Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Stock inventory for taxation

Options
  • 06-08-2020 2:12pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 641 ✭✭✭


    Has anyone experience of a practice that I think is called stock inventory. It is used when someone is reducing stocking numbers. I think the purpose is for tax, that you get some relief on the income accrued from reducing stocking rates when you are not restocking to the same level (could be wrong).
    Anyone here have any experience of it, pros and cons. I think once you go on it you have to stay on it forever, so if you are increasing stock numbers some time in the future it might not be ideal.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    I've come across this before a few times. I'm not an accountant, but this is my understanding of it.
    Every financial year, you have Opening (1st Jan) and Closing (31 Dec) stock values for cattle on your farm. If you decide to reduce cattle numbers, you will have extra 'Cash On Hand' on 31 Dec as a result. Remember this is not profit, so you don't have to pay income tax on it. You simply carry this 'Cash On Hand' over to the following year.
    If in the future, you decide to buy in cattle, you use this Cash On Hand to do so.

    If you decide to take that Cash On Hand out of the farm business, I don't know if it is treated then as income. Maybe someone else will know.

    Some info here;
    https://www.agriculture.gov.ie/agri-foodindustry/agri-foodandtheeconomy/agri-foodbusiness/agri-taxation/indicativelistofagri-taxmeasures/incometaxmeasures/#:~:text=in%20brief%20here.-,25%25%20General%20Stock%20Relief%20on%20Income%20Tax,and%20above%20the%20opening%20value.

    'The Bishops blessed the Blueshirts in Galway, As they sailed beneath the Swastika to Spain'



  • Registered Users Posts: 641 ✭✭✭k mac


    So you can carry the cash in hand for years to come and it is available if you increase stock numbers again. I don't really see any downside in this so.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    Put it this way, the company APPLE are carrying $93 billion 'Cash on Hand' at the moment. :D

    https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AAPL/apple/cash-on-hand

    You need to discuss all this with your accountant.

    'The Bishops blessed the Blueshirts in Galway, As they sailed beneath the Swastika to Spain'



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭lakill Farm


    Is it stock relief your asking about really?
    k mac wrote: »
    Has anyone experience of a practice that I think is called stock inventory. It is used when someone is reducing stocking numbers. I think the purpose is for tax, that you get some relief on the income accrued from reducing stocking rates when you are not restocking to the same level (could be wrong).
    Anyone here have any experience of it, pros and cons. I think once you go on it you have to stay on it forever, so if you are increasing stock numbers some time in the future it might not be ideal.


  • Registered Users Posts: 641 ✭✭✭k mac


    Is it stock relief your asking about really?

    Sorry I am not sure as I said I only really heard about this second hand, am not even sure if it is called inventory. Where I am coming from I suppose I hope to cut back in stock numbers and do not want to have a big tax bill to pay for the extra income generated from selling stock and not buying in more to offset that as I usually do. I do know I was told by the person that is in this, that you have to stay on it after going on it. Is that stock relief?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭lakill Farm


    k mac wrote: »
    Sorry I am not sure as I said I only really heard about this second hand, am not even sure if it is called inventory. Where I am coming from I suppose I hope to cut back in stock numbers and do not want to have a big tax bill to pay for the extra income generated from selling stock and not buying in more to offset that as I usually do. I do know I was told by the person that is in this, that you have to stay on it after going on it. Is that stock relief?

    Are you on income averaging or just standard ?

    Does your accounts show Opening and closing stock values ?

    How many years were you planning to reduce stock over?


  • Registered Users Posts: 641 ✭✭✭k mac


    Are you on income averaging or just standard ?

    Does your accounts show Opening and closing stock values ?

    How many years were you planning to reduce stock over?

    Not sure I pay paye as well, I presume standard. Not sure if the accounts show opening and closing stock values, would have to check with the accountant. I was planning if I sold the cattle this year and did not buy any until next year and from then on just kept them for the 7 months each year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    I print off my Herd Profile from Agfood for 31 Dec every year in *.pdf form and send it to my accountant.

    'The Bishops blessed the Blueshirts in Galway, As they sailed beneath the Swastika to Spain'



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭lakill Farm


    k mac wrote: »
    Not sure I pay paye as well, I presume standard. Not sure if the accounts show opening and closing stock values, would have to check with the accountant. I was planning if I sold the cattle this year and did not buy any until next year and from then on just kept them for the 7 months each year.


    even though your PAYE you could be on income averaging or standard

    Yes check them details

    I would suggest doing 2020 management accounts in October/Early November and deciding then how many of the cattle to sell this year that wont effect your tax to much

    You may have unused s381 or 392 coming forward


  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭trg


    I've come across this before a few times. I'm not an accountant, but this is my understanding of it.
    Every financial year, you have Opening (1st Jan) and Closing (31 Dec) stock values for cattle on your farm. If you decide to reduce cattle numbers, you will have extra 'Cash On Hand' on 31 Dec as a result. Remember this is not profit, so you don't have to pay income tax on it. You simply carry this 'Cash On Hand' over to the following year.
    If in the future, you decide to buy in cattle, you use this Cash On Hand to do so.

    If you decide to take that Cash On Hand out of the farm business, I don't know if it is treated then as income. Maybe someone else will know.

    Some info here;
    https://www.agriculture.gov.ie/agri-foodindustry/agri-foodandtheeconomy/agri-foodbusiness/agri-taxation/indicativelistofagri-taxmeasures/incometaxmeasures/#:~:text=in%20brief%20here.-,25%25%20General%20Stock%20Relief%20on%20Income%20Tax,and%20above%20the%20opening%20value.

    There's no way this is right is it?

    If you sell the animals you pay tax on them less the opening stock value.

    Stock Relief is on the difference between closing and opening stock. If you sell the animals and money is in the bank then there'll be no stock relief at all that year.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    Stock Relief relates to the opposite scenario, an increase in stock numbers.

    From the Revenue website;

    Stock relief is available only to farming trades and is a relief given in respect of
    increases in the value of farm trading stock. It is calculated by reference to the
    increase in value of the stock between the beginning and end of an accounting
    period.



    https://www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/income-tax-capital-gains-tax-corporation-tax/part-23/23-02-02.pdf

    'The Bishops blessed the Blueshirts in Galway, As they sailed beneath the Swastika to Spain'



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    Put it this way, a simple example.

    A farmer buys and sells 100 cattle every December. He buys for €500 and sells for €1000. His expenses for the year are €30,000. So his farm income is €20,000.
    (100x(1000-500)) minus 30,000.

    Lets say he gets sick after selling his cattle but can't buy in. He now has no cattle on 31 Dec. His sales are €100k, expenses €30k. So €70,000. Do you really think that revenue will treat this €70k as income for that year?

    'The Bishops blessed the Blueshirts in Galway, As they sailed beneath the Swastika to Spain'



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭Panch18


    Put it this way, a simple example.

    A farmer buys and sells 100 cattle every December. He buys for €500 and sells for €1000. His expenses for the year are €30,000. So his farm income is €20,000.
    (100x(1000-500)) minus 30,000.

    Lets say he gets sick after selling his cattle but can't buy in. He now has no cattle on 31 Dec. His sales are €100k, expenses €30k. So €70,000. Do you really think that revenue will treat this €70k as income for that year?

    yes


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 604 ✭✭✭TooOldBoots


    Here's a more simple explanation of stock relief

    Jan 1st farmer has 25 cows valued at €1000 each so €25000 worth of stock in total.
    By the end of the year those 25 cows have calved and the calves are worth ~€800 each so €20000 worth of calves.

    So on the 31st of December that year the Farmer now has stock to the value of the cows and calves which equal €25000 + €20000 = €45000
    That's an increase in stock value of €20000
    The farmer can now claim 25% increase stock relief which is 25% of €20000 = €5000

    So now the farmer has a Taxable gain of €15000

    (and I know the reality is the farmer will have a shed load of other expenses so he's hardly going to have 15k profit)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭minerleague


    Did my own accounts for about 12 years, whether you buy less or more cattle in the year doesn't make a whole lot of difference, its accounted for in the change between opening and closing stock values. ( if you sell less cattle your closing stock will be higher) Stock relief was something to help farmers trying to increase production.


  • Registered Users Posts: 181 ✭✭KAMG


    Put it this way, a simple example.

    A farmer buys and sells 100 cattle every December. He buys for €500 and sells for €1000. His expenses for the year are €30,000. So his farm income is €20,000.
    (100x(1000-500)) minus 30,000.

    Lets say he gets sick after selling his cattle but can't buy in. He now has no cattle on 31 Dec. His sales are €100k, expenses €30k. So €70,000. Do you really think that revenue will treat this €70k as income for that year?

    Yes, that's how it is treated. Hence why Income averaging for farmers is such a handy thing to be allowed to avail of. It smoothes out profits over 5 years. In the example above, if the farmer hopefully gets better and buys in 100 cattle the following year, he will have a loss more than likely if he doesn't sell the 100, so, again averaging will smooth it out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭minerleague


    Put it this way, a simple example.

    A farmer buys and sells 100 cattle every December. He buys for €500 and sells for €1000. His expenses for the year are €30,000. So his farm income is €20,000.
    (100x(1000-500)) minus 30,000.

    Lets say he gets sick after selling his cattle but can't buy in. He now has no cattle on 31 Dec. His sales are €100k, expenses €30k. So €70,000. Do you really think that revenue will treat this €70k as income for that year?

    This farmer opening and closing stock are 50000, most years zero diff. In the scenario where he buys nothing in closing stock less opening stock is -50000 (Thats the way I did it anyway :D) income averaging is more to do with value of sales increasing/ decreasing ( ie milk price volatility)


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,037 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    my take on it
    afarmer expanding has 10 k more in cattle on hands at the end of the ye
    ar therefore he will have to pay tax on the extra 10 k in stock.however the next year he loses land and has to destock so he sells the 10 k in cattle and his stock goes down by 10 k.he does not have to pay tax on these sales as the 10 k in sales is negated by the 10 k decrease in closing stock so in there fore no tax is liable.feel free to correct me


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭minerleague


    K.G. wrote: »
    my take on it
    afarmer expanding has 10 k more in cattle on hands at the end of the ye
    ar therefore he will have to pay tax on the extra 10 k in stock.however the next year he loses land and has to destock so he sells the 10 k in cattle and his stock goes down by 10 k.he does not have to pay tax on these sales as the 10 k in sales is negated by the 10 k decrease in closing stock so in there fore no tax is liable.feel free to correct me

    in first part yeah, he has put 10k money( profit) into cattle instead of holding it in cash so pays income tax on this (stock relief of 100% for young trained farmers would have negated this)
    In second part again correct closing stock has reduced so no tax ( but if he sold them for more than they were valued at in opening stock some liability would accrue!)


  • Registered Users Posts: 374 ✭✭trg


    Put it this way, a simple example.

    A farmer buys and sells 100 cattle every December. He buys for €500 and sells for €1000. His expenses for the year are €30,000. So his farm income is €20,000.
    (100x(1000-500)) minus 30,000.

    Lets say he gets sick after selling his cattle but can't buy in. He now has no cattle on 31 Dec. His sales are €100k, expenses €30k. So €70,000. Do you really think that revenue will treat this €70k as income for that year?

    You're forgetting opening stock there.

    Sales 100k minus opening stock 50k minus expenses of 30k = taxable profit of 20k.

    He still has 70k in the bank to buy his stock when he recovers. All going well then the year after he'd have 12,500 stock relief (50k x 12.5%)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 790 ✭✭✭richie123


    KAMG wrote: »
    Yes, that's how it is treated. Hence why Income averaging for farmers is such a handy thing to be allowed to avail of. It smoothes out profits over 5 years. In the example above, if the farmer hopefully gets better and buys in 100 cattle the following year, he will have a loss more than likely if he doesn't sell the 100, so, again averaging will smooth it out.

    Is income averaging something you can only use once Ina given period of time or how does that work ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,057 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Can someone please explain this interesting concept that I have heard a few times before and some have mentioned it on thread.

    Everyone keeps mentioning something called "profit".


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,057 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    So how does the stock relief work in terms of eventually disposing of the stock.

    Suppose you start with an empty place and whatever income you make from other endeavors, you buy stock. Assume you can live on fresh air
    Year 1 you made 20k and you use that to buy 20 cattle @1k each. So overall your farm has 0 profit
    Year 2 you make another 20k and you use that to buy 20 more cattle @1k each. The year 1 cattle increase in value to 1.20k or a total increase of 4k for their value. Total value of stock at end of year 2 is then 44k
    Year 3 you retire and sell your 40 cattle for 1.5k each so make 60k income. You don't make anything else.

    So am I right in saying that in Year 1, you have to pay tax on 25% of the increase in stock value which would result in an "income" of 5k.
    Then in year 2, your income is effectively 25% of 24k

    What happens in year 3? Are you paying tax on the 16k book "profit" or on the 60k income?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭MIKEKC


    Can someone please explain this interesting concept that I have heard a few times before and some have mentioned it on thread.

    Everyone keeps mentioning something called "profit".

    With what people are paying for stock at the minute they must be making loads of it


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,057 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    MIKEKC wrote: »
    With what people are paying for stock at the minute they must be making loads of it




    I don't know about that. Feed and water a beast for 30 months and when you take your expenses out of whatever you get for them, what's left isn't going to get you too far with the oul' coke and hookers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭minerleague


    So how does the stock relief work in terms of eventually disposing of the stock.

    Suppose you start with an empty place and whatever income you make from other endeavors, you buy stock. Assume you can live on fresh air
    Year 1 you made 20k and you use that to buy 20 cattle @1k each. So overall your farm has 0 profit
    Year 2 you make another 20k and you use that to buy 20 more cattle @1k each. The year 1 cattle increase in value to 1.20k or a total increase of 4k for their value. Total value of stock at end of year 2 is then 44k
    Year 3 you retire and sell your 40 cattle for 1.5k each so make 60k income. You don't make anything else.

    So am I right in saying that in Year 1, you have to pay tax on 25% of the increase in stock value which would result in an "income" of 5k.
    Then in year 2, your income is effectively 25% of 24k

    What happens in year 3? Are you paying tax on the 16k book "profit" or on the 60k income?

    Stock relief is/was a tax break where you can write off increases in stock value against tax ( was 100% for young trained farmers 25% otherwise) same as any normal farm expense
    If you retire I think there are special arrangements in place ( dont know what exactly)


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    So nobody can give a definitive answer to the OP' s original question.

    'The Bishops blessed the Blueshirts in Galway, As they sailed beneath the Swastika to Spain'



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,138 ✭✭✭MIKEKC


    I don't know about that. Feed and water a beast for 30 months and when you take your expenses out of whatever you get for them, what's left isn't going to get you too far with the oul' coke and hookers.

    What it costs the producer to rear the animal is irrelevant. The person buying has to decide what he can pay, and leave a profit


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,427 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    MIKEKC wrote: »
    What it costs the producer to rear the animal is irrelevant. The person buying has to decide what he can pay, and leave a profit

    Well said Larry, the beef farming charities get the animals to slaughter weight.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,057 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    MIKEKC wrote: »
    What it costs the producer to rear the animal is irrelevant. The person buying has to decide what he can pay, and leave a profit




    You said there must be profit what with the current prices that are being paid for stock.

    You can't say the costs are irrelevant to that.

    Unless I am misunderstanding are you are saying something else.


Advertisement