Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Wokeism of the day *Revised Mod Note in OP and threadbanned users*

1228229231233234241

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,678 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    True, if they make a Genghis Khan film, I dont want it to star Colin Farrell and a bunch of other spud faced chancers.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,516 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    It's actually a ripcord; It expands to its full size when the spring engages.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    How can we fix it so that young people will be able to buy a house? Simple. Just increase property taxes for houses that were build prior to 2023 and exempt houses that get built from this point forward. Also, exempt first time buyers of pre 2023 houses from the property tax for at least 20 years, (provided they did not make the purchase before 2023).

    If the tax on pre 2023 houses was high enough, it would have these effects:

    1) It would create a real economic demand for new builds (over existing housing stock). Anyone who can afford a new house will buy one and sell their existing house which will be costing them too much to keep. This will make building new houses far more economically viable as they will fetch a higher price.

    2) This increase in sales of existing houses will put serious downward pressure on the price of pre 2023 houses., making them more affordable.

    3) It would correct the mistake the governments made in enriching and protecting property owners by re-inflating property prices which were trying to correct themselves in 2009. Re-inflating property prices has cost us all 200 billion euro in borrowed money since the crash of 2008. Natural justice dictates that 200 billion should be repaid by the people who benefitted from it and not by young people who were school children back in 2008. And by raising 200 billion (by taxing pre 2023 properties), the government could bring the national debt back to where it was in 2008, before they did their bank bailouts and market manipulations.





  • @BoxcarWilliam99 threadbanned



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,994 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    If that was in Ireland it's even stranger...white folk account for 94.7% of the population...if it's about proportional representation then it should still have some white folk...also a few weeks back some empty-head 'journalist/blogger" was on the tonight show whining about politics not being inclusive enough and said Ireland doesn't have anyone of colour in the dail...a-hem Leo is of Indian decent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,679 ✭✭✭StevenToast


    Sky sports leading story this evening is some womens game a very small minority of people are interested in...

    The champions league quarter finals where literally millions of people are far more interested in worldwide is pegged down a few rungs of the ladder to make way for this blatant shoehorning wokeism....

    Fine, cover the womens game...no problem...but making it top billing tonight is taking the pìss.....

    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." - Fletcher



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,994 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    BBC had one tonight's women's games... surely it would have made more sense to have it when there wasn't a champions league QF



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭Me_Grapes


    Yep

    Number 1 billing on their website all evening....... not even in their top 10 most trending articles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,814 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Attendance confirmed at 6,658…. Ballpark mid table league two attendance.

    Attendance in Munich for the Munich vs City game was confirmed at 75,000 with millions watching on tv worldwide…

    6658 people.. that interest is akin to the attendances at Grimsby Town …but ..

    why not just have it Friday night…? I know, wanting to be ‘seen’ to be competing with men’s fixtures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,158 ✭✭✭Cordell


    I think you posted in the wrong forum, and your communism is showing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,505 ✭✭✭Killinator


    It's probably just as much about the fact that Sky don't have the rights to the Champions League but do to the WSL, hence pushing one over the other



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,268 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Did someone mention Arsenal, Womens Football and Sky ?




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    It should be blatantly obvious to anyone with a shred of media literacy that this is the real reason, but that still doesn’t stop the denizens of boomers.ie from crying about “shoe horning wokeism.”

    Let’s not forget that the people crying about Sky Sports’ exploiting their right to post headlines on their website as they please are exactly the same people who blubber about “freedom of speech” and “cancel culture” when anyone has a go at their own heroes. 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    I don't follow sport much but when did they drop "women's" when talking about womens' sports?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,994 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,158 ✭✭✭Cordell


    About this boomer thing when used derogatory towards people who are virtually all gen X, what's the deal with it? How is it acceptable to misage a person? I know it started as a meme, it should have died as that, so don't give me that answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    For some people there are no bad tactics only bad targets. They will claim to have a philosophy like be kind but only apply it to those that agree with their outlook and apply all sorts of -isms to the right targets, in their view. It's olympic gold medal level mental gymnastics.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    Let’s not forget that the people crying about Sky Sports’ exploiting their right to post headlines on their website as they please are exactly the same people who blubber about “freedom of speech” and “cancel culture” when anyone has a go at their own heroes. 🤣

    News outlets having agendas isn't a free speech matter as you know, it's a matter of ethics. I know it's a dead concept in the modern world, but we once expected impartiality from the media.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    What on Earth are you talking about? There’s nothing “unethical” about Sky Sports putting a women’s football game result on their website.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    The news doesn't exist to promote things, bar the news, and putting female football front and centre when there's little general demand for it is certainly agenda driven.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭NattyO


    It is cringe-inducingly embarrassing to see/hear Irish people, especially Irish adults, use the term "boomer" - I understand they are using it because they don't know what it means, but still. It's the teenage/young adult equivalent of a combover.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,036 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Exactly. Sky are pushing what's on their channels. Like every other TV station in the world does. Now the fact that they scheduled the match at the same time as the CL quarter finals, to me that's a bit daft but I suppose they have to schedule something.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Sky Sports isn’t “the news,” it’s sport reportage.

    In publication terms imagine that if RTE News is the Irish Independent then Sky Sports is Match Magazine. It’s not beholden to the same editorial standards as a news publication.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,158 ✭✭✭Cordell


    No man it's not like that, calling us boomers doesn't offend us, it's not like calling a fat person fat or Dylan a man, i.e. using the truth to inflict insult on people offended by the truth. I'm just wondering why, that's all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Badly Drunk Boy


    It's not just Sky Sports, though. Two years ago I was watching the Virgin Media news when the sports section started. The first sentence was that Spain had beaten Ireland in a shock win for them. I was thinking "Spain would probably be favourites in most sports against Ireland so why the shock?". In the second sentence, they mentioned that it was rugby. That made a bit more sense, even though I didn't know the Irish team was playing them. In the third line of the report, it was revealed that it was women's rugby. Okay, now I know what's going on.

    Why not say "Spain have beaten the Ireland women's rugby team in a shock defeat for the Irish" and then continue with the details on the match? I realise that Virgin Media news isn't exactly the pinnacle of news (and sports) journalism, but they should be able to do better than that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Confusion on your part because you think hearing about any sport = men’s sport doesn’t really mean anything. That’s your own prejudice and just because it’s the status quo doesn’t mean it’s valid.

    That actually goes for anyone else who flies into an apoplexy when they hear or read about women’s sport too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    That's because sport is defacto mens' sport, women aren't excluded from most sports they just can't compete with the men. Women's sports are explicitly for women, or were until very recently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    If you have a point I would love to hear what it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    That thinking sport=mens' sport or more accurately sports that will exclusively feature men isn't some grand display of misogyny or prejudice it's just reality for the vast majority of sports, and all of the really popular ones AFAIK. The exceptions that exist are usually when being smaller or lighter is one of the most significant factors in outcome, extreme long distance running (in the range of 200km+) for example. And as a result of the above dropping the "women's" from womens' sports is needlessly confusing. But then you did understand my point you just had to childishly pretend like I wasn't making one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Badly Drunk Boy


    Firstly, more people want to hear about the Irish men's rugby team than the women's rugby team because they are more skilled, more successful and are better known to the general public. That's just a fact. Yes, there isn't the same investment in the women's game, but there's no point in pretending that they are the same. More men play sports than women, and more people are interested in watching men's sports (and that includes female sports fans).

    Having noticed this way of reporting sport, I also remember one news report which started "Ireland's men's 7s rugby team...". Why suddenly say "men's" when it's a different version of rugby, but if it's women's...no need to mention it? No, there's no agenda...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,210 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,158 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Kind of both. It means the act of using the wrong age or generation when talking to or about someone. I'm gen X, calling me a boomer is misaging me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,210 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Still unable to tell if you’re being serious, in the Wokeism thread, of all threads 😳

    I get that you’re not bothered by being called boomer, gen x, y, z whatever, but… accusing someone of ‘misaging’? It’s weird 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,158 ✭✭✭Cordell


    It is weird, isn't it? Not being able to tell if something is serious or not is the new normal. Dude masquerading as a girl gets invited to White House, surely it must be a joke, right? Right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,210 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Ohh THAT’s the Dylan you were referring to! I was wondering about that one alright seeing as Dylan is a name normally given to boys, though I’ve heard of girls called Dylan too.

    Makes me want to stick a fork in my good eye tbh 🙄



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    This discussion is simply about Sky Sports covering women’s sport on their website, it’s not relevant if men’s sport is more popular or more skilled than women’s sport.

    The fact is that while women’s sport is not anywhere near as popular or skilled as men’s sport, there are professional women’s leagues that are growing in popularity and Sky Sports, having seen this growth in popularity, have made an editorial decision to cover these leagues in their sports coverage. That is their inalienable right as a publication, to insist otherwise is an infringement of their freedom of expression.

    All of this moaning from confused gammons about professional sport being the reserve of men doesn’t mean anything except that it highlights their own outdated prejudices.

    I know that this is very confusing to the middle aged denizens of boomers.ie but that is the reality. Women play sport and people have exactly the same right to follow it and post about it as men’s sport, even if any men’s team could beat any women’s team on the football/rugby pitch. This is what equality means.



  • Registered Users Posts: 95 ✭✭jamieon




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    My sincerest apologies oh great Arbiter of the Topic of Discussion. I had not realised you had dained the progression of the topic from Sky Sports' specific coverage to the general dropping of "women's" from the womens' sports coverage to be irrelevant.* We shall seek your approval before expanding the scope of discussion in future.

    *Despite the fact you responded to exactly that and subsequent responses were about clearing up why sport = mens' sports in almost all cases.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    You can get as uppity as you like but the fact remains that reportage on professional sport is not exclusive to men’s sport, nor is it exclusive to who happen to be the best or most popular at any time. Otherwise, just to use one example, the men’s English Football League (Championship level down) would not be covered at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    Could you quote who is asking for it to exclusively cover mens' sport? Or exclusively popular sport as opposed to in order of popularity? I must have missed those posts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭CGI_Livia_Soprano
    Holding tyrants to the fire


    Well one poster expressed dismay at women’s football being covered when the attendance of one particular game was similar to a men’s Grimsby Town game, another was crying over the “woke shoehorning” of covering the women’s game at all, and a third sobbed about the biased “agenda” Sky Sports have because they committed the cardinal sin of mentioning women’s football.

    Reading between the lines here, it’s obvious that a certain bright pink demographic sincerely believe that sports coverage is exclusively for men, by men, about men.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    So no evidence then, besides the narrative you have created in your head.

    Just to check since you seem to know so much about racism etc, are skin colour based slurs in vogue again? Or is this more bad targets not bad tactics?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,479 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    I'm sensing all is not as harmonious as we have been lead to to believe within the gay 'community' lol. Of course Owen Jones isn't in the slightest big obnoxious.

    But isn't he's breaking a Lefty golden rule that you can't generalize about a demographic esp a minority one.

    And yeah there's nothing woke about this I just can't resist an opportunity to show up Owen Jones. It's a love to hate him kinda thing with me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭NattyO


    People with "antifascist" in their bio are like countries with "democratic" in their name - it's generally a good indication that they aren't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,500 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    Seems this guy assigns gay people liberal at birth and is offended if they don't salute to the rainbow flag.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,158 ✭✭✭Cordell



    No wonder aliens give us a wide berth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,789 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    He didn't do the lad any favours in the mickey department. 😁



  • Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭NattyO




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,805 ✭✭✭Evade


    Statues are cold so...



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement