed to being in the court room) tends to focus people's mind as to whether this case can be settled by negotiations or if you need the court to determine it.

Yes I've been preparing myself for the hurry up and wait scenario. Thanks for that.

Reggie. · 10-01-2019 6:25pm

hullaballoo wrote: »

Just to clarify (with a caveat, of course! )

Hearing = trial. So there isn't a hearing first and then a trial. The terms are sometimes used interchangeably and I think that is the case here.

At least that's what I'm getting from what you've posted.

The caveat is that it could be a hearing of another sort but tbh I would be very surprised in the context of what you have posted for there to be any other kind of hearing that your solicitor would notify you of using these words. I'd say the chances that it's anything other than the trial are so remote as to be non-existent imo.

Ah yeah to be honest I always thought a hearing was separate to the actual trial. I'm blaming the American shows

. Like I said no experience of court at all so it's a steep learning curve.

4ensic15 · 10-01-2019 8:35pm

Another thing to note is there may be no hearing at all. More often than not, personal injury cases settle without being heard. You may just find yourself standing around a courthouse for hours while talks go on.

CIARAN_BOYLE · 11-01-2019 12:34pm

Reggie. wrote: »

Ah yeah to be honest I always thought a hearing was separate to the actual trial. I'm blaming the American shows . Like I said no experience of court at all so it's a steep learning curve.

In criminal cases the media separates hearing and trial.

In these cases a hearing is usually a procedural matter where the jury is not present while the main body of the thing is the trial.

Usually in a civil case there is no real distinction.

breda1970 · 21-01-2019 12:10pm

So if your personal injury case is listed for a certain date,does that mean all the specialists/doctors involved have to be informed ,so they can attend ?
When people say it settles on the steps of the court,what happens all the specialist doctors?do they still get there days pay...?

Peregrinus · 22-01-2019 1:56am

breda1970 wrote: »

So if your personal injury case is listed for a certain date,does that mean all the specialists/doctors involved have to be informed ,so they can attend ?

If it's listed for the hearing of the action on that day, yes, obviously you need the necessary witnesses to be present. But if it's just listed for some preliminary or intermediate step, then no.

breda1970 wrote: »

When people say it settles on the steps of the court,what happens all the specialist doctors?do they still get there days pay...?

Yes, of course they do. They still had to turn up, and were prevented from doing whatever they would have been doing if the trial hadn't been listed for that day. The earlier in the proceedings you settle your case the less the proceedings themselves will cost you, and this is one of the tactical factors that feeds into decisions about settlements.

4ensic15 · 22-01-2019 10:29am

CIARAN_BOYLE wrote: »

In criminal cases the media separates hearing and trial.

In these cases a hearing is usually a procedural matter where the jury is not present while the main body of the thing is the trial.

Usually in a civil case there is no real distinction.

The media has no input into a trial, only to observe. When the jury is sent out the proceedings are described as a "voir dire". The entire comprises a hearing.

breda1970 · 22-01-2019 2:07pm

Peregrinus wrote: »

If it's listed for the hearing of the action on that day, yes, obviously you need the necessary witnesses to be present. But if it's just listed for some preliminary or intermediate step, then no.

Yes, of course they do. They still had to turn up, and were prevented from doing whatever they would have been doing if the trial hadn't been listed for that day. The earlier in the proceedings you settle your case the less the proceedings themselves will cost you, and this is one of the tactical factors that feeds into decisions about settlements.

So does that mean there has to be an some sort of settlement discussions between both party’s before for the actual court date?
If there is no settlement offers from either side,what way does the judge look at this?

Claw Hammer · 22-01-2019 5:56pm

breda1970 wrote: »

So does that mean there has to be an some sort of settlement discussions between both party’s before for the actual court date?
If there is no settlement offers from either side,what way does the judge look at this?

The judge is not told of settlement offers. He might be told of talks but not the detail of talks. There is no obligation to hold settlement talks but when an insurance company is defending and the case looks reasonable they will make an offer. A settled case does not give rise to an appeal and usually there is no publicity.

Peregrinus · 23-01-2019 3:02am

breda1970 wrote: »

So does that mean there has to be an some sort of settlement discussions between both party’s before for the actual court date?
If there is no settlement offers from either side,what way does the judge look at this?

What Claw Hammer said. There doesn't have to be settlement offers at any point in the process, though there are usually at least approached by one side or the other. The judge is not normally involved (unless one of the parties is a minor or a ward of court, in which case any settlement will need court approval).

realitykeeper · 23-01-2019 4:12am

You probably won`t be asked to say anything. The Judge will hear an outline of the case and decide whether or not to accept jurisdiction. I am rather unimpressed with the Irish legal system. I discovered its ins and outs in civil case back in the naughties. It works best if you don`t have to use it, i.e. just use it as a deterrent. When the great recession happened, you had all these people claiming to be sovereign individuals who did not recognize the law (usually because they couldn`t pay their mortgage) and groups like Integrity Ireland and yer man the bald fellow who tries to help people in mortgage difficulty doing the rounds. Fun stuff.

hullaballoo · 23-01-2019 9:04am

realitykeeper wrote: »

You probably won`t be asked to say anything. The Judge will hear an outline of the case and decide whether or not to accept jurisdiction. I am rather unimpressed with the Irish legal system. I discovered its ins and outs in civil case back in the naughties. It works best if you don`t have to use it, i.e. just use it as a deterrent. When the great recession happened, you had all these people claiming to be sovereign individuals who did not recognize the law (usually because they couldn`t pay their mortgage) and groups like Integrity Ireland and yer man the bald fellow who tries to help people in mortgage difficulty doing the rounds. Fun stuff.

Neither of the emboldened points are true.

If you are the plaintiff in a High Court personal injury case that goes to trial, expect a minimum of a full day in the witness box. It could be less than a day if straightforward but in the majority of cases that go to trial these days, the examination of the plaintiff goes on for quite some time.

On the second point, a judge hears an outline and accepts/refuses jurisdiction only in the District Court for criminal offences that are triable summarily or on indictment. That's the only place and time that I can think of that the procedure operates in this way.

As a plaintiff in a personal injuries case, once you see the judge assigned to your case, you are either running your case before that judge or walking away.

realitykeeper · 23-01-2019 3:32pm

hullaballoo wrote: »

Neither of the emboldened points are true.

If you are the plaintiff in a High Court personal injury case that goes to trial, expect a minimum of a full day in the witness box. It could be less than a day if straightforward but in the majority of cases that go to trial these days, the examination of the plaintiff goes on for quite some time.

On the second point, a judge hears an outline and accepts/refuses jurisdiction only in the District Court for criminal offences that are triable summarily or on indictment. That's the only place and time that I can think of that the procedure operates in this way.

As a plaintiff in a personal injuries case, once you see the judge assigned to your case, you are either running your case before that judge or walking away.

I thought your solicitor would just say a few words on your behalf, then after a few moments of the usual befuddling by the judge a trial date would be set. Sounds like much ado about nothing.

breda1970 · 23-01-2019 3:33pm

hullaballoo wrote: »

Neither of the emboldened points are true.

If you are the plaintiff in a High Court personal injury case that goes to trial, expect a minimum of a full day in the witness box. It could be less than a day if straightforward but in the majority of cases that go to trial these days, the examination of the plaintiff goes on for quite some time.

On the second point, a judge hears an outline and accepts/refuses jurisdiction only in the District Court for criminal offences that are triable summarily or on indictment. That's the only place and time that I can think of that the procedure operates in this way.

As a plaintiff in a personal injuries case, once you see the judge assigned to your case, you are either running your case before that judge or walking away.

Do you mean on the morning of the court whenever the case is as signed to a judge,either settle at that point or let the case run??
I seen in cases before the judge annoyed because the parties could not come to an arrangement instead of wasting court time..

4ensic15 · 23-01-2019 8:03pm

breda1970 wrote: »

Do you mean on the morning of the court whenever the case is as signed to a judge,either settle at that point or let the case run??
I seen in cases before the judge annoyed because the parties could not come to an arrangement instead of wasting court time..

Quite often a case can only be accurately valued when it is known who the judge is. Quite often cases are halted to allow for talks. Settlement negotiations can start long before a trial and can take place up till judgement is delivered.

nuac · 23-01-2019 9:44pm

There may be various efforts to settle a case
Some insurers used to call, by appointment, to the Plaintiff's solicitor's office to negotiate. That was more usual towards the end of their financial year when they were hoping to reduce the number of their open cases.
Not as common nowadays.
Other meetings might take place at the courthouse months before the case is to be heard. Sometimes it is a genuine effort to explore settlement; other times it is to suss out the amount of the lodgment.
While a case might still be settled on "on the steps", many insurers wait to see if the plaintiff is actually ready to go into the box and swear up before making their best offer.
Some defence teams mention just before trials that they have videos of plaintiff which will damage the plaintiffs, or that the insurer has some issue about validity of cover.
Few plaintiffs want to give evidence in such cases - I would be worried about anyone rushing into the box. An experienced plaintiff's solicitor has to prepare and psych the plaintiff to walk confidently into the witness box and to look directly at the trial judge.
I don't know why defences go on with these games. It only adds to the expenses and costs

,

ezra_ · 24-01-2019 7:29am

breda1970 wrote: »

I seen in cases before the judge annoyed because the parties could not come to an arrangement instead of wasting court time..

I have seen this once in a HC case. The Judge suggested that the parties engage in talks, and a settlement was reached that morning.

From talking to the people involved, the judge was pretty scathing that this had gotten as far as the HC (was a civil matter).

Peregrinus · 24-01-2019 7:45am

realitykeeper wrote: »

I thought your solicitor would just say a few words on your behalf, then after a few moments of the usual befuddling by the judge a trial date would be set. Sounds like much ado about nothing.

Usual form is that both sides are asked to confirm that they are ready to go to trial.

If they both say "yes", then a date is fixed. May be a bit of back-and-forth reconciling (a) slots available on the court list with (b) parties views about how urgenly the matter needs to be resolved, (c) issues about particular dates which might problematic, (d) etc, but this is usually dispatched in a few minutes.

If one party says "no", then a bit of a grilling about why they're not ready yet, what the problem is, how soon they can be ready, etc. followed by setting a date on which the matter will be looked at again, and issuing of dire threats about what will happen if still not ready by that date.

This may have an indirect bearing on settlement efforts. If other party isn't ready to go to trial, and you sense that issue may be that they have a problem with witnesses, evidence, etc, and that their case is starting to look dodgy. In which case a quick offer of a low settlement figure might be v. attractive to them, and might get rid of the matter quickly at what you regard as an acceptable cost. So you might make that offer. Alternatively you might decide not to make or accept any offer of settlement, because you think they are likely to lose at trial.

breda1970 · 24-01-2019 12:26pm

But if the defendant thought the person would receive an award in court,would it not make sense to make an offer before the court sitting or lodge an amount in court to save on the expenses of high court/specialists dr etc..

24-01-2019 8:37pm

nuac wrote: »

There may be various efforts to settle a case
Some insurers used to call, by appointment, to the Plaintiff's solicitor's office to negotiate. That was more usual towards the end of their financial year when they were hoping to reduce the number of their open cases.
Not as common nowadays.
Other meetings might take place at the courthouse months before the case is to be heard. Sometimes it is a genuine effort to explore settlement; other times it is to suss out the amount of the lodgment.
While a case might still be settled on "on the steps", many insurers wait to see if the plaintiff is actually ready to go into the box and swear up before making their best offer.
Some defence teams mention just before trials that they have videos of plaintiff which will damage the plaintiffs, or that the insurer has some issue about validity of cover.
Few plaintiffs want to give evidence in such cases - I would be worried about anyone rushing into the box. An experienced plaintiff's solicitor has to prepare and psych the plaintiff to walk confidently into the witness box and to look directly at the trial judge.
I don't know why defences go on with these games. It only adds to the expenses and costs

,

Cuts both ways, very often plaintiff solicitors only seriously engage in settlement talks on the day in the Court. Personally I think increased collegiality between both sides would lead to quicker and more efficient settlements which would ultimately benefit both side's clients more.

Imo, bad practices on both sides has lessened trust over the years, needlessly. (and sadly many of these bad practices are rooted in bad training)

4ensic15 · 24-01-2019 8:45pm

breda1970 wrote: »

But if the defendant thought the person would receive an award in court,would it not make sense to make an offer before the court sitting or lodge an amount in court to save on the expenses of high court/specialists dr etc..

It is often not known which judge will hear the case until the day of the hearing. Until they know which judge will hear the matter, the defence can't value the case.

What is a high court hearing?

Comments