Ian Bailey case: Our civil liberties threatened

ash2020 wrote: »

In Ireland the cops are lazy sods!

ash2020 wrote: »

Check my previous post few pages back!

ash2020 wrote: »

I was listening to the news at 5, on the radio, and apparently Ian bailey had a film developed with some man (now deceased) some photos was that of a dead female body lying on the ground, the man that developed the photos made a statement to the guards.

That alone is one damning piece of evidence.
Ian bailey had scratches on his forehead, hands and arm, in his defence it was caused when he was supposedly plucking a Turkey 2 days before Christmas, however the judges denined this story and said the scratches were likely to be from the murder victim while she was struggling in self defense

ash2020 wrote: »

Any man that can do this to his wife, is liable for anything else. He is a vile human been and she be hung from the tallest tree.

(Ms Thomas had a closed, blackened right eye. Another picture showed a bandage over her eye, in another bruises could be seen on her hand and she had a 4cm clump of hair pulled from her head)

ash2020 wrote: »

Stop been so childest, it is hardly an allegation when
he admitted it himself

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/ian-bailey-admits-assaulting-partner-4615565.amp

Aswell as a 3 judge jury finding him guilty
I have also given you 4 pieces of information that you are finding it very hard to swallow, information of battery, a living eye witness, another journalist witness statement and a deceased man's statement with photograph evidence of a woman dead body lying on a ground

The guards and dpp where obviously not doing there job fully or somebody had them all believe the cock and bull alibies from a man that thinks hes the pillar of society, hes not so clever now that judgement has been served

How is that his a lazy post, have a nice day!

Michael McSweeney in his statement dated 18 February 1997 says that Padraig Beirne phoned him at 2 p.m. approximately on 23 December 1996 and advised him to go to West Cork in relation to the incident.
At 2.10 p.m. Padraig Beirne phoned Michael McSweeney back to say that he had been contacted by Ian Bailey who claimed he had photographs of the scene.
At around 2.15 to 2.20 p.m. Bailey phoned Michael McSweeney stating that he had taken photographs of the scene. At statement 74(A) McSweeney states that Bailey was vague about the content of the photos and then went on to say that his girlfriend had taken them.
No reference to Bailey having a picture of the deceased is to be found in any of McSweeney’s three statements. McSweeney is the witness who D/Sgt. Hogan described as not being co-operative. However, his statements appear objective, balanced and fair.

Padraig Beirne’s statement is made five months after the murder.
He states that Bailey phoned him at about 1.55 p.m. and offered him a picture of the deceased.
Beirne says that he told Bailey that Michael McSweeney would collect the picture of the dead woman.
Beirne says that Bailey also offered him pictures of the scene where the body was found but he was not interested in them.
Beirne says that he gave Bailey, Michael McSweeney’s mobile phone number.
We know from Michael McSweeney’s statement that Bailey phoned McSweeney.
However, Michael McSweeney makes no mention of Bailey stating that he had a
photograph of the deceased.
Beirne says that he contacted Michael McSweeney and advised him of the
conversation -agreement with Bailey.
Michael McSweeney in his statement makes no mention of being told by Beirne that Bailey had a photograph of the deceased taken prior to her death which was to be picked up by him.
Padraig Beirne’s statement is strange. With regard to the alleged pre-death photograph of Sophie, he is not supported in his recollection by Michael McSweeney, Dick Cross, Bailey or indeed anyone else.
If Bailey had stated that he had a pre-death photograph of Sophie Toscan Du Plantier it is not credible that McSweeney would have forgotten such an important item from a media perspective.
Michael McSweeney’s statement is taken less than two months after the murder. His recollection appears more logical and reliable than that of Beirne whose statement was taken five months after the murder.
On balance it appears probable that the photograph never existed.
It is clear from the file that Bailey had been trying to establish a journalistic career in this country.