Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Probability of Occurrences

  • 03-12-2020 12:46pm
    #1
    ShyWho12
    Registered Users Posts: 8 ✭


    Hi!

    I am wondering could someone help me with an issue I am having as I am new to probabilities. I have data that I calculated the correlations for and plotted the distribution as a histogram and getting a bell shape curve as expected and now I want to know the likelihood of those correlations occurring. I have calculated these values accounting for above and below the mean. I need to make a visual to represent these values but I am unsure what’s the best graph to represent these values. I have tried a histogram but because probabilities are positive this doesn’t seem to work as I do expect that bell shape curve again. When I look at my data the probabilities gradually increase to a point and then start to decrease but it’s when I try and plot the histogram it’s like once the peak is reached the probabilities fold back on each other because they are all positive values and it’s not a fair representation of the data.

    Thank you!
    Tagged:


Comments

  • #2
    Michael Collins
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 1,851 Mod ✭✭✭✭Michael Collins


    Hello ShyWho12,

    It's not 100% clear what you mean.

    You say you have a histogram already, is this not what you want? This would tell you the relative frequency of occurrence for each range on your x-axis. To get an estimate of the probability you could then divide each y-value on your histogram plot by the total number of occurrences -- this is one way of generating an experimental distribution, although there are other, more sophisticated, ways.

    Yes, probabilities are always between 0 and 1 (inclusive), but that doesn't mean the histogram cannot go back down again. Remember, you're breaking your x-data up into discrete ranges, and seeing how many of the values fall into those ranges, this usually reaches a peak for mid-value ranges e.g. most people have a height between 5 ft 5 in and 5 ft 10 in, while either side of this there are fewer people who are smaller or taller -- so the graph will be lower for height ranges above and below this range.

    Normally, there's no need to consider the mean separately, if your data are bell-shaped (or close to it), then the mean range is the range in the centre of the x-axis, where your histogram reaches its peak, i.e. you can see this visually from the plot. If your data are not bell-shaped (i.e. not "normally distributed"), then the mean is not so easy to see visually, but can be calculated and indicated on the graph.

    It would help if you could upload an image of the various plots you mention.


Advertisement