Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Would you journey on Titanic II?

Comments

  • #2
    LessOutragePlz
    Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    DS86DS wrote: »
    I personally don't think I could knowing the history of the Titanic. Though perhaps irrational, I'd be thinking to myself that this thing is going to sink in the middle of the ocean at any moment.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanic_II


    https://youtu.be/FadTHCPY3T8

    I certainly would journey on it there'll be a lot less icebergs in the sea because of global warming so the same disaster is less likely to happen again.


  • #3
    Pkiernan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,310 ✭✭✭Pkiernan


    Only if they lock the Micks down in steerage again.


  • #4
    Hamsterchops
    Registered Users Posts: 3,278 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    Would love to, but I thought the whole Titanic II project was scrapped several years ago?


  • #5
    dotsman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    Can't see it happening. It appears to be the pipe-dream of a bat-$hit crazy guy.

    Even if it did - what's the point? The purpose of the Titanic was to transfer people from US to Europe and vice versa. It's a hell of a lot cheaper and faster to just take a plane.

    For those who enjoy cruises etc, Titanic II will be very dull. After the first hour or two, the thrill will wear off and you will realise that you miss the bars/clubs/pools/casinos/games etc that modern cruise ships offer.


  • #6
    Trigger Happy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,104 ✭✭✭Trigger Happy


    I would - but will bring my own inflatable dingy. One of the wee ones from Lidl should do it.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Gregor Samsa
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    Titanic II was an even bigger disaster than the first movie



  • #8
    topper75
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    Trigger Happy wrote: »
    I would - but will bring my own inflatable dingy. One of the wee ones from Lidl should do it.

    No. Keep your money for pints of Smithwicks from the bar.

    A cabin door will do the job. I saw it in a documentary.


  • #9
    ThewhiteJesus
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭ThewhiteJesus


    well the titanics sister ships were ok, granted another sank but it was during the war and hit by a mine so yes i would for sure.
    The captain was to blame for the titanic, not the ship


  • #10
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'd totally sail on it. Assuming all the staff are CVD19 free and there were no ports of call and enough essentials on board to sail us right out of 2020 and into a glorious future full of vaccinations and ethical elections and economic happiness, I'd stay on the damn thing indefinitely.


Advertisement