Conor mcgregor is being sued Read OP for mod warning

19-01-2021 7:47pm #1

Woman sues mcgregor for damages from incident in 2018......<snip>

https://amp.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/woman-sues-conor-mcgregor-in-multi-million-euro-injuries-lawsuit-39986589.html?__twitter_impression=true

Mod warning - do not make any unproven allegations of illegal activity

19-01-2021 7:49pm

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Woman sues mcgregor for damages from incident in 2018.....<snip>

https://amp.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/woman-sues-conor-mcgregor-in-multi-million-euro-injuries-lawsuit-39986589.html?__twitter_impression=true

Hope she cleans him out

nolivesmatter · 19-01-2021 7:58pm

MikeOxsgreen wrote: »

Hope she cleans him out

No amount she might take from him will clean him out. His brand ensures he can always make more.

Irishphotodesk · 19-01-2021 8:04pm

Deleted User wrote: »

Woman sues mcgregor for damages from incident in 2018......<snip>

https://amp.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/woman-sues-conor-mcgregor-in-multi-million-euro-injuries-lawsuit-39986589.html?__twitter_impression=true

Isn't it two women suing ? And it's McGregor and another male being sued.

Both women have same surname (Indo reporting mother-daughter) interesting that the name of two parties suing are listed in Irish, I wonder if this was to try hide identity somewhat.

Rodin · 19-01-2021 8:08pm

A professional fighter fined a grand for punching an auld fella in a pub but Starbucks fined 12grand for a slanty-eyed drawing?
I know who was most hurt of those two victims...

Something wrong there.

suicide_circus · 19-01-2021 8:14pm

Yeah how did he get away with 1k for boxing your man in the pub?

19-01-2021 8:17pm

suicide_circus wrote: »

Yeah how did he get away with 1k for boxing your man in the pub?

i think he paid off alot more underhand (talk of 100K)....afaik your man was father of hit-man for one of gangs in dublin

odyssey06 · 19-01-2021 8:18pm

The Rumpoles will be able to retire on the retainers for this one...

suicide_circus · 19-01-2021 8:18pm

Deleted User wrote: »

i think he paid off alot more underhand (talk of 100K)....afaik your man was father of hit-man for one of gangs in dublin

That makes sense. Loved the way the auld lad didnt even fall off his chair

McCrack · 19-01-2021 8:20pm

Rodin wrote: »

A professional fighter fined a grand for punching an auld fella in a pub but Starbucks fined 12grand for a slanty-eyed drawing?
I know who was most hurt of those two victims...

Something wrong there.

There is a big difference between a court imposed fine (criminal penalty) and a civil case for damages

Fuascailteoir · 19-01-2021 8:21pm

[Deleted User] wrote: »

i think he paid off alot more underhand (talk of 100K)....afaik your man was father of hit-man for one of gangs in dublin

That wasn't the same incident

spodoinkle · 19-01-2021 8:51pm

Deleted User wrote: »

i think he paid off alot more underhand (talk of 100K)....afaik your man was father of hit-man for one of gangs in dublin

Eh? That cctv footage looked faker than a tik tok "prank"

simongurnick · 19-01-2021 9:01pm

Johnny BGood wrote: »

Its satisfying to know that this mupp*** might actually be held accountable for the horrific crime he committed. From the dpp to the hotel which the incident happened in, they should all be held accountable for trying to cover this up.
I’m led to believe the Gardai have substantial evidence from that night, so hopefully justice prevails.

"you are led to believe"?

Must be more convincing than the actual Garda investigation and DPP review.

LollipopJimmy · 19-01-2021 9:11pm

Johnny BGood wrote: »

Its satisfying to know that this mupp*** might actually be held accountable for the horrific crime he committed. From the dpp to the hotel which the incident happened in, they should all be held accountable for trying to cover this up.
I’m led to believe the Gardai have substantial evidence from that night, so hopefully justice prevails.

I'm led to believe they don't. The Gardai and DPP would have enjoyed pinning him on this and the fact they didn't speaks volumes.

He gets accused of all sorts all the time, just look at the Liverpool thing.

Darc19 · 19-01-2021 9:34pm

Dravokivich wrote: »

This is a civil matter though. Gards don't usually get involved in that. Article also states DPP didn't pursue charges due to lack of evidence.

Civil action has a much lower evidence threshold than a criminal action.

Johnny BGood · 19-01-2021 9:34pm

LollipopJimmy wrote: »

I'm led to believe they don't. The Gardai and DPP would have enjoyed pinning him on this and the fact they didn't speaks volumes.
He gets accused of all sorts all the time, just look at the Liverpool thing.

Ah cmon, he admitted to sleeping with you’re woman and obviously paid her off, the child is the absolute spit of him!
In regards to the hotel incident, the gardai gave the dpp a ridiculously strong file against him. The dpp dismissed dna evidence, only they can explain their ridiculous decision to dismiss the case.
His victim will now have the opportunity to stand up in court backed up by evidence which includes cctv.
It’s not looking good.

LollipopJimmy · 19-01-2021 9:38pm

Johnny BGood wrote: »

Ah cmon, he admitted to sleeping with you’re woman and obviously paid her off, the child is the absolute spit of him!
In regards to the hotel incident, the gardai gave the dpp a ridiculously strong file against him. The dpp dismissed dna evidence, only they can explain their ridiculous decision to dismiss the case.
His victim will now have the opportunity to stand up in court backed up by evidence which includes cctv.
It’s not looking good.

Get a hold of yourself, everybody knows who fathered that kid in Liverpool. My neighbour looks like Conor but fairly certain he didn't father him either.

You're going on here like you know inside stuff but clearly haven't a breeze

NewMan1982 · 19-01-2021 9:44pm

LollipopJimmy wrote: »

Get a hold of yourself, everybody knows who fathered that kid in Liverpool. My neighbour looks like Conor but fairly certain he didn't father him either.

You're going on here like you know inside stuff but clearly haven't a breeze

Who?

weldoninhio · 19-01-2021 9:45pm

suicide_circus wrote: »

Yeah how did he get away with 1k for boxing your man in the pub?

It was 1k in court because he’d already come to a private settlement afaik.

beakerjoe · 19-01-2021 10:02pm

Berties_Horse wrote: »

Scobe is parading a million dollar diamond watch, evidently he has more than enough cash to spray around.

The state of the watch.

I would be interested to see how this plays out.

Ive my opinion of Conor based on his punching aul lads, coke fueled binges, his cheating on his misses with trollopes and what not.

Hes not a man of good character.

I hope he gets what he deserves.

And the state of his watch. How old is he? Its the millionaire equivalent of a nudie pen bought from a huckster shop on holibops. Is he a horny 12 year old?

Money cant buy character and neither can publicised charitable donations.

Rodin · 19-01-2021 10:09pm

The one thing money can't buy is class.

19-01-2021 10:13pm

McGregor probably would not want any details of an alleged vicious assault to make it to a public forum in a court surely.

robwen · 19-01-2021 10:19pm

LollipopJimmy wrote: »

Get a hold of yourself, everybody knows who fathered that kid in Liverpool. My neighbour looks like Conor but fairly certain he didn't father him either.

You're going on here like you know inside stuff but clearly haven't a breeze

But but but he got the WhatsApps so it has to be true, LOL

19-01-2021 10:41pm

mysteriously that unemployed woman from Liverpool was suddenly heading off on trips to New York and LA exactly just after that supposed DNA test resolution.

pure coincidence of course.

Atlantic Dawn · 19-01-2021 11:01pm

Makes the New York Times, more detail as to what is alleged compared to Irish media...
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/19/sports/conor-mcgregor-lawsuit-ufc.html

19-01-2021 11:06pm

Atlantic Dawn wrote: »

Makes the New York Times, more detail as to what is alleged compared to Irish media...
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/19/sports/conor-mcgregor-lawsuit-ufc.html

She was examined in a sexual assault treatment unit at a hospital after her mother called her an ambulance when she arrived home, the lawsuit said. According to the statement, bruising was found on most of her body, and she had abrasions on her face, neck and right breast.

Fcuk him and his million euro watches

simongurnick · 19-01-2021 11:13pm

Atlantic Dawn wrote: »

Makes the New York Times, more detail as to what is alleged compared to Irish media...
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/19/sports/conor-mcgregor-lawsuit-ufc.html

Sounds even more like a set up with that info. Damages include the cost of selling a house and moving, so as not to remember the incident.

Moving in next to Bono, I'd guess

19-01-2021 11:18pm

simongurnick wrote: »

Sounds even more like a set up with that info. Damages include the cost of selling a house and moving, so as not to remember the incident.

Moving in next to Bono, I'd guess

Assuming we've read the same article, on what basis does it seem like a stitch up?

Donald Trump · 19-01-2021 11:18pm

simongurnick wrote: »

Sounds even more like a set up with that info. Damages include the cost of selling a house and moving, so as not to remember the incident.

Moving in next to Bono, I'd guess

You think something is a set-up based on what the compensation that your solicitor recommends you ask for?

Hypothetically speaking now of course. If it were true that a woman had been assaulted by a multi multi millionaire in the fashion described or alluded to, what price would you put on the compensation?

beakerjoe · 19-01-2021 11:22pm

simongurnick wrote: »

Sounds even more like a set up with that info. Damages include the cost of selling a house and moving, so as not to remember the incident.

Moving in next to Bono, I'd guess

Set up?

Really? Hes only set up if he takes the bait.

Dravokivich · 19-01-2021 11:23pm

Darc19 wrote: »

Civil action has a much lower evidence threshold than a criminal action.

Not Garda evidence. Which the person I was responding to made a point of stating, also suggesting it was quite strong.

simongurnick · 19-01-2021 11:55pm

Donald Trump wrote: »

You think something is a set-up based on what the compensation that your solicitor recommends you ask for?

Hypothetically speaking now of course. If it were true that a woman had been assaulted by a multi multi millionaire in the fashion described or alluded to, what price would you put on the compensation?

Of course. This is compo culture Ireland where people get 12 grand because of a smiley face on a cup and politicians seek damages for falling off swings.

Anyone care to explain why the mother is also seeking damages? Did he assault her too??

Donald Trump · 19-01-2021 11:58pm

simongurnick wrote: »

Of course. This is compo culture Ireland where people get 12 grand because of a smiley face on a cup and politicians seek damages for falling off swings.

Anyone care to explain why the mother is also seeking damages? Did he assault her too??

So what is your answer to the question?

What would be an appropriate price that you would expect to see put on such a hypothetical scenario for you not to automatically rule it out as a set-up?

NewMan1982 · 20-01-2021 12:00am

simongurnick wrote: »

Of course. This is compo culture Ireland where people get 12 grand because of a smiley face on a cup and politicians seek damages for falling off swings.

Anyone care to explain why the mother is also seeking damages? Did he assault her too??

I agree with you on compo culture but I’ll make an exception for an alleged rape victim getting a pay off.

Johnny BGood · 20-01-2021 12:04am

New York Times article on the lawsuit is brilliant.
The attached paragraph gives the “nay-sayers” no other choice but to accept reality.
Innocent until proven guilty is correct, but he has some serious questions to answer.

Donald Trump · 20-01-2021 12:07am

Johnny BGood wrote: »

New York Times article on the lawsuit is brilliant.
The attached paragraph gives the “nay-sayers” no other choice but to accept reality.
Innocent until proven guilty is correct, but he has some serious questions to answer.

The same article alleges that the friend of the alleged perpetrator claimed he was the one who had had sex with the complainant.

simongurnick · 20-01-2021 12:09am

Donald Trump wrote: »

So what is your answer to the question?

What would be an appropriate price that you would expect to see put on such a hypothetical scenario for you not to automatically rule it out as a set-up?

Depends on the case. In this case claiming for a new house looks a total money grab.

simongurnick · 20-01-2021 12:11am

NewMan1982 wrote: »

I agree with you on compo culture but I’ll make an exception for an alleged rape victim getting a pay off.

I'd be ok too. Just take out the word alleged. Guards looked at this for 2 years and couldn't bring a case

Donald Trump · 20-01-2021 12:12am

simongurnick wrote: »

Depends on the case. In this case claiming for a new house looks a total money grab.

It is quite a simple question.

If what is alleged to have happened, as reported, did in fact happen, what do you think would be an appropriate amount?

Bear in mind that if it did happen, then it could quite plausibly ruin her life. What would the amount be that makes you think "she's only setting him up"

10k? 100k? 1m?

It also does not say anything about claiming for a new house. It mentions the cost of moving to a new house. Not the same thing

simongurnick · 20-01-2021 12:18am

Donald Trump wrote: »

It is quite a simple question.

If what is alleged to have happened, as reported, did in fact happen, what do you think would be an appropriate amount?

Bear in mind that if it did happen, then it could quite plausibly ruin her life. What would the amount be that makes you think "she's only setting him up"

10k? 100k? 1m?

It also does not say anything about claiming for a new house. It mentions the cost of moving to a new house. Not the same thing

My issue isnt the sum involved, it's the reasoning for the claim, as in moving house. Smells like BS to me. If they just said a mil for pain and suffering it wouldn't seem so dodgy, but the cost of moving? Hmm

Also, what is the mother claiming for?

Donald Trump · 20-01-2021 12:23am

simongurnick wrote: »

My issue isnt the sum involved, it's the reasoning for the claim, as in moving house. Smells like BS to me. If they just said a mil for pain and suffering it wouldn't seem so dodgy, but the cost of moving? Hmm

Also, what is the mother claiming for?

It appears that the complainant is from the same area, and moved in somewhat similar circles to the alleged perpetrator.
One might imagine that, given the alleged perpetrators popularity and connections among certain sections of society, that she might feel a little uncomfortable in remaining in that area.
I would have thought that that was perfectly reasonable? No?

NYT article doesn't mention the mother.

simongurnick · 20-01-2021 12:26am

Donald Trump wrote: »

It appears that the complainant is from the same area, and moved in somewhat similar circles to the alleged perpetrator.
One might imagine that, given the alleged perpetrators popularity and connections among certain sections of society, that she might feel a little uncomfortable in remaining in that area.
I would have thought that that was perfectly reasonable? No?

NYT article doesn't mention the mother.[/quote

That's a fair point but why can't she move to a home of equal value to her current residence?

The info article mentions two lawsuits. Second one is the mother. I imagine she is claiming some sort of distress but where does that end? I'm sure all family and friends of a rape victim are extremely distressed. Do they all get compensated too?

Donald Trump · 20-01-2021 12:35am

simongurnick wrote: »

Donald Trump wrote: »

It appears that the complainant is from the same area, and moved in somewhat similar circles to the alleged perpetrator.
One might imagine that, given the alleged perpetrators popularity and connections among certain sections of society, that she might feel a little uncomfortable in remaining in that area.
I would have thought that that was perfectly reasonable? No?

NYT article doesn't mention the mother.

That's a fair point but why can't she move to a home of equal value to her current residence?

The info article mentions two lawsuits. Second one is the mother. I imagine she is claiming some sort of distress but where does that end? I'm sure all family and friends of a rape victim are extremely distressed. Do they all get compensated too?

It never says where she is moving to. It just says that the calculated figure includes costs for the move. It does not say how much is attributed to each bit.

I don't know anything about the second case. When or if info comes out on it I might make a comment on it. We have no idea whether it directly relates to the same incident or whether it is for something else. No point speculating on it.

beakerjoe · 20-01-2021 12:47am

simongurnick wrote: »

Depends on the case. In this case claiming for a new house looks a total money grab.

Realisticly its an expensive money grab if it doesnt pay off. You cant just sue someone, especially a multi millionaire, on a whim. The legal costs alone would make a frivolous claim a stupid move against someone with some financial muscle.

She must be confident in her case. Her confidence is probably based off Conors wreckless behaviour.

Rows Grower · 20-01-2021 12:58am

Rodin wrote: »

The one thing money can't buy is class.

Love.

Money can't buy you love.

Faugheen · 20-01-2021 1:19am

Johnny BGood wrote: »

Ah cmon, he admitted to sleeping with you’re woman and obviously paid her off, the child is the absolute spit of him!
In regards to the hotel incident, the gardai gave the dpp a ridiculously strong file against him. The dpp dismissed dna evidence, only they can explain their ridiculous decision to dismiss the case.
His victim will now have the opportunity to stand up in court backed up by evidence which includes cctv.
It’s not looking good.

I’d bet both my bollocks that the DPP didn’t proceed because they knew they wouldn’t get a conviction.

Think about it, that trial would be a circus. McGregor would be entitled to anonymity but I’d bet that all the American networks would fly over and cover it, and not even bother to check the laws we have here and name him anyway.

There isn’t a chance we’d get a day out of the case before it’s thrown out.

Vestiapx · 20-01-2021 1:31am

Evidence of something happening is not evidence of who did it.

The fact they weren't paid off to go away speaks volumes in my opinion.

Gatling · 20-01-2021 1:50am

beakerjoe wrote: »

She must be confident in her case. Her confidence is probably based off Conors wreckless behaviour.

Doesn't have to be just has to wait for the right offer to be made from the legal representatives of his ,

If she wants justice she would be all over the media and social media with her claims but instead she wants compensation .

At the time the apparent rumors was this victim was destroyed and left in awful state yet no evidence to charge it's got nothing to do with a buy off either

hynesie08 · 20-01-2021 2:25am

Gatling wrote: »

Doesn't have to be just has to wait for the right offer to be made from the legal representatives of his ,

If she wants justice she would be all over the media and social media with her claims but instead she wants compensation .

At the time the apparent rumors was this victim was destroyed and left in awful state yet no evidence to charge it's got nothing to do with a buy off either

So she should accuse him of rape in the media, and then he'd sue her into oblivion?

Donald Trump · 20-01-2021 2:31am

Gatling wrote: »

Doesn't have to be just has to wait for the right offer to be made from the legal representatives of his ,

If she wants justice she would be all over the media and social media with her claims but instead she wants compensation .

At the time the apparent rumors was this victim was destroyed and left in awful state yet no evidence to charge it's got nothing to do with a buy off either

Am I misreading your claim or are you saying that if a hypothetical rape victim wanted justice, then they should forgo their anonymity on Facebook if they are genuine?

That they should publicly accuse a hypothetical suspect of rape on social media and not be worried about defamation or other repercussions?

Gatling · 20-01-2021 2:43am

Donald Trump wrote: »

Am I misreading your claim or are you saying that if a hypothetical rape victim wanted justice,

A hypothetical victim who's claim were completely rejected by the gardai and DPP and now we have person injury claim before a big fight for him ,
Which will likely be settled out of court and the hypothetical victim signs a non disclosure agreement and she suddenly goes away quietly ,
Why not go public with the claim she would find huge support by doing so why would he sue her if she's got evidence to back up her claim,

Personal injury claims are settled by insurance companies not individuals being sued.

Seems like a odd situation to me ,

Conor mcgregor is being sued *Read OP for mod warning*

Comments

Conor mcgregor is being sued Read OP for mod warning