Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Ethics of our Corporation Tax

Options
124»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,066 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Gbear wrote: »
    What would be the issue with simply abolishing it completely?

    If, as we've seen, a mega-corporation can just sidestep it anyway, while smaller companies, like OscarBravo's, don't have the resources to do so, the tax is already effectively regressive.

    If the income of the company that would otherwise be taxable is attempted to be expatriated, then perhaps it could be taxed, but otherwise, what benefit is there in taxing money that will otherwise be taxed through income, capital gains, PRSI, or whatever the company spends it on?

    At a minimum, is it not needless complexity added to taxation that could be acheived through other means?

    Even if we were to get to the stage where 90% of current jobs were automated and few employees were around to earn taxable income, the massive profit margin would still ultimately end up as taxable income, whether it was in purchasing more plant or property, issued as dividends, DIRT, capital gains or whatever.

    Some tax theories in economics suggest that the optimal rate of capital/corporate taxation is 0%.


  • Registered Users Posts: 26,283 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Could work if you forced these big companies to fund infrastructure projects and/or base themselves in secondary locations.

    Livingin Leixlip, Ive seen first hand what intel and HP have paid for volountarily , its not the ‘ evil corporation’ mantra many on the left preach


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,469 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Gbear wrote: »
    What would be the issue with simply abolishing it completely?

    being black listed as a tax haven, there is no way the EU nations would allow it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,108 ✭✭✭paul71


    Geuze wrote: »
    Some tax theories in economics suggest that the optimal rate of capital/corporate taxation is 0%.

    I was once of that opinion however the issue is one of ultimate ownership. I believed that you allow the corporation to earn tax free income but tax the distribution of profit so the person who is taxed is the one in the receipt of the dividend.

    However the advent of the international corporation or more to the point the prevalence of international corporations in our tax jurisdiction makes a mockery of that.


Advertisement