Dublin Bus January Service Enhancements

devnull · 12-01-2018 4:59pm #1

Just a quick heads up that Dublin Bus have today announced a range of service improvements and frequency enhancements in conjunction with the NTA which include additional departures on a number of routes with effect of 28th January.

Note that some of these extra services operate in college term time only - check the timetables for details.

Route 9 (new timetable)
As a result of customer feedback there will be a revised timetable with additional departures on Sunday services. These changes will improve frequency and reliability.

Route 15 (new timetable)
Additional departures Monday to Friday will operate from Ballycullen Road at 07.24hrs and 07.32hrs and from Clongriffin at 07.30hrs and 07.46hrs.

Route 25a (new timetable)
As a result of customer feedback there will be a revised timetable with additional departures on Monday to Friday services. These changes will improve frequency and reliability.

Route 25b (new timetable)
As a result of customer feedback there will be a revised timetable with additional departures on Monday to Friday services. These changes will improve frequency and reliability.

Route 26 (new timetable)
Additional departures from West County Hotel towards Bachelors Walk at 06.25hrs, 07.25hrs, 08.25hrs and 09.40hrs Monday to Friday.

Route 46A (new timetable)
Additional departures from Foxrock Church to Parnell Square West at 07.10hrs, 07.25hrs, 07.40hrs and 07.55hrs Monday to Friday.

Route 66 (new timetable)
Additional departures from Merrion Square towards Maynooth at 07.40hrs and 07.55hrs Monday to Friday.
Additional departures from Maynooth towards Merrion Square at 16.25hrs Monday to Friday.

Route 67 (new timetable)
Additional departures from Maynooth towards Merrion Square at 06.20hrs Monday to Friday.

Stephen15 · 12-01-2018 6:01pm

I wonder where the extra buses are coming from?

BonnieSituation · 12-01-2018 6:32pm

Stephen15 wrote: »

I wonder where the extra buses are coming from?

The bus fairy.

thomasj · 12-01-2018 7:11pm

Apart from the 9 (theres no weekday changes anyway) and the 25A/B (where they have announced new timetable), these additional services only run during school term.

devnull · 12-01-2018 7:15pm

The buses are believed to come from the fact in December there were more new buses entering service than were withdrawn.

They have announced new timetables for all of the above listed routes in my first post and they take effect from 28/29 January.

Nothing to suggest that they are running only term time.

thomasj · 12-01-2018 7:18pm

devnull wrote: »

Nothing to suggest that they are running only term time.

It says it in the timetables for all except 9 and 25A/B

L1011 · 12-01-2018 7:23pm

So the promise of 'extra 67s to deal with overcrowding' effectively ignored the fact that since the 30 minute service was brought in passenger numbers have soared and the bus is overcrowded all bloody day, 6 and half days a week.

devnull · 12-01-2018 7:26pm

thomasj wrote: »

It says it in the timetables for all except 9 and 25A/B

Just noticed that on the timetables themselves.

There are news articles on the website for each route and not a single one of them mentions the fact that the new services operate during term time only and it's disappointing that Dublin Bus were not completely upfront about this.

Hugh Jampton · 12-01-2018 7:39pm

devnull wrote: »

Just noticed that on the timetables themselves.

There are news articles on the website for each route and not a single one of them mentions the fact that the new services operate during term time only and it's disappointing that Dublin Bus were not completely upfront about this.

Official Ireland Flimflam. Tell people what they want to hear and bury the detail.

StreetLight · 12-01-2018 8:08pm

I'm a bit intrigued with a departure on the revised 66 table:

http://www.dublinbus.ie/Your-Journey1/Timetables/All-Timetables/661/

There's a regular Monday to Friday departure from Merrion Square at 0740, but another 0740 during term time only. Does this mean there will be two buses running together during term times?

Stephen15 · 12-01-2018 8:14pm

Term time only is a bit vague do they mean school term or college term does this mean the service dosen't operate during the Christmas, Easter and Midterm breaks or just summer. Would it not be better if they didn't mark this confusing information and just don't run those services on the Summer timetable.

thomasj · 12-01-2018 8:48pm

StreetLight wrote:

I'm a bit intrigued with a departure on the revised 66 table:

StreetLight wrote:

There's a regular Monday to Friday departure from Merrion Square at 0740, but another 0740 during term time only. Does this mean there will be two buses running together during term times?

Presuming that the 0740 is full to capacity with students and factory workers so the additional 0740 on term time will provide backup capacity.

Del2005 · 13-01-2018 9:33am

Stephen15 wrote: »

Term time only is a bit vague do they mean school term or college term does this mean the service dosen't operate during the Christmas, Easter and Midterm breaks or just summer. Would it not be better if they didn't mark this confusing information and just don't run those services on the Summer timetable.

The schools don't even have a standard term, so how can something be term time only when there's no defined term time for schools or colleges?

noelfirl · 13-01-2018 11:24am

devnull wrote: »

Route 26 (new timetable)
Additional departures from West County Hotel towards Bachelors Walk at 06.25hrs, 07.25hrs, 08.25hrs and 09.40hrs Monday to Friday.

If I'm reading that one correctly, they're removing the 0825 departure from Palmerstown (cut short to start from the West County Hotel further down the line).

Considering the function of that route is to "mop up" for the other busier outer suburban services using the N4, it seems a bit ridiculous to remove that departure from Palmerstown - at one of the key times when that end of the route merits the extra support.

LeinsterDub · 13-01-2018 11:56am

Unbelievable the 4 didn't get an improvement. It's a core north-south route.

thomasj · 13-01-2018 11:56am

noelfirl wrote:

Considering the function of that route is to "mop up" for the other busier outer suburban services using the N4, it seems a bit ridiculous to remove that departure from Palmerstown - at one of the key times when that end of the route merits the extra support.

That has to be a timetable error.

The general trend of the 26 route during morning peak is 30 minute frequency . If you look at the other earlier new departures they run at the same time (or give or take a few minutes before or after the existing departures)

They couldn't have an hour gap between buses in the morning peak even if it is outside term time could they?

thomasj · 13-01-2018 12:00pm

LeinsterDub wrote:

Unbelievable the 4 didn't get an improvement. It's a core north-south route.

I was on a 39a at 8.30 last night. With a 20 minute gap for the next one it was skipping stops or only letting the first few on. And this was a triaxle bus being used.

devnull · 13-01-2018 12:17pm

noelfirl wrote: »

If I'm reading that one correctly, they're removing the 0825 departure from Palmerstown (cut short to start from the West County Hotel further down the line).

Considering the function of that route is to "mop up" for the other busier outer suburban services using the N4, it seems a bit ridiculous to remove that departure from Palmerstown - at one of the key times when that end of the route merits the extra support.

Well spotted. I reported the changes as they had been announced by Dublin Bus but as past experience has shown they tend to use a more "PR Speak" approach to such notices over the last few years to mention the good and ignore the bad rather than using a factual approach to them

What the NTA needs to do in the next Dublin Bus contract is enforce them to report route changes on a factual basis using a set template of wording rather than allowing such announcements to be made from a marketing point of view.

The announcements should include:
- Details of services dropped when they are withdrawn and the times of them
- Details of new services provided when they are introduced and the times.
- When services run certain parts of the year only - list those dates
- The date the timetable takes effect from
- Alternative arrangements (if any) for areas omitted.
- When routes are changed, a clear map of the new route.

If Dublin Bus or any other state contractor do not comply with this then it should be fined. Using spin the way they have on a number of occasions is not fair on the public, the same public the company is supposedly set up to serve paid for by public money.

AlekSmart · 13-01-2018 1:32pm

devnull wrote: »

Well spotted. I reported the changes as they had been announced by Dublin Bus but as past experience has shown they tend to use a more "PR Speak" approach to such notices over the last few years to mention the good and ignore the bad rather than using a factual approach to them

What the NTA needs to do in the next Dublin Bus contract is enforce them to report route changes on a factual basis using a set template of wording rather than allowing such announcements to be made from a marketing point of view.

The announcements should include:
- Details of services dropped when they are withdrawn and the times of them
- Details of new services provided when they are introduced and the times.
- When services run certain parts of the year only - list those dates
- The date the timetable takes effect from
- Alternative arrangements (if any) for areas omitted.
- When routes are changed, a clear map of the new route.

If Dublin Bus do not comply with this then it should be fined. Using spin the way they have on a number of occasions is not fair on the public, the same public the company is supposedly set up to serve paid for by public money.

Given that BAC schedule alterations come with the words

All changes have been approved by the National Trasport Authority.

,one must assume that the NTA are indeed satisfied with the methodology used ?

The various Irish sectors which have become "regulated" over the past two decades,have become well used to adhering closely to the wordings of reguatory agencies,which is not always to the benefit of the end user.

Perhaps a pithly worded enquiry to the NTA's public affairs department might spur them clarify their position ?

One element is becoming clearer in the light of the Go-Ahead transfer,and it is the absence of an operational transition plan.

Since 2014, there is a comprehensive agreement in place between the NTA,Bus Atha Cliath and the Dept of Transport,outlining quite specific (and substantial) PSO Bus Service enhancements to existing BAC routes to cater for BAC's now altered situation.

The Agreement was arrived at after protracted negotiations,but one significant issue is that it is based upon 2013 usership data.:eek:

Neither the NTA or BAC,appear to recognise the front-line reality of the increased demand for Public Transport Services since 2013,which as many posters here confirm,regularly results in Full buses across the entire day.

What we are now seeing,is a response to a demand situation which existed in 2013,and which has become far more acute since then.

With our core schedules still adhereing to the 1950's definition of Peak/Off Peak,and the inability of anybody to define the extent of "Term Time",we have returned to the time honoured practice of "tinkering" with individual departures and hoping that it will address the greater capacity issues.......this aproach has not worked in the past,and it will not work now.

I'm assuming the NTA's standard PR reply will refer to the Jarrett Walker Busconnects programme,which apears now to be slipping into overdue status,when it is now urgently required in terms of comprehensively addressing the situation.

There is now a worrying element of lack-of-leadership on display,both from the NTA as the oversight body and Bus Atha Cliath,as the major service provider.

It can be argued that the country,as a whole is headed down the exact same road as led us into the last collapse,which makes it even more important that those involved in Public Transport do not head in that direction yet again,with the inevitable end result of more "Network Direct" style survival plans for the entire Public Transport area.

devnull · 13-01-2018 1:50pm

AlekSmart wrote: »

Given that BAC schedule alterations come with the words ,one must assume that the NTA are indeed satisfied with the methodology used ?

My comment was not in relation to changes to the schedule or the methodology but it was in relation to the text of the announcements which was written by Dublin Bus which was less than transparent about the full nature of the changes that were being made on the route and this is not the first time that this has happened as it happened in the middle of last year with the 75.

Dublin Bus are required to get approval and agree changes with the NTA, but there is no requirement for Dublin Bus to get approval for the text that is issued to announce such changes to the public contained within the PSO contract that is in place between the NTA and Dublin Bus and I'm saying that should change in the future so a standard format is used detailing everything I outlined above as right now there is not full transparency.

Wagon360 · 13-01-2018 1:57pm

I suggest it would be better for the NTA to make the announcements.

AngryLips · 13-01-2018 2:24pm

AlekSmart wrote: »

the inability of anybody to define the extent of "Term Time"Transport area.

It's fairly clear to me that term time is the difference between the summer timetable and the timetable in force for all other times of the year, no?

thomasj · 13-01-2018 2:30pm

AngryLips wrote:

It's fairly clear to me that term time is the difference between the summer timetable and the timetable in force for all other times of the year, no?

I would have thought it would have been during the term at college and school.

For example look at the 145 timetable, the departures that go from ucd mention term time.

AngryLips · 13-01-2018 2:32pm

thomasj wrote: »

I would have thought it would have been during the term at college and school.

For example look at the 145 timetable, the departures that go from ucd mention term time.

The summer timetable is always talked about in the context of lower demand from schools and colleges being off - I don't think it could mean anything else TBH. Of course, I stand to be corrected

thomasj · 13-01-2018 2:35pm

But are those 145 services run on midterm etc ? I wouldn't know myself

Stephen15 · 13-01-2018 5:12pm

Del2005 wrote: »

The schools don't even have a standard term, so how can something be term time only when there's no defined term time for schools or colleges?

Exactly the timetable should say September to May Only or not exist on the summer timetable.

r93kaey5p2izun · 13-01-2018 5:22pm

I sincerely hope they have the resources, in terms of both buses and drivers, to actually deliver new timetables. Because timetabling yet more buses that won't show up due to operational issues is just making the situation worse. For me reliable delivery of the advertised timetable is the most important thing. I feel extra resources should go to ensuring there is adequate capacity to deal with issues arising daily and causing buses not to run daily on these routes, such as drivers not coming in and traffic delays, before adding departures to the timetable.

Stephen15 · 13-01-2018 6:37pm

Raegan Green Tachometer wrote: »

I sincerely hope they have the resources, in terms of both buses and drivers, to actually deliver new timetables. Because timetabling yet more buses that won't show up due to operational issues is just making the situation worse. For me reliable delivery of the advertised timetable is the most important thing. I feel extra resources should go to ensuring there is adequate capacity to deal with issues arising daily and causing buses not to run daily on these routes, such as drivers not coming in and traffic delays, before adding departures to the timetable.

You have to remember that DB is not allowed operate any additional services without NTA approval so they can't send extra buses that aren't timetabled.

r93kaey5p2izun · 13-01-2018 7:49pm

Stephen15 wrote: »

You have to remember that DB is not allowed operate any additional services without NTA approval so they can't send extra buses that aren't timetabled.

I don't want extra buses that aren't timetabled - just that the ones that are timetabled depart as advertised. Right now it's a common occurence for some of these routes to not operate due to no driver or due to the incoming bus being too delayed to start the outbound journey on time so it's just dropped. It seems 100% of buses are already deployed so there is no capacity to deal with everyday problems. Additional drivers and buses are required just to operate the current timetable from I can see, let alone add new departures.

devnull · 13-01-2018 7:55pm

Raegan Green Tachometer wrote: »

I don't want extra buses that aren't timetabled - just that the ones that are timetabled depart as advertised. Right now it's a common occurence for some of these routes to not operate due to no driver or due to the incoming bus being too delayed to start the outbound journey on time so it's just dropped. It seems 100% of buses are already deployed so there is no capacity to deal with everyday problems. Additional drivers and buses are required just to operate the current timetable from I can see, let alone add new departures.

As stated earlier the buses are believed to come from the fact in December there were more new buses entering service than were withdrawn and in any case there are also a small number that have been stored in case they are needed for expanded service.

r93kaey5p2izun · 13-01-2018 8:12pm

There may be extra buses but if the current timetable is not being delivered I'm very sceptical an enhanced one will be. On the 25a for example the extra buses would be needed just to operate on time from the terminus given the frequency with which departures are dropped completely or curtailed (operate from Aston Quay instead of Merrion Sq with no prior notice) due to the incoming bus being so delayed en route. This is a daily occurence. I just hope the extra buses are sufficient to mean that the timetable actually operates as advertised - that's not the case right now.

bebeman · 18-01-2018 11:30pm

145 up next, new timetable , maybe slight route changes?

dfx- · 19-01-2018 11:08am

Just eight routes? And predominantly morning time and only in term? I think enhancements is pushing it a bit - small changes may be more accurate. Is this going to be level of the promised "increased levels of services"..

thomasj wrote: »

I was on a 39a at 8.30 last night. With a 20 minute gap for the next one it was skipping stops or only letting the first few on. And this was a triaxle bus being used.

It's everyone for themselves after office hours.

The NTA people are safely warm and dry at home by then.

devnull · 19-01-2018 11:32am

dfx- wrote: »

Just eight routes? And predominantly morning time and only in term? I think enhancements is pushing it a bit - small changes may be more accurate. Is this going to be level of the promised "increased levels of services"...

These are some of the improvements which are possible by the increase in fleet size at the end of 2017 and follows changes to the 33b, 33d, 44, 44b, 65 and 65b at the end of last year. It's believed there is more to come in the next few weeks and in March a new route from Finglas to Broombridge but bills have to be agreed with unions before these can happen.

The most recently talked about increased levels of service by Dublin Bus relate to the fact that the Dublin Bus fleet size is to remain static even when they lose routes to Go-Ahead, allowing at least 80 vehicles to be redeployed elsewhere to increase frequency, reliability and possibly new services.

Note that some of the recent changes also did more than add extra timetabled buses - some of them had extra vehicles added to the routes with increased running time to aid service reliability and punctuality.

dfx- · 19-01-2018 1:21pm

One or two departures on key lengthy routes like the 15 or 67 or adjustments to smaller routes like the 65B, 44 or 33B doesn't hack it as an enhancement for me. Do they then operate back out from the opposite terminus or is it one half lap of a route?

AlekSmart wrote: »

Perhaps a pithly worded enquiry to the NTA's public affairs department might spur them clarify their position ?

I'm assuming the NTA's standard PR reply will refer to the Jarrett Walker Busconnects programme,which apears now to be slipping into overdue status,when it is now urgently required in terms of comprehensively addressing the situation.

There is now a worrying element of lack-of-leadership on display,both from the NTA as the oversight body and Bus Atha Cliath,as the major service provider.

If you get anything more from an enquiry than an evasive variant of the stock NTA response of "For details, you should contact the operator", then you should do the lotto tonight, Alek.:)

Stevek101 · 19-01-2018 1:56pm

BusConnects report was never due before Q1 2018. It'll be put out to the public early March.

This may be worth tuning into in early Feb https://www.engineersireland.ie/groups/divisions/energy-environment/events/irish-public-transport-policy-and-the-busconnects.aspx

Also a fairly substantial increase to 140 just announced today. Including Sunday times. http://www.dublinbus.ie/Your-Journey1/Timetables/All-Timetables/140-1/

devnull · 19-01-2018 2:14pm

dfx- wrote: »

One or two departures on key lengthy routes like the 15 or 67 or adjustments to smaller routes like the 65B, 44 or 33B doesn't hack it as an enhancement for me. Do they then operate back out from the opposite terminus or is it one half lap of a route?

As stated there are more enhancements to come from what I understand and the ones announced so far are not the extent of the late 2017 fleet expansion but they cannot happen all at once as the new bills have to be voted on and approved by the unions which I understand is ongoing for a number of routes at the moment. There then will be another tranche of improvements in Q2/Q3.

I would not expect that these vehicles are only doing one half lap of the route, it has been previously earmarked that some of the fleet expansion would be used to make the services more reliable by using more buses to operate timetables through increased running times to prevent laps being dropped due to late running and buses not completing the full routes leading to gaps in service. This will also help deal with capacity issues.

devnull · 19-01-2018 2:26pm

Stevek101 wrote: »

Also a fairly substantial increase to 140 just announced today. Including Sunday times. http://www.dublinbus.ie/Your-Journey1/Timetables/All-Timetables/140-1/

Fairly decent increases alright:

Finglas to Palmerstown
Mon-Fri 69 (was 62)
Sat 58 (was 48)
Sun 37 (was 28)

Palmerstown to Finglas
Mon-Fri 65 (was 56)
Sat 55 (was 47)
Sun 34 (was 26)

Seems morning peak stays at 8 minute frequency for longer instead of every 10 minutes and in the evening it stays at 10 minute frequency for longer than it does now instead of 15.

dublinman1990 · 19-01-2018 9:57pm

thomasj wrote: »

I was on a 39a at 8.30 last night. With a 20 minute gap for the next one it was skipping stops or only letting the first few on. And this was a triaxle bus being used.

I was waiting for a 7 outside Argos in Dun Laoghaire to get home sometime between 6:25 & 6:30 yesterday evening.

There were about 2 dozen people waiting for a 46a to arrive at that stop with only 3 minutes to go on the RTPI. The 46a approaches the stop as normal going down George St. What happened next? The tri-axle bus for the 46a proceeds to sail past the stop at Argos with all of the passengers who wanted to board it behind at Argos to wait for the next one. I was asking myself the question why would a bus like the 46a leave passengers behind at a stop like Argos after only leaving the terminus 2 stops earlier? I just do not understand the logic of why DB would let this happen under any circumstance to intending passengers. There was plenty of empty seats along inside the bus with only a handful of passengers in it already on the bus without any other known issues.

Luckily; the 7 that I wanted stopped outside Argos as intended to let me on it. I only waited 5 minutes to get that bus home.

I want to ask everyone here would this type of operation from DB of skipping bus stops starting to become a trend for daily routes like the 46a?

Would this start to become the norm now when the new 46a timetable begins in late January? Also; Could there have been an instruction from Dublin Bus Central Control at OCS to let bus routes skip bus stops to meet running time if the bus ran late from the terminus?

Tickityboo · 19-01-2018 10:10pm

dublinman1990 wrote: »

I was waiting for a 7 outside Argos in Dun Laoghaire to get home sometime between 6:25 & 6:30 yesterday evening.

There were about 2 dozen people waiting for a 46a to arrive at that stop with only 3 minutes to go on the RTPI. The 46a approaches the stop as normal going down George St. What happened next? The tri-axle bus for the 46a proceeds to sail past the stop at Argos with all of the passengers who wanted to board it behind at Argos to wait for the next one. I was asking myself the question why would a bus like the 46a leave passengers behind at a stop like Argos after only leaving the terminus 2 stops earlier? I just do not understand the logic of why DB would let this happen under any circumstance to intending passengers. There was plenty of empty seats along inside the bus with only a handful of passengers in it already on the bus without any other known issues.

Luckily; the 7 that I wanted stopped outside Argos as intended to let me on it. I only waited 5 minutes to get that bus home.

I want to ask everyone here would this type of operation from DB of skipping bus stops starting to become a trend for daily routes like the 46a?

Would this start to become the norm now when the new 46a timetable begins in late January? Also; Could there have been an instruction from Dublin Bus Central Control at OCS to let bus routes skip bus stops to meet running time if the bus ran late from the terminus?

The new schedule has already started.
There would be no instructions to skip stops while displaying route number.
Either no one bothered to stick there hand out or the driver was a Dick.

BonnieSituation · 20-01-2018 6:15pm

devnull wrote: »

Fairly decent increases alright:

Finglas to Palmerstown Palmerston Park (Ratmines)
Mon-Fri 69 (was 62)
Sat 58 (was 48)
Sun 37 (was 28)

Palmerstown Palmerston Park (Ratmines) to Finglas
Mon-Fri 65 (was 56)
Sat 55 (was 47)
Sun 34 (was 26)

Seems morning peak stays at 8 minute frequency for longer instead of every 10 minutes and in the evening it stays at 10 minute frequency for longer than it does now instead of 15.

I was wondering what this bus was. Never knew it went to Palmerstown. Jeebus man...

L1011 · 20-01-2018 6:28pm

The suburb changed to Palmerston spelling a while back, to confuse people further

BonnieSituation · 20-01-2018 7:21pm

L1011 wrote: »

The suburb changed to Palmerston spelling a while back, to confuse people further

No it didn't. It went the other way.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/palmerstown-wins-back-w-as-council-approves-name-change-1.2064799

bebeman · 20-01-2018 10:31pm

Something up with the 145, it was at the WRC, came down on side of drivers, DB have to come back with new plan, going back again soon to WRC.
Rumors are flying around, the biggest is that the 145 and 39 will be rolled together to create a new route.

BonnieSituation · 20-01-2018 10:34pm

bebeman wrote: »

Something up with the 145, it was at the WRC, came down on side of drivers, DB have to come back with new plan, going back again soon to WRC.
Rumors are flying around, the biggest is that the 145 and 39 will be rolled together to create a new route.

That would be bordering on insane.

AlekSmart · 20-01-2018 11:03pm

BonnieSituation wrote: »

That would be bordering on insane.

Panic ye not :eek: The 39A/145 alignment is mooted for the NIGHT services proposed by the NTA,which allows for a 30/60 min service from 0000-0500,operating 7 days per week between Ongar and Bray.

AlekSmart · 20-01-2018 11:19pm

Stevek101 wrote: »

BusConnects report was never due before Q1 2018. It'll be put out to the public early March.

This may be worth tuning into in early Feb https://www.engineersireland.ie/groups/divisions/energy-environment/events/irish-public-transport-policy-and-the-busconnects.aspx

Also a fairly substantial increase to 140 just announced today. Including Sunday times. http://www.dublinbus.ie/Your-Journey1/Timetables/All-Timetables/140-1/

Jarrett Walker's proposals will certainly turn current Bus Network thinking largely on it's head,and that's no bad thing.
However,I note the caveats which accompany his own account...

http://humantransit.org/dublin-area-bus-network-redesign-background

...namely,

A parallel project is working on this issue.

I fear that the ubiquitous Irish disease of,exactly how "parallel" these projects actually are,may yet prove to be the undoing of jarrett's good work.

With €750,000,000 having been allocated in Budget 2018 for Busconnects,it is to be hoped that we won't fritter it away on pointless revisions,expert group reports and suchlike.

dfx- · 21-01-2018 12:31am

devnull wrote: »

I would not expect that these vehicles are only doing one half lap of the route, it has been previously earmarked that some of the fleet expansion would be used to make the services more reliable by using more buses to operate timetables through increased running times to prevent laps being dropped due to late running and buses not completing the full routes leading to gaps in service. This will also help deal with capacity issues.

In that case has anyone identified the additional departures from the new timetable in the other direction?

Really they should advertise all the added departures in both directions.

Stephen15 · 21-01-2018 12:12pm

AlekSmart wrote: »

Panic ye not :eek: The 39A/145 alignment is mooted for the NIGHT services proposed by the NTA,which allows for a 30/60 min service from 0000-0500,operating 7 days per week between Ongar and Bray.

Just looking at that link you shared it also seems to suggest a return of the 10 between Belfield and The Phoenix Park as there is a dark blue line represting a link between the Stillorgan Rd. Corridor and the Blanchardstown Corridor and a thinner light blue representing a link between UCD and The Phoenix Pk. but only as far as UCD and not DL as is the case with the 46a. Interesting times Ahead!

thomasj · 24-01-2018 7:13pm

noelfirl wrote: »

If I'm reading that one correctly, they're removing the 0825 departure from Palmerstown (cut short to start from the West County Hotel further down the line).

Considering the function of that route is to "mop up" for the other busier outer suburban services using the N4, it seems a bit ridiculous to remove that departure from Palmerstown - at one of the key times when that end of the route merits the extra support.

I see that they've corrected the timetable now.

So there is now the normal 08.25 departure and an 08.25 departure from the west county hotel to bachelors walk during term-time

trellheim · 24-01-2018 7:35pm

We will start seeing the LUAS effect soon I suppose.

Will DB be doing the same thing as happened with the Green line as a lot of buses reduced in frequency when that happened along the LUAS core if I recall ( or am I wrong )

39 through stoneybatter both directions very busy nearly all the time. Yes its the local route but the 46a is closer and the frequency is just right on that route so I think we need to see a higher freq

Dublin Bus January Service Enhancements

Comments