Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Cleaning up the Net

Options
  • 22-06-2001 10:02am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,417 ✭✭✭


    Taken from http://www.netauthority.org/faq.html

    >>A young man, let's call him Ray, notices that his friend, let's call her Jody, has been acting a little strange. She is much more aloof around family and friends, and she has been spending a lot more time at the computer. These are clear, tell-tale signs that Jody is exploring illegal pornography on the Internet<<

    Oh dear.

    These people also devote a seperate section on their 'internet offenders' database for people who have viewed 'Interracial Pornography'. Ok, they think pornography is wrong, that's fine and good - eveyone is entitled to their views and I have no problem with it. But why do they single out Interracial Pornography as a seperate section?

    "Oh No! Not only has Timmy been looking at pornography but he's been looking at *gasp* Interracial Pornography - how terrible!!!!!!

    I'm the Dude

    [This message has been edited by Jeff_Lebowski (edited 22-06-2001).]

    [This message has been edited by Jeff_Lebowski (edited 22-06-2001).]


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭Puck


    <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
    Forums Unavailable

    Due to massive abuse, the forums will not be available. Let it be known that everyone who posted their filth on the message boards has been duely added to our databases.
    </font>

    What a bunch of fascist nutcases!

    Don't get me wrong I am absolutely against child porn and all that sick crap but these people are going too far! What gives them the right! I believe kids being exposed to porn is wrong but I mean if an adult wants to look at legal pornography and nobody is getting hurt then he should be allowed.

    [This message has been edited by Puck (edited 22-06-2001).]


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭Puck


    Very sorry for double posting but you just have to read this!
    <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">It is expected that all Internet users familiarize themselves with The Bible. Ignorance is no excuse! </font>

    John (yes THE John!)
    "Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government."

    [This message has been edited by Puck (edited 22-06-2001).]


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    The site almost seems like a windup, I can bet the people being shopped in for the thing below are there for a windup.
    <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
    Win A Bible!

    Be the person who reports the most offenders to the Net Authority databases and you too can study the Bible in style with your very own copy of Compton's Interactive Bible! All you have to do is include your own email address in the form when you report Internet offenders. On July 30, 2001, Net Authority will tally the number of offenders added to our databases, and the person who submitted the most will be notified that they have won this wonderful multimedia CD ROM. See below for details and contest rules.

    </font>


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    Taken from another forum...
    <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">
    Alastair - Report an offender! For the Children!!!

    I just reported an offender!
    Offender's name: Net Authority

    Offender's home page: http://www.netauthority.org/
    The offender violated the following sections of the NA-AIUG:

    - Hate speech
    - General Blasphemy.

    Comment:

    "This site, Net Authority, doesn't follow proper internet guidelines.

    On Hate Literature: "Hate literature entails any media that indicates, direct or implied, one group of persons' superiority over another"
    Proof of the offense: on page "http://www.netauthority.org/guidelines.html", the offenders indicate, directly, their superiority over other groups, notably: homosexuals, people of other races, and people who happen to not believe in their interpretation of the Bible or even don't consider the Bible as their holy writ. This is an absolutely outrageous case of hate speech on the Internet.

    General Blasphemy:"Blasphemic content is any material that is seen as sin through the eyes of our Lord".
    Proof of the offense:
    On page http://www.netauthority.org/info.html, the offenders admit: "We have prayed without answer for a centralized agency with the power and the means to stop crimes against humanity on the Internet."
    However, further down, they state: "While we may not yet have any legal power to back our enforcement of the NA-AIUG, our cause is justified in the eyes of God, which gives us all the authority we desire."
    This is clearly a case where the offenders are calling the Name of God in vain, since they admit He didn't answer their prayers. Further, their claim of authority in the Name of God is, therefore, also, a blatant lie.

    I hope Net Authority will take every action in their powers to pull this multiple offender from the Internet. For our children."
    </font>


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭Puck


    Excellent stuff!
    They will probably put that guy on their offenders list because it seems that anyone who dissagrees with them is evil in their eyes.

    John (yes THE John!)
    "Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government."

    [This message has been edited by Puck (edited 22-06-2001).]


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭Mills


    The site is 100% spoof, put on by mikeycomics.com smile.gif I had a good laugh at an article on theregister yesterday where they were ****ting themselves about being aded to a Blasphemy database, but they copped it later and posted http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/28/19878.html smile.gif


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,417 ✭✭✭Miguel_Sanchez


    DOH!

    I can't believe I got suckered.

    Here's another one: www.landover.org although it's an easier spoof to spot.

    I'm the Dude


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 132 ✭✭scutchy


    True religious nutters:

    http://www.tencommandments.org


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 28,633 Mod ✭✭✭✭Shiminay


    <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Mills:
    The site is 100% spoof, put on by mikeycomics.com smile.gif I had a good laugh at an article on theregister yesterday where they were ****ting themselves about being aded to a Blasphemy database, but they copped it later and posted http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/28/19878.html smile.gif</font>

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/35/19910.html

    heeheehee


    All the best!
    Dav
    @B^)
    So Bob Hoskins was about to roll a spliff when in walks Dana with her 3 foot Bong
    [honey i] violated [the kids]
    Tribes 2 Goodness
    The Dawn of the Beefy King approaches...


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,299 ✭✭✭irishguy


    i hope net content is never monitered.i like it that way .i preferr 2 chouse what i want 2 c


  • Advertisement
Advertisement