Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Sir George Martin "The 5th Beatle" dies . . . .

  • 09-03-2016 11:41am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭


    George Martin, who produced much of the Beatles' classic catalog, has died. The cause of death has not yet been released. He was 90.

    Ringo Starr reported the news on Twitter. "God bless George Martin," he wrote late Tuesday night. "Peace and love to Judy and his family, love Ringo and Barbara. George will be missed." In another post, accompanied by a photo of Martin with the Beatles, Starr wrote, "Thank you for all your love and kindness."

    Over the decades, many people have claimed to be the "fifth Beatle." But the only person who can credibly hold that title was Martin. The producer not only signed the Beatles to their first record contract in 1962 but went on to work extensively with them on the vast majority of music they recorded over the next eight years, from "Love Me Do" to the majestic suite that wrapped up Abbey Road.

    "George Martin made us what we were in the studio," John Lennon said in 1971. "He helped us develop a language to talk to other musicians."

    Martin was born January 3rd, 1926 in Highbury, London. He began playing piano at a young age, and in 1943 he joined the Fleet Air Arm of the Royal Navy. After World War II, he worked in the BBC's Classical Music Department and then moved on to EMI. Much of his time was spent producing records for British comedians like Peter Sellers, Dudley Moore and Bernard Cribbins.

    Martin met the Beatles in early 1962. At the time, they had a cult following in parts of England, but little success in landing a recording deal. The group's manager, Brian Epstein, approached the producer, who worked for EMI records, and got him to agree to give their demo tape a listen.

    RIP George, you were truly great.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    What a fright. I thought your man who writes Game of Throws was after dying and we'd be left without a finale.

    (RIP George Martin.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,715 ✭✭✭✭Ally Dick


    What a great man he was. Rest in peace George


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭cml387


    Very bad year for musical icons.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    Bon voyage in your yellow submarine over rainbow bridge sweet prince of the valley of the snowdrops down yonder in the glens of the the mists of time. May the light of heaven shine on your grave and the spirits of those gone before serenade you into the afterlife with the voices of angels and the timpani of distant thunder signalling your journey to the be at the side of the saints of sound who who walked up the cloudy steps to the great orchestra in the sky before you.

    (RIP)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    I thing we can safely say that the Beatles & George Martin met in the right place at the right time, for without George's wizardry in the control room the Beatles may never have been as FAB as they became!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,705 ✭✭✭✭Tigger


    Stuart Sutcliffe was the fifth Beatle
    There were five in the Beatles then He died and they carried on with four

    Rip George


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭Laois_Man


    cml387 wrote: »
    Very bad year for musical icons.

    Yet Cliff Richard still lives!! :mad:
    Tigger wrote: »
    Stuart Sutcliffe was the fifth Beatle
    There were five in the Beatles then He died and they carried on with four

    Sutcliffe left The Beatles a year before he died. And he was useless.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,001 ✭✭✭recylingbin


    I thought George best was the fifth Beatle?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭cml387


    Laois_Man wrote: »
    Yet Cliff Richard still lives!! :mad:



    Sutcliffe left The Beatles a year before he died. And he was useless.

    He was a useless bassist.
    Apparently a talented artist though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 Stephen Squaking


    The cause of death has not yet been released. He was 90

    Being 90 is as good as cause of death as any in my books.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,658 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    The Beatles wouldn't have been The Beatles without him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    Did the harpsichord solo bit in In My Life.

    Anyone else care to add specific contributions they know of?

    There was a good book out years ago, explaining who wrote and played what, track by track. Can't recall title of it now.

    I do remember that when I read through it, I was amazed at how heavy his influence on the end product was.

    I reckon he must be all over Sgt. PLHCB.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,357 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    topper75 wrote: »
    Did the harpsichord solo bit in In My Life.

    Anyone else care to add specific contributions they know of?

    There was a good book out years ago, explaining who wrote and played what, track by track. Can't recall title of it now.

    I do remember that when I read through it, I was amazed at how heavy his influence on the end product was.

    I reckon he must be all over Sgt. PLHCB.

    Revolution In The Head.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Good innings for the man, but still sad to hear. IMH his influence is most felt with opening up McCartney to the possibilities of where he could go with his music. Less so with Lennon or George. I'd reckon that without George Martin, Paul would have ended up writing musicals or film music and John and George would have been basic blues types(though the latter was open to the weird). Overall I'd put it this way; they were a fantastic orchestra with brilliant instruments and talent and he was the conductor who helped them gel.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,658 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Birneybau wrote: »
    Revolution In The Head.

    Perhaps the best book on music I've ever read! Definitely the best Beatles book, by a distance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,744 ✭✭✭diomed


    He was a nice guy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,715 ✭✭✭✭Ally Dick


    cml387 wrote: »
    Very bad year for musical icons.

    Who's next ? Big Tom ? :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭cml387


    Arghus wrote: »
    Perhaps the best book on music I've ever read! Definitely the best Beatles book, by a distance.

    I use it as a kind of bible whenever I listen to a Beatles song.

    George Martin's work on Strawberry Fields Forever alone would earn him awesome producer status.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭dd972


    4th Beatle, then comes Ringo...:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,357 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    cml387 wrote: »
    I use it as a kind of bible whenever I listen to a Beatles song.

    George Martin's work on Strawberry Fields Forever alone would earn him awesome producer status.

    And this, 1966, plays the piano and produces. Still sounds like the future.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭cml387


    George Martin was also a producer of comedy records for Peter Sellers and the Goons.
    In our family we have a copy of this very record on the red Parlophone label.

    Peter Sellers does all the voices in this story of a recording of ceilidh music that goes terribly wrong.

    While I have no proof that Martin was the producer on this, I rather like to think he was.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Birneybau wrote: »
    And this, 1966, plays the piano and produces. Still sounds like the future.

    Aye, sometimes these days we can forget what the Future(™) might look and sound like. Thirty odd years ahead of the Chemical Brothers. For a bunch of guys in 1966 to mix up the Tibetan book of the dead and Eastern music and Phillip Glass and Stockhausen type stuff and play the studio itself and lay it down as a "pop" track was beyond mad and innovative. More, when one thinks that only a year separates that song - the first one laid down for the album Revolver - and their song Help(which itself was a move on from "she loves you" type stuff).

    To put it in a more contemporary context, if this and all the Beatles other groundbreaking non pop song stuff really started to come out today in 2016, their first number one Please Please Me only came out in 2014. And you have some pundits claiming that Lady Gaga is a genius? GTFO.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,273 ✭✭✭UsedToWait


    Legend - his son Giles shared the decks on the fantastic mash-up Beatles album which was the soundtrack to the Cirque du Soleil show 'Love' - well worth investigating if you haven't heard it..

    ____________________________________


    What a trooper to survive that horrible kidnapping also



    :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,675 ✭✭✭✭Ol' Donie


    I never liked his tie.

    What a great man. Sad, sad day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,675 ✭✭✭✭Ol' Donie


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Aye, sometimes these days we can forget what the Future(™) might look and sound like. Thirty odd years ahead of the Chemical Brothers. For a bunch of guys in 1966 to mix up the Tibetan book of the dead and Eastern music and Phillip Glass and Stockhausen type stuff and play the studio itself and lay it down as a "pop" track was beyond mad and innovative. More, when one thinks that only a year separates that song - the first one laid down for the album Revolver - and their song Help(which itself was a move on from "she loves you" type stuff).

    To put it in a more contemporary context, if this and all the Beatles other groundbreaking non pop song stuff really started to come out today in 2016, their first number one Please Please Me only came out in 2014. And you have some pundits claiming that Lady Gaga is a genius? GTFO.

    I love The Beatles. Have for years. It's easy to forget how remarkable what they & George Martin did.

    I mean, they went from Help through the madness of psychedelia and then to the white album in what, 3 years?

    Roughly 2 number 1 albums a year for 7 years? No band, even the very very best bands, have come close to that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,639 ✭✭✭andekwarhola


    Listened to the Beatles a lot today after hearing the news. Always amusing to hear people pretending to hate them while championing more obscure indie fare when nearly every cliché of that genre from clothes, drugs, hair, songs, studio effects and the - now tired and old - notions of transgression and 'rebellion' beat a beeline right back to the likes of the Beatles and the Velvet Underground.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭colossus-x


    I though Yoko Ono was the fifth Beatle.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Aye, sometimes these days we can forget what the Future(™) might look and sound like. Thirty odd years ahead of the Chemical Brothers. For a bunch of guys in 1966 to mix up the Tibetan book of the dead and Eastern music and Phillip Glass and Stockhausen type stuff and play the studio itself and lay it down as a "pop" track was beyond mad and innovative. More, when one thinks that only a year separates that song - the first one laid down for the album Revolver - and their song Help(which itself was a move on from "she loves you" type stuff).

    To put it in a more contemporary context, if this and all the Beatles other groundbreaking non pop song stuff really started to come out today in 2016, their first number one Please Please Me only came out in 2014. And you have some pundits claiming that Lady Gaga is a genius? GTFO.

    The progression of the Beatles was remarkable for sure. Love me do and please please me are standard pop songs (first one - their first record - is one of their weakest songs). A few years later starting with revolver some of the most intricate pop music ever.

    George Martin seemed like a lovely man. Old school charm.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭colossus-x


    Birneybau wrote: »
    And this, 1966, plays the piano and produces. Still sounds like the future.


    I've never been into bands, and I never got the Beetles. That video is very good though for it's time. I've not known them for trancy futuristic type stuff though as in that vid. Perhaps I was going to the wrong lsd clubs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,658 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    I feel at times like I've listened to The Beatles plenty; I was borderline obsessed with them for years.

    And then something happens - in this case a sad event - that sends me back to them...

    Jesus Christ. Too good for words.

    I remember as a kid/young teenager I thought I knew The Beatles: Those guys my parents liked, who sang these catchy little love songs. Yeah, they were good, but you know, they were old and kind of boring.

    I can still remember the moment when the scales fell from my eyes. I was listening to the radio around Christmas time. Pretending to study for Christmas tests? Probably. I think the "Fanning Fab 50" was on and he played A Day in The Life. I can still feel my WTF reaction to the moment when the orchestral backing starts to slide, slide and the song turns inside out. Holy Sh!t, I thought: I've never heard anything remotely like that before.

    This is on in the background at the moment:


    What. A.Tune. I forgot how thoroughly tasty that bluesy guitar solo in the middle is. And that outro: That riff that goes on and on until you feel like it's in your bones, the swirling sound that builds and builds: Can you feel it!

    It's ominous. And I love it.


Advertisement