Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Refugee campaigner targetted with fake ad

2»

Comments

  • #52
    Ruraldweller56
    Registered Users Posts: 938 ✭✭✭Ruraldweller56


    dr.fuzzenstein wrote: »
    This is always the argument made and I'm afraid it's got a rather large logic hole.
    I am pretty certain that as a normal, right thinking person you are in favour of health care.
    If you are so in favour of health care, why don't you lead by example and take in some of them sick people and make them better?
    Exactly the same argument.

    As for the people who say "I don't want any of them brown people in my country, well, you just have to elect a brain-dead, far-right, knuckledragging government like in Hungary and they'll shut down the borders.

    No it isn't.

    "in favour of healthcare". Jesus. What does that even mean? Is that what they teach people in Lefty school these days? Are you suggesting that I go away and start doing kidney transplants in my shed?


  • #53
    hill16bhoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    dr.fuzzenstein wrote: »
    This is always the argument made and I'm afraid it's got a rather large logic hole.
    I am pretty certain that as a normal, right thinking person you are in favour of health care.
    If you are so in favour of health care, why don't you lead by example and take in some of them sick people and make them better?
    Exactly the same argument.

    As for the people who say "I don't want any of them brown people in my country, well, you just have to elect a brain-dead, far-right, knuckledragging government like in Hungary and they'll shut down the borders.

    The far-right regularly invoke fake concern for homeless people as a fake reason why they are against immigration.

    Viktor Orban is the poster boy of the far right.

    He has just banned rough sleeping and rough sleepers face imprisonment under this new law.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/hungary-homeless-ban-viktor-orban-rough-sleeping-street-a8584401.html

    The far right don't give a **** about homelessness. They never have and they never will.

    The far right are the last people who'd help the homeless or do anything about our housing crisis.

    The far right have always been about picking on the weakest in society.

    How many anti-immigrant posters here have ever taken in a rough sleeper or a homeless person?

    I stringly suspect the answer is a big, fat, roundy number.


  • #54
    John Sacrimoni
    Registered Users Posts: 229 ✭✭John Sacrimoni


    MFPM wrote: »
    Typical of many on the anti migration side.



    Do tell how you arrived at this conclusion?

    Did you see the photoshop of matteo salvini this one fell for? as i said idiot.


  • #55
    hill16bhoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    MFPM wrote: »
    Typical of many on the anti migration side.



    Do tell how you arrived at this conclusion?
    That poster called O'Leary an "idiot" because:
    i) O'Leary is a woman
    ii) she clearly has compassion for others, and
    iii) takes on far right propagandists and disinformation spreaders.

    The far right hate all three of these things.

    Somebody who embodies all three, is exactly the type of person that gives the far right palpitations, which is why they have engaged in a vicious bullying and intimidation campaign against her.

    The likes of the vicious boor Ben Gilroy (sorry, Ben of the family Gilroy) of the bat**** crazy "Freeman On The Land" group have been heavily involved in this.


  • #56
    end of the road
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,146 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    Knew I was right.

    you weren't. you claimed i had said it when i hadn't when you claimed it, ergo you were wrong.
    Ruraldweller56 wrote: »
    There's a sizeable minority of people not brainwashed by this Liberal crap and don't have an alternative.

    The mainstream political parties and media are complicit in demographics replacement. And most people can't see through it.

    I'm not defending the guys who made the ad. But she's the one looking for these people to come here. Why won't she take a few in?

    because it's not her job. we already have a system to house refugees and asylum seekers.
    Ruraldweller56 wrote: »
    There are already a few there but our sh1tlib media would never let it get off the ground.

    'oh yeah why don't you do it so'

    It's like being in primary school all over again.

    the "sh1tlib media" can't stop something from ultimately getting off the ground, they don't have the power to not let something get off the ground. the reason the type of political party you would like won't get off the ground is the majority don't agree with such a political party.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • #57
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    end of the road wrote: »
    you weren't. you claimed i had said it when i hadn't when you claimed it, ergo you were wrong.



    because it's not her job. we already have a system to house refugees and asylum seekers.



    the "sh1tlib media" can't stop something from ultimately getting off the ground, they don't have the power to not let something get off the ground. the reason the type of political party you would like won't get off the ground is the majority don't agree with such a political party.

    That was a joke sure I cut your quote short aswell. It’s gone straight over your head


  • #58
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    It's the same guy.

    https://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?433306-McManus-Watches-they-re-back!

    He's also known as "The Sperminator". Seriously.

    http://www.donegaldaily.com/2013/09/26/revealed-man-who-wants-woman-to-live-with-him-on-donegal-island-offered-to-get-women-pregnant-for-e20/

    Fiona O'Leary has helpfully screenshotted the comments that were written on a YouTube video of a Cork 96FM interview she did. The video was uploaded by a far-right YouTube channel and the comments underneath it are pretty much all by far-right scum posting up sick personal abuse and intimidation.

    https://fionaolearyblog.wordpress.com/2018/12/15/racists-show-their-true-colours/

    So must be a head case if he has set up a business and then is posting like that using the business name. I would say untypical of what you call the far right aka anyone who doesn’t agree with you.


  • #59
    MFPM
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,561 ✭✭✭MFPM


    John Sacrimoni wrote: »
    Did you see the photoshop of matteo salvini this one fell for? as i said idiot.

    'Idiot' 'this one' - you're a charmer, aren't you?


  • #60
    John Sacrimoni
    Registered Users Posts: 229 ✭✭John Sacrimoni


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    That poster called O'Leary an "idiot" because:
    i) O'Leary is a woman
    ii) she clearly has compassion for others, and
    iii) takes on far right propagandists and disinformation spreaders.

    The far right hate all three of these things.

    Somebody who embodies all three, is exactly the type of person that gives the far right palpitations, which is why they have engaged in a vicious bullying and intimidation campaign against her.

    The likes of the vicious boor Ben Gilroy (sorry, Ben of the family Gilroy) of the bat**** crazy "Freeman On The Land" group have been heavily involved in this.

    Im not far right, nor do i have a problem with people showing compassion for others or with women in general.

    The women is an idiot for reasons i explained already.


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    hill16bhoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    So must be a head case if he has set up a business and then is posting like that using the business name. I would say untypical of what you call the far right aka anyone who doesn’t agree with you.

    Given that he's posting vicious personal abuse against a woman and appears to have an extremely dangerous, neanderthal attitude towards women in general, I'd say he's very typical of the far right.

    I call the far right such because that's exactly what they are. A danger to society is another way of describing them.

    The far right could not exist without vicious personal abuse and intimidation, and they love nothing more than to pick on women.

    Vicious personal abuse and intimidation with a clear implication of physical threats to a person's safety is an intrinsic, essential part of what what the far right are.


  • #62
    MFPM
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,561 ✭✭✭MFPM


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    So must be a head case if he has set up a business and then is posting like that using the business name. I would say untypical of what you call the far right aka anyone who doesn’t agree with you.

    Interesting how quick you are to explain/excuse/defend the antics of those who share your anti migrant viewpoint. Yet you make no such efforts when generalising against migrants as you do on every thread you pollute.


  • #63
    end of the road
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,146 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    That was a joke sure I cut your quote short aswell. It’s gone straight over your head

    yeah, sure.
    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    So must be a head case if he has set up a business and then is posting like that using the business name. I would say untypical of what you call the far right aka anyone who doesn’t agree with you.

    no, the far right as in the far right. someone isn't far right because they disagree with someone, they are far right because of the views they hold.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • #64
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    The country is our home so we have no obligation to take in strangers....you said it. The government is us.
    Indeed they are, and if Ireland as a nation has an appetite for limiting immigration, one of the further right parties like Renua or Identity Ireland are bound to be voted in during the next election. Right?
    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    So must be a head case if he has set up a business and then is posting like that using the business name. I would say untypical of what you call the far right aka anyone who doesn’t agree with you.
    Also, they literally showed how far right this person is to the point you couldn't argue it anymore. Your last sentence makes absolutely no sense whatsoever in this context, and comes over as nothing more than a reflexive phrase you were hoping to use regardless of circumstance.


  • #65
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    You must be all working together in some special internet left wing political party. The posts are to well timed trying to break all my posts down at the same time, nice one. As I said the chap seems like a total mad man to be using his business name to post like that. No one in their right mind would do that and you know it. If I picked out some mad Muslim killing people and said this is typical of Muslims you would say the exact same back ie. he is not representative of the Muslim community.


  • #66
    hill16bhoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    John Sacrimoni wrote: »
    Im not far right, nor do i have a problem with people showing compassion for others or with women in general.

    The women is an idiot for reasons i explained already.
    I had the misfortune to read some of your posts last week, so I'm familiar with your form.

    I've never heard a far right scumbag identify as such.

    Your posting history suggests that's exactly what you are.

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108872204&postcount=34

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108828509&postcount=2378

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108820494&postcount=1191

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108796886&postcount=329

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108754703&postcount=297

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108729441&postcount=35


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    MFPM
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,561 ✭✭✭MFPM


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    You must be all working together in some special internet left wing political party. The posts are to well timed trying to break all my posts down at the same time, nice one. As I said the chap seems like a total mad man to be using his business name to post like that. No one in their right mind would do that and you know it. If I picked out some mad Muslim killing people and said this is typical of Muslims you would say the exact same back ie. he is not representative of the Muslim community.

    Yet this is exactly what you have done with almost every post in the Balbriggan Gang thread, you have generalised against all migrants in particular those of African descent based on the antics of a group of teenagers. So perhaps you might park the sanctimony at the door.


  • #68
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    MFPM wrote: »
    Yet this is exactly what you have done with almost every post in the Balbriggan Gang thread, you have generalised against all migrants in particular those of African descent based on the antics of a group of teenagers. So perhaps you might park the sanctimony at the door.

    I have experience of what the Africans have done to Balbriggan so I’m speaking from experience unlike yourself. You are scared out of your wits visit Balbriggan and witness the gang.


  • #69
    Kivaro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Kivaro


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    The far-right regularly invoke fake concern for homeless people as a fake reason why they are against immigration.

    Viktor Orban is the poster boy of the far right.

    He has just banned rough sleeping and rough sleepers face imprisonment under this new law.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/hungary-homeless-ban-viktor-orban-rough-sleeping-street-a8584401.html

    The far right don't give a **** about homelessness. They never have and they never will.

    The far right are the last people who'd help the homeless or do anything about our housing crisis.

    The far right have always been about picking on the weakest in society.

    How many anti-immigrant posters here have ever taken in a rough sleeper or a homeless person?

    I stringly suspect the answer is a big, fat, roundy number.


    Ah, I see. If posters do not agree with you, they are far right. How many times have you used that term in your arguments, I wonder.

    By the way, there are about 200 actual "homeless" people in Ireland .......... but you know that already.
    I don't know any anti-immigrant poster. Immigration is a good thing. Most of the objections are against open-border economic migration; those with little to no English language skills or education or criminal history, which a small country like Ireland cannot handle.

    You are one of the biggest disingenuous posters that I've seen on here for a long time, and there's been a fair few. Welcome to the Ignore List.

    Yeah, yeah, I'm a racist/far right for putting you on the Ignore List.
    You will understand when you're older though .......... when you get a job and join the workforce.


  • #70
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    Kivaro wrote: »
    Ah, I see. If posters do not agree with you, they are far right. How many times have you used that term in your arguments, I wonder.

    By the way, there are about 200 actual "homeless" people in Ireland .......... but you know that already.
    I don't know any anti-immigrant poster. Immigration is a good thing. Most of the objections are against open-border economic migration; those with little to no English language skills or education or criminal history, which a small country like Ireland cannot handle.

    You are one of the biggest disingenuous posters that I've seen on here for a long time, and there's been a fair few. Welcome to the Ignore List.

    Yeah, yeah, I'm a racist/far right for putting you on the Ignore List.
    You will understand when you're older though .......... when you get a job and join the workforce.

    Nazi :D


  • #71
    hill16bhoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    Kivaro wrote: »
    Ah, I see. If posters do not agree with you, they are far right. How many times have you used that term in your arguments, I wonder.

    By the way, there are about 200 actual "homeless" people in Ireland .......... but you know that already.
    I don't know any anti-immigrant poster. Immigration is a good thing. Most of the objections are against open-border economic migration; those with little to no English language skills or education or criminal history, which a small country like Ireland cannot handle.

    You are one of the biggest disingenuous posters that I've seen on here for a long time, and there's been a fair few. Welcome to the Ignore List.

    Yeah, yeah, I'm a racist/far right for putting you on the Ignore List.
    You will understand when you're older though .......... when you get a job and join the workforce.

    As pointed out earlier, posters do not get called far right because they disagree.

    Posters get called far right because they've proved that's exactly what they are.

    Please ignore me, by all means, if I offend you.

    It's pretty obvious you don't like home truths, so I wouldn't want to intrude on your precious little bubble.

    I'm not sure you quite got the irony of you claiming that you're not far right while similtaneously defending the far right, by the way.


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    end of the road
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,146 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Kivaro wrote: »
    Ah, I see. If posters do not agree with you, they are far right. How many times have you used that term in your arguments, I wonder.

    By the way, there are about 200 actual "homeless" people in Ireland .......... but you know that already.
    I don't know any anti-immigrant poster. Immigration is a good thing. Most of the objections are against open-border economic migration; those with little to no English language skills or education or criminal history, which a small country like Ireland cannot handle.

    You are one of the biggest disingenuous posters that I've seen on here for a long time, and there's been a fair few. Welcome to the Ignore List.

    Yeah, yeah, I'm a racist/far right for putting you on the Ignore List.
    You will understand when you're older though .......... when you get a job and join the workforce.


    ireland doesn't have open borders. at least not as a policy anyway. in terms of staffing numbers on the other hand.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • #73
    hill16bhoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    This can't be posted enough.

    This is the from the far right website The Daily Stormer's house style guide for racist troll posters.

    A few posters here are definitely playing to it.

    5a301c0c1600001f00cf0cf7.png?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale

    The far right are all about the "lulz" and the "bantz", or something.

    I don't see many people laughing.


  • #74
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    As pointed out earlier, posters do not get called far right because they disagree.

    Posters get called far right because they've proved that's exactly what they are.

    Please ignore me, by all means, if I offend you.

    It's pretty obvious you don't like home truths, so I wouldn't want to intrude on your precious little bubble.

    I'm not sure you quite got the irony of you claiming that you're not far right while similtaneously defending the far right, by the way.

    All you are doing here is attacking the poster not the post because he dared to disagree with you.


  • #75
    hill16bhoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    All you are doing here is attacking the poster not the post because he dared to disagree with you.
    Yet you couldn't point out one line that did attack the poster.

    And I was replying to an ad hominem, attack post made against me.

    It's entirely predictable that you'd consider the actual attack post, by the other poster, to not be such, and the non-attack post, by me, to be an attack post.

    That's another classic derail and deflect tactic from the alt-right playbook you've used there, by the way.

    But I'm sure you knew that already.


  • #76
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    Yet you couldn't point out one line that did attack the poster.

    And I was replying to an ad hominem, attack post made against me.

    It's entirely predictable that you'd consider the actual attack post, by the other poster, to not be such, and the non-attack post, by me, to be an attack post.

    That's another classic derail and deflect tactic from the alt-right playbook you've used there, by the way.

    But I'm sure you knew that already.

    Kivaro made a few detailed points in the post and all you were concerned about was labelling them as far right. So I attacked your non attack post to say that it was an attack post against an attack post attacking your previous non attack posts against previous attack posts. Yes it’s all making sense now.


  • #77
    hill16bhoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    Kivaro made a few detailed points in the post and all you were concerned about was labelling them as far right. So I attacked your non attack post to say that it was an attack post against an attack post attacking your previous non attack posts against previous attack posts. Yes it’s all making sense now.

    Now you're just trolling, mate.

    Troll's always gonna troll, so I'll leave you to it.

    But in a post where you're mendaciously complaining about me "attacking" somebody else, it's absolutely hilarious to see you actually admit to attacking me.

    Without irony.

    Christ you're good.

    That last line is sarcasm, by the way.


  • #78
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    Now you're just trolling, mate.

    Troll's always gonna troll, so I'll leave you to it.

    But in a post where you're mendaciously complaining about me "attacking" somebody else, it's absolutely hilarious to see you actually admit to attacking me.

    Without irony.

    Christ you're good.

    That last line is sarcasm, by the way.

    Read my post again and apply the last line of your post to it. It will all make sense to you then. You didn’t come back with any answers to Kivaros points. Your probably threading water with these posts while you trawl the internet looking for articles that prove anyone that disagrees with you is a Nazi.


  • #79
    John Sacrimoni
    Registered Users Posts: 229 ✭✭John Sacrimoni


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    I had the misfortune to read some of your posts last week, so I'm familiar with your form.

    I've never heard a far right scumbag identify as such.

    Your posting history suggests that's exactly what you are.

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108872204&postcount=34

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108828509&postcount=2378

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108820494&postcount=1191

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108796886&postcount=329

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108754703&postcount=297

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=108729441&postcount=35

    I was on the wind up about Robinson, dont care about the man. Do you ever take a break from your social justice crusade? You're a weird little man.

    I hate travellers as do many hundreds of thousands of others are we all far right?

    Are all the yellow vest protestors far right?


  • #80
    Franz Von Peppercorn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    This can't be posted enough.

    This is the from the far right website The Daily Stormer's house style guide for racist troll posters.

    A few posters here are definitely playing to it.

    5a301c0c1600001f00cf0cf7.png?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale

    The far right are all about the "lulz" and the "bantz", or something.

    I don't see many people laughing.

    Do You spend a lot of time on those sites?

    Is there a “troll everybody by calling everybody racist so when actual racists turn up they are largely ignored” technique.


  • #81
    John Sacrimoni
    Registered Users Posts: 229 ✭✭John Sacrimoni


    Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »
    Do You spend a lot of time on those sites?

    Is there a “troll everybody by calling everybody racist so when actual racists turn up they are largely ignored” technique.

    I feel sorry for the guy, way too much time on his hands.


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    end of the road
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,146 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    Kivaro made a few detailed points in the post and all you were concerned about was labelling them as far right. So I attacked your non attack post to say that it was an attack post against an attack post attacking your previous non attack posts against previous attack posts. Yes it’s all making sense now.

    nope fake news. you tried to engage in the usual alt-rightist deflection and it failed spectacularly.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • #83
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    end of the road wrote: »
    nope fake news. you tried to engage in the usual alt-rightist deflection and it failed spectacularly.

    Took you awhile to come back with that one. Fake news and alt-right in the one post. You dug deep there. As I said it highlights that the woman who is the subject of the original post is all talk. As soon as it’s put to her would she take in some refugees, homeless or travellers she runs to the hills. Seeing as you are defending her and her like what have you done to help refugees, the homeless and travellers? Would you take in a homeless family for Christmas?


  • #84
    end of the road
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,146 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    Took you awhile to come back with that one. Fake news and alt-right in the one post. You dug deep there.?

    yeah i have other more important things to be doing, so i come to the thread when i have down time.
    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    As I said it highlights that the woman who is the subject of the original post is all talk.?

    it doesn't.
    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    soon as it’s put to her would she take in some refugees, homeless or travellers she runs to the hills.?

    there is a system in place to deal with refugees or travelers needing housing. so she has no need to be taking anyone in if she chooses not to. if she wishes to do so then good on her but she has no obligation to and it's nothing to do with anyone else.
    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    Seeing as you are defending her and her like what have you done to help refugees, the homeless and travellers? Would you take in a homeless family for Christmas?

    i don't and wouldn't take anyone i didn't know into my home, i don't care about their back ground or where they come from. it doesn't mean i can't care about helping people, but we have systems in place to deal with problems and they are the best able to deal with them compared to an individual.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • #85
    hill16bhoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »
    Do You spend a lot of time on those sites?

    Is there a “troll everybody by calling everybody racist so when actual racists turn up they are largely ignored” technique.

    No, I don't.

    I became aware of it when I listened to the podcast of the article I link to below, and followed it up to check.

    You'd do very well to read or listen to it.

    Denialism: what drives people to reject the truth

    From vaccines to climate change to genocide, a new age of denialism is upon us. Why have we failed to understand it? By Keith Kahn-Harris

    https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/aug/03/denialism-what-drives-people-to-reject-the-truth


  • #86
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    end of the road wrote: »
    yeah i have other more important things to be doing, so i come to the thread when i have down time.



    it doesn't.



    there is a system in place to deal with refugees or travelers needing housing. so she has no need to be taking anyone in if she chooses not to. if she wishes to do so then good on her but she has no obligation to and it's nothing to do with anyone else.



    i don't and wouldn't take anyone i didn't know into my home, i don't care about their back ground or where they come from. it doesn't mean i can't care about helping people, but we have systems in place to deal with problems and they are the best able to deal with them compared to an individual.

    A no as I expected. Your being exposed badly here. So what have you done to help the travellers, homeless and refugees then?


  • #87
    Stephen15
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    She compared one of the best politicians in Europe a fascist. The League are one of the only parties in power in Western Europe at the moment with the issues of their own people first and foremost. Salvini is spot on and is doing his best to improve the Italian economy after the countries problems all created by centre left and centre right politicians such as Renzi and Berlusconi. He is a true statesman and patriot unlike Varadkar, May, Macron, Juncker and Merkel.


  • #88
    hill16bhoy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭hill16bhoy


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    Your being exposed badly here.
    We clearly have an intellectual powerhouse on our hands here.

    Sneering yet paranoid, all while saying absolutely nothing.

    What a combination.


  • #89
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    We clearly have an intellectual powerhouse on our hands here.

    Sneering yet paranoid, all while saying absolutely nothing.

    What a combination.

    Another one of your gems. I’m sure you will take no one in or have done nothing to help the refugees etc. Fair play though your passive support will help them immeasurably.


  • #90
    end of the road
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,146 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    A no as I expected. Your being exposed badly here. So what have you done to help the travellers, homeless and refugees then?

    i'm not being exposed at all. i have always been clear that i wouldn't take in someone i didn't know or anyone i did know who i felt would be a potential threat.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • #91
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    end of the road wrote: »
    i'm not being exposed at all. i have always been clear that i wouldn't take in someone i didn't know or anyone i did know who i felt would be a potential threat.

    Let me be clear besides not taking someone in what have you done to help the homeless, travellers and refugees? If you don’t answer this time everyone is going to know you are just all talk.


  • #92
    end of the road
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,146 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    Let me be clear besides not taking someone in what have you done to help the homeless, travellers and refugees? If you don’t answer this time everyone is going to know you are just all talk.

    you are clutching at straws now you have been exposed and debunked.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • #93
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    end of the road wrote: »
    you are clutching at straws now you have been exposed and debunked.

    So there it is everybody. Not one thing done, not even a cent given to the homeless. Advocates countries taking in refugees yet wouldnt take a refugee in need into their own home.


  • #94
    end of the road
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,146 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    All Seeing Eye wrote: »
    So there it is everybody. Not one thing done, not even a cent given to the homeless. Advocates countries taking in refugees yet wouldnt take a refugee in need into their own home.

    so? most people likely wouldn't take a stranger into their home so your line of argument here is really a non-issue. dealing with refugees and other groups in need is what part of our taxes go toards.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • #95
    Sweetemotion
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion


    end of the road wrote: »
    so? most people likely wouldn't take a stranger into their home so your line of argument here is really a non-issue. dealing with refugees and other groups in need is what part of our taxes go toards.

    And why wouldn't most people take a stranger into their home?


  • #96
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    end of the road wrote: »
    so? most people likely wouldn't take a stranger into their home so your line of argument here is really a non-issue. dealing with refugees and other groups in need is what part of our taxes go toards.

    Thats such an insipid reply. So you are basically doing nothing but helping to pack refugees into direct provision after all that is what our taxes mostly pay for in this area.


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    All Seeing Eye
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 330 ✭✭All Seeing Eye


    hill16bhoy wrote: »
    Given that he's posting vicious personal abuse against a woman and appears to have an extremely dangerous, neanderthal attitude towards women in general, I'd say he's very typical of the far right.

    I call the far right such because that's exactly what they are. A danger to society is another way of describing them.

    The far right could not exist without vicious personal abuse and intimidation, and they love nothing more than to pick on women.

    Vicious personal abuse and intimidation with a clear implication of physical threats to a person's safety is an intrinsic, essential part of what what the far right are.


    Going against your own creed


  • #98
    Billy86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Not the first time our far right friends have taken to doxxing boards users and mods.


  • #99
    John Sacrimoni
    Registered Users Posts: 229 ✭✭John Sacrimoni


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Not the first time our far right friends have taken to doxxing boards users and mods.

    Hes a homophobic scumbag and he deserves it.
    Thats right up there with being a racist, but no comment from you on that.


  • #100
    Sweetemotion
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,512 ✭✭✭Sweetemotion


    Billy86 wrote: »
    Not the first time our far right friends have taken to doxxing boards users and mods.


    How was that doxing?


  • #101
    Ken.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    Mod- This will probably get me in trouble but fück it.

    The fücknuts in this thread are the reason we can't have nice things in AH. Us mods give some leeway cause ye say we are too heavy handed and this is what happens.

    Next dick that starts a thread in feedback about modding in AH is going to be shown this thread as an example as to why the children need to be supervised.

    Locked


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement